prev

Blue Jeans Blues Clues

The third largest denim fabric manufacturer (and major textile conglomerate) Arvind Mills reported a couple of weeks ago. Below we include some relevant data points comparing the company’s textile results over the past two quarters as well as comments from the company’s chairman on the pricing environment. Arvind’s large customers include Wal-Mart and Gap Inc to name a few.

 

Q&A with Sanjay Lalbhai, Chairman and Managing Director of Arvind via CNBC-TV18:

 

When we spoke to a couple of textile players last, they indicated that because of the surge in cotton prices there is a shift that many of the makers are doing to polyester and they are increasing the production units there, are you doing anything of that sort and is the gap increasing between cotton and polyester?

 

The gap is increasing, we have a large range of polyester denims which is growing rapidly but there is a large portion of our business which is cotton and it's very difficult to move it into polyester because this is high-end cotton. We do believe that even with high prices in cotton, these prices have been absorbed and expected in the US and European markets and also the Indian market. And we believe these prices are sustainable now that the consumers have also accepted them and now all the buyers have also accepted them. So unless the prices further go up dramatically there should not be any reason for worry.

 

How is FY12 shaping up, now that you have turned around your operations effectively in FY11 – FY12 both in terms of topline and also your EBITDA level performance given that cotton prices are so high, do you think 14% kind of margins are sustainable?

 

We believe so, but you are right that cotton has touched all time highs. This kind of cotton prices have never been seen before and we have been able to pass on this costs until now but if the cotton situation gets worse then I think there could be issues whether there would be erosion in demand. Q3 Textiles (ending 12/31)

 

Q3 comments: Cotton prices have more than doubled in last one year and the prices have shot up very sharply in last 3-4 months. The company has increased selling price of its products to offset the cost push, any significant increase in cotton price could affect the margin if company is not able to pass on the cost increases.

 

Q3 Textile Summary (ending 12/31)

 

Blue Jeans Blues Clues - q3 textiles

 

Q2 Textile Summary (ending 9/30)

 

Blue Jeans Blues Clues - q2 textiles

 

Despite rising costs, potential for trading down, and increasing use of substitute materials-

 

Blue Jeans Blues Clues - denim

 

Eric Levine

Director


SMALL BUSINESS REALISTS

The person paying the bills typically has a unique perspective on things and this came through loud and clear in the most recent survey of Small Business Optimism. 

 

The Index of Small Business Optimism gained 1.5 points in January, rising to 94.1 (the best reading since the economy peaked in 2Q 2007); the index has moved sequentially higher 5 out of the last 6 months.  The average reading before the recession started was 100.

 

Given the nearly almost 100% move in the S&P 500 since the bottom on March 9th, 2009, it is interesting to note that since its low of March 31st, the Small business optimism index is only up 16.2%.  There are some interesting trends that emerge from the most recent report as it relates to how small business plans the move ahead in trying times.

 

 

CREDIT MARKETS

 

The most amazing statistic in the survey was that 92% of respondents reported that all their credit needs were met or that they were not interested in borrowing; 52% said they did not want a loan, up two points (12 percent did not answer the question) and only 3% claim that financing is their top business problem.  Washington remains obsessed with the notion that small banks will not lend money to “creditworthy” firms and that this is holding back employment and economic growth.  In this vein, the bureaucracy of D.C. persists in creating new programs to spur lending to small businesses, ignoring the fact that small business owners, for the most part, do not want a loan.  

Hedgeye thought - Interventionist government policy is unwanted by the very parties it is touted to be aiding.

 

 

LABOR MARKETS WEAKNESS

 

According to the survey, the average employment change per firm was -4 down from a -1 in December.  The December reading was the best reading since January of 2008 when it hit 0.  The decline in small business hiring is consistent with the most recent number from the BLS, which showed the change in nonfarm payrolls of 36,000, significantly below the consensus expectation of 146,000. 

 

Referring back to my post from 2/3/11, “HIGHLIGHTING THE RISKS TO GDP GROWTH IN 2011”, 4Q10 GDP growth was a robust 3.2%.  However, this was accomplished with very little job hiring and can be completely explained by the by the fact that manufacturing and trade are leading the recovery, industries and activities that are not labor intensive.

Hedgeye thought - The labor intensive construction industry remains in a recession.  We continue to believe that housing will remain depressed for the balance of 2011.

 

 

SALES

 

The net percent of all owners, seasonally adjusted, reporting higher nominal sales over the past three months improved by five points to a net -11%, 23 points better than March 2009 (near the recession bottom) but still indicative of weak consumer activity.

Hedgeye thought - Despite what we see from the conflicted government data, the main street consumer remains challenged.

 

 

INFLATION

 

The big deflationary pressure seen in 2009 and for most of 2010 has subsided.  Seasonally adjusted, the net percent of owners raising prices was a -4, which improved from -5 in December and consistent with the 4Q readings.  Importantly, plans to raise prices rose four points to a net seasonally adjusted 19% of owners, the highest reading in 27 months.  As the theory goes, an improving economy (including rising stock prices), is likely to have more and more price hikes stick.  The intention to raise prices moved up significantly from 15% in December to 19% in January; the highest reading since 2008.

Hedgeye thought - The tipping point for the consumer will come when companies stat to raise prices to protect margins.   

 

 

EARNINGS

 

The need to raise prices is evident in the earnings trends.  Reports of positive earnings trends improved points in January, registering a net negative 28%.  More owners report that earnings are deteriorating quarter to quarter than rising. Part of this is due to price cutting and inflationary trends, but the overall environment is not supportive of employment growth. 

Hedgeye thought - There is little incentive to add incremental labor in a weak demand environment. 

 

 

CAPITAL SPENDING

 

The frequency of reported capital outlays over the past six months rose four points to 51% of all firms, higher than previous months, but historically low and far less than what is needed coming out of the Great Recession.  Small business remain in “maintenance mode”, unwilling to put new capital to work.  The percent of owners planning capital outlays in the future rose one point to 22%, but is still historically quite low.  The demand environment continues to keep the small business owner on the sidelines.

Hedgeye thought - This speaks to the lack of confidence among business owners.   

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Small business owners don’t need the free money from the Federal government.  Expectations improved, but not spending and hiring plans. Although, Main Street disinflation is dissipating, inventory is lean but the top line continues to be a struggle.  Small business need to raise prices despite a weak demand environment and are unwilling to add to their cost structure by hiring new employees.

 

SMALL BUSINESS REALISTS - nfib

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director


SMALL BUSINESS REALISTS

The person paying the bills typically has a unique perspective on things and this came through loud and clear in the most recent survey of Small Business Optimism. 

 

The Index of Small Business Optimism gained 1.5 points in January, rising to 94.1 (the best reading since the economy peaked in 2Q 2007); the index has moved sequentially higher 5 out of the last 6 months.  The average reading before the recession started was 100.

 

Given the nearly almost 100% move in the S&P 500 since the bottom on March 9th, 2009, it is interesting to note that since its low of March 31st, the Small business optimism index is only up 16.2%.  There are some interesting trends that emerge from the most recent report as it relates to how small business plans the move ahead in trying times.

 

 

CREDIT MARKETS

 

The most amazing statistic in the survey was that 92% of respondents reported that all their credit needs were met or that they were not interested in borrowing; 52% said they did not want a loan, up two points (12 percent did not answer the question) and only 3% claim that financing is their top business problem.  Washington remains obsessed with the notion that small banks will not lend money to “creditworthy” firms and that this is holding back employment and economic growth.  In this vein, the bureaucracy of D.C. persists in creating new programs to spur lending to small businesses, ignoring the fact that small business owners, for the most part, do not want a loan.  

Hedgeye thought - Interventionist government policy is unwanted by the very parties it is touted to be aiding.

 

 

LABOR MARKETS WEAKNESS

 

According to the survey, the average employment change per firm was -4 down from a -1 in December.  The December reading was the best reading since January of 2008 when it hit 0.  The decline in small business hiring is consistent with the most recent number from the BLS, which showed the change in nonfarm payrolls of 36,000, significantly below the consensus expectation of 146,000. 

 

Referring back to my post from 2/3/11, “HIGHLIGHTING THE RISKS TO GDP GROWTH IN 2011”, 4Q10 GDP growth was a robust 3.2%.  However, this was accomplished with very little job hiring and can be completely explained by the by the fact that manufacturing and trade are leading the recovery, industries and activities that are not labor intensive.

Hedgeye thought - The labor intensive construction industry remains in a recession.  We continue to believe that housing will remain depressed for the balance of 2011.

 

 

SALES

 

The net percent of all owners, seasonally adjusted, reporting higher nominal sales over the past three months improved by five points to a net -11%, 23 points better than March 2009 (near the recession bottom) but still indicative of weak consumer activity.

Hedgeye thought - Despite what we see from the conflicted government data, the main street consumer remains challenged.

 

 

INFLATION

 

The big deflationary pressure seen in 2009 and for most of 2010 has subsided.  Seasonally adjusted, the net percent of owners raising prices was a -4, which improved from -5 in December and consistent with the 4Q readings.  Importantly, plans to raise prices rose four points to a net seasonally adjusted 19% of owners, the highest reading in 27 months.  As the theory goes, an improving economy (including rising stock prices), is likely to have more and more price hikes stick.  The intention to raise prices moved up significantly from 15% in December to 19% in January; the highest reading since 2008.

Hedgeye thought - The tipping point for the consumer will come when companies stat to raise prices to protect margins.   

 

 

EARNINGS

 

The need to raise prices is evident in the earnings trends.  Reports of positive earnings trends improved points in January, registering a net negative 28%.  More owners report that earnings are deteriorating quarter to quarter than rising. Part of this is due to price cutting and inflationary trends, but the overall environment is not supportive of employment growth. 

Hedgeye thought - There is little incentive to add incremental labor in a weak demand environment. 

 

 

CAPITAL SPENDING

 

The frequency of reported capital outlays over the past six months rose four points to 51% of all firms, higher than previous months, but historically low and far less than what is needed coming out of the Great Recession.  Small business remain in “maintenance mode”, unwilling to put new capital to work.  The percent of owners planning capital outlays in the future rose one point to 22%, but is still historically quite low.  The demand environment continues to keep the small business owner on the sidelines.

Hedgeye thought - This speaks to the lack of confidence among business owners.   

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Small business owners don’t need the free money from the Federal government.  Expectations improved, but not spending and hiring plans. Although, Main Street disinflation is dissipating, inventory is lean but the top line continues to be a struggle.  Small business need to raise prices despite a weak demand environment and are unwilling to add to their cost structure by hiring new employees. 

 

SMALL BUSINESS REALISTS - nfib

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director


investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.

TGT: Trend Brewing?

Today we added a short TGT position in the firm's virtual portfolio following a strong move higher for the retailer and the majority of the sector.  Below we include our latest thoughts following last week's January sales release:

 

Despite January expectations that were gradually ratcheted down, Target’s results were once again disappointing.  This marks the second month in a row where internal projections called for a low to mid single digit increase and results failed to materialize. 

 

Interestingly, there remains a major divergence between the growing, P-Fresh driven performance in the food and consumables category and the rest of the store.  Unfortunately, grocery induced traffic does not appear to be leading to an acceleration in discretionary spending at this point.  While two months doesn’t make a trend, scrutiny surrounding the company’s topline initiatives centered on 5% rewards and P-Fresh is on the rise. Over time, these strategies should work.  However, sales expectations need to be taken down in the near term.  Management’s guidance for low single digit increases in February is a start, but this is clearly not the 4+% comp trend we were originally expecting to see for most of 2011. 

 

TGT: Trend Brewing? - TGT matrix

 

Eric Levine

Director


Inflation...In Obama's Popularity

Conclusions: President Obama’s approval rating is inflating, and with it, his chances of re-election.

 

Clearly, we’ve been a loud voice in the debate on whether inflation currently exists.   Regardless of how the textbook defines inflation, our view is simply that inflation occurs when prices go higher.  To deny inflation in most commodities is ignorant, but, conversely, deflation continues to occur in housing prices.  Interestingly, now that the dust has settled post the midterm election, we are beginning to see inflation in the approval rating of President Obama, and with it, his chances of a re-election are steadily increasing.

 

We look at two key measures for Presidential Approval, the Rasmussen Presidential Approval Index and the Real Clear Politics poll aggregate.   We will grant that all polls have their biases, but what matters in polls happens on the margin, and in both of these polls President Obama’s approval is improving:

  • Rasmussen Presidential Approval Index – In its most recent reading this poll was a -8, with a breakdown of 36% strongly disapprove and 28% strongly approve.  As noted in the chart below, President Obama has seen a noted improvement in this poll over the last few weeks as his ratings were mired in the -11 to -20 range for much of late 2010.
  • Real Clear Politics Poll Aggregate – This collection of polls tells much the same story as the Rasmussen Approval Index.  For much of the second half of 2010, President Obama’s approval rating was lower than his disapproval rating.  In fact, his approval rating bottomed on August 10, 2010 at 44.4.  In early January of 2011, President Obama’s approval ratings surpassed his disapproval ratings for the first time since July 22, 2010.  Currently, President Obama has a 49.8 approval rating and 43.8 disapproval rating.

At the same time, since the start of this year, the political futures market has also begun pricing in a more favorable chance for the Democratic Party candidate to win the 2012 Presidential Election.  In fact, this contract is now trading at 60.4, which is close to a 1-year high. So for those who have written off President Obama and the political outcomes associated with him losing in 2012, we would recommend caution. 

 

But the question remains, what is driving this Inflation in Obama Popularity?  We would point to a number of factors, which include:

  • With the election season behind us, less money is being spent on negative advertisements targeting the President;
  • President Obama is shifting towards slightly more moderate positions in certain areas and, more generally, reaching out to the Republicans in bipartisanship;
  • The stock market has been quite strong over the past few months and has tracked President Obama’s approval rating closely.  While a strong stock market does not help the millions of people on food stamps, it does make those with investable assets marginally more confident; and
  • Finally, the President had an opportunity to show real leadership around the Tucson shooting which was received and perceived favorably by many.

Inflation exists in many commodities and around the globe, but we are also seeing it close to home in the approval ratings of President Obama.

 

Inflation...In Obama's Popularity - dj rasmussen

 

Daryl Jones

Managing Director


RL: Before The Quarter

Here we are again, waiting for another quarter from RL. And of course, the ONLY question I’m being asked is “How much will RL beat by given management’s sandbagging track record, and is it in the stock?”

 

The answer is they’re going to beat meaningfully. We’ve got ‘em at $1.52 vs. the Street at $1.29 (20%). Then we’ve got 4Q (Mar) at $1.28 vs. the Street at $0.88 (45%).

 

There are several factors to consider about this quarter.

  1. The company guided to high-teens growth in total company sales, and noted that Retail will lead that growth. Huh?
    1. They guided to high teens for Wholesale too. Fall rollout of Lauren handbags to 150 US doors is partially driving this.
    2. But we’re just at the point now where RL’s retail segment is larger in size than wholesale.
    3. Let me get this straight…two divisions of equal size accounting for 95% of revenue. One will grow high teens, and the other will be more than that. How does that equate to high teens for the parent?
    4. We think that Retail will grow by 30% in the quarter. Why?
      1. First and foremost, The Chinese and Korean licenses are both being folded into Retail – instead of wholesale like all previous licenses have been. Is this just accounting? An optical illusion to goose the perception of growth? Perhaps. But strip out 4% of a 23% top line growth expectation, and I’ll still be impressed.
      2. RL turned on its UK dot.com business in October. This alone should boost e-commerce as a percent of total from 3.5% to 5%. And yes, it carries an incremental margin north of 50%, and serves as the best avenue to flush out goods at end of season.

 

In aggregate, we have sales  growing by 23%. If we’re right on that, then in order to justify their ‘GM down 100bp’ guidance, we’d need to peg SG&A up near 30% in order to get closer to the consensus. That’s not going to happen.

 

Is it in the stock? RL saw record selling activity in December by several senior executives. Regardless of what the stats say, my sense from talking to investors is that there simply is no consensus on this name.  But one trend is clear in looking at other names in retail – investors are paying for top-line growth. RL fits right in.

 

I wouldn’t chase it here, as there’s admittedly not enough controversy in the name. But If we’re right with $6.13, $7.34, and $8.34 for the next three years, respectively, then it suggest 20% CAGR EPS growth with a bullet proof balance sheet. We never like pulling multiples out of the air – but the reality is that others will. Let’s use a number a bit below the growth rate. 18%, or 18x? It suggests $110 today (where the stock is), $130 in a year, and $150 in 2.

 

 


Early Look

daily macro intelligence

Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.

next