SUBSCRIBE TO HEDGEYE.
“Basically, I’m for anything that gets you through the night – be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack.”
Sinatra was a beauty, but he wasn’t a risk manager. And prayer isn’t a risk management process either.
I get it. There’s no need to bring our respective religions into this discussion…
So every time you hear a consensus Old Wall economist tell you to ignore the 0.11% US GDP bomb for Q1 (and that this sucker is going to magically accelerate to 3-4% growth from here), drink.
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
Imagine being me for a second… This morning I’ll be doing Institutional Investor meetings in my 4th state in 4 days (IN, MN, CT, and NY), and I get to hear all of it. I’ll hear about what all of our competitors selling macro research think. I’ll hear how all these sell side economists knew it was “all about the weather” (but they didn’t know the number would be so bad)… and how everything is really ramping (even though the data isn’t) …
On and on and on it goes…
Empathize with me people! I’ll be like the US Dollar (on its YTD lows post Q1 GDP disaster) and get down on my bloody knees and pray for your forgiveness for having my team think for itself. I must repent!
Serious question - should I, like the bond market (yields falling to 2.66% on the 10yr as growth slows), beg thy overlord at The Fed for an un-taper too? Or will that have to wait until the weather stops being the weather in Alabama this morning?
Enough questions already. Time to show you the wood (US GDP data for Q114):
Pardon? (says the ragingly linear economist who missed last year’s US #GrowthAccelerating as both the US Dollar and rates rose too). Pardon the data, I guess – because it’s not cooperating with Keynesian academic dogma!
Before I get into more of the good stuff (data), consider the following relationships that are driving David (Blanchflower) @Dartmouth right batty right now:
Oh, and there’s this other thing going on in US Housing that Janet refuses to address:
Back to the tasty data that is both the US government and Fed’s definition of “inflation”:
So, do the math. If America was using anything in the area code of a real world cost of living proxy (let’s say MIT academic thought is acceptable to a Princeton or Yale economist) US GDP for Q1 of 2014 would have been DOWN over 2%.
But since we’re not going to play a game of gotcha with conflicted and compromised US government data, let’s pretend for a second that it’s the 16th century again and we haven’t learned a damn thing about economic gravity.
Yep, let’s go all Copernicus on the Catholics of Wall Street forecasting, and suggest there is a solar system!
To get real, or nominal, remains the question. And as long as we can monitor all of our proxy baskets for US inflation (food, rents, energy, education, wages, etc.) in real-time, even a Mucker can model this in the 21st century.
But you don’t need to take my or a dead Polish dude’s (Nicholas Copernicus died in 1543) word for it. You can ask Mr. Macro Market:
If you’re going to buy in May, please do more of what you should have been doing since January 1st – be it inflation protection (TIP), food commodities (DBA), or slow-growth-yield-chasers (XLU), it’s all working. If you have been buying Twitter (TWTR) the whole way down on the weather thing, drink.
Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now as follows:
UST 10yr Yield 2.63-2.73%
Natural Gas 4.61-4.85
Best of luck out there today,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
This note was originally published at 8am on April 17, 2014 for Hedgeye subscribers.
“Ambition is the germ from which all growth of nobleness proceeds.”
As an equity investor if you are early on growth in owning a stock, that is usually a very good thing. Parabolic growth can propel a stock to, as they say, “infinity and beyond.” On a macro level the same lesson applies. We’ve obviously been vocal and early on our view of growth slowing this year and the sub-sector performance of the SP500 has reflected that in spades.
On a more micro level, we’ve also been pretty negative on social media stocks, in particular Twitter (TWTR) and Yelp (YELP). Admittedly on Twitter, we were early as we were literally negative from the IPO, but as TWTR’s first earnings report showed us, expectations will eventually meet the gravity of reality.
In adding YELP to our Best Ideas list as a short, our timing has been much better. The key tenets of the short thesis on YELP are that customer attrition is a major issue, which no one is focused on, and also that the addressable market is much smaller than the management team is pitching to investors. The combination of attrition and a smaller market makes us believe that revenue growth will eventually disappoint. (If you’d like to get on the distribution list of Hesham Shabaan, who runs our Internet research team, please email email@example.com.)
Even as we believe that certain social media stocks are getting ahead of themselves, it is hard to deny their ambitious growth. The boot strapping startup stories of the likes of Twitter and Facebook are worthy of admiration. In what direction these business models evolve will be the true test of longevity, but it is hard to deny the potential of a company like Facebook where 1/8 of the planet uses the application and 64% of users visit the site daily.
Another growth area we have been focused on has been electronic cigarettes, or e-Cigs. This has been reflected on our Best Ideas list with a long in Lorillard (LO). For the most part, LO is a boring tobacco stock, but has an underlying growth engine in its e-Cig business, which makes its growth prospects much more exciting. Although, admittedly, it is hard to call this noble growth.
The research on e-cigs naturally led us to also look at the burgeoning medical marijuana market. In states that have recently legalized marijuana it has been a boon to state tax coffers and to the extent that this legalizing expands, it is likely that tobacco companies enter the field. But before we dive into research and start doing calls on the topic, we’d like to get your view.
In our poll of the day that will circulate later today, we will be asking the question: Would you invest in a company that produces medical marijuana? We look forward to your responses and in getting the crowds view on whether medical marijuana is noble growth.
Back to the Global Macro Grind . . .
Heading into the long weekend, many business people and investors will be taking stock of the score in the year-to-date. In the chart of the day, we have attached one of a number of the quant screens that we circulate internally daily that show relative asset class performance.
One interesting chart looks at P/Es for countries versus their 3-year mean. Based on that metric the three most overvalued countries are Mexico, Argentina, and Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, the three most undervalued are Russia, China, and Japan. There is some global macro performance to be found in that group to be sure!
Speaking of performance, it likely has not been a great year for the average long only fund as the SP500 is up a dreary +0.75% (certainly much different than what the Barron’s round table projected to start the year) and the hedge fund industry hasn’t fared much better. According to data from Preqin, the average hedge fund returned 1.23% in Q1, which is the worst start since 2008.
Interestingly, the one strategy that has worked well is activist investing. According to the same data, activist funds on average were up 3.3% in Q1. We have also been very vocal on one major activist name, the restaurant behemoth Darden (DRI). And this may fall in the category of growth that isn’t noble as well, but you should expect to see more activist ideas come from us as the year continues.
As we noted earlier, based on a comparison to the 3-year mean in forward P/E, Japanese equities are screening as cheap. The question that arises is whether Japan is cheap for a reason. Certainly, one potential negative catalyst for Japan is the VAT tax. March department store sales were up an astonishing 25.4% year-over-year in March ahead of the VAT tax that was implemented on April 1st.
Meanwhile, despite buying a lot, the confidence of consumers in Japan actually declined in March. According to the Japanese consumer confidence index, confidence declined to 37.5 in March from 38.5 in February. Clearly not an earth shattering breakdown in confidence, but likely a leading indicator of future declines now that the VAT tax is in place.
Clearly, the Japanese policy makers are going to have some interesting decisions to make in coming months and most of them are unlikely to bode well for the Yen. Japanese leadership may be wise to consider the words of Nascar legend Dale Earnhardt:
“You win some, lose some, and wreck some”
Ultimately, Japanese policy makers will have to decide whether growth by devaluation is truly noble growth.
Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now:
Nat Gas 4.49-4.72
Keep your head up and stick on the ice,
Daryl G. Jones
Director of Research
Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.
TODAY’S S&P 500 SET-UP – May 1, 2014
As we look at today's setup for the S&P 500, the range is 28 points or 1.27% downside to 1860 and 0.21% upside to 1888.
CREDIT/ECONOMIC MARKET LOOK:
MACRO DATA POINTS (Bloomberg Estimates):
WHAT TO WATCH:
COMMODITY/GROWTH EXPECTATION (HEADLINES FROM BLOOMBERG)
The Hedgeye Macro Team
Borgata disappointing (in part to 1x online startup expenses) but overall at the top of guidance. 2014 guidance looks in line. Upcoming catalysts include big refi, Borgata property tax resolution (likely favorable and material), and less bad regional gaming revs.
Las Vegas Locals
Downtown Las Vegas
On Line Gaming
Q2 EBITDA Outlook
Full Year Outlook
Q & A
Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.