prev

Ferocious Determination

“… self assured, guided by his own ferocious determination.”

-Doris Kearns Goodwin

 

No matter what your views are on how this epic market move ends, you have to find it within yourself to find a way to win. This has nothing to do with what you’d like your former free-markets to be; it has everything to do with risk managing what they have become.

 

The aforementioned quote is one that defined President Teddy Roosevelt’s character at a very young age. “Teedie (his nickname) held a distinct place among his siblings; the asthma that had weakened his body seemed to have inordinately sharpened his mind and sensibilities… he was always reading or writing with a most unusual power of concentration.” (The Bully Pulpit, pg 37)

 

So, in the spirit of what America’s “Strenuous Life” used to stand for, sharpen your mind this morning. Challenge yourself to learn. Evolve your investment process. And, above all else, tone down your emotional market response to whatever you may or may not have missed.

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

Are you ferociously determined to beat beta? I am. And I’m not going to apologize for that. Why else would you wake up to play this game every morning unless you wanted to win?

 

After 382 points of price appreciation, the SP500 clocked yet another all-time closing high yesterday of 1808. That’s a +26.8% gain for 2013 YTD. And once again, it came on a no-taper (in December) market expectation day.

 

Whether you or I think the Fed should have tapered in September doesn’t actually matter at this stage of the game. Been there, argued about that. What matters is what decisions you make next.

 

Risk is always changing. Up until September 18th, Mr. Macro Market scored growth as the most relevant stock market risk (to the upside). Sure, some people were bullish – but consensus wasn’t positioned bullish. Here’s what worked from JAN-SEP:

  1. #StrongDollar
  2. #RatesRising (Gold and Bonds weren’t working)
  3. #GrowthAccelerating (as an Equity Style Factor)

Then, post the Fed’s unaccountable decision not to taper (as Q313 US Growth was tracking +3.6%), from mid-SEP to mid-OCT:

  1. Down Dollar
  2. Rates Falling
  3. #GrowthSlowing outperformed growth  

Then, in November, growth as an Equity Style Factor started to recover again:

  1. Rates Rose
  2. Gold fell
  3. But the US Dollar remained no bid (in spite of an ECB rate cut!)

Now, look at what we have – the return of our old un-elected friend: @FederalReserve’s Policy To Inflate:

  1. Down Dollar (for 5 straight weeks)
  2. CRB Commodities Index inflation (and Gold) arrested their YTD lows
  3. Oil prices and inflation oriented equities inflating again

Instead of debating this, look at the trivial matter that is Correlation Risk between the US Dollar and everything else (using a 6 week duration – these are inverse correlations; i.e. Down Dollar = Up X):

  1. SP500 vs USD = -0.63
  2. Brent Oil vs USD = -0.66
  3. CRB Commodities Index vs USD = -0.73
  4. Nasdaq vs USD = -0.79
  5. Natural Gas = -0.85

#Cool, eh?

 

For whom? The small percentage of us in America who understands it? Or to those who are the recipient of inflated prices at the pump and accelerating costs to heat their homes during today’s CT snowstorm?

 

Yes We Can, baby. We can re-flate Bernanke’s Bubble in commodity prices. Why not? Who cares if it slows everything that we haven’t had during this entire monetary policy experiment (sustained real-consumption growth). It’s time to buy some coal!

 

To be clear, this will end in tears. But, in the meantime, I will trade this market’s all-time highs with ferocious determination. Yes, that means that on pullbacks I will buy-the-damn-bubble #BTDB.  Then I’ll sell on green too. Keep moving out there; risk does.

 

Our immediate-term Risk Ranges are now:

 

10yr UST Yield 2.80-2.91%

SPX 1

USD 80.03-80.55

Brent 109.07-111.19

NatGas 4.04-4.26

Gold 1

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

Ferocious Determination - Chart of the Day

 

Ferocious Determination - Virtual Portfolio


New Ideas

This note was originally published at 8am on November 26, 2013 for Hedgeye subscribers.

“Should we care about how new ideas begin?”

-Jon Gertner

 

That’s a very basic question Jon Gertner asks at the beginning of a book I’ve been grinding through as of late – The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation.

 

The story of innovation at Bell Labs is better than the book. It’s a uniquely American story that most entrepreneurs, innovators, and patriots can associate with. It’s all about the struggle, the wins, and the losses. The boys at Bell Labs (yes, they were all boys) shared a culture of learning and evolution. They weren’t afraid to make mistakes.

 

There was a little bit of everyone in their ranks. “Kelly, Fisk, Shockley, Shannon, Pierce, and Baker. Some of these names are notorious – Shockley won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1956… in Shannon’s case, it was mathematics and artificial intelligence, while remaining largely unknown by the public…” (Gertner). A multi-factor approach perpetuated their growth.

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

We’re trying to build that culture of learning both internally (working as a team) and externally (collaborating with clients). We don’t have any Nobel laureates on staff, but we do allow the lowest level IQs (hockey players like me) to contribute.

 

Do we care how new ideas begin? Nope. Not at all. Mr. Macro Market decides that for us. Our research process is grounded in the uncertainty of it all. That’s what makes it so exciting. We are humble observers of time and space.

 

This, as I pointed out earlier, isn’t a new style of thinking. Per Gertner, to a degree Thomas Edison made it cool at Bell Labs too. On ideas, “…how they worked was to Edison less important… he read compulsively… he scorned talk about scientific theory…” (pg 12). Imagine Edison had to deal with Keynesian “economists”!

 

Moving along…

 

A few weeks ago (November 14th) I wrote an Early Look titled “A New Idea”, so I’m going to go back to milking that cow this morning (plural title) with my “everyone’s a winner” position at Mr. Macro Market’s centrally-infected casino.

 

To review, I have my market bets spread across the macro table:

 

1. CASH = 44% (need lots of cash in case this sucker implodes)

2. FX = 24% (lots of alpha to be generated on the other side of the USA Burning The Buck)

3. INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES = 8% (some of these markets love Down Dollar)

4. US EQUITIES = 8% (the variance of US Sector Returns is testing all-time lows)

5. COMMODITIES = 8% (we’re still rolling the bones on Gold)

6. FIXED INCOME = 8% (no-taper in DEC is a big Bond Bull Lobby @PIMCO wants)

 

Crazy Eights!

 

And, again… to be clear, I realize that in some cases I am buying-the-damn-bubble #BTDB (both former ones like Gold and Bonds, and news ones like US stocks) here. But what do I care about the “why” on these new ideas anyway?

 

The #OldWall idea of trying to call tops has rendered itself useless. They are processes, not points.

 

Looking at the all-time-bubble-highs in US stocks, what is signaling caution?

 

1. VOLUME – vs its TREND, US Equity volumes have tracked down -11% and -14%, respectively, at the last 2 closing highs

2. VOLATILITY - front month VIX has been making higher-lows as SPX tracks higher-highs on falling volume

3. BREADTH – at the closing high (Russell2000 = 1124) yesterday’s breadth was negative (more decliners than gainers)

 

Does that mean we can all jump up and down @Hedgeye headquarters today and call “the top”? Nope. It means what it means. With “it” usually meaning something new.

 

On the other side of the caution signs, there are plenty green lights:

 

1. EQUITY FLOWS – US Equity fund INFLOWS are trending at fresh YTD highs

2. BOND FLOWS – US Bond Fund OUTFLOWS are trending at fresh YTD highs

3. TRADE and TREND SIGNALS – for SPX, RUT and NASDAQ remain bullish

 

So what matters more, internal market signals or external flows? I don’t know, yet. But I am certain that Mr. Macro Market will decide, and not me. That’s not a new idea either.

 

Neither is buying on red and selling on green. So in between now and whenever whatever this is ends, within our immediate-term risk ranges for stocks, bonds, commodities, and currencies, we’ll just keep doing more of that. Keep moving out there.

 

Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now as follows:

 

UST 10yr Yield 2.69-2.81%

SPX 1792-1809

VIX 11.85-13.62

USD 80.61-81.29

Brent 108.81-111.63

Gold 1226-1288

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

New Ideas - Chart of the Day

 

New Ideas - Virtual Portfolio


Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

$MCD: Nope, We're Not Lovin' It

Takeaway: Our bearish thesis on MCD remains in play.

Editor's note: Hedgeye analyst Howard Penney has basically been the sole bear on McDonald's this whole year. And he's been dead right. Some interesting stats: MCD is down -5.5% since Penney made his short call earlier this year on April 25th. For comparison's sake, the XLY (Consumer Discretionary) has risen almost +20% since then. The S&P 500 is up over +14%. It's hard to beat being right on the short side in a red-hot bull market.

 

$MCD: Nope, We're Not Lovin' It - mcd1

 

Here's a snippet from a report he sent out earlier this afternoon.

 

“Looking ahead to 2014, the U.S. is intent on rebuilding its underlying business momentum by strengthening key elements of customer service and leveraging the breadth of menu choices across all dayparts and value tiers.”

- McDonald’s November Press Release

 

We found the above quote to be quite interesting.  In October, McDonald’s spoke of strengthening its underlying business momentum in 2014.  In November, however, the talk has shifted to rebuilding its underlying business momentum in 2014.  As we have been calling out for the greater part of 2013, MCD has issues in its underlying core business that management must address.  The fact that management finally acknowledged it needs to rebuild its U.S. business momentum is a positive; but it is not a solution...

 

...Overall, November marked another disappointing month for MCD, as the company missed muted global same-store sales estimates.  The U.S. was once again a major source of disappointment, as the company attributed the weak comparable sales to the competitive environment and flat industry traffic trends.  To be clear, this suggests that MCD is losing market share in the U.S. and, we contend, they have been for a while.

 

Despite the temporary uptick in two-year trends, our bearish thesis remains in play.  With the street looking for 7% EPS growth in 2014, we continue to believe there is disconnect between investor’s expectations and the company’s fundamentals.  Until we see a legitimate change in company operations or strategy, we fail to see how MCD will be able to hit the street's current 2014 EPS target. 

 

Would you like to learn more about Hedgeye Research? Click here.

 



MCD: REBUILDING NOT STRENGTHENING

Takeaway: How much will it cost to rebuild?

“Looking ahead to 2014, the U.S. is intent on rebuilding its underlying business momentum by strengthening key elements of customer service and leveraging the breadth of menu choices across all dayparts and value tiers.”


- McDonald’s November Press Release

 

We found the above quote to be quite interesting.  In October, McDonald’s spoke of strengthening its underlying business momentum in 2014.  In November, however, the talk has shifted to rebuilding its underlying business momentum in 2014.  As we have been calling out for the greater part of 2013, MCD has issues in its underlying core business that management must address.  The fact that management finally acknowledged it needs to rebuild its U.S. business momentum is a positive; but it is not a solution.

 

MCD reported November global same-store sales growth of +0.5% vs. +2.4% in 2012 and missed consensus expectations by 10 bps.  The two-year trend ticked up 210 bps sequentially. 

 

The U.S. and APMEA regions showed same-store sales declines of -0.8% and -2.3%, respectively.  The U.S. missed consensus expectations by 110 bps, while APMEA missed by 160 bps.  The two-year trend in the U.S. and APMEA improved sequentially to +0.9% and -0.9%, respectively.

 

Europe was the sole bright spot in November with +1.9% same-store sales growth, beating consensus expectations by 110 bps.  Positive performance in the U.K., France and Russia was slightly offset by poor results in Germany.  The two-year trend accelerated sequentially to +1.7%.

 

Overall, November marked another disappointing month for MCD, as the company missed muted global same-store sales estimates.  The U.S. was once again a major source of disappointment, as the company attributed the weak comparable sales to the competitive environment and flat industry traffic trends.  To be clear, this suggests that MCD is losing market share in the U.S. and, we contend, they have been for a while.

 

Despite the temporary uptick in two-year trends, our bearish thesis remains in play.  With the street looking for 7% EPS growth in 2014, we continue to believe there is disconnect between investor’s expectations and the company’s fundamentals.  Until we see a legitimate change in company operations or strategy, we fail to see how MCD will be able to hit the street's current 2014 EPS target. 

 

MCD: REBUILDING NOT STRENGTHENING - twoyear avg

MCD: REBUILDING NOT STRENGTHENING - TTM

MCD: REBUILDING NOT STRENGTHENING - table

 

 

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director

 


investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.

next