“There’s a lot of things Congress can do, in the near term, not just in the long run, to make growth stronger.”
Having spent 54% of his born life in government, growing both deficits and debts as far as the eye can see, US Treasury Secretary Timmy Geithner’s Growth has been, if anything, consistent.
As President Obama goes into full campaign mode, his Top 2 central planners take center stage this week. Our almighty overlord of short-term asset price inflation will speak to commoners and journalists alike after his 215PM FOMC decision. Meanwhile, Geithner has been making his American/European media rounds for the last 24 hours.
The Germans in particular don’t care for the bailout policies to inflate inasmuch as they don’t care for Geithner’s economic partisanship. Now that Timmy is interviewing with Global banking outfits, he needs to be careful to not tell the Europeans what to do. Been there, done that – and he’s been mocked. That can be a bummer when negotiating a post Washington, DC employment agreement.
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
To paraphrase Geithner’s latest ideas for both Americans and Europeans alike: ‘We need to do more – more of what has not worked. There’s more of that to do – I believe that “deeply.” Do more.’
By “more”, he means more #BailoutBull policies for delinquent and/or underwater borrowers (US home buyers and Spanish banking conquistadors alike). By more, he means more government spending. By more, he means Big Government Intervention.
To review what doing “more” of that has done to both our economies and said “free” markets”:
- Shortened Economic Cycles (#GrowthSlowing)
- Amplified Market Volatility
In the very short-term, while No Volume; No Trust stock markets may or may not get this (depending on the latest rumor induced Viagra Rally in the S&P futures), the bond market understands this across intermediate and long-term durations, big time.
Geithner’s Growth (debt and deficits) slows growth. That’s not a rumor. That’s a fact. That’s why:
- 10-year US Treasury Yields continue to make lower-lows since #GrowthSlowing picked up on the downside in March
- Russell2000 (broad measure of US liquidity risk and equity exposure) stopped going up on March 26th
- That’s why US Equity market volatility (VIX) bottomed YTD on the same day that the Russell2000 topped (March 26th)
Bernanke’s Growth (asset price inflations) slows growth too. For July, this is best illustrated by the SP500’s Sector returns:
- Energy (inflation expectations) = UP +4.94%
- Consumer Discretionary (growth expectations) = DOWN -0.55%
Again, to review – INFLATION IS NOT GROWTH.
US Consumption represents the 71% that I don’t hear the Democrats talking about inasmuch as I didn’t hear the Republicans talking about it under Bush. That’s the 71% of the US Economy (GDP). And it’s been getting jammed by the likes of Bernanke and Geithner since at least 2006. Policies to debauch the Dollar and inflate oil prices at the pump are a colossal failure of Keynesian sense.
And it’s not just US Consumption Growth that slows when food/energy prices grow. Global Growth does too. Today’s reminder from the Big 3 Macro countries that will report gravity (economic data) for July continue support that:
- China’s PMI (manufacturing) hits its lowest level in 8 months
- Germany’s PMI hits a fresh YTD low of 43 for July (versus 45 in June)
- USA’s PMI is due out later this morning and could easily come in the low 50s (versus 52.9 in June)
In other words, the other side of “growth” that the Keynesians of the 112th Congress are being chastised to “stimulate” (export manufacturing) isn’t growing either. On a net basis (Exports minus Imports), exports were a negative drag on Q2 2012 US GDP.
After all this cochamamy stimuli “growth” talk and defict/debt spending, both US Consumption and Manufacturing Growth are slowing, at the same time. That’s not progress. That’s regressive. That’s why I still think the only real (inflation adjusted) “growth” solution is not doing more – it’s changing the lineup, and getting these failed central planners out of our way.
My immediate-term support and resistance ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), US Dollar, EUR/USD, and the SP500 are now $1, $102.46-105.49, $82.21-82.92, $1.20-1.23, and 1, respectively.
Best of luck out there today,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
The Macau Metro Monitor, August 1, 2012
MACAU JULY GGR DICJ
Macau gross gaming revenues eked out a 1.5% YoY gain to MOP 24.58 billion (23.86 HKD billion, 3.08 USD billion).
SANDS CHINA CONFIRMS DATA REGULATOR PROBE Macau Business
Sands China confirmed today that Venetian Macau is being probed by the Macau Office for Personal Data Protection. Sands China said the body has launched an official investigation procedure in relation to the alleged transfer from Macau to the United States of “certain data”, related to the case of Steve Jacobs.
According to a news report from U.S.-based ProPublica.org earlier this week, Sands China and LVS moved documents from Macau to the United States in 2010 without the prior authorization of the Macau government. The information allegedly transferred to the U.S. was stored on Jacobs' office computers in Macau, and was moved to Las Vegas a few days after he was fired, in July 2010.
The Office for Personal Data Protection confirmed it held a meeting with representatives for Venetian Macau in March 2012 to discuss the matter, but it says it never gave the “green light” for any data transfer.
WYNN MACAU CLINCHES FINANCING DEAL Macau Business
Wynn Macau Ltd said it will borrow up to US$2.3 billion to finance the construction of its Cotai casino resort, and also to refinance the company’s existing debt. The amended facilities consist of: a US$750 million equivalent fully funded senior secured term loan facility maturing in July 2018; a US$1.55 billion equivalent senior secured revolving credit facility maturing in July 2017; and an option to upsize the total senior secured facilities by an additional US$200 million.
Once completed, Wynn Cotai is anticipated to include a casino, a five-star hotel with about 2,000 rooms and suites, as well as convention, retail, entertainment and food and beverage offerings. The total budget for the project is estimated to be in the range of US$3.5 billion to US$4 billion.
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.
For the first time in five quarters, MPEL could miss the Street, but at 7x current year EBITDA, should we really care?
MPEL could come in just a tad below consensus EBITDA estimates this quarter. Pretty good performance considering the LVS and WYNN punts. The stock is down 57% since its 52 week high on April 26th so expectations cannot be too high. Based on our below consensus estimates, MPEL is trading at just 7x 2012 and 6x 2013 EBITDA – and that’s before we give the company any credit for Macau Studio City or the pending deal partly owned and managed by Belle Grande Manila Bay. Investors must really be afraid of the Macau VIP outlook.
We estimate hold played a small role in the quarter of around a $4MM EBITDA benefit. CoD held a little high, while Altira held a little low. We are projecting $212MM of EBITDA for Q2, which is 3% below consensus of $219MM. Consensus estimates have factored in hold of 2.94% for CoD (we’re at 2.98%) and 2.8% for Altira (vs. HE at 2.75%).
While most investors are worried about the slowdown that’s been occurring in the VIP market, we would point out that MPEL’s mass/slot business should grow about 28% YoY in 2Q12 and has averaged 49% YoY in the last 3 quarters. MPEL remains the cheapest concessionaire with operations on Cotai Strip with two large projects in the pipeline and a multiple of just 6x 2013.
We estimate that City of Dreams will report $704MM of net revenues and $185MM in EBITDA (2% below consensus)
- Our net casino win projection is $682MM
- VIP net win of $400MM
- Assuming 15.5% direct play, we estimate $19.3BN of RC volume (flat YoY) and a hold rate of 2.98%
- Using CoD’s historical hold rate of 2.87%, EBITDA would be $7MM lower and net revenues would be $18MM lower
- $243MM of mass win, up 37% YoY
- $38MM of slot win
- VIP net win of $400MM
- $23MM of net non gaming revenue
- $22MM of room revenue
- $14MM of F&B revenue
- $23MM of retail, entertainment and other revenue
- $37MMM of promotional allowances or 63% of gross non-gaming revenue or 5.4% of net gaming revenue
- $407MM of variable operating expenses
- $334MM of taxes
- $61MM of gaming promoter commissions in addition to the rebate rate of 90bps (we assume an all-in commission rate of 1.21% or 40.8% on a rev share basis)
- $25MM of non-gaming expenses
- $87MM of fixed operating expenses flat QoQ
We project $216MM of net revenues and $38MM in EBITDA for Altira (5% above consensus)
- We estimate net casino win $209MM
- VIP net win of $281MM
- $10.2BN of RC volume (23% YoY decrease) and a hold rate of 2.75%
- Using Altira’s historical hold rate of 2.81%, we estimate that EBITDA would be $3MM higher and that net revenues would be $6MM better
- $26MM of mass win, up 12% YoY
- VIP net win of $281MM
- $7MM of net non gaming revenue
- $146MM of variable operating expenses
- $120MM of taxes
- $24MM of gaming promoter commissions in addition to the rebate rate of 96bps (we assume an all-in commission rate of 1.19% or 43.3% on a rev share basis)
- $3MM of non-gaming expenses
- $29MM of fixed operating expenses in-line with 1Q
- Mocha slots revenue and EBITDA of $36MM and $9MM, respectively
- D&A: $96MM (guidance of $90-95MM)
- Interest expense: $25MM (guidance of $23-25MM)
- Corporate expense: $20MM (guidance of $18-20MM)
Conclusion: This company smells so much like it did at the time it was spun out of Sara Lee. We think that the market is giving the company too much credit in blowing through historical profitability, and out-earning the best brands in the business. The consumer is unlikely to be that forgiving.
We think that a whole lot of historical context is needed in looking at this HBI quarter. The reason is that in reconciling the company’s guidance for earnings and cash flow for 2H and 2013, you need to go back in time to 2006 and imagine that you’re the analyst at a buldge bracket brokerage firm that just got the call from your banker regarding the mandate to lead the spin-off from Sarah Lee (hint hint).
Think of the following.
1) HBI is guiding for 2H EBIT margins to come in between 12.5-13.0%, and that was unprescedented. Its’ historical 2H peak is 11.6%. For the record, Nike and Ralph Lauren will be lucky to land those margin levels in the back half.
2) Getting long term debt to $1bn by the end of 2013 means that HBI needs to generate well over $600mm in free cash flow next year. That’s about 35% higher than anything HBI ever reported.
Now here’s the interesting part. When did HBI print those margin levels? In 2004-05. And the peak free cash flow numbers? In 2004-05. When did Sara Lee spin-out Hanesbrands? 2006. If there’s anything that the company made no secret about way back then were the contentious ‘discussions’ between SLE and HBI because it was being spun out with such a disproportionately high debt burden. In addition to being saddled with debt, SLE had underinvested in HBI in the 2-years prior (SG&A), knowing full well that it would be monetized over the intermediate-term. The punchline is that we’re talking about achieving margin and free cash flow rates well above those realized when the company was being dressed up to maximize the amount of capital that ultimately ended up in SLE’s wallet – and leaving HBI in a multi-year hole in the process.
So the question is…can they get to these levels?
Yeh…perhaps. But a lot needs to go right. Was I the only one who was disturbed that Outerwear margins were down 1,200bps, International was down 1.8%, and most notably Direct to Consumer was DOWN 3%? DTC (which is largely dot.com) should never be down for any company. Period.
The View on Inflation is All Wrong!
The most troubling thing from my perspective is this prevailing view that ‘inflation is good’ and that the recent raw material cycle has ‘broken in’ the retailers like oil to a new baseball glove, conditioning them to pay higher prices in the future. That’s an assumption that we don’t think belongs in any good risk management process.
Ultimately, the consumer will decide if the inflation will sustain itself. Not the retailers. Just because costs change, it does not mean that the consumer’s perceived value proposition will change. In the context of the value proposition, will the consumer be cool with Nike getting a lower margin than HBI? I know that sounds like a ridiculous question, as the consumer is not looking at comparative margin charts. But they are pretty smart with where their dollars go, and beyond the course of several quarters, this is a question that is not only 100% valid, but one that needs to be asked. When the answer is ‘No’ it always leads to violent swings in a given company’s results relative to plan.
It’d be unfair not to mention that there is a pretty positive angle here. Even if EBIT growth is flat this year, we get 300-500bp of EPS growth from delevering. You’ve got to hand it to the company in that they have systematically chipped away at the $2.6bn debt burden they were originally handed, and are now sitting at only $1.65bn. Next year, lower interest expense alone gets HBI 12% earnings growth.
In addition, the working capital change this quarter was nothing short of astounding – with days inventory on hand off by about 36 days. Much of that is due to the yy change in raw materials costs, but the numbers are what they are. And they’re positive. The question, as noted above, is whether the retailer and consumer will allow them to keep it.
Our take on the Stock
In the end, the consensus is right in line with this margin and cash flow guidance for this year, and is at $3.14 next year – in line with management’s continued comment of a ‘potential’ EPS in the ‘low 3s’ in 2013. We're 5-8% lower in each period.
On these numbers, the stock definitely looks cheap at about 10x. But the reality is that it still has debt, and a cash flow outlook that we think is far less stable than the market thinks as the mid-tier landscape is rattled by JCP. At nearly 9x EBITDA, we can think of a dozen other places to invest our capital.
Brian P. McGough
Cautious on domestic REVPAR
- REVPAR growth may have peaked in June 2012. Based on our model, which projects sequential REVPAR growth on a seasonally-adjusted dollar basis, the 2nd half of 2012 will show a sequential slowdown in YoY REVPAR growth.
- This model does not take into account macroeconomic issues and with the typical lodging lag, our estimates could prove aggressive
- Obviously, REITs have the most leverage but among the hotel brand companies, the more cyclically-sensitive lodgers (more hotel ownership) like Starwood and Hyatt are more exposed than a Marriott