At around this time last week, we were staring at the associated market impact of the US Dollar being that Ball Underwater that was released to the upside. As the Buck broke-out, equities broke down (taking the SP500 down for a -3.5% correction in 4-days).
Today, we’re seeing quite the opposite. As global risk managers sell that Dollar back down to new YTD lows (down -0.93% to $77.30), the REFLATION trade is back! (Energy, XLE, and Basic Materials, XLB, are the 2 best performing sectors in our 9 S&P Sector study, trading +3% and 1.4% on the day, respectively).
Gold is trading > $1000/oz. Oil is trading straight back up above its immediate term TRADE line at $71.12/barrel. Copper is making new YTD highs.
Dollar down = Ball Underwater. As simple as this inverse correlation sounds is as simple as simple does.
After doing a lot of covering/buying on Wednesday of last week, I have been doing a lot of nothing for the last few days. Why? Well, A) I get the fundamental short case against the US Dollar (its once again broken across all 3 of our investment durations) and B) I’m happy watching one of the 24 stocks and/or ETFs we are long in the virtual portfolio find this last gasp of air.
Where does the air run out of the REFLATION trade? I’m sticking with the high-side of what we called our Range Rover line (updated 5 weeks ago at 1041 on the SPX).
My newly established lines of immediate term support for the SP500 are 1015 and 1008 (dotted green lines in the chart below). Intermediate term TREND support is now 952.
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Read It And Weep
We have just read the report from the Office of the Inspector General of the SEC, Case No. OIG-509, “Investigation of the Failure of the SEC to Uncover Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme”.
After reading this sorry document – the 22 page Executive Summary of a 450-pager to be delivered in the coming weeks – we can say with all sincerity that we truly hope there was massive fraud and criminal deception at multiple levels within the Commission. We have been dealing with regulators for the better part of three decades, and we have seen some humdingers. But even we are not so cynical as to believe the SEC is as incompetent as the Inspector General’s report makes them out to be.
Even a saint would come away with a ruffled feather and a diminished opinion of human nature after reading this report. An unmistakable whiff of fraud, meddling and deliberate cover-up emanates from nearly every paragraph of this horrifying document.
This Executive Summary is required reading for everyone who works in the finance industry – as well as for everyone who invests, anyone who cares about how our government works, anyone who either believes in, or doesn’t believe in the capitalist system, and anyone whose life stands to be affected by the foibles of human nature. The voters of this nation should have it emblazoned on the insides of their eyelids in laser-hot day-glo letters. The government has failed its citizenry. The SEC is surely to blame, but they are not to be blamed alone.
The morning after this document came to light, former SEC Chair Harvey Pitt found himself under the bright lights of the Bloomberg TV studio, defending with sad and weary mien the embattled Commission, and praising Chairman Schapiro for the job she is doing in upgrading the Commission’s staff and strengthening its mandate.
But then, Pitt would have to defend the Commission, wouldn’t he? As would just about everyone involved with this sorry enterprise.
The OIG report finds that, as early as 1992, the SEC came into possession of information that, if followed up on in even rudimentary fashion, would have brought Madoff’s scheme to light, and the game would have been over then and there.
Meanwhile, the Summary contains references too numerous to mention of moments where a dismally under-qualified staff of examiners actually came up with something so blatantly out of order that even they suspected it was wrong – and where senior SEC staffers overseeing the examination either failed to follow up, or specifically instructed the junior examiners to abandon a line of inquiry.
In one apparent case of routine regulatory numbskullery, a team of examiners was sent to Madoff’s offices because allegations had surfaced of improper dealings in the firm’s advisory business. Once there, the team set about looking for evidence of front running. When it was pointed out that this was not the reason investigators had been sent in, the SEC staffer in charge responded that, he knew that front-running was not the charge at issue, but that his team’s expertise was in analyzing front running, so they were performing a front running investigation.
(“What are you doing on your hands and knees?”
“I lost a contact lens.”
“Where? Here on the floor?”
“No. Over there in the corner.”
“So why aren’t you looking over there in the corner?”
“There’s more light here.”)
The OIG’s Summary recounts six separate complaints brought to the SEC’s attention regarding Madoff’s business. Two of them were from Madoff investors – which meant that even under the Commission’s own inane internal unwritten guidelines, they had to follow them up. A third was actually submitted three times, each more detailed than the previous.
Regulators receive a lot of “tips”, many of which are so vague as to be useless – or clearly motivated by personal hostility. One of the unwritten rules of regulatory investigations is that they can not follow up on everything, so a sort of regulatory triage takes place, in which first priority is given to allegations from insiders – partners of a money manager, C-level executives of a public company, supervisors, senior bankers or head traders in brokerage firms. Red flag status is also accorded to tips received from immediate family – spouses are best – especially when the family member in question is part of the business enterprise.
As to other tips, unfortunately we see clearly how even the most detailed presentations were tossed aside. We have read Markopolous’ report to the SEC. It reads like a doctoral thesis. For a senior SEC supervisor to toss it aside requires a significant level of willful negligence. We hear the staffer in question had a personal animosity to Mr. Markopolous, and so she did not pass his report on to others who might take a closer look at Madoff’s business. She no doubt taught Mr. Markopolous a lesson he won’t soon forget!
On top of the complaints, SEC examiners in an unrelated routine examination of another hedge fund came across internal emails describing with great specificity the fund’s own due diligence on Madoff, describing in detail why Madoff’s returns were not credible. The fund’s internal emails identified red flags, including “(1) incredible and highly unusual fills for equity trades; (2) misrepresentation of his options trading; (3) secrecy; (4) auditor; (5) unusually consistent and non-volatile returns over several years; and (6) fee structure.” The OIG report goes on to describe another internal email which “provided a step-by-step analysis of why Madoff must be misrepresenting his options trading.”
This email was neither the first, nor by any means the only report to come to the SEC’s attention raising serious suspicions as to whether Madoff was trading at all. Many of these were based on a simple analysis that compared options volume reported by Madoff to his customers, with volume actually traded on the options exchanges on the days in question. The presence of repeated, consistent vast discrepancies should have occasioned someone at the SEC to merely duplicate the exercise – we have heard arguments about SEC examiners being junior, not well enough trained to catch out a Madoff, but how much training does one require to pull a month’s worth of Madoff customer account statements and place a call to the CBOE to see whether the numbers match?
How about two substantial articles in well-regarded publications – Barrons’ and MAR Hedge – raising serious questions about Madoff’s operation? The OIG report says Lori Richards – then head of Enforcement – “reviewed the Barron’s article in May 2001 and sent a copy to an Associate Director in OCIE shortly thereafter, with a note on the top stating that Arvedlund [author of the Barron’s article] is ‘very good’ and that ‘This is a great exam for us!’”
Not only did OCIE not open an investigation, the OIG report says “there is no record of anyone else in OCIE reviewing the Barron’s article until several years later.” In other words: Lori Richards was the only person in her entire chain of command who actually read the newspapers – presumably this was part of the skills set that qualified her to head the Enforcement Division. In keeping with her aggressive move to upgrade the Commission, we understand Chairman Schapiro intends to designate multiple Barron’s readers, to avoid a gap in coverage now that Richards is leaving.
The fact that never, at any time in any of the examinations or investigations launched by the SEC into Madoff’s business, did any SEC examiner call any third party to verify anything – not trading volume, not customer positions, not customer assets, not trades, executions, orders – nothing, means not merely that the SEC fell down on the job.
The failure, in the course of an investigation, to independently verify any aspect of Madoff’s business is not an “oversight” or a “failure” on the part of the SEC staff. It is not even a colossal and tragic blunder. It is criminal negligence, pure and simple.
We have sat through many a routine firm examination – NASD, SEC, exchanges, state regulators, we’ve dealt with them all. Among the very first documents requested by an examiner is the trades blotter. And one of the first steps an examination team does in a firm-wide review is to verify trading with the clearing firm or prime broker. There are two simple reasons for doing this. The first reason is to verify that the firm is keeping accurate records – or honest ones. Since every firm knows its examiners will request the blotters, and that the blotters will be compared with the clearing firm’s records, there is high incentive to maintain accurate blotters.
The second reason examiners always verify a firm’s blotters with an independent source is – imagine what would happen to a regulator who failed to obtain third-party verification, and then it turned out to be a fraud?
Can you imagine such a thing? Neither could Harvey Pitt.
Poor Harvey, sitting there ruefully wagging his head over the demise of what he characterized as a good – nay, a “great” agency. Since part of Madoff’s scamming took place during Pitt’s tenure as SEC chair, he would naturally have to defend the staff and their actions. This he did by speaking of how “dedicated” and “principled” so many of them are. To be sure, Pitt also said – and it was his position historically, we recall – that the Commission was “over-lawyered”, with too many attorneys, and not enough market practitioners.
This gives us yet another opportunity to lay into one of our favorite flogging ponies – and to note that, while we continue to beat it, this horse is still far from dead. We have raised numerous times the notion of bringing a high-visibility team of Wall Street professionals to the SEC. The process whereby young talent goes from law school to the SEC, and thence to Wall Street, is exactly backwards and has resulted in, for one thing, Bernie Madoff.
We will briefly repeat our strong recommendation that the SEC bring in a team of industry compliance professionals and hand the examination and investigation process over to them. In the few cases we are aware of where this has been tried, the professionals in question found themselves smack up against a brick wall of bureaucratic nit picking and internecine feuding over resources and authority occasioned by the Kafkaesque hierarchy of job grades and examination schedules. While this is traditionally exactly the way to run a government bureaucracy, this is no way to regulate the world’s most important financial marketplace.
We are greatly encouraged by the Commission’s volte face under Chairman Schapiro. In her Statement on the Release of the Executive Summary of the Inspector General’s Report, Schapiro mentioned that the SEC has already filed twice as many restraining orders related to Ponzi schemes as were filed in the comparable period a year ago. Underlying all our criticizing, we have a fundamental respect for Mary Schapiro and the job she has done throughout her career.
Where John Thain harmonized technologies to make the NYSE much more powerful, Mary Schapiro was stuck, in her tenure as NASD Chair, with having to harmonize personalities in her efforts to merge the NASD and NYSE cultures. It is a testament to her perseverance and patience that she accomplished this thankless task. Having spent two decades supervising these folks, we would sooner boil and eat our own scrotum than have to get a stadium full of financial professionals to work with one another.
That being said, any increase in enforcement, investigations and surveillance is an invidious comparison, when put alongside the Cox SEC. Same store comps are going to be great when measuring against a property that was shuttered last year. We know the Commission will be far more effective under Chairman Schapiro than under her predecessor. The question is whether Chairman Schapiro will have the political will to make some nasty decisions – and, in the process, enemies – and whether Congress and the President will back her up. Otherwise the accomplishments of her first year as SEC Chair will be recorded with an asterisk, and the hoped-for Change We Can Believe In will be reduced to Chump Change.
We are waiting with fearful anticipation for the full report, which we shall force ourselves to read cover to cover. Make no mistake: while our experience dealing with regulators has frequently left us with a sense of the pathetic, we nonetheless feel an acute sting of embarrassment for an industry that has come to this sorry state, and profound personal chagrin at being a part of this, however remote from the squalid epicenter. The shame of Bernie Madoff and his thieving associates – surely, no one believes he did this all himself – is a shame that permeates the financial industry. The shame of those willing to benefit from Madoff’s “garden variety” fraud, who considered it “business as usual”, is a moral tragedy that tears at the very fabric of our society. The opprobrium we heap upon the bunglers at the SEC is a shame in which we are mired too. Truly, this brush has tarred us all.
Now it can be told. Speaking unabashedly from the front page of the Forward (4 September, “Crazy Eddie’s Cousin, A Former Fraudster, Speaks Out On Syrian ‘Subculture Of Crime’”), Sam Antar – cousin of “Crazy Eddie” Eddie Antar – told it like it is regarding the scandal that hit over the summer. The arrest of several dozen New Jersey politicians, together with five prominent Rabbis (and a Moslem – let’s not forget the Moslem!) sparked outrage and “I told you so” from nearly every quarter. Speaking on condition of publicity, Sam Antar spilled what beans he held regarding corruption in certain circles within the community where he grew up, and with whom he still has close ties.
Antar, who served as CFO of Crazy Eddie’s, was indicted along with his cousin, an uncle and other officers of the company. In a journalistic passage that cleverly parodies the cadences of penitential prayer, the Forward article describes Antar’s “almost gleeful” willingness to discuss his past misdeeds. “He lied. He committed fraud. He skimmed money. He misled investigators.”
Antar’s version of the story is, his cousin and the other family members were going to blame the whole fraud on him – so he blamed it on them. He turned state’s evidence, and got off with a suspended sentence, while his cousin and uncle went to prison.
Antar, who continued to live in the Syrian Jewish community after the scandal, believes he was largely left alone because, even though he turned on other members of the community, they were his own family. In this community noted for being close-knit, blood is thicker than Arak.
The mainstream financial press, meanwhile, has run stories about the Madoff trustee gearing up to go after charities and claw back monies they withdrew from their Madoff accounts in the years before the scandal broke.
Call us cynical – please! – but we are convinced that all the biggest charities that invested with Madoff knew he was doing something highly immoral – or outright illegal. The problem was, they were betting on the wrong crime.
Bernie started his career by taking advantage of a weakness in the system. The weakness was called Spreads, and by rebating firms for their order flow, Bernie ended up pocketing most of the spread, while filling the customers on their respective sides of the market. The seller got the bid price, the buyer paid the offer – Bernie paid a penny to each side, and kept ten and a-half cents. God’s in His heaven, all’s right with the world.
The fine line separating commerce and crime is a fascinating topic, and Madoff’s tale may yet prove a laboratory for the analysis. Where does an entrepreneur who exploits a weakness in the market slip over into being a criminal? At what point does taking advantage of a market inefficiency become immoral – and finally, illegal? And at what point does society intervene and place boundaries to this behavior?
Financial professionals who invested serious money with Madoff did so partly on the strength of his position in the marketplace – the unassailability of the man with whom many of them had traded in earlier times, who bestrode the financial world like a colossus – one foot planted in the shadowy world of third-market trading where he could manipulate the hell out of every trade that came his way; the other crushing the windpipe of the regulators in his capacity as Chairman of NASDAQ and senior advisor to the SEC.
Then there were senior foundation officers at the charities that gave Bernie millions – tens or even hundreds of millions. These were intelligent, dedicated and hard-working professionals, generally people who understood the working of the markets. While they did not go to the length – quite simple, really – of third party verification of the Madoff Magic there were many who assiduously teased apart the monthly statements sent to them by Madoff & Co, and who kept coming to the conclusion that he was front running and skimming pennies off customer trades – in effect picking off his own customers, as well as pocketing the spread.
They figured out that Bernie was committing a low-level fraud on a massive scale, taking undisclosed bits and pieces, then doling them out to this investors. To keep the performance steady, they thought he was doling out the profit in lean months, then holding back more for himself when he had good ones.
Imagine their surprise when they discovered that – yes – Bernie was breaking the law and stealing money; but – no – he wasn’t breaking that law, and he wasn’t giving them the money. Bernie broke an altogether different law, and he kept all the money for himself.
Aside from questioning just how “due” the due diligence was of these firms that were responsible for billions of dollars of foundation money, does it not seem reasonable that they should be clawed back on money they withdrew – especially if they believed they were receiving the proceeds of illicit activity?
As the rabbis in Sam Antar’s community can tell you, among the primary reasons God destroyed the world with the Flood in the time of Noah was the prevalence of a kind of theft we today call “victimless crime.” It is the equivalent of skimming the third and fourth decimal places of interest-bearing bank balances; the equivalent of entering fictitious orders to manipulate the price of stock in the marketplace. The equivalent of pocketing the spread, when no one on either side of the trade expected to share in it anyway.
These crimes are victimless, because no one gets hurt. Actually, no one knows they have been hurt. And isn’t that the same thing?
But someone does get rich. How can it be that one person is becoming monumentally wealthy at the expense of others, yet the others appear to not be losing anything?
If you can figure that out, you are way too smart to work at the SEC.
Chief Compliance Officer
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.
A handful of thoughtful investors in our exclusive Macro Research network have started asking me what I think about US Treasury Bonds working higher at the same time as Gold is raging higher. I think it boils down to one word - stagflation.
As the Burning Buck gets absolutely torched (down a big -1.4% today alone), the US Government is going to sponsor imported inflation in Q4 (when y/y deflation becomes y/y inflation). That’s why the Prices Paid component of the August ISM report was up +18% sequentially (month-over-month). That’s why Gold was up +4% last week. That’s why gold and other stable foreign currencies like the Euro are making new YTD highs relative to the US Dollar again today.
Understanding that the US Bond market smells stagnant growth AND that the US Federal Reserve is as politicized as it has ever been could be one and the same thing. There has never been a country that has sustainably attracted mass investment (foreign inflows) with ZERO as their base rate return AHEAD of accelerating Consumer and Producer Price readings. As a result, growth oriented risk capital is leaving America.
Don’t take my word for it. Look at the recent TIC Report (Treasury Capital Inflows). It’s getting flat out nasty. While the world’s central bankers may be buying non-growth oriented US Treasuries (supporting the Treasury market), they are nowhere to be found buying agency debt or anything American-risk for that matter. Instead, they are buying gold, copper, oil, foreign currencies – you name it. Anything other than the currency of a country who is about to enter the danger zone of economic stagflation.
Below, we have attached the metaphor for this foreign fund flow trade – the chart of NYMEX Gold. While we have it immediate term overbought north of $1009/oz, the long term setup here is very attractive. Any time we have our longest dated duration (the TAIL line = $889/oz) underpinning both the TREND ($945/oz) and TRADE ($953/oz) lines of price momentum, we call that a Bullish Formation.
Anytime a Bullish Formation is met with accelerating volume and accommodative volatility studies, we are paid to pay attention. Gold remains in a bull market. US centric stagflation remains the world’s rightly placed future concern.
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
MCD is scheduled to report August comparable sales tomorrow.
U.S. (facing a 4.5% comparison from last year)
Good: +3.5% or better would signal that the company is maintaining its 4%-plus 2-year average trend. If the number comes in at 5% or better, it would point to a sequential acceleration in 2- year trends from July.
Neutral: +2.5% to +3.5% would signal a sequential slowdown in 2-year average trends from July, but would point to trends that are still better than what we saw in June. July 2-year average trends improved 185 bps on a sequential basis from June.
Bad: < +2.5% would signal a return to the May and June 2-year average trend levels. Anything below +1% would signal a slowdown even from the already depressed June level.
Europe (facing a difficult 11.6% comparison from last year)
Good: +4.0% or better would signal an acceleration in 2-year average trends. A number better than 4.4% would represent an 8%-plus 2-year average trend.
Neutral: +2.0% to +4.0% would signal that the company is maintaining its 2-year average trend from July.
Bad: < +2.0% would point to a sequential slowdown in 2-year average trends from July. Although a 2% number would still represent 6%-plus 2-year trends, investors are accustomed to 5%-plus reported numbers on a 1-year basis so a number below 2% would be alarming. A result worse than flat YOY performance would signal a return to June levels.
APMEA (facing a difficult 10.0% comparison from last year)
Good: +3.0% or better would signal an improvement in 2-year average trends on a sequential basis from July. Anything better than 4% would represent a return to 7%-plus 2-year average trend levels.
Neutral: +1.0% to +3.0% would signal an acceleration from June and July 2-year average trend levels, which had slowed rather significantly from prior months.
Bad: < +1% - A flat to +1% result would still signal a slight acceleration in 2-year average trends from June and July, but like Europe, I think a number below 1% on a 1-year basis would be alarming to investors that are accustomed to 5%-plus results out of the APMEA segment. A reported -0.5% to -1% would point to 2-year average trends that are similar to the already slowed trends in June and July.
RETAIL FIRST LOOK: GOODBYE HAMPTONS, HELLO REALITY
SEPTEMBER 8, 2009
TODAY’S CALL OUT
Here’s the post-Labor Day setup.
Now that the masses are back from the Hamptons and en route to the Goldman retail conference, let’s take a quick look at the setup. On the margin, it reinforces the point we’ve been making over the past 2 weeks that the pendulum is shifting to the downside, and if you want to own a name in this space, you’ve gotta be super confident in meaningful earnings beats or takeout potential. Here are some notables…
- Earnings revision factor flattened out for retail last week. It is still a healthy +25%, but marks the first time since June that it did not go up week on week.
- In looking at earnings trajectory for the 1462 companies in the S&P 1500 composite that have reported 2Q, the major call out is the rate of change in earnings expectations. Consumer Discretionary EPS growth expectations have gone from -16.7% to -3.4% for CY09 from March 1 through today. That delta is 2x the next closest group, which is Tech.
- Retail is trading at 15.5x those expectations. Not egregious, but absolutely not cheap by any means.
- As Zach elaborated on in Friday’s First Look, our SIGMA is headed in the right direction. Inventory/sales ratio looking good for the industry, and the margin setup for next two quarters is in check. But I struggle to find anyone that doesn’t know this and is positioned accordingly.
- Note that 30% of retail is in the “Sweet Spot” meaning that sales are outpacing inventories and margin delta is positive. We have to look back to early 2007 to find such a high percentage of companies in this zone.
LEVINE’S LOW DOWN
Some Notable Call Outs
- Despite having many years of growth ahead, the total ecommerce channel is now expected to post its first decline ever in 2009. According to interactive firm eMarketer, the ecommerce sector will decline by 3.1% this year (excluding online travel and ticket sales). However, the same study suggests growth will resume to 5.5% in 2010 and at a double digit rate in 2011.
- We don’t often think about Toys R Us much anymore given it’s now in private hands and is no longer the largest toy seller. However, the company has been on mini-acquisition spree lately, acquiring trademarks and IP that have long been icons in the industry. Toys R Us is now the owner of: FAO Schwartz, eToys.com, babyuniverse.com, ePregnancy.com, Toys.com and KB Toys. With all these brands now in-house, it will be interesting to see how the company markets each of them over the holiday period.
- As the eco-friendly trend in textiles and apparel continues to grow, the FTC is cracking down on environmental claims made by “green focused” manufacturers. The FTC recently charged four sellers of eco-apparel with deceptively labeling products. These manufacturers claimed their goods were made of bamboo, when in fact they were made of rayon. Given this recent crackdown, it is likely retailers will also need to be more diligent in substantiating the claims of their wholesalers before putting environmentally friendly products on their shelves.
-Three creditors of Signature Apparel Group last week sought to force the Rocawear licensee into bankruptcy - The petitioning creditors, representing about $14.9 million in debt past due, filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition in a Manhattan bankruptcy court on Friday. New York-based Signature manufactures apparel largely for the urban market. It holds licenses for Rocawear in the junior category as well as Artful Dodger, another urban brand. Signature also owns the Fetish trademark, which it relaunched with the rapper Eve for holiday 2008, after the line had separate unsuccessful stints with Marc Ecko Enterprises and Innovo Group. According to court documents, the petitioners are: Hitch & Trail Inc., New York, owed $3.6 million; Talful Ltd., Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, $4.8 million, and Harvestway China Ltd., Kowloon, Hong Kong, $6.5 million. The company has 20 days to respond to the petition. <wwd.com/business-news>
-UK comp sales values fell 0.1% - UK retail sales values fell 0.1% on a like-for-like basis from August 2008, when sales had fallen, hit by very wet weather. On a total basis, sales rose 2.2% against a 1.4% gain in August 2008. This August, food sales continued to do better than non-food. Food sales growth edged up only slightly from July's low. Clothing and footwear weakened further. Homewares and furniture sales fell back below year-earlier levels after July's weather- and clearance-driven growth. Non-food non-store sales (internet, mail-order and phone sales) in August were 7.9% higher than a year ago, the weakest since May. <brc.org.uk>
-Home furnishing retailers reap rewards as home purchases start to ramp up - The news on the home front has been a steady increase in home sales for the past few months. Now an e-commerce systems provider reports that heightened interest in home investments may be reflected in increased sales at home furnishings sites. While admittedly unscientific because the data represent sales at only three sites—ArtPassions.com, BathtubStore.com and Foamiture.com—Avid Commerce LLC reports that sales at the three sites in June were 5.2% higher than sales in May; 33.9% higher in July from June; and 81.1% higher in August from July. The U.S. Department of Commerce reports that new home sales in May were up 4.9% from the prior month; in June, they were up 9.1% from May; and in July, 9.6% from June. <internetretailer.com>
-Goal is for India to turn into a global manufacturing hub of textile accessories by increasing the turnover - Indian Textile Accessories & Machinery Manufacturers' Association (ITAMMA) aims to turn India into a global manufacturing hub of textile accessories by increasing the turnover from this textile sub-segment from the current Rs 65 billion to Rs 200 billion by the end of the next decade. The Association is also in the process of transforming itself from a government liaison body to a new role of tying up for technology upgrade n and conducting market research for its members. It is also projecting an increase in exports from Rs 6.5 billion to Rs 10 billion in the next five years, since most of its exporting members have already started focusing on new regions and existing buyer countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Far-east countries. <fashionnetasia.com>
-Bangladesh asks for a stimulus package for the apparel industry - A member delegation from the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA) has met the Finance Minister AMA Muhith to ask for a stimulus package for the industry. While giving out the details of demands requested by the Finance Minister, the President of BKMEA demanded for a 5% stimulus incentive on FOB value of exports. He said, they had also requested that banks not to increase interest rates higher than 10%. Muhith assured the delegation that the garment sector problems and demands will come up for discussion at the second meeting of the taskforce on recession due on September 15-16. <fashionnetasia.com>
-Japan’s Renown Inc. to sell Aquascutum Group Limited to U.K.-based Broadwick Group Limited - Japan’s Renown Inc. said Tuesday it has struck a deal to sell Aquascutum Group Limited to U.K.-based Broadwick Group Limited, a company owned by retail tycoon Harold Tillman and Jaeger ceo Belinda Earl, for an undisclosed price. Renown also said it will sell the Aquascutum trademark for China and the rest of Asia to Hong Kong-based YGM Mart Limited, which had been the brand’s licensee in China. Renown said it will continue to manufacture and distribute the British brand’s products in Japan through a long-term master-licensing agreement with YGM. Renown is in the process of restructuring its business as it grapples with ongoing financial difficulties and weak macroeconomic conditions in its home market of Japan. Last year it put the British brand up for sale. <wwd.com/business-news>
-Department stores added jobs for the first time since May - Department stores added 5,800 jobs last month to employ 1.53 million, but specialty stores cut 9,500 to employ 1.4 million, the Labor Department said Friday. Despite the higher department store jobs figure, the overall landscape for retailers was not bright, economists said. <wwd.com/business-news>
-U.S. discount, grocery and restaurant chains are hiring a larger percentage of job applicants than seven months ago - In July, 2.99 of every 100 applications resulted in a hire, compared with 2.75 in January, a three-year low. The pace of hiring of cashiers, merchandise stockers and other frontline workers in July was less than half that of October 2006, Kronos said. U.S. unemployment rose to a 26-year high of 9.7 percent in August, according to the Labor Department. Retailers fired 10,000 people last month while all U.S. employers trimmed payrolls by 216,000 after slashing 276,000 jobs in July. <bloomberg.com>
-The Action Sports Retail Show will hit the San Diego Convention Center September 10th -12th - ASR will showcase the latest apparel, footwear, swimwear, accessories and hardgood products from over 700 surf, skate, swim, snow, moto, wake, lifestyle and streetwear brands. Retailers, buyers, brands and athletes will all get a chance to converge and find out about the latest trends in action sports equipment and apparel. The event takes place at the San Diego Convention Center this Thursday thru Saturday. <examiner.com>
-The skate business may be headed for slower times, as the youth market feels the sting of the down economy - The economic downturn and a sharp reduction in discretionary spending among teens has impacted the market. The rapid expansion in the skate arena over the past few years may be unsustainable and slowing is to be expected. August is the most important month of the year for skate. To see a slowdown this dramatic in the biggest month of the year does not bode well. According to NPD data, for the 12 months ending June 2009, sales of skate shoes declined 13.3% in terms of dollars spent, largely due to a lower average selling price of $31.95, down from $33.30. By contrast, the total athletic footwear market declined 3%, while the average unit price increased to $37.70, from $35.05. <wwd.com/footwear-news>
-Many retailers are upbeat that fall’s footwear arrival will give them a much-needed boost after a lackluster spring - With inventories at extremely low levels, a number of key department stores and independents were optimistic last week about early reads on the season and said several key boot styles were already registering strong sales. Larger retailers were also hopeful about their prospects for the coming months — and said shoppers were already starting to snap up fall styles. <wwd.com/footwear-news>
-An official at the Collegiate Licensing Co. predicted that retail sales of college fan merchandise could be down 7% this year - All the leagues have definitely seen declines this year.The North American college sports segment continues to be a major licensing player. <sportsonesource.com>
-Under Armour launches new ad campaign - Under Armour will be debuting its "Under Armour is Football" advertising campaign this coming weekend in spots that will include Founder and CEO Kevin Plank making a cameo appearance from his days playing youth football. <sportsonesource.com>
-New York Fashion week kicks off this Thursday with "Fashion's Night Out," a global event spearheaded by Vogue to stimulate store sales - Retailers in eight cities around the world, from Paris and Milan to New Delhi and Beijing, will stay open late to offer a special night of shopping jazzed up with celebrity and designer appearances, musical performances and special events. More than 800 stores in New York, from Payless to Louis Vuitton, are participating in the five-borough event, which is being produced through collaboration among the City of New York, its marketing arm NYC & Company, American Vogue and the Council of Fashion Designers of America. While the event is designed to boost sales, deep discounts won't be part of the night's offerings. To help promote the event, advertising is running on city media assets, including outdoor on bus shelters and kiosks and in New York City's 6,500 taxis. A celebrity-studded PSA created by Laird + Partners has been playing in cab monitors, as well as on TV, online and spread virally through social networks such as Facebook and Twitter. <brandweek.com>
-Walmart dwarfs Target in size, yet it loses out to its rival when it comes to consumer discussions online - Target consumers are much more likely to speak about their shopping experience, according to online buzz monitor Crimson Hexagon, while chatter about Walmart often veered into discussion of the social implications of the retailing giant when it comes to labor practices and local retailers. It examined online chatter on blogs, Twitter, social networks and message boards for a one-month period beginning in mid-July. Overall, Target enjoys mostly positive chatter. About 75% of conversations were positive, according to Crimson Hexagon. Walmart, on the other hand, is discussed in a negative light 61% of the time. One in five shopping conversations touched on low prices. <brandweek.com>
INSIDER TRANSACTION ACTIVITY:
SCVL: Timothy Baker, Exec. VP – Store Operations, sold 6,028shs (~$90k) upon exercising the right to purchase 6,028 shares roughly 10% of common holdings.
ZUMZ: Lynn Kilbourne, President & GMM, sold 9,074 ($127k) or roughly 15% of common holdings.
get free cartoon of the day!
Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.