prev

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS)

Below Josh Steiner and Allison Kaptur of our Financials Team quantify the 40 most exposed European banks (among the 91 tested) to the PIIGS based on the results of the EBA’s EU Stress Test. While the team notes that this data is “stale”, with the data and risk assumptions based on year-end 2010 figures, the exposures are nevertheless valuable reference points as European sovereign debt contagion risks persist:

 

 

Moving Beyond EBA Conclusions That All is Well

Our view of the European bank stress tests released last Friday is rather dim.  We criticized the leniency of the "adverse scenario" assumptions, noting in particular that the actual deterioration since year-end 2010 is already worse than the "adverse" assumptions in some cases.  (Contact us if you want to see our full note.)

 

While we consider the loss assumptions to be balderdash, the stress tests were valuable in that they disclose a wealth of bank-specific data around sovereign and commercial exposures by country.  Clearly, the greatest default risk is currently in Greece, Portugal and Ireland. Italy and Spain, while on slightly more stable ground, are rapidly deteriorating as well.   

 

In the tables below, we show the exposure to sovereign debt and commercial loans by bank to each PIIGS country. Specifically, we show the top 40 most exposed European banks (among the 91 stress-tested), ranked by gross loans and sovereign debt holdings as a percentage of their Core Tier 1 Capital. Bear in mind that this data is as of December 31, 2010. In addition to showing which banks hold the greatest exposure on a country by country basis, we also show which banks hold the greatest exposure to Greece, Portugal and Ireland collectively, as we view those countries as being at greatest risk for default. Further, we show total exposure to all five PIIGS countries.

 

We highlight in red those banks with 100% or more of their Core Tier 1 Capital in the form of sovereign debt holdings and/or commercial loans to a given country or group of countries. The total exposure groups (all PIIGS) are presented two ways. First, we show exposure sorted by RWA. In other words we show the PIIGS exposure by bank for the 40 largest European banks. Second, we show exposure sorted by % of Core Tier 1 Capital at risk regardless of the size of RWA.

 

Summary Conclusions: 14 of the Top 40 EU Banks Hold Over 200% of their Capital in PIIGS Exposure

We find that there are numerous European banks with over 100% of their Core Tier 1 Capital committed to either PIIGS commercial loans or PIIGS sovereign debt holdings. For example, we found that 18 of the 40 largest European banks held 100% or more of their Core Tier 1 Capital in PIIGS sovereign debt or commercial loans. In 14 of these cases, the banks held more than 200% of their Core Tier 1 Capital in PIIGS sovereign debt or commercial loans. 

 

As a general rule we found that the Nordic banks are the least exposed to PIIGS debt, typically holding less than 20% of their Core Tier 1 Capital, putting them at considerably less risk than the group as a whole.  

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - P1

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - P2

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p3

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p4

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p5

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p6

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p7

 

EUROPEAN DEBT CRISIS: WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED (THE 14 MOST EXPOSED EU BANKS) - p8

 

Joshua Steiner, CFA

 

Allison Kaptur

 

 


RT - LOOKING AHEAD TO Q4FY11

A recap of commentary from the last earnings call and our thoughts heading into 4QFY11 earnings on Thursday.

 

The biggest event for RT this quarter was that Steven Becker and Matthew Drapkin have been appointed to the board of directors at Ruby Tuesday shortly after Becker, Drapkin and Carlson Capital began agitating the company.  Sandy said "Steve, Matt and I recently met in person, and have subsequently worked quickly and cordially to reach a win/win scenario which we believe is in the best interests of our shareholders.”

 

HEDGEYE - Why did Sandy cave so quickly?  My guess is that the fundamental performance of the company did not offer him the opportunity to fight.  Yes, it’s going to be another bad quarter.  That being said, look for changes in the strategic direction of the company (i.e. new ways to create shareholder value).  The stock has been outperforming of late.

 

 

BIG PICTURE COMMENTS FROM LAST QUARTER

 

SALES TRENDS - “Absent the snow-related impact during the quarter, which we estimate at 1.5-2.0% on top of last year's negative weather impact, we would have had our fourth quarter in a row of positive same restaurant sales.” The weather dilution impact estimated at $0.03 to $0.04 per share in the third quarter

 

“We have seen sales in bar grill lag casual dining overall and have recently seen some non-weather related issues in some of our markets, more so in the south, which is most likely due to the gas prices being significantly higher year-over-year and tracking a bit like we saw in 2008.  We are actively responding with sales building programs to drive traffic in these markets, which we hope will offset this behavior over time.”

 

HEDGEYE – Actually, we have learned that sales in the bar & grill category have not been disappointing.  The two largest players Chili’s and Applebee’s are showing accelerating trends: yet another indication of a bad 4Q from RT.

 

 

INVESTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE - “We will have invested approximately $9 million of loan in our fresh bread program and our new marketing/brand research initiatives by the end of fiscal year '11 and with some offsetting costs, but basically a big investment year.  Just need to translate into sales. “We've recently strengthened our real-estate and development team as we get back into trying to move into the investment of this excess capital and start growing a bit again.”

 

HEDGEYE - Defensive move or competitive advantage.  Not sure giving away bread is a big deal to anyone.

 

 

THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN - “First and foremost, we continue to stay focused on getting more out of Ruby Tuesday, continue to enhance the sales, margins, and overall strength of that great brand. We need to maintain that cash flow and create even more cash flow from Ruby Tuesday, the cash cow, so that we can reinvest it in other areas, and if we can't, return it to shareholders in whichever way is appropriate.”

 

“Our second strategy is focused on increasing shareholder returns through new concept conversions. We believe that converting our low volume Ruby Tuesday restaurants that are in good site locations to other high-quality casual dining concepts.”

 

“Whatever is best suited for that local marketplace is what we're focused on. Actually, we're trying to run our entire company in almost in every respect on what's right for that market instead of being a national brand is more of a roll-up or collection of communities in our company.”

 

“Our third strategy is to create value by increasing revenue and EBITDA through franchise partner acquisitions. We pretty well have this complete. We'll have it complete by the end of the year”

 

HEDGEYE - First, it was two years ago that a national advertising campaign was going to save the day and drive traffic.  Since that failed, they are now going in the opposite direction “roll-up or collection of communities in our company”.  Second, they want to convert Ruby’s Tuesdays in to other concepts and at the same time increase exposure to the brand by buying franchise partners.  I’m not sure that’s likely to produce an outcome in line with the company’s ultimate goal.

 

 

COMMODITY EXPOSURE - While we currently could have some food cost exposure in the back half of fiscal 2012, we also have plans for savings, which on a net basis we currently estimate to approximate a 20 to 30 basis point increase in food costs for fiscal 2012.

 

HEDGEYE – The final impact of food inflation will likely be higher than 20-30 basis points, in our view.

 

 

PROMOTIONS - “We hope to continue shifting our promotional dollars away from coupons and incentives and towards LTO product offerings and frequency-building programs”

 

“From a promotional and advertising perspective, we continue to have success with our RT Athletics program, which is a part of our So Connected e-mail club The investments we've made in the bar program to create a more sophisticated sports viewing experience where guests can come and have fun with friends, watch great sporting events, and enjoy handcrafted beverages and unique bar fare have resulted in improved bar sales and are helping to support our goal of moving alcohol sales from 9% to our goal of 12%.”

 

“We're investing approximately $4 million in order to better understand consumer and guest behavior this year, and anticipate these investments will continue to positively impact sales and brand strategy throughout fiscal 2012”

 

HEDGEYE - Coupons are a big driver of consumer behavior.  The transition could cause a hiccup in sales trends. 

 

 

DEVELOPMENT - “We are still researching and negotiating potential sites for restaurant development and are on track to open our first Lime Restaurant in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and should have six to eight open by the end of the calendar year. We're targeting three regions for development including Washington, D.C., the Midwest and Ohio Valley area, and the core South East.”

 

“Our next planned conversion will be a Marlin and Ray's slated for the northern Virginia area early this summer. Now our site selections for our planned conversions over the next 12 to 15 months are largely complete and over the next nine to 12 months we should have a better of idea of which brands represent the best conversion growth opportunity in each individual market.”

 

 

GUIDANCE FOR 2011 IS AS FOLLOWS:

  • Same-restaurant sales for company-owned restaurants to be in the range of flat to positive 1% for the year
  • We do not expect to open any inline restaurants in fiscal '11, anticipate closing eight to 10 company-owned restaurants, these closures obviously exclude our conversions, and converting four to six lower performing company-owned restaurants to other high-end casual dining concepts. Our franchisees expect to open between six to eight restaurants in the year, up to three of which will be international.
  • We plan to buy back the remaining 13 franchise partnership restaurants during the fourth quarter.
  • We expect restaurant operating margins to be relatively flat, primarily reflecting the impact of our continued investment in higher-quality menu items and new product offerings, such as our complimentary bread program, as well as investments in service to enhance our guest experience and drive sales, all offset by lower promotional levels.
  • Our core food costs are expected to remain relatively stable compared to the prior year. 
  • Depreciation and amortization is estimated to be $62 million to $64 million.
  • SG&A is targeted to be up approximately 18% to 20% year-to-year, primarily reflecting a shift in spending from promotional initiatives to advertising expense, higher marketing brand research, higher training expense, and the loss of fee income from acquired franchise partnerships which has historically offset our selling, general, and administrative expenses.
  • Interest expense is estimated to be in the $12 million to $13 million range. The tax rate is estimated to be 10% to 15% as we continue to benefit from FICA Tip and other employment-related tax credits.
  • Diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2011 are estimated to be in the range of $0.74 to $0.82.

RT - LOOKING AHEAD TO Q4FY11 - RT POD1

 

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director

 

Rory Green

Analyst

 

 


European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB

Positions in Europe: Short UK (EWU); Short EUR-USD (FXE); Short Italy (EWI); Sold Germany today


Germany Confidence Dips, Selling EWG

German expectations of economic growth over the next 6 months according to ZEW declined for the 5th straight month to -15.1 in July versus -9 in June, its lowest level since January 2009 (see chart below).  While but one sentiment indicator, it confirms with high frequency data that has slowed in Germany in recent months, which prompted us to sell our long Germany position via the etf EWG in the Hedgeye Portfolio today. 

 

European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB - 1.mh

 

According to GfK, another sentiment survey provider, German consumer sentiment will rise for the first time in four months in July, citing that “Good general conditions” have become “more influential than detrimental factors, such as the state of affairs in Greece.”  We’re however not convinced.

 

While the intermediate term TREND line in the DAX has held up above the 7,100 line, it danced dangerously around this level for most of June and recently pulling back squarely to the line (see chart below).  We think that despite Germany’s strong fiscal position and leadership in the debate on solutions to the region’s peripheral ails, it is not immune to broader contagion.

 

European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB - 2. mh

 

UK’s Sticky Stagflation, Shorting EWU

UK CPI has held at or above the 4% for the last 5 months, currently at 4.2% in June year-over-year, with no indication that the BoE will move off its 0.50% benchmark interest rate to quell it. We’ll take the other side of BoE Governor King who expects CPI to return to the target of 2% over the intermediate term.  With inflation pushing at these elevated levels and growth prospects anemic, we’re bearish on the UK’s sticky stagflation. Below we show a chart of the FTSE, which is clearly broken below our intermediate term TREND line at 5,926.

 

European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB - 3. mh

 

IBEX and MIB Level to Watch

Spain’s IBEX at the 9,984 resistance line, down -15.0% since 2/17

Italy’s MIB at the 19,559 resistance line, down -21.1% since 2/17

-For both indices we’d initiate short positions provided the resistance TREND lines were not violated to the upside.

 

European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB - 4. mh

 

Italy’s Spotlight Day-over-Day, Short EWI

Day-over-day we’re seeing a reduction in risk in Italy. The 10YR government bond yield came in 26bps to 5.73%, after flirting around the 6% level in the last days, a level proven to be a significant breakout level for yields in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal in the past.  Equally, Italian 5YR CDS spread dropped 17bps d/d to 302bps today.

 

We’d caution that this is but one day of improvement. Spain’s bond auction of 12 and 18 month bills today showed a significant boost in yields to entice investors, with the 12M pegged at 3.7% versus 2.7% in a similar auction in June and the 18M pushing 3.9% versus 3.3% in June. We’d expect a similar trend of higher yields to continue for the rest of the periphery over the intermediate term.

 

Calendar Events

The next calendar catalyst to watch is the upcoming EU Summit, scheduled for this Thursday, however speculated to be pushed to tomorrow.  The main agenda is to address a new rescue plan for Greece, pegged around €115 Billion. Over the weekend Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel told the FT that she will only attend “if there is going to be an agreement on a new rescue plan for Greece”, a marked inflection from recent discourse suggesting a plan would come in mid-September.  Merkel said “she wished to avoid any Greek debt rescheduling, but underlined that the key to a deal would be substantial voluntary involvement of private creditors in easing the Greek debt burden.”

 

While it’s anyone’s guess what may come out of the meeting given the competing ideologies and politicking, the fire was further stoked today with comments from Austria’s Central Banker and ECB Governing Council member Ewald Nowotny who said there’s “a full range of options and definitions, from a clear-cut default, selective default, credit event and so on.”

 

The meeting will be front and center on our screens including how it relates to the EUR-USD, which we’re short in the Hedgeye Portfolio via the etf FXE. Our immediate term TRADE levels are $1.39 to $1.41 and the intermediate term TREND is decidedly broken at $1.43. This is THE key trade our team is watching! 

 

European Portfolio Update: Selling Germany; Shorting UK; and Key Levels on EUR-USD, IBEX, MIB - 5. mh

 

Matthew Hedrick

Analyst


get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

Are You In the Herd?

This note was originally published July 19, 2011 at 08:31 in

“Nothing is more obstinate than a fashionable consensus.”

Margaret Thatcher

 

Most stock market operators, particularly those trained in the dark art of short selling, have an understanding of the concept of herd mentality.  The expression “herd mentality” describes how people are influenced by their peers to adopt certain behaviors.  Herding around perceived fundamentals has led to some of the most spectacular bubbles of the last fifteen years – the internet, real estate, uranium, and so on.  Interestingly, we may be at the beginning of the end of the most spectacular financial bubble of our lifetimes: sovereign debt.

 

Just over two years ago, on April 8th, 2009, Keith and I attended a guest lecture at the Yale Law School by former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.  For better or worse, Keith and I have never worshipped at the Church of Rubin, though many current and former U.S. policy makers are considered his protégées - including the venerable Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers - so his philosophy certainly influences current U.S. policy.  At that time two years ago, the Hedgeye team was digging deep into sovereign debt issues and were naturally struck by one specific quote from Rubin’s lecture:

 

“There is no risk of any defaults on sovereign debt globally."

 

In hindsight, Rubin pretty near top ticked the global sovereign debt markets with his Fashionable Consensus.

Last week, we introduced Policy Pong as one of our three Q3 2011 investment themes.  On a global level, Policy Pong refers to the batting back and forth of Keynesian monetary and fiscal policies between Europe and the United States.  Our view on the world’s two key reserve currencies, the Euro and the U.S. Dollar respectively, is directly influenced by the intermediate outlook for policy from each region. 

 

In the U.S., the policy debate over the debt ceiling is critical to watch, but the U.S. Treasury market is telling us emphatically that no default is imminent.  In fact, yields on 10-year treasuries are near year-to-date lows at 2.92%, while credit default swaps for 10-year treasuries are trading at 64 basis points versus 59 basis points on December 31, 2010.  Despite heightened rhetoric, it is likely that the Republicans and Democrats will reach a Fashionable Consensus, which in the intermediate term is positive for the U.S. dollar versus the Euro.

 

Are You In the Herd? - Chart of the Day

 

There is no doubt that the herd is negative on European sovereign debt. In fact, with Greek 5-year CDS currently trading at 2,568 basis points and recent media reports suggesting that Greek debt could be written down by 80%, the case could be made that investors are too bearish on Greece.  As it relates to the outlook for Europe more broadly though, Greece, at less than 2% of European Union GDP, is not the best indicator for contemplating the next move in the Euro currency or the Eurozone economy.  So, the question remains, is the herd bearish enough on the Euro and European sovereign debt issues?

 

We are currently short of the Euro / USD via the etf FXE in the Virtual Portfolio. The key component of this thesis is that we believe that the ECB will be forced to shift its monetary policy stance due to both slowing growth in Europe and accelerating sovereign debt issues, primarily in Italy.  Currently, credit default swaps on 5-year Italian bonds are trading just north of 300 basis points, which is slightly better than Lebanon at 358 basis points and Vietnam at 344 basis points.

 

This acceleration in the price of Italian credit default swaps has been underscored by the rapid increase in yields on Italian government debt.  As an example, the yields on Italian 10-year bonds are currently at 5.79%, an increase of almost 100 basis points from the start of July.  Rapidly accelerating interest costs are an issue for Italy because it has debt-to-GDP of north and 110% and interest-payments-as-percentage-of-GDP are north of 4.8%, according to recent ECB reports, which is second only to Greece at 6.7%.

 

Rather than viewing the European Union holistically, sovereign debt investors are rightfully evaluating each sovereign issuer on its own merits.  Conversely, the ECB is seemingly evaluating the next interest rate move on what is best for the healthy economies in Europe, in particular Germany.  Unfortunately for the one size fits all policy makers at the ECB, the GIPSIs (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Italy and so named for their wandering fiscal policies) are collectively more than 25% of Eurozone GDP and have credit default swaps government debt yields that are saying “No Más” to Trichet’s hawkish stance.

 

(For those sports fans, the best analogy is Sugar Ray Leonard versus Roberto Duran when Duran quit mid-fight, which occurs at 1:35 of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPoWrWwwi8M)

 

The second derivative issue of sovereign debt in Europe relates to the European banking system and the impending collateral call on European banks.  Our ever insightful Financials Team lead by Josh Steiner wrote a note yesterday titled, “European Debt Crisis: Where the Bodies Are Buried (The 13 Most Exposed EU Banks), with the following key takeaway:

 

“We find that there are numerous European banks with over 100% of their Core Tier 1 Capital committed to either PIIGS commercial loans or PIIGS sovereign debt holdings. For example, we found that 18 of the 40 largest European banks held 100% or more of their Core Tier 1 Capital in PIIGS sovereign debt or commercial loans. In 13 of these cases, the banks held more than 200% of their Core Tier 1 Capital in PIIGS sovereign debt or commercial loans.” 

 

Is it Fashionable Consensus to be short of the Euro? Perhaps, but our research, risk management, and obstinance are telling us to stick with it.

 

Keep your head up and stick on the ice,

 

Daryl G. Jones

Director of Research

 

Are You In the Herd? - Virtual Portfolio


LVS: HIGH HOLD MAKES FOR AN IN-LINE QUARTER

We’re expecting LVS to report a slight beat after the help of high hold in Macau. Singapore could be the standout, finally, after a few quarters of “disappointing” results.

 

 

We don’t think LVS will match WYNN’s standout quarterly release from last night.  We’re even more confident that MPEL overpowers all Macau operators for Q2, particularly LVS.  The Street looks a little light to us in Macau and Singapore and a high in Las Vegas.  Wynn’s blowout in Las Vegas may not carry over to Venetian Las Vegas.  As always, LVS has a lot of moving parts and high expectations so it’s particularly difficult to predict the post earnings stock reaction.  Expectations are likely to be even higher after Wynn reported last night so we are a little cautious.  A bigger beat than expected in Singapore could be the only hope for a positive move in the stock.

 

 

MACAU

We estimate that LVS’s Macau properties will report property level net revenue of $1,183MM and EBITDA of $394MM, 2% and 6% ahead of Street estimates.   Sands and especially Venetian played lucky, while FS suffered from poor luck.   All in, we estimate that lady luck helped LVS’s Macau properties by $65MM on the net revenue front and by $34MM in EBITDA. 

 

Sands

We estimate that Sands will report $339MM of revenue and $105MM of EBITDA, 2% and 8% ahead of consensus, respectively.

  • Net gaming revenue of $331MM benefiting from high hold
    • Gross VIP table win of $240MM and $163MM net
      • Table drop up 4%, to $7.5BN, assuming 10% direct play, and hold of 3.2%
      • We estimate a hold benefit of $26MM on gross revenue, $18MM on net revenue and $10MM on EBITDA
  • Mass table revenue of $139MM (assume 15% increase in drop and 20% hold)
  • Slot win of $29MM (assume 18% increase in handle and 6% win rate)
  • Net non-gaming revenue of $8MM and expenses of $4MM
  • Variable expenses of $188MM
    • Taxes of $159MM
    • Gaming commissions in excess of the rebate of $18MM
    • Fixed expenses of $42MM – in-line with 1Q and 5% below 2Q10

Venetian

We estimate that Venetian will report $729MM of revenue and $262MM of EBITDA, 7% and 9% ahead of consensus, respectively.

  • Net gaming revenue of $647MM benefiting from high hold
    • Gross VIP table win of $452MM and $317MM net
      • Table drop up 30% YoY, to $12.7BN, assuming 18.5% direct play, and hold of 3.5%
      • We estimate a hold benefit of $89MM on gross revenue, $62MM on net revenue and $36MM on EBITDA
  • Mass table revenue of $279MM (assume 15% increase in drop and 27% hold)
  • Slot win of $52MM (assume 5% increase in handle and 7% win rate)
  • Net non-gaming revenue of $82MM and expenses of $20MM
  • Variable expenses of $346MM
    • Taxes of $305MM
    • Gaming commissions in excess of the rebate of $21MM
    • Fixed expenses of $101MM – flat with 2Q10

Four Seasons

We estimate that Venetian will report $116MM of revenue and $27MM of EBITDA, 17% and 25% below consensus, respectively.

  • Net gaming revenue of $95MM hurt by low hold
    • Gross VIP table win of $71MM and $46MM net
      • Table drop down 32.5% YoY, to $3.3BN, assuming 40% direct play, and hold of 2.2%
      • We estimate hold dragged down gross revenue by $22MM, net revenue by $15MM and $12MM on EBITDA
  • Mass table revenue of $38MM (assume 31% increase in drop and 30% hold)
  • Slot win of $11MM (assume 70% increase in handle and 7% win rate)
  • Net non-gaming revenue of $21MM and expenses of $7MM
  • Variable expenses of $61MM
    • Taxes of $47MM
    • Gaming commissions in excess of the rebate of $11MM
    • Fixed expenses of $21MM compared to an estimated $19.4MM in 1Q11 and $28MM in 2Q10

 

SINGAPORE

We estimate that MBS will report $640MM of net revenue (in-line with Street) and $338MM of EBITDA (3% higher than the Street).

  • Net gaming revenue of $500MM
    • Gross VIP table win of $292MM and $162MM net
      • Table drop of $10.4BN and hold of 2.8%
  • Mass table revenue of $223MM (assume $1,006MM of table drop and 22% hold)
  • Slot win of $116MM
  • Net non-gaming revenue of $130MM ($162MM net of $32MM of promotional expenses)
  • Variable expenses of $113MM
    • Taxes of $106MM
    • Fixed expenses of $180MM compared to an estimated $182MM in 1Q11

 

U.S.

We estimate that LVS’s US operations will report in-line results of $416MM of net revenue and $102MM of EBITDA

 

Las Vegas

We estimate that Venetian and Palazzo will report combined revenue of $314MM and EBITDA of $77MM, slightly below street estimates.

  • Net gaming revenue of $101MM
    • Table win of $76MM
      • Flat YoY drop of $417MM and ‘normal’ hold of 18.3%
  • Slot win of $38MM
    • 30% decrease in slot handle to $470MM and 8% win rate
    • Non-gaming revenue of $235MM
      • $117MM of room revenue
        • 93% occupancy and ADR of $196
  • F&B, retail and other revenue of $119MM
  • $22MM of promotional allowances
  • Operating expenses of $229MM, up 13% YoY and comparable to 1Q11 operating expenses of $233MM

Sands Bethlehem

We estimate that Sands Bethlehem will report net revenue of $102MM and EBITDA of $28MM, 23% and 9% above consensus, respectively.

  • Casino revenue of $92MM
    • Table win of $24MM
    • Slot win of $68MM
    • Non-gaming revenue of $10MM
    • $41MM of taxes and $33MM of operating expense 

 

LVS: HIGH HOLD MAKES FOR AN IN-LINE QUARTER - lvs


HST YOUTUBE

In preparation for HST's Q2 earnings release tomorrow, we’ve put together the pertinent forward looking commentary from HST’s Q1 earnings call.

 

 

1Q YOUTUBE

  • “Transient segment, business trends continue to be positive, with an overall average rate increase of 6.2% for the quarter, driven by an 8% increase in our premium and corporate segment and a 5 plus percentage increase in our special corporate segment.”
  • “Group business, we benefited from a demand increase of 4% at an average rate increase of more than 2%, resulting in an overall Group revenue increase of 6.4%. The main driver for these results was a 24% increase in demand from our higher-rated corporate Group business, as that segment continues to recover ground loss in the downturn. Our association business, which has longer booking lead times, was off this quarter by 17%, but it is expected to recover significantly over the course of the remainder of the year. Every segment of our Group business experienced average rate growth, and all but the corporate segment are now exceeding 2007 rate levels. However, given that overall Group demand is still more than 13% behind 2007 levels, we were still expecting to see an increase in Group business drive our recovery.”
  • “Our booking pace outlook improved over the course of the quarter, especially in March, and exceed 2010 in our booking pace from last quarter. We expect overall Group revenues to increase meaningfully this year”
  • “For the full year, we expect to spend approximately $230 million to $250 million on these types of projects.  For the full year, we expect to spend $300 million to $325 million on maintenance capital expenditures.”
  • “We expect that our disposition activity will pick up in the second half of 2011 and become even more active in ‘12 and ‘13. With that being said, our guidance currently does not assume any dispositions.”
  • “We remain optimistic that the economy will continue to pick up steam this year.  As the recovery continues, we expect demand to remain strong and average rates to keep improving, as our business mix shifts the higher rate of business segments”
  • “We expect comparable hotel RevPAR will increase 6% to 8% for the year, with adjusted margins increasing 100 to 140 basis points.  It is worth noting that we expect the second half of the year will exhibit better relative performance than the first half on both the RevPAR and margin front, as we expect to be more significantly affected by renovation work in the first and second quarters.  Now we anticipate that pricing will be better during the latter stages of the year.”
  • FY 2011 Guidance: “Adjusted EBITDA of $1.01 billion, to $1.045 billion, an FFO per share of $0.88 to $0.93.”
  • “Over the next three quarters with the expectation of a full year common dividend of $0.10 to $0.15 per share.”
  • Regional RevPAR guidance for 2Q11:
    • San Francisco: “continue to outperform our portfolio… due to excellent Group and transient demand and further ADR increases”
    • San Diego: “underperform the portfolio due to fewer citywide and overall reduced group demand only partially offset by improvements in transient demand and rates.”
    • “We expect Hawaii to have an outstanding second quarter due to further improvements in group and transient demand as well as increases in ADR.”
    • New Orleans: “underperform the portfolio … due to a decline in group demand”
    • Phoenix: “outperform our portfolio… due to strong corporate group demand and ADR gains”
    • Boston: “underperform the portfolio…due to the reduced citywide demand and the displacement of business as we wrap up our meeting space renovation at the Sheraton Boston.”
    • San Antonio: “great second quarter and to outperform the portfolio because of strong group demand, which should drive a significant increase in ADR”
    • “With the renovations continuing into the second quarter, we expect our New York hotels to continue to underperform our portfolio, however, we do believe that our New York hotels will have a great third and fourth quarter”
    • “The Philadelphia market will continue to struggle in the second quarter due to the renovation of the hotel, which is expected to be completed in August of this year. However, we expect our Philadelphia hotels to have a strong second half of the year.”
  • “On a full year basis for 2011, hotel level bonuses are expected to be roughly flat relative to 2010.”
  • “In the first quarter of 2011, cancellation and attrition fees were well below the levels (in 1Q10 which were elevated), the typical level, and that trend’s expected to continue throughout 2011”
  • “Looking forward to the rest of the year, we expect the RevPAR increase to continue to be driven more by rate growth and occupancy, which should lead to strong rooms flow through, even with growth in wage and benefit costs above inflation.”
  • “We expect some increase in group demand as well as higher quality groups, which had helped to drive growth in banquet and audio-visual revenues and solid F&B flow through, particularly in the second half of the year, as payroll tax and bonus expense comparisons become easier.”
  • “We expect unallocated costs to increase more than inflation, particularly for utilities, where we expect higher growth due to an increase in rates and volumes and sales and marketing costs, where higher revenues and implementation of new sales and marketing initiatives will increase costs. We also expect property taxes to rise in excess of inflation.”
  • “I think we will be opportunistic about selling some of our larger hotels, but I think the focus initially will really be as you were suggesting on the non-core assets”
  • “Washington was one of the markets that held up the best in the downturn. So it declined the least. As all these different markets start to work their way back to where they were before and then move beyond that, we’ve generally assumed that Washington growth would be fine in a historical context but in the short-term would likely be lower than certainly markets like New York, Boston and San Francisco, but not because it’s not a healthy market, but because the overall level of decline there was just lower.”
  • Q: “Guidance on corporate expense is $99 million versus last year’s $108 million. How do you account for that being down?”
    • A: “One of the bigger factors is just the way that our compensation program works. The amount of shares that we earn depend upon primarily on our relative performance compared to the rest of the market, and at this point in the year we tend to just use target for a number and then we refine that number as we get later into the year. Last year, because we performed so well against NAREIT and so well against the lodging companies that are in our index, our compensation was higher, and that’s why you saw the number being higher”

Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

next