prev

The Macro Show Replay | February 24, 2016

 


MTW | MFS-W Trading, Implied Crane Value Quite Small

Unfortunately, One Can’t Borrow A When Issued

 

Summing The Parts, With Actual Parts:  MFS-W, the when issued trading for Manitowoc Foodservice, began trading this week and closed today at 12.92 on 950,000 shares traded – the first day of decent volume.  Since MFS will have about $1.4 billion in net debt and about 137 million shares, the MFS enterprise value pencils out to just shy of $3.2 billion.  The combined current MTW EV comes out to $3.475 billion, of which about $210 million is the net debt of the remaining Cranes business.  That leaves the lightly levered remaining Crane business, with nearly $2 billion in sales and potential Chinese suitors, with just over $100 million in equity value.  At 2014 Crane segment profitability that equity value equates to a P/E of roughly 2 by our estimates. 

 

MTW | MFS-W Trading, Implied Crane Value Quite Small - MTW MFS 2 23

 

 


CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values

Takeaway:  While Cat Financial’s year-end credit metrics were better than our expectations, we still expect an impact from lower equipment values and increasingly stressed customers. The Cat Channel appears to be holding units off the market with unrealistic pricing.  Borrower flexibilities with respect to negative equity and skip payment options may be forestalling the eventual impact of weaker end-markets.  Of course, we may also be misreading Cat Financial’s exposures and are continuing a dialogue with management.  While we will not dismiss the disconfirming evidence of favorable portfolio metrics lightly, we still expect an eventual negative impact from pending mine closures, oil & gas bankruptcies, and equipment auctions.

 

 

Overview

 

As we went through CAT’s 10-K, we were struck by steady to improving credit trends at Cat Financial.  Relevant used equipment values have generally been falling, and credit quality in many key customer categories has been deteriorating (e.g. mining, coal, oil & gas, emerging markets).  We view CAT’s reporting as having become more aggressive as the company now risks falling below the key $3.50 EPS compensation threshold.  Switching pension accounting methods and changing receivable loss allowance calculations can add to reported profits.  The credit trends at Cat Financial could be part of the same ‘efforts’.  They also may be a byproduct of a captive finance subsidiary’s role in stabilizing used equipment pricing, which can often prove costly.  Perhaps Cat Financial can navigate the current environment adequately.  We review some details below. 

 

 

Used Equipment Pricing Is Pretty Clearly Down

While it is challenging to determine exact pricing trends in used equipment (i.e. collateral for equipment financings) the changes we track have mostly been negative.  We see more equipment for sale and generally lower prices.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 1 2 23

 

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, oil and gas equipment is piling up.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 2 2 23

 

 

Construction Equipment, Too:  Used equipment pricing pressure isn’t limited to mining and oil & gas equipment.  While we think this chart overstates used excavator price weakness, it seems pretty clear that excavator auction prices have declined in recent years.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 3 2 23

 

 

Cat Financial Credit Metrics Moving The Other Way

Usually, we would expect used equipment values to correlate with customer creditworthiness, and for both to correlate with Cat Financial’s portfolio metrics.  Interestingly, that is not what we saw in the 2015 10-K.

 

 

Dubious Allowance For Credit Losses:  The allowance for credit losses is down, but this is largely because CAT changed the calculation in 3Q 15 (reviewed here http://app.hedgeye.com/feed_items/47347).  From the 10-K The decrease in allowance rate is primarily a result of changes in our estimate of the loss emergence period and loss given default.”  As we see it, allowance is not sequentially comparable; such historically low reserve levels in the present environment seem dubious at best.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 4 2 23

 

 

Write-Offs Somewhat Elevated:  We would also note that 2H 15 saw a modest increase in write-offs, which help can improve other portfolio measures by removing troubled loans.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 5 2 23

 

 

91+ Days Past Due Looks Better:  The past due payments improved sequentially, which is a noteworthy positive.  While higher write-offs help, it is a surprising trend relative to our expectation.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 6 2 23

 

 

Regional Data Mixed:  Latin America & Europe were worse year-on-year, but North America and Asia/Pacific improved.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 7 2 23

 

 

Total Past Due Also Improved:  While partly from larger write-offs, total past due also improved sequentially and YoY.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 8 2 23

 

 

Non-Accrual Status:  The year over year increase decelerated, albeit on a smaller portfolio.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 9 2 23

 

 

Skip Payments & Consigning Negative Equity Equipment

 


Perhaps Just Delayed:  We would note that Cat Financial generally offers the option to skip payments: “Skip payment plans (up to 3 per year) are available on monthly payment schedules”*, and the ability to offset negative equity in specific equipment with positive equity in a customer fleet.  That said, these factors were also true a year ago.

*https://www.catfinancial.com/en_US/solutions/finance/loan.html

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 10 2 23

 

 

Keeping Used Prices High & The Role Of Captive Finance Subsidiary

 

 

Accumulating Equipment For Sale (Charts Below):  As we have previously noted, used equipment appears to be piling up at CAT Dealers.  Equipment counts and sale durations do suggest to us that CAT is trying to hold prices up in the aftermarket.  Critically, only about 10% of CAT machines are sold by non-CAT auctioneers. Maintaining aftermarket prices is a standard theoretical role for a captive finance subsidiary, partly so used equipment doesn’t compete with new sales. In the face of prolonged end-market downswings, these efforts can prove costly.

 


Auction Results vs. Cat Asking Prices:  Comparing used mining trucks is a bit difficult given specific features, rebuilds, and maintenance histories, but we do not see auction prices that in any way correspond to the asking prices on the CAT Used website.  For example, CAT Used lists the price of a 1999 785C with 61,823 hours (although some zero hour components) at $1,350,000.  That mining truck has been offered at that price in Winchester, VA since at least 2014, when demand for mining equipment was stronger.  Given the coal/mineral mining capital spending environment, it would seem that the likelihood of remarketing the truck at all is low, let alone at a 2014 price.  Looking at Ritchie Bros. auction results, a 2005 785C with 36,759 hours sold for $105,000 in April 2015.  Even since then mining equipment demand has weakened.  Similar comparisons show up for many of the rock/off-highway trucks on the CAT Used site – this one is no way unique.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 11 2 23

 

 

Raises A Number Of Questions: How is collateral valued if equipment doesn’t receive a bid?  Is this the reason Cat Financial dropped the word “liquidation” from the recent 10-K?  Where would used equipment values settle if Cat wanted to sell more quickly?  How does it make sense to, presumably, shorten the loss emergence period when equipment is accumulating and lingering?

 

 

Liquidation vs. Fair Value:  We questioned CAT management on a seemingly important language change in the 2015 10-K.  The allowance for credit losses on receivables that merit individual evaluation switched from consideration of “liquidation of collateral” to the PV of effective interest or the “fair value”.  In the context of unsold equipment, the change seemed material to us.  When queried, Cat Financial responded with: “The disclosure regarding methodology of allowance for credit losses attributable to specifically evaluated finance receivables does not represent a change in methodology but rather additional disclosure of the methods that we use for evaluation.  The methods disclosed in 2015 are standard practice under US GAAP for evaluating impairment of finance receivables.” Presumably, then, Cat Financial has already been using fair value… The word “liquidation” was removed from the filing.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 12 2 23

 

 

Accumulating Used Equipment In Cat Channel

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 13 2 23

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 14 2 23

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 15 2 23

 

 

Closures, Bankruptcies Still Coming: As we understand it (see here for call with Michael Currie http://app.hedgeye.com/feed_items/47572), mines will start to move from idling to closures this year.  Permanent closures, which mostly have been avoided so far, should involve significant equipment liquidations.  Oil & gas hedges will also expire, creating further pressure in an increasingly saturated used equipment market.

 

CAT | Mismatch Between Cat Financial Trends vs. Used Equipment Values - CAT 16 2 23

 

 

Upshot:  While Cat Financial’s year-end credit metrics were better than our expectations, we still expect an impact from lower equipment values and increasingly stressed customers. The Cat Channel appears to be holding units off the market with unrealistic pricing.  Borrower flexibilities with respect to negative equity and skip payment options may be forestalling the eventual impact of weaker end-markets.  Of course, we may also be misreading Cat Financial’s exposures and are continuing a dialogue with management.  While we will not dismiss the disconfirming evidence of favorable portfolio metrics lightly, we still expect an eventual negative impact from pending mine closures, oil & gas bankruptcies, and equipment auctions.


get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

FLASHBACK: Sold to You, Jamie! | $JPM

Takeaway: Remember that Old Wall narrative, "Dimon must know something" when he bought 500K shares? That was amusing.

In case you missed it, shares of JPMorgan tumbled over 4% today. Below is special commentary from Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough who issued a prescient short signal on shares of JPM in Real-Time Alerts shortly after news broke that CEO Jamie Dimon has bought 500,000 shares.

 

 

Here are the signals McCullough sent to subscribers. 

2/12/16 - Sell signal - shorting jpm

Having been The Bear on JP Morgan for all of 2016, I find this Old Wall narrative that "Dimon must know something " rather amusing. He's obviously a smart man, so you can be rest assured that if he really understands what the economic and credit risks are in the US economy, he needs to start to try to get out in front of that.

 

From a macro forecasting perspective, what does he really know though? Does he know more than the insider who sold stock at $59? Has he even read or considered the Hedgeye Macro view?

 

All I know is that interest rates are going to continue to make lower-all-time lows as long as the prevailing macro headwinds of #Deflation and #GrowthSlowing continue. I also know that is not good for bank stocks.

 

Sold to you, Jamie.

 

KM

 

2/23/16 - BUY SIGNAL - COVERING SHORT JPM

How can we not get paid on being on the right side of the Dimon trade today?

 

Down -4% on the day, this is a big alpha generator for us inasmuch our favorite S&P Sector on the short side is (Financials).

 

Book some so that you can re-short some on the next storytelling bounce. No "peddling economic fiction" here.

 

KM


Cartoon of the Day: Cliff Dive

Cartoon of the Day: Cliff Dive - lemmings cartoon 02.23.2016

 

We warned our subscribers in July about increasing stock market risks. Despite the recent selloff, we think the worst isn't over.


What Matters More? Sentiment Or Fundamentals

In this brief excerpt of The Macro Show, Hedgeye Senior Macro analyst Darius Dale and CEO Keith McCullough discuss the relationship between the economic cycle and financial markets and how the former influences our approach to the latter.


GET THE HEDGEYE MARKET BRIEF FREE

Enter your email address to receive our newsletter of 5 trending market topics. VIEW SAMPLE

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

next