Takeaway: Initial thoughts on the quarter below. We will have a more detailed note out later today.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss further, let us know
Hesham Shaaban, CFA
April GGR finished up 11% owing to a big final 3 days. The placeholder strikes again.
As we wrote about in our Tuesday note, “WE’VE BEEN PLACEHOLDERED”, the last few days of April were likely to be volatile yet strong. While the fundamentals remain solid, the strength in the numbers the past 3 days was probably due in part to an understatement of the prior week’s revenues. That week sure looked like a “placeholder” week to us as reported table revenues totaled the recurring sum of exactly HK$5,425 million.
Daily table revenues for Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of this week averaged an estimated $HK1,210 million, up 34% from the disappointing prior “placeholder” week. We saw this phenomenon occur with the big finish to March and the light last few days of January in addition to numerous other examples from prior years.
So what is the conclusion? Based on sequential trends, our math suggested April should’ve been up 13-14% yet growth fell a little short at 11%. However, we suspect a low hold percentage early in the month may have caused the slight shortfall. All in all, it’s business as usual in Macau despite all the consternation. We’re still expecting a big May that should keep the newfound positive momentum (since Tuesday) going on these stocks. WYNN continues to look the best to us over the near term.
Hosted by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough at 9:00am ET, this special online broadcast offers smart investors and traders of all stripes the sharpest insights and clearest market analysis available on Wall Street.
HOT's negative stock performance relative to MAR should narrow and close over the coming weeks/months.
Call to Action:
We expect HOT’s negative stock performance relative to MAR to narrow and close over the coming weeks/months due to the reactivation of HOT’s share repurchase plan.
Takeaway: This model leaves no room for error. We’re 27% below consensus by Yr3. 2.5/1 down/up. TGT has more to worry about than just the data breach.
Conclusion: We’re short Target. We think that the model that management is selling to the Street leaves no room for error. Everything has to go right, and nothing can go wrong. We’re in the twilight of a department store margin cycle, margins are at peak, our proprietary survey shows that visitation at Target stores is down materially, and worse yet, the share appears to be going to Wal-Mart. We could make a case that target.com is one of the worst e-commerce businesses in retail, and it is certainly not making up for the shortfall in stores. Lastly, Canada expectations are extremely high, and our analysis of demographics around new Canadian stores leaves us with the view that management growth and profitability expectations are a pipe dream. In the end, we’re 27% below the consensus in year 3 of our model – which is a huge delta for this company. We get to downside to the high $40s ($13/14) if we’re right, but about $5/$6 upside if we’re wrong – that’s nearly 2.5 to 1. We’ll take that anyday on a sleepy mega cap retailer like Target.
Earlier this week, we published our 47-page deck on why we think Target is a short. We can’t print all the slides here, but here are five that we think are among the most notable.
1. The Macro Setup is not pretty. We just finished the fifth year of a margin expansion cycle for department stores. When we look back historically, we don’t think that there’s ever been a ‘year 6’. And by a country mile, we’re trading at peak valuations on these margins. The core of the TGT call goes far beyond this, but this is an extremely uninspiring backdrop.
2. Visitation is down. We’re all tired of hearing about the Data Breach. But the reality is that the fallout is extremely notable. We just conducted our third Department Store consumer survey and we can gauge sequential changes in visitation intent on an absolute basis, and relative to other retailers. This shows how TGT went from 13 visits (TTM) in 3Q, to near 14 in 4Q (pre-Breach), to 11 today. That might not seem severe, but that’s 20% by our math.
3. Share is going to Wal-Mart. Not exactly the retailer we’d want to lose share to if we were Target. When WMT takes share, it has a tendency to not give it back. We have a lot of research in our deck that shows how consumers rank them on price, discounts, and product quality. The trends are compelling.
4. Dot.Com can’t save TGT. When other retailers get into trouble with their stores, often e-commerce makes up the difference. Our analysis of target.com’s traffic trends suggest that dot.com is performing just as poorly as the stores – if not worse. Based on our research, we can make a case that Target has one of the worst e-commerce businesses in all of retail.
5. Canada can’t save Target, either. We pulled up the lats and longs for both Canada and US stores, and then analyzed demographics in a 20-minute driving radius. Canada lacks the density and income characteristics around its stores that Target enjoys in the US. That’s not to mention that there is a cannibalization issue given that 11% of target customers already shop in Target US stores. Consensus revenue estimates assume that Target Canada outstrips share of wallet levels Target has in the US. The company’s guidance assumes productivity levels above US levels. We think both are extremely unrealistic.
Call replay can be accessed by clicking the link below:
Replay: CLICK HERE
In the first of three parts of an interview with Chris Ciovacco, the founder of independent money management firm Ciovacco Capital, Keith and Chris discuss the cornerstone to a top investor – the investing process.
In the second of three parts of an interview with Chris Ciovacco, Keith and Chris discuss three market bubbles and their overall effects.
In the third of three parts of an interview with Chris Ciovacco, Keith and Chris discuss how to invest with conviction in an indecisive market.
The total percentage of successful long and short trading signals since the inception of Real-Time Alerts in August of 2008.