Takeaway: Mixed messages from Russia is about re-setting expectations for a 9-month extension.

Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from a research note written this past Friday by Energy Policy analyst Joe McMonigle. 

Moscow Mystery or OPEC Playbook? - ptun2

Russia, an early proponent of extending the production cut deal, is now suddenly hesitant and sending mixed messages about whether it will support any extension of the production cut deal at the November 30 meeting in Vienna.

Some are calling this the “Moscow mystery.” We call it the OPEC playbook for re-setting expectations.

Since an October 17 Reuters report citing “four OPEC sources” who said the group was “leaning towards extending a deal…to cut oil supply for another nine months,” oil prices surged above $60 and the market priced in a 9-month extension. 

But as we reported here first in an October 31 client note: other OPEC members and non-OPEC producers in the deal are cool to the idea of a full year of continued cuts.  As a result, the Saudi/Russia team has been unable to get consensus for a 9-month extension.

While work continues on the 9-month extension goal, it’s now clear that OPEC needs to re-set market expectations.  As a result, the Russians have been playing along and openly discussing whether any extension decision is needed and causing jitters about the upcoming November 30 meeting. 

As a result, OPEC hopes the market won’t be disappointed when a shorter duration extension is announced.  A 3-month extension is better than no extension.

We don’t doubt that Russian oil companies are opposed to yet another extension of cuts but, as we have seen before, they will go along with whatever President Putin directs. It doesn’t much matter if Russian compliance falls behind in the coming months; the most important objective for Saudi Arabia is to continue the Saudi/Russia alliance on managing the oil market.

With the Aramco IPO coming up in 2018, the Saudis have turned into activist managers of oil markets and price hawks.  They want to avoid a repeat of the May 2017 meeting when OPEC set expectations for potentially deeper cuts but only enacted a longer duration of cuts disappointing markets and sending Brent crashing from $54 to $45 after the meeting.

No extension decision at the November 30 OPEC meeting would see a negative market reaction, and therefore we think it is a very unlikely scenario.  Instead, we believe there is consensus for a 3-month extension moving the expiration date to June 2018 and timed perfectly for OPEC’s mid-year meeting of 2018.  OPEC will then have another six months to reassess market conditions and consider next moves.

Moscow Mystery or OPEC Playbook? - cy


You're Leaving Hedgeye Risk Management...

By selecting this link, you are now leaving the Hedgeye Risk Management (“HRM”) website. The following website contains information concerning investment products managed by Hedgeye Asset Management (“HAM”), an affiliate of HRM, or a firm partnering with HAM, and is subject to HAM’s Privacy Policy. As a separate legal entity, all HAM asset management services are made independently by portfolio managers at HAM and, as such, funds may vary from HRM research.

HRM is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of information on external websites. HRM does not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in any investment product or any particular investment advisory. Any opinions or recommendations from linked websites are solely those of our affiliate and are not the opinions or recommendations of HRM.

HRM DOES NOT PROVIDE PERSONALIZED INVESTMENT ADVICE OR ENGAGE IN ANY ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICE. LASTLY, THIS LINK IS NOT AN OFFER TO BUY OR A SOLICITATION TO SELL ANY SECURITY OR INVESTMENT PRODUCT, OR THE SOLICITATION OF ANY ADVISORY SERVICES.