prev

January 22, 2015

*SPECIAL ALL-DAY LIVE EVENT JANUARY 27TH

 

WATCH and INTERACT with CEO Keith McCullough and Hedgeye's analysts as they discuss the stock market, economy and provide refreshed trade ranges all in real-time. They will answer your questions live via email, phone, Twitter and chat throughout the entire trading day. 

   

Special appearances by market experts, including best-selling "Currency Wars" author James Rickards, money manager Michael Holland, Jones Trading chief market strategist Michael O'Rourke and many more. CLICK HERE to sign up.

 

January 22, 2015 - Slide1

 

BULLISH TRENDS

January 22, 2015 - Slide2

January 22, 2015 - Slide3

January 22, 2015 - Slide4

January 22, 2015 - Slide5

 

BEARISH TRENDS

January 22, 2015 - Slide6 

January 22, 2015 - Slide7

January 22, 2015 - Slide8

January 22, 2015 - Slide9

January 22, 2015 - Slide10

January 22, 2015 - Slide11
January 22, 2015 - Slide12

January 22, 2015 - Slide13


Nonrandom Patterns

This note was originally published at 8am on January 08, 2015 for Hedgeye subscribers.

“All fixed patterns are incapable of adaptability. The truth is outside of all fixed patterns.”

-Bruce Lee

 

For those of us who embrace the non-linearity and uncertainty of Global Macro markets, how good is that quote? I can’t believe it took me this long into my career to find it. The more I read, the less I realize I really know.

 

Non-fixed market patterns. They are dynamic and constantly testing consensus narratives. Some of the best Bayesians in our profession get this. While they aren’t in the business of providing us their #process, they do make a lot of money front-running market truths.

 

“In 1993, Renaissance Technologies hired away from IBM a Bayesian group of researchers… searching for nonrandom patterns that will help predict markets, RenTech gathers as much information as possible. It begins with prior knowledge about the history of prices and how they correlate with eachother…”The Theory That Would Not Die (pg 237)

Nonrandom Patterns - 99

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

What an excellent start to 2015! It’s been years since I’ve seen so many great long and short ideas across the Global Macro universe. If your portfolio mandate is diversified and flexible (across asset classes), I think you can have a crusher of a year!

 

Pardon? Yep, those who have been chasing single-factor #MovingMonkey models aren’t quite down with my optimism. But hey, I’m an optimistic guy – I’ve always thought that those who evolve their #process and adapt the fastest will ultimately win.

 

At 1PM EST today I’ll review our Global Macro Themes for Q1 of 2015 (ping sales@Hedgeye.com if you’d like access). In customary hash-tag style, our current themes are as follows:

  • Global #Deflation: Amidst a backdrop of secular stagnation across developed economies, we continue to think cyclical forces (namely #StrongDollar driven commodity price deflation) will drag down reported inflation readings globally over the intermediate term. That is likely to weigh heavily upon long-term interest rates in the developed world, underpinning our bullish outlook for U.S. Treasury bonds (TLT, EDV, ZROZ, etc.)
  • #Quad414: After DEC and Q4 (2014) data slows, in Q1 of 2015 we think growth in the US is likely to accelerate from 4Q, aided by base effects and a broad-based pickup in real discretionary income. We do not, however, think such a pickup is sustainable, as we foresee another #Quad4 setup for the 2nd quarter. Risk managing these turns at the sector and style factor level will be the key to generating alpha in the U.S. equity market in 1H15.
  • Long #Housing?: The collective impact of rising rates, severe weather, waning investor interest, decelerating HPI, and tighter credit capsized housing in 2014.  2015 is setting up as the obverse with demand improving, the credit box opening and 2nd derivative price and volume trends beginning to inflect positively against progressively easier comps. We'll review the current dynamics and discuss whether the stage is set for a transition from under to outperformance for the complex. 

While commercializing my research and risk management process will continue to take time, after 7 years of doing this from an independent research provider perspective, I think we’ve made significant progress.

They key word in that statement is we.

 

Our Macro Team is not only up to 6 analysts at this point – they have matured into a very cohesive unit of selfless grinders who not only work very well together, but question one another’s premise, so that we keep finding ways to front-run consensus market truths.

 

As legendary Macro maven Ray Dalio likes to ask, “what is the truth?”

 

Well, on yesterday’s US stock market bounce:

 

  1. Healthcare (XLV) led the rally +2.4%
  2. Consumer Staples (XLP) wasn’t far behind at +1.7%
  3. And Energy Stocks (XLE) continue to suck wind (+0.2%)

 

And, if all you do is US Equities, that’s precisely the Macro Playbook (ask sales for our daily note on that with Top/Bottom 5 ETFS, long/short) we have for you while we are still in #Quad4 reporting season (December and Q4 GDP data all gets reported in January).

 

As we roll out of that into Q1, we think you should be tilting to early-cycle (LONG) and late-cycle (SHORT). I’ll explain both asset-class-rotation and catalysts/timing as best I can on our 1PM call today. We hope you can find the time to dial in.

 

If I’m wrong on the timing and patterns of behavior born out of my macro calendar catalysts, I’ll do the only thing a humble servant to Mr. Macro Market knows – adapt to the prior, so that I can best position for the next posterior.

 

Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now:

 

UST 10yr Yield 1.91-2.12%

SPX 1195-2046

Nikkei 16884-17488

YEN 118.11-121.27

Oil (WTI) 47.22-52.63

Gold 1195-1225

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

Nonrandom Patterns - 01.08.15 chart


P: International Opportunity?

Takeaway: Prohibitive costs + lower monetization potential = unprofitable opportunity for an unprofitable company sitting on a powder keg.

KEY POINTS

  1. PROHIBITIVE COST STRUCTURE: One of the major reasons why P hasn’t expanded internationally past Australia/New Zealand comes down to cost.  There isn't a royalty-setting board internationally, meaning P would need to negotiate on an individual label/country basis on licensing rates, which the company currently deems as "prohibitively expensive".
  2. LOWER MONETIZATION POTENTIAL: Much smaller international ad budgets vs. a much larger internet population means each International user is worth considerably less than a domestic user.  In short, sell-through would prove more challenging, and Ad RPM would be inherently limited.
  3. TOO MUCH RISK AT HOME: We don’t believe there is a viable and material international opportunity for P outside of potentially Australia/New Zealand.  But even if there was, any further expansion would be dependent on a favorable outcome on Webcaster IV.  As we’ve mentioned previously, anything short of a best case scenario on that front could derail P’s entire business model.  

 

PROHIBITIVE COST STRUCTURE

The international opportunity is something the sell-side has been touting for some time, but has yet to come to fruition for P outside a small venture in Australia & New Zealand.  One of the major reasons is cost.  According to P’s filings, the company suggests that international expansion could be prohibitively expensive and not commercially viable. 

 

One of the major reasons is that is there is no statuary licensing entity comparable to the CRB internationally.  That means P would have to enter into direct license agreements with performing rights organizations/copyright owners in order to stream music; something it hasn’t been able to do domestically that would likely prove more difficult/costly on a individual label/country basis.  We can debate the merits of whether P will ever be able to negotiate reasonable royalty rates, or we can point you to the bigger issue… 

 

LOWER MONETIZATION OPPORTUNITY

We initially published this analysis for TWTR, but it applies to P as well.  In short, the international user is worth considerably less in terms of per-capita advertising spend, which is the source of ~80% of P’s current revenues. 

 

The math is fairly simple.  International digital advertising spend is considerably lower than that of the US, but there are considerably more international internet users.  In turn, the ad monetization potential is considerably less for each international user than it is for domestic users; making sell-through on those listener hours tougher to achieve, and the ultimate RPM (revenue per thousand listener hours) that much lower. 

 

P: International Opportunity? - Advertising   Per cap digital by region 

 

TOO MUCH RISK AT HOME

It’s important to remember that P is a marginally profitable company (at best), that hasn't been able to achieve operating leverage to date.  P’s model can barely support its domestic operations, so any further international investment would just lead to heightened cash burn.

 

P: International Opportunity? - P   Operating Leverge CF

 

More importantly, Webcaster IV remains a overhang into 2016.  The major point of contention is P’s ad-supported royalty rate, which applies to roughly 90% of its listener hours, of which, P is monetizing less than half of them.  P and SoundExchange are worlds apart on what they are seeking, so anything short of a best-case scenario for P could derail its entire business model.  That likely means P would have to to curb usage, either through more stringent listener caps or market exits altogether.  See the note below for more detail.

 

P: Webcaster IV = Powder Keg

01/13/15 02:49 PM EST

[click here]

 

P: International Opportunity? - P   Web IV proposals

 

We don’t believe there is a viable and material international opportunity for P outside of potentially Australia/New Zealand.  But even if there was, P isn’t likely to expand internationally unless it receives a favorable outcome on Webcaster IV.  And even if that were to happen, expansion would be a slow process that wouldn’t start until 2016 at the earliest, with monetization more likely a 2017 event at the very earliest.  Long-story short, we wouldn’t bet on the international story.

 

 

Let us know if you have any questions, or would like to discuss further.

 

Hesham Shaaban, CFA

@HedgeyeInternet 


get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

Cartoon of the Day: Draghi vs. Deflation

Cartoon of the Day: Draghi vs. Deflation - Deflation cartoon 01.21.2015

Is Draghi preparing to act against deflation? Or is deflation preparing to act against Draghi?


Keith's Macro Notebook 1/21: Japan | #Deflation | Swiss

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough shares the top three things in his macro notebook this morning.

 

Sign up for Hedgeye's Market Marathon on January 27: http://live.hedgeye.com/market-marathon/



Hedgeye Morning Macro Call Replay: Look Out If Draghi Doesn’t Deliver the Cow Bell

On this morning’s institutional Macro Call, Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough navigates through myriad growing market and economic risks around the world, highlights some of his favorite (and least favorite) ideas, and warns that if the ECB’s Mario Draghi disappoints investor expectations tomorrow, beware of market nastiness.

 


investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.

next