prev

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity

Takeaway: Investors pulled -$10.7 billion from equity mutual funds and ETFs as markets continued their rout.

Editor's Note: This is a complimentary research note which was originally published January 21, 2016 by our Financials team. If you would like more info on how you can access our institutional research please email sales@hedgeye.com.

 

* * * 

 

Investment Company Institute Mutual Fund Data and ETF Money Flow:

Investors continued to unload equity from their portfolios in the 5 days ending January 13th as markets continued their rout, although active international mandates held up with a +$3.2 billion inflow. Domestic equity, however, continued its losing streak with another -$4.8 billion outflow. Even passive equity ETFs were hit with a -$9.1 billion outflow, -$4.9 billion of which came from the SPY. Fixed income mandates fared slightly better with a total inflow of +$574 million into mutual funds and ETFs, although the preference was for municipal bonds and passive fixed income ETFs. Lastly, investors shored up +$8 billion of cash in money funds during the week.

 


[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI1 normal 1 26

 

In the most recent 5-day period ending January 13th, total equity mutual funds put up net outflows of -$1.6 billion, outpacing the year-to-date weekly average outflow of -$2.0 billion but trailing the 2015 average outflow of -$1.5 billion. The outflow was composed of international stock fund contributions of +$3.2 billion and domestic stock fund withdrawals of -$4.8 billion. International equity funds have had positive flows in 41 of the last 52 weeks while domestic equity funds have had only 8 weeks of positive flows over the same time period.

 

Fixed income mutual funds put up net outflows of -$526 million, trailing the year-to-date weekly average outflow of -$236 million and the 2015 average outflow of -$463 million. The outflow was composed of tax-free or municipal bond funds contributions of +$1.3 billion and taxable bond funds withdrawals of -$1.8 billion.

 

Equity ETFs had net redemptions of -$9.1 billion, trailing the year-to-date weekly average outflow of -$9.1 billion and the 2015 average inflow of +$2.8 billion. Fixed income ETFs had net inflows of +$1.1 billion, trailing the year-to-date weekly average inflow of +$1.2 billion but outpacing the 2015 average inflow of +$1.0 billion.

 

Mutual fund flow data is collected weekly from the Investment Company Institute (ICI) and represents a survey of 95% of the investment management industry's mutual fund assets. Mutual fund data largely reflects the actions of retail investors. Exchange traded fund (ETF) information is extracted from Bloomberg and is matched to the same weekly reporting schedule as the ICI mutual fund data. According to industry leader Blackrock (BLK), U.S. ETF participation is 60% institutional investors and 40% retail investors.



Most Recent 12 Week Flow in Millions by Mutual Fund Product: Chart data is the most recent 12 weeks from the ICI mutual fund survey and includes the weekly average for 2015 and the weekly year-to-date average for 2016:

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI2

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI3

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI4

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI5

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI6



Cumulative Annual Flow in Millions by Mutual Fund Product: Chart data is the cumulative fund flow from the ICI mutual fund survey for each year starting with 2008.

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI12

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI13

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI14

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI15

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI16



Most Recent 12 Week Flow within Equity and Fixed Income Exchange Traded Funds: Chart data is the most recent 12 weeks from Bloomberg's ETF database (matched to the Wednesday to Wednesday reporting format of the ICI), the weekly average for 2015, and the weekly year-to-date average for 2016. In the third table are the results of the weekly flows into and out of the major market and sector SPDRs:

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI7

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI8



Sector and Asset Class Weekly ETF and Year-to-Date Results: In sector SPDR callouts, investors pulled -$4.9 billion or -3% from the SPY as investors retreated from the broader domestic equity market.

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI9



Cumulative Annual Flow in Millions within Equity and Fixed Income Exchange Traded Funds: Chart data is the cumulative fund flow from Bloomberg's ETF database for each year starting with 2013.

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI17

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI18



Net Results:

The net of total equity mutual fund and ETF flows against total bond mutual fund and ETF flows totaled a negative -$11.3 billion spread for the week (-$10.7 billion of total equity outflow net of the +$574 million inflow to fixed income; positive numbers imply greater money flow to stocks; negative numbers imply greater money flow to bonds). The 52-week moving average is +$578 million (more positive money flow to equities) with a 52-week high of +$20.5 billion (more positive money flow to equities) and a 52-week low of -$19.0 billion (negative numbers imply more positive money flow to bonds for the week.)

  

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI10

 


Exposures:
The weekly data herein is important for the public asset managers with trends in mutual funds and ETFs impacting the companies with the following estimated revenue impact:

 

[UNLOCKED] Fund Flow Survey | Unloading Equity - ICI11 


POTOMAC INSIGHT | Why Iran Is More Bearish For Oil Than People Think

 

Here’s a brief excerpt from an institutional call Hedgeye hosted with our new Potomac Research Group teammates – former Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham and Senior Energy analyst Joe McMonigle, co-founders of the Abraham Group, LLC. With the U.S. and E.U. lifting Iranian sanctions, Abraham and McMonigle offer non-consensus insight on what lies ahead for the price of oil.

 

The Honorable Spencer Abraham, Senior Energy Analyst

 

Secretary Spencer Abraham serves as Senior Energy Analyst and is Chairman and CEO of The Abraham Group, an international strategic consulting firm focused on the energy sector and based in Washington, DC.

 

Secretary Abraham served as the tenth Secretary of Energy in United States history from 2001-2005.  He helped President Bush devise America's first national energy plan in over a decade and oversaw its implementation. As part of this plan, he led efforts to broaden America's international energy partnerships as well as forge closer ties to key oil producing nations.

 

Prior to being named a Cabinet Member, Secretary Abraham served as an effective and highly productive U.S. Senator from Michigan for six years, where he was the author of 22 pieces of legislation signed into law. He served on the Judiciary, Budget and Commerce Committees.  In addition, he was chairman of two subcommittees: Manufacturing and Competitiveness, and Immigration.

 

Secretary Abraham is a member of the Board of Directors of Occidental Petroleum, NRG Energy and PBF Energy.  In addition, he is a frequent commentator on FOX News, CNN and Bloomberg TV as well as a periodic contributor of op-ed articles to the Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The Weekly Standard and other publications.

 

Secretary Abraham and his wife, Jane, are the parents of three children. He holds a law degree from Harvard University, where he co-founded the Federalist Society, and is a native of East Lansing, Michigan.

 

Joseph McMonigle, Senior Energy Analyst

 

Joseph McMonigle serves as Senior Energy Analyst and is president and co-founder of The Abraham Group LLC, an international strategic consulting firm focused on the energy sector and based in Washington, D.C.

 

Mr. McMonigle is the former Vice Chairman of the Paris-based International Energy Agency, an international organization of oil consuming countries, whose core mission is to work for stable energy markets and respond with joint measures to meet oil supply emergencies.  He also served concurrently as U.S. Representative to the IEA (2003-2005).

 

In addition, Mr. McMonigle served as Chief of Staff at the U.S. Department of Energy, a cabinet department with a $23 billion budget and over 100,000 federal and contractor employees (2001-2005).  Mr. McMonigle also served as the American co-chair of the U.S.-China Energy Cooperation Working Group and led DOE’s bilateral activities and engagement with China.

 

Before joining the Bush Administration, Mr. McMonigle was the administrative assistant and general counsel to a United States Senator.  He is also an attorney and member of the Energy Bar Association as well as the Pennsylvania and District of Columbia bars.


NOTCH RISK

Commodity-leveraged credit, which moved on a lag to top-down commodity deflation, is now FAST on the move.

 

With large impairment charges and write-downs foreshadowed by many large producers, credit markets are front-running balance sheet contraction to reflect lower short and long-term commodity price assumptions:

  • BHP made a pre-earnings announcement of a $7.2 Bn pre-tax impairment charge on U.S. shale assets.
  • Australia’s Woodside Petroleum said it expects to take an ~$1 Bn pre-tax impairment hit due to lower long-term oil price assumptions when it announces its full-year 2015 results in mid-February.

As we flagged in a recent note PRODUCER LEVERAGE , much of the spread risk lies with what are current IG credits.

 

Two important points we would make with respect to the more recent moves in credit markets:

 

1) Both high-yield AND investment grade have historically moved together when spreads widen (all corporate credit is at risk), and there is a large amount of IG credit that could move high-yield in 2016 in the current price environment.

 

2) A good chunk of low-notch IG commodity credit trades like it’s going high yield, but there is also a large chunk that is 1-2 notches off lowest IG-Notch that has just started moving in the last couple of months – These issues are worth a look if you are behind our pending recession call. 

 

NOTCH RISK - Energy and Materials IG Yield

 

NOTCH RISK - Chart2 JNK and HYG

 

NOTCH RISK - Energy and Materials Spreads

 

NOTCH RISK - Energy   Materials HY Index

 

To consolidate concerning commentary from S&P & Moody’s on the shift in credit quality at the end of last week:

  • S&P: More companies were at risk of having their credit ratings cut at the end of December than at the close of any other year since 2009
  • S&P: The number of potential downgrades was at 655, compared with 824 reported by the finish of 2009
  • S&P: The year-end total for 2015 was "exceptionally" higher than a yearly average of 613
  • S&P: Oil-exporting countries face fresh downgrades as crude prices fall further. The agency currently has Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Kazakhstan, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and Venezuela on negative watch.
  • Moody’s: Friday morning, Moody's disclosed it was putting the ratings of 120 Oil & Gas companies and 55 mining companies on watch.
  • S&P: Revised 2016 and 2017 metals price assumptions late Friday night, following on its recent reduction in 2017 oil price forecasts from $US65 a barrel to $US45. (expected but meaningful):

-        Iron Ore: Cut to $65/MT for 2015-16 vs. $85/MT back in October

-        Copper: $2.70/lb. for 2015 through 2017, down from its previous forecast of $3.10/lb. for 2015-2016

-        Gold: Forecasts remain flat at $1,200 per ounce for the period from 2015-2017.

-        Nickel: Lowered from $8.00/lb. in 2015-2016 to $6.50/lb. this year and $7.25/lb. in 2016

-        Zinc: Lowered from $1/lb. this year to $0.95, but maintained its $1/lb. forecast for 2016

 

In the table below, we have pegged a significant amount of investment grade credit from commodity producers that could get downgraded to high-yield ($227Bn) -- some credits much more at risk near-term than others.

 

A move to HY from IG should perpetuate spread risk with forced selling from institutional money.  As mentioned above and with regards to our short JNK position, the insurance on low-IG credit in the commodities space that hasn’t moved as much (YET) is worth a look into a potential recession as a way to play our short JNK view outlined in the Q1 Themes deck.   

 

NOTCH RISK - chart1 IG to HY

 

NOTCH RISK - chart3 credit outstanding vs. HY YTM

 

One of the bubbliest charts we’ve put together alongside the above slide as it relates to commodity producer balance sheet leverage is one that shows interest expense skyrocketing despite unprecedented lows in financing expense. We continue to think the deleveraging here is in the early innings.

 

NOTCH RISK - Interest Expense

 

Ben Ryan

Analyst  

 

 


Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.

CHART OF THE DAY: An Early Look At The Q4 Earnings Scorecard

Editor's Note: Below is a brief excerpt and chart from today's Early Look written by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough. Click here to learn more. 

 

CHART OF THE DAY: An Early Look At The Q4 Earnings Scorecard - 01.26.16 chart

 

"... A cyclical #Recession morphing into a revenue recession is a serious catalyst (for multiple compression).

 

It’s early, but for Q4 Earnings Season to-date:

  1. Energy Revenues (for the 4 out of 40 Energy companies in the SP500 who have reported) are -24.4% so far
  2. Industrial Revenues (for the 20 out of 60 companies in the SP500 who have reported) are -9.1% so far
  3. Financials Revenues (for the 28 out of 88 companies in the SP500 who have reported) are 0.1% so far" 

Straight Outta Hedgeye

“Speak a little truth and people lose they mind.”

-Ice Cube

 

For those of you who are new to following our research rhymes, the maestro on the Hedgeye Macro Team is Darius Dale. He hails from West Seattle. And in case you’ve never been there, let me give you the “upper class” short cut – it’s not where Wall St. consensus lives.

 

The aforementioned quote comes from a non-peddled-fiction movie called Straight Outta Compton. For those of you “sheltered folk” who don’t do chaos theory, recessions, or rap, the movie’s title was also the name of N.W.A.’s pioneering West Coast hip-hop album in 1988.

 

I was in college by the time Dr. Dre and Ice Cube made it to my virgin ears. But I can assure you that I get the evolution of it all now. If we have the humility to open our eyes/ears (and the empathy to open our minds), we have the opportunity to learn something, every day.

 

Straight Outta Hedgeye - dre ice cube

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

What we learned yesterday was that, no matter what the Establishment police has to say, the bear market in stocks isn’t over. To put closing prices in context:

 

  1. The SP500 was -1.6% on the day, taking it to -8.2% YTD, and -13.6% since the all-time #Bubble high in July
  2. The Russell 2000 remains in crash mode (I won’t gore you with the details) down -23.0% since July 2015

 

In terms of US Equity Sector Styles, here’s where the mauling was most obvious:

 

  1. Energy Stocks (XLE) down another -4.7% on the day and already down another -11.9% YTD
  2. Basic Materials Stocks (XLB) down another -3.2% on the day, leading YTD losers -14.1%
  3. Financial Stocks (XLF) down another -2.0% on the day, shocking “rate hike” bulls at -12.5% YTD

 

If you’re shocked, that’s ok. Consensus “folks” are losing their minds over these losses of capital. Life could be worse.

 

If you’re thinking this ends with some magical “valuation” love song, think again. We’ve busted a rhyme many times on this simple reality, but to boil it down for you one more time – valuation (during a #Deflation and #GrowthSlowing Phase Transition) is not a catalyst.

 

A cyclical #Recession morphing into a revenue recession is a serious catalyst (for multiple compression).

 

It’s early, but for Q4 Earnings Season to-date:

 

  1. Energy Revenues (for the 4 out of 40 Energy companies in the SP500 who have reported) are -24.4% so far
  2. Industrial Revenues (for the 20 out of 60 companies in the SP500 who have reported) are -9.1% so far
  3. Financials Revenues (for the 28 out of 88 companies in the SP500 who have reported) are 0.1% so far

 

But, if you back out that 10% of the SP500 and just focus on the good news, no worries. Until an $11B levered “value stock” like Hess (HES) reports what it did last night and you have to go back to the pre 2000-2002 US #Recession lows to find your “price target.”

 

I realize this morning’s note is a little too bearish for the average bull. But remember, it’s Straight Outta Hedgeye – that fringe firm that authored some of the things that “no one” saw coming.

 

If the SP500 drops to fresh closing lows this week, I’ll back off, cover some shorts, and take a knee again. But if the 2015 turned 2016 US stock market bulls want to start parading around the field disrespectfully, I’m bringing Darius out to rap some recession research rhymes.

 

To paraphrase Ice Cube, ‘our art (macro #process) is a reflection of (the data’s) reality.’

 

Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges (+ Intermediate-term TREND Research Views in brackets):

 

UST 10yr Yield 1.96-2.07% (bearish)

SPX 1 (bearish)
RUT (bearish)

NASDAQ 4 (bearish)

Nikkei 16001-17925 (bearish)

DAX 9 (bearish)

VIX 21.51-29.72 (bullish)
USD 98.80-99.98 (bullish)
EUR/USD 1.07-1.10 (bearish)
YEN 116.59-118.99 (bullish)
Oil (WTI) 28.09-32.51 (bearish)

Nat Gas 1.98-2.28 (bearish)

Gold 1075-1119 (neutral)
Copper 1.93-2.04 (bearish)

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

Straight Outta Hedgeye - 01.26.16 chart


TWTR | Thesis Refresh (2016)

Takeaway: The story has devolved from lofty consensus estimates to a structurally challenged model. Mgmt needs to decide what matters more.

KEY POINTS

  1. PICK YOUR POISON: The problem with the TWTR story in its short public history is that street demands upside on both revenues and MAUs, but those two factors have historically been working against each other. The common denominator is excessive ad load, which is driving monetization, but pushing the user away at the same time.  The problem isn't ad load per se, but the magnitude at which TWTR had been increasing it on a relatively disengaged user base (last reported DAU/MAU % <50%).  In short, TWTR generally can't beat on both revenue & MAU expectations at the same time, which is basically why the stock has sold off on 6 of 8 prints.  
  2. CROSSROADS: The dynamic above has devolved into a potentially dangerous situation where TWTR could see declining y/y users if mgmt doesn't take its foot off the gas with ad load.  For context, US MAU growth has decelerated to 5% y/y in 3Q15 from 19% as recently as 3Q14.  Further, our survey results suggest that nearly 40% of its US users are no longer using the platform, which means it longer-term revenue potential is compromised.  That said, TWTR needs to decide what matters more: chasing consensus estimates with excessive increses in ad load or prioitizing the user in hopes of getting some of them back.
  3. THOUGHTS INTO THE PRINT: We suspect mgmt realizes that it's been shooting itself in the foot by trying to appease the street, and its sandbagged 4Q guide suggests it may be changing its approach to managing expectations.  We're expecting a light 2016 guidance release vs. consensus estimates that are implying a persistent surge in per-user ad engagements since MAU growth has all but flattened out in the US, which is where the majority of its ad revenue comes from since it monetizes US at nearly 7x Int'l (on an ARPU basis).  However, if TWTR attempts to appease the street by guiding to consensus estimates, then this could turn into a negative US MAU story.  Either way, we see at least one more leg down to the short.

 

TWTR | Thesis Refresh (2016) - TWTR   Ad Engagement vs. MAU 3Q15

TWTR | Thesis Refresh (2016) - TWTR   Survey Churn 8 15

TWTR | Thesis Refresh (2016) - TWTR   Ad MAU vs. CPE 3Q15 v1

 

See notes below for supporting analysis and recent thoughts.  Let us know if you have any questions, or would like to discuss in more detail.

 

Hesham Shaaban, CFA


@HedgeyeInternet 

 

 

TWTR: What the Street is Missing

05/19/14 09:09 AM EDT
[click here]

 

TWTR: The Crossroads  (User Survey: n=7,500)
08/25/15 07:48 AM EDT
[click here

 

TWTR | Auto-Play Action (3Q15)
10/28/15 09:12 AM EDT
[click here]

 


get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

next