- We’re talking a rounding error to Gap’s P&L and balance sheet – Athleta is only 0.6% of sales – but from a fragmentation standpoint this is the way to go. Aside from certain high-end apparel categories, the athletic space is the only growing category that consistently grows, and the fruits are largely shared by fewer than a dozen brands (Nike, Adidas, UnderArmour, Lulu, Lucy, Champion, Juicy, Reebok, Asics, and Russell). Gap’s core brands, on the flip side, compete with virtually everyone. Not good.
- This actually gets Gap into a category where it can add some value. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re sitting here 3 years out and Gap has grown this into a $300-$400mm brand.
- Unfortunately for Gap, that’s still a rounding error to its P&L – especially given the margin pressure it has yet to see in its core.
- Also, I can’t reiterate enough how ridiculous of an idea it is to drive an e-commerce strategy with ALL of Gap’s concepts as part of one customer experience. If I were running Banana Republic, this would take my blood pressure up big time to see customers meshing my assortments with that of Old Navy.
Bad break on EAT today, closing below my 18.98 sup line... amazing what any sell side noise is doing to stocks
DIN cracking, looks 15.42 next
PNRA battled it out, and won - looking for an upside test of 60.61
HSY still rides higher on that rumor, looks like $44-45 next; love this name - people hate it
Thankfully, this isn’t Russia or Pakistan, and the US government has not halted trading in our markets yet, so… at 9:30 AM the market will open as usual, but, more importantly, the Senate Banking hearings will also start. I said it yesterday, and I’ll say it again this morning, governments do not put bottoms in markets. What the US government is doing right now changing the rules on the fly and sponsoring volatility and illiquidity as a result.
In the week prior to the short selling ban, we were running huge volume days on the big board (between 6.5-9.5B shares/day) – yesterday volume dropped to 4.5B, and volatility across asset classes shot straight up. Oil had a +24% intraday move! I don’t know why they don’t get this, but hedge funds are critical equalizers out there in finding efficient prices. Some days they can represent 30-40% of the volume in any given market. Now the government is changing the rules on them, banning short selling on down moves and talking about regulating “oil speculating” hedge funds on up moves. Pretty soon we won’t be able to be on any side of the “Trade”!
Confusion breeds contempt in markets, and my thought is that Paulson, Bernanke, and Cox don’t simplify this picture when they are ‘You Tubed’ by politicians this morning. This is an election year. This is too politically charged. This why I am in cash.
Asia closed lower, and European markets are down 1-2% across the board ahead of the 9:30 AM reality TV session with the US government. Yesterday, the S&P 500 failed to climb and close above my critical resistance line of 1258.11, so we find ourselves with the ominous technical combo of both the immediate “Trade” and intermediate “Trend” looking lower. I am going to move my downside S&P 500 target to 1157.22 this morning. I don’t know if we get there today, tomorrow, or on October the 3rd, but that’s my level.
Here are 3 global macro focus levels of downside support to manage risk towards:
1. Hong Kong closed down -3.9% last night at 18,872, and I see immediate downside at 17,427
2. India’s BSE Index closed down -3.1% at 13,561, and I see immediate downside at 12,954
3. London’s FTSE is trading down over -2% so far this morning at 5,112, and I see immediate downside at 4,826
The US Dollar got hammered yesterday, putting in its biggest single day drop since October, 1998. This is not American Idol folks – the world has voted on the Paulson Plan. This US$ weakness, of course, contributed to the melt up in commodities which were amplified by the aforementioned move in oil, but the CRB Commodities Index (19 components) was +3.9% on its own. Bailouts are inflationary.
The “bottom is in” crowd was all over the tape on Friday. Remember, governments don’t put in bottoms. This government is sponsoring volatility and illiquidity – that combo is not going to solve anything any time soon. This is structural. This will take time.
I wish I could see something positive in all of this. I wish I had a more creative solution than being in cash. My critics will tell you that is because I am not as smart as they are. I’d have to agree with them on that.
Good luck out there today,
real edge in real-time
This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.
For August 2008, my model projects total volume down only 3%, not good, but certainly not as bad as advertised in the McCarran data. Assuming normal hold %, I calculate total gaming revenue down only 1%. Please don’t mistake my analysis for bullishness. I’ve been consistently negative regarding the prospects of Las Vegas Strip. However, consistent with our focus on objectivity here at Research Edge, I must call them like I see them. And I see August turning out a little better than expected.
Within the memo, MCD’s Treasury Department says, “Bank of America has been taking steps to increase capacity to fund additional growth….Its announcement last weekend of its intention to acquire an investment bank and the volatility in the debt markets, especially this past week, have impacted B of A's ability to get the quick solution originally anticipated.''
This memo reaffirms my view that MCD will not be able to complete its planned coffee conversions by the middle of the next year. Based on my math (please refer to my September 17th post titled “MCD – Coffee Could be the Tipping Point!” for more details), even if MCD accelerates the conversion process in 2H08, the total number of McDonald’s stores with the ability to sell specialty coffee in the U.S. would be 2,800, which only accounts for 25% of MCD’s U.S. system. The fact that franchisees are now facing additional hurdles to obtain the necessary financing to upgrade its stores (at a time when cash flows are already under pressure from increasing commodity costs) will only further delay this conversion process. For reference, MCD will invest up to 40% of the remodel cost, which on average can range up to $75K, and the operator will be responsible for current equipment costs of approx $25K. That being said, based on the article and MCD’s comments at a recent Bank of America conference, management maintains the beverage rollout is still progressing as planned, but I remain unconvinced.
In an early phase of my career I was responsible for managing fail-to-deliver positions for OTC stocks in a major Wall Street bank’s back office. Back then we used paper ledgers and, when a position had not been resolved within 30 days, it would have to be placed into an error account and bought in. A lovely bipolar guy named Sam* who had liquor on his breath by 10AM every morning was responsible for the buy-ins. If a trade had been open long enough without properly settling Sam would come by my desk to let me know that he was going to move the position into an error accounts unless it was resolved by day’s end. That way, short sales that had never been properly borrowed would be flattened by buying shares in the open market keeping everything honest. That was the theory anyway; in practice the other broker’s identity in the ledger could be changed (say, switching the entry from Smith Barney to Merrill Lynch meaning that Merrill would DK the transaction and it would start life all over again as a brand new fail to deliver for 30 more days). In the little under a year I held that job before moving on to bigger things there was one particular position that never seemed to resolve itself, a sale of shares of a small cap stock predating my employment that had been on the books for so long that no one even knew which customer or prop desk had initiated it anymore –meaning that it would go into a departmental error account if it was bought in. It was still bouncing around when I left and I would not be surprised if it is still open and undelivered in the bowels of that bank to this day.
Later in my career, when I was a prop trader at a bank, I was once assured by a slick salesman that covered me that it would be no problem getting a synthetic short position for a hard to borrow stock –he had a buddy that would pick up market maker status on a foreign exchange that had an agreement to trade US stocks and then use his market maker exemption to short without borrow. Once he was short he would then would turn around and sell a total return swap to me (with a hefty commission for the salesman and a fat spread for his buddy of course). I turned him down. I am sure that many, many others did not. I heard later that that sales guy and others like him made a killing arranging short swaps for PIPE investors –essentially letting them take all market risk out at the point they bought into an offering. It was as a very sordid, very lucrative little corner of the business.
Yes, much as it pains me to say this, Pat Byrne was actually on to something in his own crazy way.
The problem is this, none of these abuses necessarily required new regulations –they merely required that the existing regulations be enforced. Since it took a market catastrophe and political witch hunt to cause this problem to be addressed –let’s hope that it does not inhibit legitimate shorting or overall market liquidity.
*(names have been changed to protect the guilty)
Research Edge LLC