• run with the bulls

    get your first month


    of hedgeye free

prev

Poll of the Day: Which Movie Below Best Captures Janet Yellen's Fed Tenure?

Takeaway: What do you think? Cast your vote. Let us know.

 

 


August 26, 2016

Want more from Daily Trading Ranges? CLICK HERE to submit up to 4 tickers you'd like to see on the list. 

 

  • Bullish Trend
  • Bearish Trend
  • Neutral

INDEX BUY TRADE SELL TRADE PREV. CLOSE
UST10Y
10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield
1.62 1.49 1.58
SPX
S&P 500
2,168 2,193 2,172
RUT
Russell 2000
1,225 1,250 1,240
COMPQ
NASDAQ Composite
5,170 5,270 5,212
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Explore
34.91 37.93 37.17
RMZ
MSCI US REIT
1,212 1,245 1,226
NIKK
Nikkei 225 Index
16,290 16,843 16,555
DAX
German DAX Composite
10,436 10,730 10,529
VIX
Volatility Index
11.15 14.31 13.63
USD
U.S. Dollar Index
93.90 95.90 94.74
EURUSD
Euro
1.10 1.13 1.12
USDJPY
Japanese Yen
99.31 102.40 100.59
WTIC
Light Crude Oil Spot Price
43.95 49.51 47.33
NATGAS
Natural Gas Spot Price
2.51 2.92 2.88
GOLD
Gold Spot Price
1,319 1,366 1,324
COPPER
Copper Spot Price
2.07 2.17 2.08
AAPL
Apple Inc.
107.27 110.29 107.57
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc.
749 770 759
JPM
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
63.26 66.21 66.07
INTC
Intel Corp.
34.12 35.67 35.09
BAC
Bank Of America
14.82 15.63 15.53
EXPE
Expedia Inc.
110 117 112


Hedgeye's Daily Trading Ranges are twenty immediate-term (TRADE) buy and sell levels, along with our intermediate-term (TREND) view.  Click HERE for a video from Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough on how to use these risk ranges.


C’mon guys – she’s a dove; unless she shocks you today, buyem! (stocks, bonds, gold):

Client Talking Points

Japan

Unfortunately the “there’s no alternative to stocks” narrative hasn’t held this yr in China, Europe, or Japan – Nikkei down another -1.2% overnight taking its crash from the 2015 high to -21.7% (Japanese Gov Pension fund just lost $52B being long stocks in Q2, with the BOJ buying them!).

Italy

“rates are at all-time lows” (because growth is slowing), so “buy stocks” (Ex-Italy), where recession probability rising is reality; MIB Index leads losers this am in light European trading, -0.6%, taking its crash from the 2015 high to -30.9%.

USA

USA! USA! Has the Goldilocks Medal this yr because growth isn’t as slow as it is in Japan/Italy? Is what it is; for an immediate-term TRADE off the low-end of my current 2168-2193 risk range I’m in the buy/cover “stocks” (and bonds… and platinum… and Gold, etc.) camp; 10yr Yield has immediate-term downside to 1.49%.

Asset Allocation

CASH US EQUITIES INTL EQUITIES COMMODITIES FIXED INCOME INTL CURRENCIES
8/25/16 50% 3% 5% 14% 18% 10%
8/26/16 50% 3% 5% 14% 18% 10%

Asset Allocation as a % of Max Preferred Exposure

CASH US EQUITIES INTL EQUITIES COMMODITIES FIXED INCOME INTL CURRENCIES
8/25/16 50% 9% 15% 42% 55% 30%
8/26/16 50% 9% 15% 42% 55% 30%
The maximum preferred exposure for cash is 100%. The maximum preferred exposure for each of the other assets classes is 33%.

Top Long Ideas

Company Ticker Sector Duration
GLD

See update on TLT below.

TLT

#Stagnation. With that being said there were small but marginal Euro tailwinds against a U.S. retail sales report and PPI release that was likely dovish on the margin (USD -~20bps on Friday and -~60bps on the week). 

 

In line with our #EuropeSlowing theme, Q2 preliminary GDP slowed across the Eurozone to +0.3% vs. +0.6% in the prior quarter and +1.6% Y/Y for Q2 which was flat on a rate of change basis from Q1.

Looking at specific country results:

  • German (0.4% vs 0.7% sequentially) GDP accelerated to +1.8% Y/Y from +1.6% which was probably a minor Euro FX tailwind
  • Italian GDP came in at +0.7% Y/Y which was a deceleration from +1.0% in Q1
  • Greece GDP accelerated to contraction again, printing a measly -0.1% Y/Y from -1.3% in Q1

The Southern Eurozone states continue to implode.

UUP

Recall that a strong retail sales report for June, driven by a positive trend in goods consumption, was a large contributor to our GDP revision for Q2. The headline number, for June, was up +0.6% sequentially with the sequential acceleration in the control group accelerating +7.2% (annualized). #Deflation  

Three for the Road

TWEET OF THE DAY

NEW VIDEO The Big Joke: Animated Cartoon Nails Squirrely #Fed app.hedgeye.com/insights/53364… @KeithMcCullough #JacksonHole pic.twitter.com/1jYpUCjZHC

@Hedgeye

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“You find that you have peace of mind and can enjoy yourself, get more sleep, and rest when you know that it was a one hundred percent effort that you gave-win or lose.

-Gordie Howe 

STAT OF THE DAY

Ken Griffey Jr. (HOF) hit 630 HR's and batted .284 over his 22 year career.


The Macro Show with Keith McCullough Replay | August 26, 2016

CLICK HERE to access the associated slides.

An audio-only replay of today's show is available here.

 


CHART OF THE DAY: Don't Break Out The Bubbly Just Yet

Editor's Note: Below is a brief excerpt and chart from today's Early Look written by Hedgeye U.S. Macro analyst Christian Drake. Click here to learn more.

 

"... As can be seen in the Chart of the Day below, Forward Capex Plans as measured by a composite of the Fed Regional Surveys remains on its one-way street to lower-lows, suggesting the negative trend in investment spending is unlikely to ebb in the coming quarter(s)."

 

CHART OF THE DAY: Don't Break Out The Bubbly Just Yet - Capex Plans CoD2


The Bubbly

“In monetary policy, “abrupt” and “disrupt” have more than merely resonance of sound in common. “

-John C. Williams, San Francisco Fed President, 8/15/16

 

Quick, without looking it up … what’s the difference between seltzer & club soda?

 

How about sparkling water – where does that fit in the convoluted mix of carbonated aqueous concoctions?

 

The technical answer is this (via huffpost):

  • Seltzer: water + artificial carbonation, that’s it.
  • Club Soda:  Water + artificial carbonation + added mineral-like ingredients.
  • Sparkling Mineral Water: comes from a natural spring and contains various minerals.  There is no added carbonation so any bubbles are naturally occurring.

 

The real answer is that there is no difference.

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

If you’re not a fervent Fed follower, a notable development over the last few months has been the ostensible abandonment of orthodox policy assumptions and legacy forecasting models from various Fed governors. 

 

In June, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard ditched his former “narrative” (his word) for a new regime-based model for forecasting growth, inflation, unemployment and the associated policy implications.

 

Here are a few quotes from the Paper that I think capture the conceptual crux of the change:      

 

  • An older narrative that the Bank has been using since the financial crisis ended has now likely outlived its usefulness, and so it is being replaced by a new narrative.
  • The best that we can do today is to forecast that the current regime will persist.
  • We therefore think of the current values for real output growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation as being close to the mean outcome of the “current regime.”
  • If there is a switch to a new regime in the future, then that will likely affect all variables—including the policy rate—but such a switch is not forecastable.

 

Perhaps I’m wrong but, to me, the layman’s distillation of that techni-speak basically = Our old models don’t work, the new model is to straight-line what’s happened recently, and the new model will stop working at some point but we don’t know when and we’ll figure out a new, new model when that happens but on an extreme lag because we need sustained confirmation that the regime has, in fact, switched again.

 

Fast Forward 6 weeks ….

 

Last week, San Francisco Fed President John Williams stressed the necessity for policy innovation in a secularly depressed real natural interest rate environment where conventional policy has become increasingly ineffectual.   

 

  • Does this represent the final stage of broken-model grief (acceptance) and fledgling evolution? 
  • Is it an ivory tower equivalent of selling (their process) on the lows?
  • Is it a crafted public capitulation designed to catalyze fiscal policy action?

 

Technically, there is a difference between a broken orthodox model, a new model that basically just carries forward what has happened recently, and no model at all.

 

Practically, there is not really a difference. 

 

The Bubbly - Capital Goods CoD1

 

On to the Domestic Data Grind ….

 

Despite the elusiveness of an effective policy response, the primary fundamentals underpinning a depressed natural interest rate are identifiable: slack demand, negative demographics, soft productivity and an excess of savings over investment.

 

And we get the empirical on that reality with the monthly Durable and Capital Goods Orders data.

 

Headline Durable Goods rose +4.4% sequentially in July, marking the largest sequential gain in 9-months and reversing the prior month’s -4.2% retreat.

 

$$$ print, right?  It’s certainly better than printing the largest sequential decline in 9-months, but the headline gain was belied by decidedly more squishy internals:

 

  • Year-over-year growth was still negative for a second month at -3.3%.
  • Year-over-year growth in pretty much every subaggregate also remained negative.
  • Last month’s Headline retreat was largely driven by the -59% MoM/-60% YoY decline in private sector aircraft orders.  That reversed this month to +90% MoM while “improving” to -21.1% YoY.
  • Durables Ex-Defense & Aircraft (the closest proxy for household demand) rose +1.0% MoM, but held negative at -1.6% YoY, marking the 5th consecutive month of negative growth and 14th month of negative growth in the last 15 months.

 

Capex Orders, meanwhile, scored a similarly hollow victory as the +1.6% MoM increase equated to an acceleration to the downside on a year-over-year basis.  Year-over-year growth fell to -4.9% (-3.5% prior), marking the 9th consecutive month of negative year-over-year growth and  the 18th month of negative growth in the last 19 as the worst ever non-recessionary run of negative growth continues to extend (see chart above).

 

If we look across a broader selection of forward capex expectations, a congruous story of probable further underwhelming’ness emerges: 

 

Forward Capex Plans | Fed Regional Composite:  As can be seen in the Chart of the Day below, Forward Capex Plans as measured by a composite of the Fed Regional Surveys remains on its one-way street to lower-lows, suggesting the negative trend in investment spending is unlikely to ebb in the coming quarter(s).

 

Fed Senior Loan Officer Survey:  Banks tightened lending standards for C&I loans for a 4th consecutive quarter in 3Q16 and standards for Commercial real estate loans showed the highest level of tightening in the series’ 12 quarter history.  Concentrated tightening in the commercial sector suggests nonresidential fixed investment will remain underwhelming and a headwind to headline growth

 

Small Business Capex Plans:  Both Small Business Capital Expenditure Plans (NFIB Index) and Small Business Lending (Thomson Reuters) are flat-to-down in recent months and have retreated meaningfully off their 2H15 highs.  Neither series is signaling acute stress but they certainly aren’t signaling an imminent, positive inflection in business investment either.   

 

So, have you become fully desensitized to the recession in durable & capital goods spending after a year and a half of negative growth, or does the Industrial data have you depressed?

 

If the former, no worries, it’s natural. 

 

If the latter, no worries, surfing the services sector data is always good for a shot of sanguinity!   

 

The Markit Services PMI for August released yesterday dropped -0.5pts to an anti-sanguine reading of 50.8 - the lowest reading in 3 years outside of the peak deflationary angst print of 49.7 in February. 

 

The ISM Services reading is a bit better at 55.5 (July) but it really hasn’t done anything for the last 9 months. 

 

The simple net of all this (July & August ISM data and the July Durable Goods and Retail Sales data) is that 3Q is off to an underwhelming (yes, 3rd intentional use of that adjective) start. 

 

Janet’s speech at 10am this morning is titled:  "The Federal Reserve's Monetary Policy Toolkit”.

 

The theme of the Jackson Hole Symposium is: Designing Resilient Monetary Policy Frameworks for the Future”.

 

Implicit in “Designing” is the acknowledgment of the inadequacy of what is currently designed – something the domestic and global central banking collective is increasingly acceptant of.   

 

The Fed’s practice of rhetorical gradualism leading actual implementations is designed to avoid abrupt policy shocks and minimize market disruptions.   The recent verbal “carbonation” of stale conventional policy waters is not an accident. 

 

Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now:

 

UST 10yr Yield 1.49-1.62%

SPX 2168-2193

VIX 11.15-14.31
USD 93.90-95.90
Oil (WTI) 43.95-49.51

Gold 1

 

Enjoy the show today, have a great weekend,

 

Christian B. Drake

U.S. Macro analyst

 

The Bubbly - Capex Plans CoD2


Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.

next