Christman: The Real Reason Russian Fighter Jets Flew Dangerously Close To USS Donald Cook

Takeaway: Expect more Russian "Top Gun" behavior in the months ahead.

Editor's Note: Below is a complimentary research note written by Hedgeye colleague and Potomac Research Group National Security analyst LTG Dan Christman USA Ret. In the note, Christman analyzes "what was largely overlooked" in the media's coverage of Russian fighter jets' "Tom Cruise-like antics" while recently flying "dangerously close" to a U.S. destroyer in the Baltic Sea.

 

Click below to watch the footage.

 

Russian fighter-jet antics over the last 10 days -- buzzing dangerously close to an Aegis-class US destroyer and barrel-rolling over an American high-tech reconnaissance aircraft -- begs the question, "Why?"

 

Ian Bremmer of the Eurasia Group wrote shortly after the events that, discounting the muscle flexing, the intent was principally intelligence gathering: the U.S. destroyer Donald Cook had recently received an upgrade to add the highly sophisticated "Aegis" phased-array radar suite, which has anti-ballistic missile as well as anti-air and anti-cruise missile capability. The Russians were hoping the destroyer would turn on at least part of its defensive radar package, to allow Russian electronic intercepts. That probably occurred, at least with some of the Cook's radars, given the flight profile of the Russian jets.

 

What was largely overlooked in the media's emphasis on the Tom Cruise-like antics of the Russia fighter jets, however, was the slow-flying Russian helicopter which loitered near the ship, undoubtedly taking high-resolution pictures of the Aegis weapon system for later intelligence evaluation

 

None of this is particularly new in terms of muscle flexing and intelligence gathering, "Soviet-style;" actions like these were very common through the '80's, despite the signing in 1972 of the U.S.-USSR "Incidents at Sea" agreement.   

 

In this case, Vladimir Putin's finger prints are obvious; the Russia leader has yet to meet a security cooperation agreement with the West that he likes. With his economy continuing to contract in 2016 as Russian banks close by the dozens, Putin has every incentive to provoke an incident with the U.S. It's to the credit of the Donald Cook's crew that they didn't take the bait. 

 

But there is more than intelligence gathering at play. The eastern reaches of the Baltic Sea and the Baltic states themselves, for Soviet-era apologists like Putin, are Russia's back yard. They have never accepted Baltic state independence, and the incorporation of the three Baltic countries into NATO's Article V guarantees grates especially. In this light, the "muscle flexing" that really matters is geo-strategic. 

 

For well over a year, robust Russian ground exercises, submarine activity, and aerial overflights in the Baltic region have alarmed NATO's military; SACEUR General Breedlove has been especially vocal in calling for a U.S. and NATO response. The Donald Cook's steaming by Kaliningrad is part of a long-delayed US reaction to the Russian year-long push in the north; the Russians last week told us what they thought of that.  

 

But there is an additional twist: NATO must decide shortly, in advance of its July summit in Warsaw, whether to follow a U.S. and Breedlove lead to plus-up its ground forces with heavy armor and then continuously rotate these into northern Poland and the Baltics. It's no surprise that opinion is sharply split within NATO on the wisdom of doing this; it's also no surprise that the Russian information campaign is working overtime to deepen these divisions. 

 

The Tom Cruise-like antics last week should hence also be viewed as part of this larger strategic game: a none-too-subtle reminder by Moscow to NATO, and to NATO members opposing a ground force plus-up especially, what could happen if force enhancements proceed; all this in a part of Europe where Russia insists on exercising strategic influence.

 

Bottom line: expect more Russian "Top Gun" behavior in the months ahead. And hope that the U.S. exercises leadership to maintain the NATO alliance unity that Putin is determined to undermine.


Neurofinance: The Psychology Behind When To Sell A Bull Market

"Most momentum investors stay invested too long, under-reacting and holding tight after truly bad news finally arrives to break the trend," writes MarketPsych's Richard Peterson.

read more

Energy Stocks: Time to Buy the Dip? | $XLE

What the heck is happening in the Energy sector (XLE)? Energy stocks have trailed the S&P 500 by a whopping 15% in 2017. Before you buy the dip, here's what you need to know.

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Hard-Headed Bears

How's this for "hard data"? So far, 107 of 497 S&P 500 companies have reported aggregate sales and earnings growth of 4.4% and 13.2% respectively.

read more

Premium insight

McCullough [Uncensored]: When People Say ‘Everyone is Bullish, That’s Bulls@#t’

“You wonder why the performance of the hedge fund indices is so horrendous,” says Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough, “they’re all doing the same thing, after the market moves. You shouldn’t be paid for that.”

read more

SECTOR SPOTLIGHT Replay | Healthcare Analyst Tom Tobin Today at 2:30PM ET

Tune in to this edition of Sector Spotlight with Healthcare analyst Tom Tobin and Healthcare Policy analyst Emily Evans.

read more

Ouchy!! Wall Street Consensus Hit By Epic Short Squeeze

In the latest example of what not to do with your portfolio, we have Wall Street consensus positioning...

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Bulls Leading the People

Investors rejoiced as centrist Emmanuel Macron edged out far-right Marine Le Pen in France's election day voting. European equities were up as much as 4.7% on the news.

read more

McCullough: ‘This Crazy Stat Drives Stock Market Bears Nuts’

If you’re short the stock market today, and your boss asks why is the Nasdaq at an all-time high, here’s the only honest answer: So far, Nasdaq company earnings are up 46% year-over-year.

read more

Who's Right? The Stock Market or the Bond Market?

"As I see it, bonds look like they have further to fall, while stocks look tenuous at these levels," writes Peter Atwater, founder of Financial Insyghts.

read more

Poll of the Day: If You Could Have Lunch with One Fed Chair...

What do you think? Cast your vote. Let us know.

read more

Are Millennials Actually Lazy, Narcissists? An Interview with Neil Howe (Part 2)

An interview with Neil Howe on why Boomers and Xers get it all wrong.

read more

6 Charts: The French Election, Nasdaq All-Time Highs & An Earnings Scorecard

We've been telling investors for some time that global growth is picking up, get long stocks.

read more