prev

KATE: The Baby vs. Bathwater

Takeaway: KATE is being thrown out with bathwater it wasn’t even bathed in. We’re fighting an uphill sentiment battle, but it’s one worth fighting.

Conclusion. We’re all-in on KATE at current levels. All along, we’ve pointed to a $70-$80 value. The stock is off 26% over the past month, due to sentiment concerns around 'the space' (KORS is off 27%), but our fundamental outlook has not changed one bit. The business remains very strong, we think that comps are accelerating into the double digits in 2Q, and we think that KATE’s margin guidance for this year will prove conservative. Ultimately we think that numbers this year are 15% too low – a delta that widens to 35% next year, and to 50%+ by 2018 when we think KATE has $3.00 in earnings power. Using decelerating multiples as growth accelerates and the P&L matures gets us 55% upside in a year and a 2-3-bagger by 2018. If we see the typical 'peak multiple on peak earnings' that retail knows so well, then a $100+ stock by year 3 is not out of the question.

 

To put this stock move in context, KORS – due to its recent implosion – is down 27% for the past month. While we think KORS is beyond cheap and has meaningful downside support here, the fact of the matter is that whether you’re bullish or bearish on KORS – the stock move can at least be explained away by the headlines. But with KATE – that’s simply not the case. As a sidenote, we turned positive on KORS on this week's implosion, but that was not a typical call for us. We think that KATE offers far better upside, has greater margin of error, and is a much more defendable growth story, by far.

 

Quick Sentiment Check

Our strong sense on the sentiment is that if you were concerned about ‘the handbag space’ (a definition that we still think is ridiculous) and wanted to short it, you had the following options…

a)      2012-14: There was pretty much one name you had for the past 3-years – Coach. The brand was beyond full market saturation, and had 30% margins that had nowhere to go but down without significant risk to the top line. But that name largely became tough to short by the fall of 2014, after it dropped by 55% at the same time the market went up by 45% (yes, 100% relative underperformance).

b)      2014-2015: About the same time Coach stopped going down, KORS became the go-to name to short. It has a fully penetrated business in the US, and Coach-like margins of 29%. Since that time (roughly a year ago) the stock traded off by 50% and underperformed the market by 60%. Then – even before this week’s blow up – the general sense we got from the investment community was that it was getting tougher to short.

c)       2015: With Coach and Kors serving as the poster twins for saturation and underperformance, people naturally look add a triplet to the group. The only other public company in this ‘space’ is KATE, which admittedly looks wildly expensive on current year earnings. As such – for better or worse -- it has turned into the go-to ‘high multiple in a troubled space’ short and source of funds in retail. The unfavorable tape might help the short case for the time being, but the supporting fundamental premises simply make no sense. Here are some considerations…

 

Why KATE ≠ KORS ≠ COH

Let’s get COH out of the way. This company is good at one thing. Creating handbags for one consumer – a 30-60 (really 40-60) year-old US consumer that shops in department stores and outlet malls. That’s all, nothing else. It has 13% share of the US handbag market. No apparel, no meaningful accessories, little presence with men (manpurses are rarely a good investment hook anyway) and consistent failure in bridging to an International audience. This coach is being drawn by a one-trick pony.

 

KORS is a different animal. KORS has an $8bn retail footprint versus COH at $5.2bn despite having 300bp lower share of the handbag market than COH (10% share vs COH at 13%). That’s due to its presence in accessories, men, and overseas (it has nearly a $1bn business alone in Europe, and that should at least double from here). Given its diversity, we’d argue that KORS has more in common with a brand like Ralph Lauren than COH. The only thing the two have in common is an EBIT margin that recently peaked at 30%, and is now trending in the high 20s.

 

KATE is also a different animal (but much smaller, and not on the endangered species list). Did anyone ever consider that one of the reasons why the incumbents are stalling out is because KATE spade is eating their lunch? Think about it this way… COH is at 13% share, KORS is 10%, and KATE is less than 3%. KATE’s (annual) brand footprint is sitting just under $1.5bn – that’s 25% less than KORS ($8bn) generates in a single quarter. Kate is even 20% smaller than Tory Burch, which isn’t (yet) public. Like KORS, KATE sells in multiple categories, with handbags accounting for about 60% of sales, apparel at 15%, footwear at 10%, accessories/other at 15%. The company also has several licenses kicking in this year, including watches (Fossil) that should boost its high-margin accessories business. KATE, unlike COH, has been accepted by consumers in Europe and across Asia – which remains a key part of the growth story.

 

KATE: The Baby vs. Bathwater - footorint

 

 

Aside from licenses, which will help KATE meaningfully effective 2H, don’t underestimate the importance of the maturation curve for its stores. So many people think that KATE’s store base is as old as the brand is. Not so. The brand hit the mainstream over a decade ago, but it really did not start to grow at retail in earnest until about 3-years ago. That’s pretty critical from where we sit because from a profitability standpoint, these stores tend to hit their stride in years 3-4. Looked at a different way, 80% of KATE’s stores are 4-years old or younger, and a whopping 44% are less than 2 years old. This is seriously bullish for the company’s margin equation.

 

KATE: The Baby vs. Bathwater - mature

 

 

The point here is that KATE is absolutely NOT either of its perceived competitors. Financially, the closest comp is probably Tory Burch. The same reason why Tory will likely go public is that same reason why KATE should be bought today – it is just hitting its stride on the top line, which will accrue disproportionately to margins.

 

Let’s be clear about something, our estimate of $3.00 in EPS in 2018 is NOT assuming KORS or COH-like margins. It’s fair to say that both of those companies have shown us the perils of over-earning in this (or any) segment of retail. We’re simply assuming that margins at KATE get to 19% -- a good healthy level that should allow the company to continually invest to drive top line growth.

 

So What’s It Worth?

Today, 41x earnings and 15x EBITDA might seem very aggressive. But consider the earnings ramp. We’re looking at a CAGR over the next three years of about 70% for both earnings and cash flow. If we hold the cash flow multiple at 15x for the next year, which we think is fair as margins head higher and KATE catches estimate revisions and upgrades, then we’re looking at a $38 stock, or a 55% return in 12 months. Then we’ll reduce the multiple by 2 points per year, as the brand gets more mature, which gets us to $50 and then $65 in year 2 and 3 (vs $25 today). All that said, we’ve almost never seen a smooth multiple transition like that in retail. A typical pattern would be a higher/peak multiple on accelerating cash flow. That’s when we start pushing a $100 stock. That’s not our call today, but it’s not out of the realm of possibility.

 

KATE: The Baby vs. Bathwater - kate fin

 

Flash Sales:

  • On the flash sale front (meaningful bc the company is trying to wean off of them, but the absence negatively impacts comps), the company ran 2 flash sales and one semi-annual sales event during 2Q14. 2Q15 to date, KATE has run one Friends and Family event (that fell in 1Q14 last year due to the late April Easter in 2014) and one flash sale. The company already indicated that it would repeat the semi-annual event at the tail end of the quarter, so there is a chance we see the elimination of one Flash Sale during the quarter. That should be more than offset by the addition of Friends in Family in the quarter.

 

e-commerce

  • Trends here matter a lot for KATE. Consider this…KORS generates 5% of its revenue online. Coach is sitting at 11%. KATE is just north of 20% -- one of the highest ratios out there for any retailer. #healthy balance
  • When we look at recent trends for each of the brands in question (the charts measure each brand versus a year ago), KATE’s numbers are unquestionably higher than KORS and COH.  The growth is lower than we saw earlier this year – but that is expected given reduced promotional activity. Overall, the trends look very healthy to us.

KATE: The Baby vs. Bathwater - reach

 

Margins:

  • On the Gross Margin line, Kate Spade Saturday alone accounted for 240bps of the 315bps of dilution on the Gross Margin line (about $6.5mm) in 2Q14. The company hasn’t addressed this benefit in its guidance, either for the fiscal year or the upcoming quarter and it is not reflected in current consensus numbers. For the quarter we assume that the company gets back 200bps of the dilution which is offset by Fx pressure and the shift of the Friends and family sale into the quarter.
  • We’re modeling 250bps of SG&A deleverage as the company continues to leverage sales growth on the fixed G&A costs and international profitability improves. 


This Market Move Hasn’t Happened In 27 Years

Takeaway: The Gong Show in Tokyo rages on as Currency Wars continue.

Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from Hedgeye morning research. Click here for more information on how you can become a subscriber.

This Market Move Hasn’t Happened In 27 Years - Nikkei cartoon 05.27.2015

 

Ahh… the smell of Japan’s currency on fire - $123.89 vs USD.

 

You guessed it. Another down day for the Yen to fresh, year-to-date lows. The Nikkei’s ramp on that move remains epic. Get this:  Japanese stocks are up for the 10th day in a row. (For all you home-gamers out there, that hasn’t happened in 27 years.)

 

This Market Move Hasn’t Happened In 27 Years - z ben japanese

 

The Nikkei is up over +18% year-to-date versus around 3% for the S&P 500.


Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG

Takeaway: Rolling SA claims rose for the first time in 5 weeks. However, at 272k they remain in healthy territory.

Below is the breakdown of this morning's initial claims data from Joshua Steiner and the Hedgeye Financials team. If you would like to setup a call with Josh or Jonathan or trial their research, please contact 

 

OFF THE LOWS:  After hitting a 15-year low of 262k in the week ending April 25th, the weekly SA claims figures have seen some upward movement in the last few weeks, coming in at 282k in the most recent period. Given that upward movement, the 4-week rolling SA figure posted its first increase in 5 weeks this week, rising from 267k to 272k WoW. Nevertheless, this week's print, still well below the 300k Rubicon, continues to represent strength in the labor market.

 

In the chart below, indexed claims in energy heavy states rose more than the country as a whole in the week ending May 16th. The spread between the two series increased from 21 to 23.

 

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims18 normal  3

 

The Data

Prior to revision, initial jobless claims rose 8k to 282k from 274k WoW, as the prior week's number was revised up by 1k to 275k.

 

The headline (unrevised) number shows claims were higher by 7k WoW. Meanwhile, the 4-week rolling average of seasonally-adjusted claims rose 5k WoW to 271.5k.

 

The 4-week rolling average of NSA claims, another way of evaluating the data, was -13.2% lower YoY, which is a sequential deterioration versus the previous week's YoY change of -16.4%

 

 INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims2 normal  2

 

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims3 normal  2

 

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims4 normal  2

 

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims5 normal  2

 

INITIAL CLAIMS | RISING BUT STILL STRONG - Claims6 normal  3

 

 

Joshua Steiner, CFA

 

Jonathan Casteleyn, CFA, CMT



McCullough: This Is The Biggest Threat to the Stock Market

 

In this brief excerpt from today's edition of The Macro Show, Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough answers a subscriber’s question about current risks to the U.S. equity market.

 

Subscribe to The Macro Show today for access to this and all other episodes. 

 


Retail Callouts (5/28): NKE, UA, ANF, KATE, DG, AMZN

Takeaway: NKE - FIFA Allegations could accrue to UA. ANF has another muddy print, we're still on the sidelines.

NKE/UA - FIFA Allegations Could Disproportionately Accrue To UnderArmour

(http://www.wsj.com/articles/nike-cooperating-with-authorities-on-fifa-allegations-1432752855)

 

If you haven't heard, seven FIFA officials were arrested in Switzerland yesterday as part of a global bribery scheme centered around illegal cash payments and marketing/broadcasting rights. Nike appears to be caught in the fray, identified in the indictment as 'Sportswear Company A'. For starters the relationship with the Traffic Group (NKE paid the company $30mm from 1996-99) looks questionable. The owner and founder plead guilty to racketeering and money laundering charges late last year and forfeited about $150mm. The way the scheme worked, Traffic would acquire marketing rights for large soccer events and then auction them off the broadcasting and marketing rights to the highest bidder (or best connected bidder). The fact that the relationship with Traffic kicked off just days after Nike signed a deal with the Brazilian Soccer Federation adds a little fuel to the speculation fire.

 

We actually view this to be not entirely dissimilar to the zoning/real estate bribery scandal Wal-Mart battled in Mexico and the fraud Reebok 'allegedly' committed in India. We'd never in a million years say that this is 'part of doing business' overseas for any multinational. But it absolutely underscores the risk management procedures that are necessary once companies move beyond US borders.

 

As it relates to any financial impact, we're not too worried about Nike's exposure. We're more concerned about changes in regulation around FIFA and other leagues that deal with product and broadcasting licenses. In Nike's case, regulation is bad. It has a clear financial edge over any other sportswear company anywhere in the world, which is a major asset in a deregulated licensing environment.  But if the field of play is more standardized, then we'd argue that it could accrue disproportionately to smaller brands like UnderArmour.

 

 

ANF: Another Muddy Print -- We're Still On The Sidelines

A few highlights: a) Comp improvement vs prior two quarters, despite lower promotional activity. b) Comp trends have improved in May. c) US AUR stabilizing, International AUR is down intentionally to driving better conversion. d) International DTC saw healthy growth, US DTC negative yoy (that's still a big red flag for us). e) AUC improving -- down MSD in Q1. f) Guidance: sequential comparable sales improvement into the second quarter and the second half of the fiscal year, in-line with prior guidance. Gross margin rate to be flat to slightly up, same as prior guidance. Op expenses down 40mm, guided roughly flat before.

 

As it relates to the stock, we have a hard time getting an edge on this one. We get the story around management, cost cuts, store rationalization, a more activist board, etc… But where we come up short is that when all is said and done, we'd still be left owning the Abercrombie brands, which are simply not relevant to what used to be the core teen consumer anymore.

Retail Callouts (5/28): NKE, UA, ANF, KATE, DG, AMZN - 5 28 chart1

 

OTHER NEWS

 

KATE - Kate Spade New York looks to personalize online fit with True Fit

(http://www.chainstoreage.com/article/kate-spade-new-york-looks-personalize-online-fit-true-fit)

 

DG - Dollar General Board Names Todd J. Vasos as CEO

(http://investor.shareholder.com/dollar/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=915291)

 

AMZN - Amazon plans to hire at least 6,000 new workers

(http://www.retailingtoday.com/article/amazon-plans-hire-least-6000-new-workers)

 

HBC - Hudson’s Bay Intensifies Quest for Germany’s Kaufhof Chain

(http://wwd.com/retail-news/department-stores/hudsons-bay-kaufhof-store-chain-germany-10136066/)

 

RL - Ralph Lauren Joins the New York Fashion Week: Men’s Schedule

(http://wwd.com/menswear-news/designer-luxury/ralph-lauren-new-york-fashion-week-mens-schedule-10136387/)

 

COLM - Columbia Sportswear Announces Four Key Leadership Promotions

(http://www.sportsonesource.com/news/article_home.asp?Prod=1&section=1&id=56158)


Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

next