[UNLOCKED] Early Look: Sloppy Guesswork

Editor's Note: Below is a complimentary Early Look written by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough on 5/4/16. In it, McCullough discusses our process, Wall Street's poor economic forecasting track record, and why our GDP model has been spot on over the last 5 quarters. McCullough also nails the April "jobs bomb" ahead of the BLS's monthly jobs report that Friday. Click here to get the Early Look delivered in your inbox weekday mornings.

 

*  *  *  *

 

“Isn’t it time for such sloppy guesswork drawing to a close?”

-Phil Tetlock

 

Yesterday was a good day. The Long Bond was up big and I spent the day meeting with some of the largest hedge funds in my home state of Connecticut. I absolutely loved the debates.

 

The aforementioned quote (from a great book I’m reviewing called Superforecasting) really nails a common thread we hear from the sharpest institutional investors in the world when it comes to The Establishment’s US GDP forecasting process.

 

In one meeting in particular, the PM (who oversees an entire office of hedge fund PMs) read an excerpt from a sell-side note that said “GDP feels like it’s going to be 2.5% in Q2.” A feel? Really? I don’t feel anything in our predictive tracking algo, but we’re at 0.3%.

 

[UNLOCKED] Early Look: Sloppy Guesswork - GDP cartoon 05.29.2015

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

Let me take that back. I do feel something. I feel really good when A) our GDP forecast is a long way from Old Wall consensus and B) consensus positioning in the SP500 (Index +E-mini futures/options contracts) is leaning as long as it has been for all of 2016.

 

Oh you bombastic Hedgeye boy, you.

 

Yep. I’m proud of both my people and process. We’ve actually been, on average, within 20-30 basis points of getting the US GDP number right for the last 5 quarters (the historical standard error in our model is 35 basis points).

 

The main reason why we’ve been so much more accurate than any other research department on accurately forecasting one of the most important factors in any economic model (growth) is that, instead of “feeling” it, we use modern-math and machines.

 

“After all, we live in an era of dazzlingly powerful computers, incomprehensible algorithms, and Big Data… isn’t it time for such sloppy guesswork drawing to a close? … The point is that if you have a well-validated statistical algorithm, use it.”

-Phil Tetlock, Superforecasting (pg 20-21)

 

While I am sure our forecasting #process will continue to evolve alongside technology and time, for now I probably sound overly confident that what we do crushes what they keep doing. With statements like this, how do you feel about it?

 

  1. “A rate hike could be appropriate, if the data is as expected.” –John Williams (San Francisco Fed Head, yesterday)
  2. The economy is offering mixed signals, but favors unemployment data.” –Dennis Lockhart (Atlanta Fed, yesterday)

 

Given that a recently reported GDP of 0.5% isn’t in the area code of “as expected”, I don’t think Williams has a lot of credibility as a Wall St. forecaster. But Lockhart’s Atlanta Fed actually has a “GDP Now” tracking model (that has recently had an intra-quarter standard error of 200-250 basis points!) that is NOT mixed. It’s flat out bad. So he’s “favoring” non-GDP data.

 

I know. I know. You’re probably saying to yourself that the Fed is obviously dovish now (US Dollar at a 16-month low, post Janet Yellen’s recent rate-cutting-of-the-hikes), so this banter from Williams, Lockhart, Bullard, etc. is just popycock and posturing.

 

I don’t disagree with that. Neither would most people I meet with.

 

In modern forecasting, we deal with everything in rate of change terms and then probability-weight surprises vs. expectations.

 

As the rate of change in the economic, profit, and credit cycle continues to slow, the probability continues to rise that the Fed’s latest of #LateCycle indicators (Employment) starts slowing at a faster pace.

 

In other words, you’re one NFP (non-farm payroll) jobs bomb away from both Trump and Sanders sounding really right on the economy.

 

I’m sure we have absolutely nothing to worry about if Trump or Sanders becomes President of the United States. But last night’s voting machine in Indiana reveals that it’s more than just Hedgeye (and the Bond Market) that gets what’s really going on in the US economy.

 

Instead of those who were “feeling” US GDP was going to be 3-4% with “falling gas prices” (last year), now they have to spin that into rising gas prices are good for US Consumer Confidence as both the conference board and Univ. of Michigan report hit new YTD lows.

 

It’s either sloppy guesswork or just the conflict of interest ridden cabal of The Establishment consensus doing what they think they have to do before it becomes obvious to The People right before The Election.

 

Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now:

 

UST 10yr Yield 1.72-1.87%

SPX 2053-2083
RUT 1101-1140

NASDAQ 4711-4844

VIX 14.26-17.83
USD 92.35-94.50

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

[UNLOCKED] Early Look: Sloppy Guesswork - 05.04.16 chart


Neurofinance: The Psychology Behind When To Sell A Bull Market

"Most momentum investors stay invested too long, under-reacting and holding tight after truly bad news finally arrives to break the trend," writes MarketPsych's Richard Peterson.

read more

Energy Stocks: Time to Buy the Dip? | $XLE

What the heck is happening in the Energy sector (XLE)? Energy stocks have trailed the S&P 500 by a whopping 15% in 2017. Before you buy the dip, here's what you need to know.

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Hard-Headed Bears

How's this for "hard data"? So far, 107 of 497 S&P 500 companies have reported aggregate sales and earnings growth of 4.4% and 13.2% respectively.

read more

Premium insight

McCullough [Uncensored]: When People Say ‘Everyone is Bullish, That’s Bulls@#t’

“You wonder why the performance of the hedge fund indices is so horrendous,” says Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough, “they’re all doing the same thing, after the market moves. You shouldn’t be paid for that.”

read more

SECTOR SPOTLIGHT Replay | Healthcare Analyst Tom Tobin Today at 2:30PM ET

Tune in to this edition of Sector Spotlight with Healthcare analyst Tom Tobin and Healthcare Policy analyst Emily Evans.

read more

Ouchy!! Wall Street Consensus Hit By Epic Short Squeeze

In the latest example of what not to do with your portfolio, we have Wall Street consensus positioning...

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Bulls Leading the People

Investors rejoiced as centrist Emmanuel Macron edged out far-right Marine Le Pen in France's election day voting. European equities were up as much as 4.7% on the news.

read more

McCullough: ‘This Crazy Stat Drives Stock Market Bears Nuts’

If you’re short the stock market today, and your boss asks why is the Nasdaq at an all-time high, here’s the only honest answer: So far, Nasdaq company earnings are up 46% year-over-year.

read more

Who's Right? The Stock Market or the Bond Market?

"As I see it, bonds look like they have further to fall, while stocks look tenuous at these levels," writes Peter Atwater, founder of Financial Insyghts.

read more

Poll of the Day: If You Could Have Lunch with One Fed Chair...

What do you think? Cast your vote. Let us know.

read more

Are Millennials Actually Lazy, Narcissists? An Interview with Neil Howe (Part 2)

An interview with Neil Howe on why Boomers and Xers get it all wrong.

read more

6 Charts: The French Election, Nasdaq All-Time Highs & An Earnings Scorecard

We've been telling investors for some time that global growth is picking up, get long stocks.

read more