prev

EBO > EAO

My partner Keith McCullough recently coined the phrase “earnings before Obama” or EBO. With a supportive congress, President Obama is likely to follow through on Candidate Obama’s populist rhetoric. I see four areas where Obama’s policies could drive EAO below EBO.

• Taxes – Corporate income taxes may or may not rise but personal income and capital gains taxes are certainly headed higher. “Hidden” taxes and fees on corporations would likely increase.

• Interest rates – In another post today I addressed the likely EPS hit from bank line refinancing. This was before even considering macro level interest rates which are likely to rise under an Obama administration advised by Paul Volcker. Attacking inflation could certainly benefit the long term economy but near term profits would suffer.

• Regulation – We’ve had a de-regulating trend in this country for nearly 30 years. Obama would likely reverse that positive trend and with it force up compliance costs.

• Labor – This is a biggie for my companies. Obama favors the “Employee Free Choice Act” which I’ve discussed in previous posts. Despite opposition from liberal stalwart George McGovern in Friday’s WSJ, this democratic congress favors the union initiative to oust the secret ballot in union elections. An open petition or “card check” will certainly result in more union victories. Higher wage costs, reduced labor flexibility, and lower productivity should follow.

I do not write a political blog and Research Edge is not a political firm. Like most firms we have diverse individual views but we do share at least one important value: objectivity. So while I’m not expressing a political opinion on whether an Obama presidency is good for America, I am trying to make an economic call that Obama will not be good for consumer stocks.



Chinese Wage Inflation De-bunked...

Inflation needs to be understood on two fronts, not just the commodity front. On the wage front we have a dynamic situation whereby inflation in Asia and Eastern Europe is running well ahead of that being realized in the West.

What China and Russia will have to deal with in the coming months is not unlike the ominous combo that Nixon faced here in the 1970’s – wage and price spirals occurring in tandem. Both countries look to be sustainably pushing towards wage inflation of +20% year over year growth.

When I posted the chart of Chinese wage inflation earlier in the week, I had questions in reply asking what the numbers might look like if I looked at urban workers versus those driving the numbers in rural China. Edge always lies in the question, and I think that is the one to ask. According to the Xinhua article on July 28th out of Beijing that was pulling numbers from the latest issued by the China National Bureau of Statistics, “urban workers' per capita salary averaged 12,964 Yuan (1,878 U.S. dollars) in the first half of this year, up 18 percent year-on-year.”

So, yes, the wage inflation number appears lower on the urban side of the ledger, however it’s still running at a considerably higher rate than reported Chinese CPI which is running around 8% for the same time period.

On Tuesday, we’ll have our eyes on the latest Chinese inflation report for July. It is global this time, indeed.
KM
  • Research Edge, LLC

A Two Horse Race

There’s no question in my mind that the US footwear environment is shaping up to be a 2-horse race from a brand perspective. This is all about Nike and Under Armour.

I say that tongue in cheek, as we’re talking about a company with 35% share vs another with 1% share. But that gap will close to some degree. Will it come out of Nike? No way!! Nike won’t let that happen, and it has the deep pockets to prevent it. But that’s bad news for New Balance (10% share) Adidas (6%), and Reebok (3-4%).
  • I still think that the big winner is FL and FINL. The brands don’t compete on price, they compete on innovation. That brings traffic back to performance channels – from fashion channels (ie Journeys, and even dept stores).
  • How does it end? Nike maintains share or a growing market, Under Armour takes up share dramatically (from 1% up to 3-4%) but at a 300-500bp margin hit, AdiBok takes it on the chin with growth and margin as Reebok all but goes away in the US, and the athletic specialty retailers (FL, FINL) actually start to comp again.
  • Added consideration. With AdiBok tanking in the US, and with my prior post about how Adidas and Reebok basketball players are in the pole position with NBA jersey sales in China, one needs to ask if Nike is overspending to protect share in the US and is exposing itself in growthier markets?? Could Adidas be playing a pretty good game of chess after all? Make Nike spend up in one market to dominate in another? Definitely an issue to dig into.
Under Armour is the sole share-gainer in US footwear aside from Nike.
Nike is simply crushing it in the US.

GET THE HEDGEYE MARKET BRIEF FREE

Enter your email address to receive our newsletter of 5 trending market topics. VIEW SAMPLE

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

Merrill Lynch (MER): To Short Or Not To Short?

From Wall Street’s vaunted CEO’s, we’ve all seen our fair share of what my favorite hockey Coach used to call “misinformation” in 2008. Most of these CEO’s have either been fired or are currently under fire, however. Save one John Thain, who is actually Merrill’s new face, but not a new one to the Street.

Goldman Sachs has produced some interesting politicians as of late. John Corzine, is suffering from bad public opinion polls as the Governor of New Jersey. Meanwhile, Hank Paulson is doing his best to admit that he has no idea what to do for the next 3-6 months before he loses his job as the Secretary of the Treasury. Then we have Mr Thain, another Goldman alum, who is one of those guys that apparently thinks he is so smart that he can fool everyone with “misinformation”, including himself.

In Merrill’s recently filed 10Q, Thain’s latest disclosure was that the $4.3 Billion stake that he announced Merrill was selling back to Bloomberg wasn’t exactly a cash deal. In fact, Michael Bloomberg didn’t really give Merrill any cash at all. Merrill gets $110M in cash, and the rest in long term notes! Yet, John Thain was waiving Merrill’s sale of their 20% stake in Bloomberg as a liquidity event? I don’t get it. I guess he is hoping no one does.

We have our eyes on Thain’s concept of transparency. This is the 2nd time he has been ‘You Tubed’ in less than a month. For one, that’s hard to do; secondly, it’s just embarrassing. Insiders bought a pile of MER stock at $22.50/share at the end of July, but that certainly doesn’t mean much to me. Insiders have been buying stock in poorly managed companies at terrible prices since November of 2007.

Merrill is one of those companies that I am looking to re-short into this latest market rally. I like to sell high, and cover low – I do not have a position currently, but I will if the stock fails at my resistance line of $28.66. At 4.1% of the float, the stock has a shockingly low short interest relative to the risks implied in their equity valuation. This company has negative cash flow from operations and will have no visibility on paying their dividend if the US economy deteriorates to the extent that it has the potential to from here.

My math says that a drop from $28.66 to $22.50 is a -21.5% decline, and I’ll happily cover the stock alongside any insiders who are brave enough to buy more on that downside test. If the stock can close above $28.66, I’ll stay on the sidelines and refresh this point of view as the facts change. For now, be weary of what this company states as facts.
KM
  • If MER fails at $28.66, I'll be shorting it.
(chart courtesy of stockcharts.com)

Footwear Market Looking More Stable

The footwear industry finally seems to have stabilized in the US after nearly 10 weeks of cycling one of the most intense periods of discounting in years. Undoing last year’s sins when aggressive pricing drove clearance activity, we’ve recently had +10-20% selling price gains offset by commensurate unit sales decline.

We’re finally back at zero barrier – at almost the exact point when back-to-school sales start to pick up. Translation? We’re back to a point where these numbers gain increased relevancy on many fronts. My team and I will be watching them like a hawk.

Given the conservative fall buying I’m seeing out of many of the footwear retailers, I like how things are shaping up. I’m, still liking FL.

What Nike Does Not Want You To See

I am floored by the list below showing the top 10 NBA Jerseys in China ranked by sales in ‘07/’08. Nike has only 40% share of the top 10 NBA jerseys sold in China over the past year. 40% might seem respectable -- -but not when Nike/Jordan and Converse collectively have 90% share of the basketball footwear market in the US.
  • Just as alarming for Nike is that the other 60% is held by AdiBok. Kobe is Nike, which is nice given his #1 slot. LBJ is too, but he’s #7. Not good. Paul Pierce (Nike) is an amazing player, but does not connect with US consumers. Wade is Converse (Nike sub). But Garnett, McGrady, Iverson, Howard, Arenas and Yao? They’re all AdiBok.
  • Basketball has been the single most impenetrable franchise inside Nike. To say that Nike’s Asian sales and marketing team is feeling massive pressure to face this challenge is an understatement. Nike does not like to lose. But so far, it is losing…
  • With 10 out of 11 US players on the US Olympic team donning the swoosh, let’s hope the team makes a lasting impression in Beijing.
Nike's better hope that NBA Jersey sales don't lead basketball footwear market share in China.
40% Nike, 60% AdiBok.

Early Look

daily macro intelligence

Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.

next