The TI sale looks like a non-event. Near term liquidity is improved but the multiple was just ok. Most importantly, the covenant situation is essentially unchanged. The chart below provides estimated quarterly leverage ratios against the maximum allowable ratio as provided in the credit agreement. This is the biggest issue facing MGM right now. Investors should expect a highly dilutive equity offering in the coming months or a sharp rise in the company’s borrowing rate should they choose to renegotiate their credit facility. Neither of these options will be good for the current equity.
As I am writing this note, the SP500 is testing its lows of the day at 859. From that line, the balance of risk/reward is very straightforward, playing to the bullish side’s favor. Downside is -2% from here; upside is +6.5%.
BUY “Trade” = 841.11
SELL “Trade” = 915.68
“Heli-Ben” will be dropping moneys from the heavens in t-minus 24 hours. That will be bullish, on balance, for stocks.
get free cartoon of the day!
Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.
Today, for the record, is December 15th, and markets trade on what happens tomorrow, not last month. Both China and Hong Kong closed up overnight, despite this “news.”
The more interesting chart is the second one below, simply because it’s a proactive prediction of what tomorrow (January 2009) may bring. The Chinese stimulus plan is math, and we can draw conclusions from it. We remain bullish on China and suggest that those who have missed the recent +20% and +40% moves in the Shanghai and Hang Seng indices, respectively, find room in their portfolios to buy China on down days.
Krugman’s criticism, which matches that of other European nations, relates to Germany’s inability to name their contribution in Euros that some project to be too low. Krugman took this sentiment to accuse Germany as the lone kink in the chain to setting this package in motion. In our view this is a bit shortsighted. Taking a step back, any time the European community comes together to make a group decision, consensus is never a guarantee; in fact, regional and economic differences play a huge role.
Just last week EU leaders agreed to spend €200 billion, or 1.5% of the bloc’s GDP, to bolster growth. Yet few governments have matched this target number with new spending or tax relief, prompting renewed discussion and a closer look at individual contribution on a per country basis. As an example of the disparity among EU nations on GDP basis, Germany’s Q3 GDP totaled €567 Billion versus Belgium at €83 Billion. Certainly Germany will pay a larger piece of the EU stimulus pie than Belgium, which may not directly benefit Germany in the long run.
Germany currently says its proposed package represents 1.3% of GDP. This comes at the heels of Merkel’s issuance of a €400 billion banking stimulus to guarantee loans. According to the WSJ, “a senior German official said Germany is waiting until US President-elect Barack Obama takes office and enacts his own stimulus program (to name theirs),” which if true, means the EU will have to be patient.
Germany, arguably the strongest economy in Europe and the biggest market for exports from the 27 nation EU, is sending a signal in dragging its heels—one that shows its cautious nature, but more importantly, implies that its economy may not need as much stimulus as the rest of Europe. The government looks to be buying time to run the cost/benefit numbers to determine what type of stimulus package will lead to growth both domestically and within the Union, as opposed to making a reactive decision.
In The New Reality, we want to own the patient and proactively prepared. We remains long Germany via the EWG etf. Today the EWG is outperforming most of the top 10 in this world’s country GDP tables. Slow and steady works for us.
If you read our Macro team’s work regularly you know that we think Japan bulls looking for a glass-half-full scenario in which US and EU government stimulus packages shore up demand are going to be sorely tested as they wait for income derived from public works projects to be converted into flat screen TV purchases. Furthermore, we don’t see domestic demand helping to close the gap in Japan: BOJ has only 30 BP of wiggle room left and, if consumers there were content to build of $15 trillion in the zero rate environment that ended less than 3 years ago presumably they won’t be rushing out to spend now.
Nonetheless, the market is not likely to care about the Macro angle when these luxury goods companies report the upcoming quarter and see favorable translation – presuming that they don’t lose control of any Yen-denominated inventory). Here’s who benefits the most (% of sales in Japan).
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.