• It's Here!

    Etf Pro

    Get the big financial market moves right, bullish or bearish with Hedgeye’s ETF Pro.

  • It's Here


    Identify global risks and opportunities with essential macro intel using Hedgeye’s Market Edges.

At first glance, Q4 looked amazing and full year 2010 guidance was solid. No complaints on RevPAR but digging a little deeper we found that things weren’t as good as they appear.  

By our math, the “clean” EPS number for the quarter was $0.25 (using a “normalized tax rate” and excluding all charges and a fully diluted share count).  However, even the "clean" number contained $21MM of what we believe are mostly termination fees.  Normally “termination and other fees” run at around $11MM per quarter.  If we adjust out for abnormally high termination fees, we get “normalized" EPS of $0.21, which was in line with our original estimate and the Street.  Beating on termination fees is not exactly encouraging.  Even so, there were a lot of positive things to point to in this quarter's results

Here are some additional and, we hope, unique thoughts: 

  • For anyone wondering where the upside to guidance came from, we have an answer for you – it's call SFAS 167.  If you recall, on the last call HOT explained that the new accounting rules would benefit their 2010 EBITDA to the tune of $10 to $15MM.  Well, now that number is $40 to $45MM and it's all accounting - no associated “cash flow” with this raise.  The Street’s 2010 EBITDA estimate was $730MM so if you add the extra $30MM the number goes to $760MM, actually ABOVE the new guidance of $750 million.
    • “This new accounting rule impacts the accounting for securitized vacation ownership loans. As a result of the adoption of this rule, the Company expects its reported assets (accounts receivable and other assets) to increase by approximately $400 million and its reported liabilities (short-term and long-term debt) to increase by $445 million, prior to any tax effects. Also as a result of the accounting change, vacation ownership pretax earnings for 2010 are expected to increase by approximately $20 million to $23 million and EBITDA is expected to increase by approximately $40 million to $45 million. The new accounting rule is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s cash flow.”
  • It also becomes clear that 1Q2010’s EBITDA guidance was also inflated by roughly $8MM, so again a bigger guide down versus the Street than meets the eye
  • We understand why HOT is adding back the $17MM of cost of sales price discount adjustments to get to “Adjusted EBITDA”, but to be fair, wouldn’t you also take out the $23MM of gains on securitization then? Same goes for adding back $2MM of D&A on discontinued operations.
  • HOT is excluding all the Bliss associated expenses - which were all in SG&A while Bliss revenues were in Management fees & other.  We wrote about the Bliss sale on Nov 2, 2009 “HOT: A BLISSFUL EXIT” and on Jan 11,2010 in “HOT: 4Q IN REVIEW”.  However, we wrongly assumed that Bliss expenses and revenues wouldn’t come out until 2010. 
  • 2010 & Q1 RevPAR guidance was actually quite good, no doubt aided by HOT's international exposure


Cliff notes:

  • RevPAR was better than expected, especially international.  Occupancy led the way
  • F&B revenues declined only 9-10% … a nice sequential improvement
  • Management & fees where low quality with higher than normal termination fees doubling from prior quarters
  • Timeshare income was better due to the higher than previously reported gain


  • Owned, Leased and Consolidated JV revenues and EBITDA cleanly beat our estimates
    • International RevPAR was much better than we estimated, to the tune of 5.5%.
    • North American RevPAR came in 1.7% better than our estimate
    • We suspect the vast majority of the beat here came better F&B and other revenues, which we suspect declined less than 10% in the Q vs. out -20% estimate
    • Total costs per occupied room decreased 2.3% (estimated 6.8% in local currency) 
  • Management fees were messy since Bliss was excluded
    • Base fees were in line, just $1MM less than our estimate
    • Incentive fees were $3MM better than our estimate, declining 19%
    • Franchise fees were $1MM better than our estimate
    • “Other Management & Franchise Revenues” came in $12MM higher than our estimate, due to what we believe were higher termination fees.  The $42MM included $21MM of deferred amortization of gains (like every quarter), the balance is usually mostly termination fees. 
    • Bliss was excluded
    • So base, incentive and franchise fees decreased 9.7% compared to guidance of down 8-10%
  • Timeshare beat due to a $23MM gain on securitization, strange because when the announced the deal the gain was stated at $15MM… hmmm anyone else confused here?
    • Originations were better than we estimated though but margins were lower, probably due to discounting of inventory