“A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something that he can learn in no other way.”
In money management, like many professions, the act of doing is probably the best training available. There is nothing like a mistake to change your process or habits, and when you manage money professionally the mistakes come frequently. The key, of course, is what you do with the mistakes and how you adjust to them.
This is certainly an interesting time in the money management business. In the last few years, we’ve seen a number of long time and highly successful portfolio managers decide to get out of the game. In fact, earlier this week Keith and I had coffee with a Hedgeye subscriber who will be converting his highly successful hedge fund into a family office at the end of the year.
This gentleman, like many of his peers, didn’t have one specific reason for returning outside capital, but rather was more generally concerned about the ability to generate returns that justified the fees. On some level, that is a high class problem. But the truth of it is, in our view, monetary policy and policy makers have taken us to a place where the risk / reward in many asset classes is simply not all that compelling. Simply put, if you are going to carry the proverbial cat by the tail, you want to believe that the reward of that action equates to the risk.
Of course, this is not to say that all is necessarily negative. In fact, this morning is one of the more bullish runs of economic factors that we’ve seen for some time. A few things to consider this morning:
1. China – The Shanghai Composite was up +4.3% overnight to cap off a two week run of +9.6%. As a consumer of commodities, China will have its best moves when input prices are deflating, so to see a breakout above our key resistance line of 2,905 on the Shanghai Composite, we will likely need to see Bernanke and Company get out of the way for this rally to be sustainable. It also doesn’t hurt that the HSBC Flash PMI came in a little better than expected at a stable 50.9, which implies an economic recovery may be taking hold in China.
2. Germany – As the old adage goes, there is always a bull market somewhere. Going into yesterday, the DAX was up 29% in the year-to-date, which makes it one of the top ten performing equity markets globally. This move in Germany equities is supported by the high frequency economic data, such as the services PMI from this morning which came in at 52.1 versus its 49.7 reading in November.
3. Commodities – Many of the story tellers have suggested that commodity prices go up purely because of supply / demand or tight economies and while at times this is true, the reality remains that monetary policy is a big driver. To the extent that global central bankers get even marginally more hawkish, it will negatively impact commodity prices. As we all know, economic recoveries don’t occur at $150 per barrel crude oil and getting oil lower sustainably will be a key factor supporting any sustained economic recovery.
Collectively, this data and these real-time prices are signaling a shift from #SlowingGrowth to #StabilizingGrowth. This is potentially very positive for equity markets. The question from here is whether the government can stay out of the way of economic stability.
To dig into this last point in more detail, we are going to be hosting Stanford Economics Professor John Taylor this coming Tuesday at 1pm EST for a conference call (if you are not an institutional macro subscriber and would like information on attending please email ). Bloomberg Markets recently named Professor Taylor to their 50 Most Influential List and he was on the short list to replace Chairman Bernanke under a Romney administration, but he is probably most known for the creation of the Taylor rule.
The Taylor rule is a monetary-policy rule that stipulates the degree to which central banks should change nominal interest rates in response to measures of economic output, specifically inflation. The theory behind the Taylor rule is that it increases the credibility of the central bank by reducing uncertainty in monetary policy actions. In effect, the rule reduces the need for arbitrary decisions by central banks.
Generally speaking, while Taylor believes that government has a role in managing the economy, the role should be limited and predictable. As such, he has been highly critical of both Democratic economists like Paul Krugman and Republican economists like Alan Greenspan. In fact, Professor Taylor wrote the following in the Wall Street Journal about the financial crisis in 2008:
“Government actions and interventions, not any inherent failure or instability of the private economy, caused, prolonged, and worsened the crisis."
That’s a statement we couldn’t agree with more.
The big topic we will be discussing with Taylor is the upcoming fiscal cliff and the potential outcomes. Currently, it seems that a resolution between now and the end of the year is unlikely. President Obama and Speaker Boehner met for an hour last night and, shockingly, there was apparent movement to a resolution. So as things stand today, in just over two weeks taxes are set to increase dramatically and government spending is set to decline.
As we’ve stated, this will have an impact on economic growth in the short run, though the positive implication may well be dollar strength as the United States takes some fiscal medicine. The other looming issue, which we highlight in the Chart of the Day, is that in Q1 2013 the federal government is likely to hit another debt ceiling.
So, it seems our politicians have a few cats by their tails . . . it will be interesting to see what they learn.
Our immediate-term Risk Ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), Copper, US Dollar, EUR/USD, UST 10yr Yield, and the SP500 are now $1, $105.61-108.98, $3.63-3.71, $79.51-80.31, $1.29-1.31, 1.66-1.74%, and 1, respectively.
Keep your head up and stick on the ice,
Daryl G. Jones
Director of Research
This note was originally published at 8am on November 30, 2012 for Hedgeye subscribers.
“America is the only country that is constantly being reborn.”
-William Knudsen, 1945
I’ll be turning my attention to a fresh new history book this weekend. I’m looking forward to that. I always do. It’s the only way I learn how to proactively manage for future risks – by contextualizing history’s behavioral patterns and economic cycles.
The aforementioned quote comes from the conclusion of the book I have been reviewing as of late – Freedom’s Forge. It’s an interesting quote. It probably makes an American feel good. As much as I respect Bill Knudsen, it’s completely inaccurate too.
How do you think the Chinese and Germans feel about that? If you’ve studied the last 400-500 years of economic history, you’ll recall that global economic hegemons are slowly, but constantly, changing. Before its war with Britain began in 1839, China had almost 1/3 of Global GDP. In the last 3 years, the USA has fallen from 23% to 21% of Global GDP. Where will it go from here?
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
Now that the bull case for US stocks has gone from “growth is back” (Q112) to “but earnings are great” (Q212) to the government is going to save us from themselves (Q3/Q4 2012, Qe and #Keynesian Cliff), is America Reborn? As what?
If we really are asking to be reborn, maybe we should consider birth rates. Looking at America’s birth rates (officially released this morning), as US GDP as a % of Global GDP has fallen in the last 3 years, the USA’s birth rate has fallen -8% to a record low.
Japan has a negative population growth rate. And while the Keynesian Quacks who have been perpetuating unlimited Quantatitive Easing, Currency Devaluation, and Debt Financed Government Spending in Japan for the last 20 years doubt they’ve had a causal impact on the correlation between Japan’s economic decline and societal despair, to me at least, gravity is readily apparent.
So, let’s “get a deal”, kick the can, print some more money, and do more of that…
It’s sad to watch. And while I think I am doing my own part in being the change we need to see in our profession, my hope for an America “Reborn” on the principles of equality, liberty, and “free” markets is fleeting.
My hope for a Strong Dollar isn’t a risk management process either – and risk, of course, works both ways – so the best I can do is attempt to risk manage a tape that’s begging for more of what will ultimately make America look more like a European Social Democracy.
In terms of US Equity performance chasing, where is American risk trading into month-end?
- SP500 has rallied back from the thralls of its Q4 lows (on no volume) to down -4% from its Bernanke Top
- US Equity Volatility has been stamped right back down to its long-term TAIL risk zone of 14-15
- SP500 close > 1419 (TREND resistance) = bullish; a close below 1419 = bearish
All the while, despite the Dollar Debauchery (Cliff can kicking and Qe4 rumors have the US Dollar down for 2 weeks in a row), the US Treasury Bond market doesn’t care:
- UST 10yr Bond Yields down 7 basis points on the week, from 1.69% to 1.62%
- Treasury Bond Yields remain in a Bearish Formation, reflecting Global #GrowthSlowing expectations
- Yield Spread (10yr minus 2yr Yields) has compressed another 5 basis points wk-over-wk to +137bps wide
Now some still think the US stock market is the global economy, so just a reminder on our answer to that:
- CHINA – Shanghai Composite hit a fresh 3yr low this week; no China “stimulus” in sight
- COPPER – lower-highs continue since March (we shorted Copper yesterday)
- BOND YIELDS - Treasuries are going to beat Corporate Bonds in November (Corporate #EarningsSlowing)
But, again – if you are more concerned about what the government can do for your year-end bonus in December, all we need to see are 2 things:
- Japanese Style Can Kicking on the #KeynesianCliff
- Rumors from Hilsenrath (WSJ) into the close on Bernanke doubling (heck, tripling) his monthly printing
Who would have thunk? The great American Republic of “free-market liberties” reborn as a casino of market expectations driven by what Pelosi and Boehner might say next. Think about it in historical context before you beg for more of it – then think about it again.
Our immediate-term Risk Ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), Copper, US Dollar, EUR/USD, UST 10yr Yield, and the SP500 are now $1704-1732, $109.88-111.49, $3.43-3.62, $79.94-80.58, $1.29-1.31, 1.57-1.67%, and 1406-1419, respectively.
Best of luck out there today and enjoy your weekend,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.
Takeaway: This US stock market is back in a Bullish Formation for the right fundamental economic reasons.
This note was originally published December 13, 2012 at 11:11 in Macro
POSITION: Short Commodities, Long Consumer
This US stock market is back in a Bullish Formation for the right fundamental economic reasons. Deflating commodity inflation is one of the very few policies the government has tried yet. That, of course, is because it would require them to get out of the way.
Across our core risk management durations, here are the lines that matter to me most:
- Immediate-term TRADE resistance = 1435
- Intermediate-term TREND support = 1419
- Long-term TAIL support = 1366
In other words, bullish is as bullish does until it doesn’t. The volume signals in this market are beyond alarming at this point. I get that, but also get that consensus hedge funds tend to capitulate and cover at no-volume lower-highs when the VIX hits 14.
So there’s plenty to consider as you risk manage this very manageable Risk Range (1419-1435). What was TREND resistance (1419) is still confirming itself as newfound support.
If it doesn’t hold, we’ll change our position.
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
The athletic footwear sales trends out this week have investors nervous. At first glance the deceleration is notable, but a closer look at recent trends suggest that the turn is in areas that are significantly under-represented at FL/FINL. Our interpretation of the data is that trends remain strong where it matters. We think this is a solid buying opportunity for both FL and FINL on perceived weakness in trends.
There are multiple ways to parse the weekly/monthly footwear sales results to gauge underlying trends at footwear retailers like FL and FINL. The two that have proven most indicative of underlying trends that we track most closely are:
- Looking at the monthly data by channel which separates Athletic Specialty sales from the Department Store (KSS, JCP, etc) and Shoe Chain (BWS, DSW, etc.) channels that have been underperforming, and…
- Tracking our own Performance vs. Non-Performance footwear index. This analysis has yielded the more notable callout.
Simply put, performance categories (Running, Cross Training, and Basketball) which account for ~75% of athletic footwear sales and where FL and FINL are over-indexed are materially outperforming non-performance categories (Boots, Casual, Hiking, etc.).
Recall on the FL’s 3Q earnings call in mid-November, the company reported month-to-date comps up +MSD despite industry sales down -6% according to the weekly data. Over the past two years, the spread between Performance footwear vs. Total Athletic footwear has been somewhere between 5-to-10pts and currently stands at the upper end of that range. This spread can be clearly seen in the following charts below. As our proprietary index suggests, underlying Performance footwear sales are still running up +HSD (high-single-digit). What’s accounting for the industry sales deterioration is the Non-Performance index, which is largely sold through the Department/National Chain channel.
The bigger question for us is whether weakness in these non-core categories can be so sustained and pervasive such that they can carry through to the Foot Lockers of the world. We think we’d need to see months of that type of trend to pose this risk. We simply not there, but the market is starting to discount that it will come to fruition.
The bottom-line is that we think weakness in both FL and FINL reflect investor concerns based on underwhelming industry sales data without accounting for the critical distinction between Performance and Non-Performance categories. As such, we think this recent weakness is an great buying opportunity for both FL and FINL.
Our estimates remain above the Street for both names. On FL, we’re 6% above consensus EPS for 4Q with a +8% comp, and are looking at $3 in earnings power next year approaching $3.50 in F14. We still think this one is in the early stages of its turnaround and see more opportunity for upside earnings performance over the intermediate-term.
On FINL, we are in-line with Street expectations in the upcoming quarter and year where we think upside in earnings is limited due to current investment spending, but are shaking out +5% and +8% ahead of consensus in 2013 and 2014. At 9.5x our 2013 estimate, we think setup for earnings growth next year is not reflected at current levels.
Both FL and FINL are among our top long ideas behind NKE, FNP and RH.
Over the last six months, the market has shifted greatly with events like the fiscal cliff and Federal Reserve announcements shifting the performance of stocks. If we look at sectors, financials (XLF) have been outperforming the broader market (S&P 500) greatly while technology (XLK) has struggled to play catch up. With Apple (AAPL) heading lower week-after-week, it's going to be rough for people who bought into technology at peak levels.
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.