prev

THE M3: TABLES/SLOTS; SPAIN; GREEK MYTHOLOGY

The Macau Metro Monitor, October 17, 2012

 

 

MACAU GAMING TABLES/SLOTS DICJ

At the end of Q3 2012, there were 5,497 gaming tables and 17,029 slots.

 

SANDS AIMS TO START MADRID CASINO COMPLEX IN 2013 Macau Business

According to a company source, LVS has attracted sufficient funding to start building its new casino complex in Madrid in December 2013.  CEO Sheldon Adelson told the Madrid regional government in a meeting that it had offers of loans for the “Eurovegas” project, a source close to the discussions told AFP.  “They are negotiating with the banks, which already have made some offers,” the source said. “They have the financing, it is just a question of seeing which bank lends them the money most cheaply.”

 

GREEK MYTHOLOGY RETURNS TABLES TO SJM Macau Business.

Greek Mythology Casino has returned 40 gaming tables to SJM.  Greek Mythology Casino is a third-party property, operating under SJM Holdings casino licence.  The tables were returned on August and represented roughly one third of the total inventory in Greek Mythology Casino.

 



Growing The Economy

 

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough appeared live on CNBC’s The Kudlow Report this evening to weigh in on the second presidential debate. The topic du jour was growing the economy and how each candidate proposes doing so.

 

According to Keith, we need to get back to a stronger dollar and stronger America. We need confidence and have to instill it in small business owners and entrepreneurs. Growth starts with capitalists and a pro growth tax policy that helps businesses. If Romney can deliver that, he'll knock Obama out cold.

 

Watch the clip above for Keith’s appearance on The Kudlow Report.

 


TRADE OF THE DAY: MGM

Today we shorted MGM Resorts (MGM) into the close at $10.73 a share at 3:48 PM EDT in our Real Time Alerts. 

 

TRADE OF THE DAY: MGM  - tardemgm

 

The short follows Gaming, Leisure and Lodging Sector Head Todd Jordan’s guidance from a bearish note he put out on October 15 suggesting that MGM could be a decent short. The stock is right at the TRADE line of resistance of $10.71 a share and fundamentals are in line with the call. MGM is a stock that has a great deal of exposure to the Las Vegas gaming market and right now, Vegas is in a slump. Per Jordan’s note:

 

The Las Vegas Strip is back in a slump.  Slot volume, which we believe is the most important barometer of the Strip, has declined for five consecutive months and the bleeding will likely continue through Q1 2013.  Slot revenue has outpaced slot volume growth for years as the player payout has declined.  We don’t think a strategy of “price increases” through worse player odds is sustainable.


real-time alerts

real edge in real-time

This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.

CRI: Product Differentiation

Carter's (CRI) is a company full of challenges that lie ahead and our Retail Team has focused its attention on product differentiation, or lack thereof in the case of Carter's, which impacts the company's ability to command pricing power with wholesale accounts. Going forward, Cater's will find it difficult to justify its EBIT margins with its current setup.

 

Consider that you can get Carter's products in its own stores, Walmart, Amazon and other places. The same goes for produce from Nike (NKE) and Ralph Lauren (RL) but the difference is in the product stratification by availability and price. For instance, Ralph Lauren and Nike have their own direct channels via Nike and RL stores. Here they sell higher-end products that are priced as such. They can also sell entry-to-mid level product to retailers like department stores, Kohl's, online websites, etc. 

 

 

CRI: Product Differentiation  - CRIProdDiff

 

 

Carter's on the other hand just sells the same product at the same price across all channels. 90% of the product hitting the floor on on the first day comes with an average 40% discount. In other words, it has no pricing power. It has 24% market share in its core business, and 12% share in kids - about midway between a NKE and RL.


CPI DATA REMAINS BEARISH FOR RESTAURANTS

Takeaway: We remain bearish on $DRI, $BLMN, and $TXRH

The Bureau of Labor Statistics released CPI data for the month of September this morning.  The spread between CPI for Food at Home versus Food Away from Home continues to grow.  Inflation in the restaurant check is far-outstripping inflation in the grocery aisle.

 

The advantage that restaurants enjoyed over grocers in 2011, in terms of lower price increases year-over-year, has reversed.  Restaurants’ pricing power is much-diminished.  As CPI for Food at Home decelerated to 0.8% in September, CPI for Food Away from Home continues to grow at 2.8%. 

 

CPI DATA REMAINS BEARISH FOR RESTAURANTS - food at home vs food away from home

 

 

Casual Dining

 

As we wrote in our recent post, “RELATIVE VALUE MATTERS FOR CASUAL DINING”, our research indicates that the Restaurant Value Spread, or difference between CPI FAH and CPI FAFH, is highlighting downside risk for casual dining same-restaurant sales expectations.

 

CPI DATA REMAINS BEARISH FOR RESTAURANTS - cd rvs

 

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director

 

Rory Green

Analyst

 


CRI: Product Differentiation Considerations

Takeaway: The root of CRI’s challenges lie in the lack of its differentiation of product by channel.


Here’s one of the 20+ exhibits in our CRI Black Book that we think is worth calling out. It highlights what we think is the root of many of the company’s challenges.


Specifically, CRI has little product differentiation relative to other brands. You can get CRI product in Carter’s own stores, at Wal-Mart, Amazon, Kohl’s, JC Penney, or Macy’s and it all pretty much looks the same. You can get away with that as a small brand – like how big CRI was a decade ago. But with over $3bn in (retail equivalent) sales, you’ve got to be careful – especially with so many new competitors coming into the space today (GILT, Giggle, Children’s Place at Sam’s, etc…).


Take a look at some of the premium branded apparel/footwear manufacturers in retail like NKE, Ralph Lauren, Under Armour, Coach, and you’ll see a very clear product stratification and segmentation strategy. What is sold through company direct channels (owned-retail/e-commerce) is higher-end, often exclusive, and priced accordingly. Product sold through specialty retail channels is often exclusive in some regard (colorways, limited quantity, etc.) along with other premium brand product. Then you have the entry level product at mass/department stores and 3rd party e-commerce, which covers some combination of mass and specialty, but not company direct. This is not how CRI sells through to the market. It’s the same product, same price. Or even worse, similar product, different price.


Is it fair to compare CRI to these brands? As long as people are arguing that CRI will get to 14% EBIT margins, the answer is yes. NKE has 40% market share in footwear, 15% in apparel, and has pricing power. Yet it has only has a 12-13% margin. RL has about 7-8% share in the US. It too has pricing power, and it has a similar retail/wholesale mix as CRI. RL’s margins are about 14%. UA has a high growth trajectory with RL-like market share in an oligopoly with pricing power. Yet it has only 10% EBIT margins.


CRI has a very promotional model, with 90% of the product hitting the floor on day 1 with an average 40% discount. In other words, it has no pricing power. It has 24% market share in its core business, and 12% share in kids – about midway between a NKE and RL. But should CRI have the same margins as these other players? We have a hard time arguing that they do.


For a more detailed analysis, please see our CRI Black Book “CRI: The Margin Rebound Disconnect

 

 

CRI: Product Differentiation Considerations - CRIProdDiff

 

 


Hedgeye Statistics

The total percentage of successful long and short trading signals since the inception of Real-Time Alerts in August of 2008.

  • LONG SIGNALS 80.33%
  • SHORT SIGNALS 78.51%
next