It’s very easy to get caught up in the ‘beat/miss vs. expectations game’ as well as all the noise around door openings and product launches. I sat on this thing for way too long today trying to make sense of it. But there are several MAJOR questions I have that are better answered by simple mathematics.
The key questions I have revolve around FX, sourcing, and margins. WRC noted that FX was a 3.4% boost to revenue in the quarter. What I want to know is how a company with a 22% sales growth rate and 50% of sales outside of the US could only benefit by 3.4% when weighted FX change is 10-15%??
My math gets me to something closer to a $65mm top line benefit. Assuming a 30% incremental margin, this is about $20mm, or 4 points of margin. In other words, excluding this FX impact we’d be looking at 6% sales growth (not 22%), margins closer to 6% (not 9.7%) and operating profit that is flattish with last year.
How can this be good if the Euro continues to roll? What if cotton goes to a buck vs. the sub-0.70s? What if the sourcing environment continues to erode as factories close in Asia to the tune of 5-10 per day? WRC management noted that costs are under control. Everyone says that. What no one says is how they are planning for the unexpected – the extent to which they will be in the pole position when the industry acts irrationally as margins go away for the companies that have underinvested at the peak.
It’s tough for me to fight the tape on this one. Heavily shorted stocks that beat numbers don’t go down. In fact, a close above 45.01 is a bullish signal from a quantitative standpoint per Keith. Not as bullish as we see with RL. But bullish enough. Could we see WRC’s multiple defy gravity for a while longer? Yes. Ultimately, however, something’s gotta give. And when it gives, run.
get free cartoon of the day!
Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.
On most mornings when my alarm goes off at 4am, I have no idea what I am going to write my “Early Look” about. I am data dependent, and that’s just the way that it is. Summers, however, looks to have had plenty of time to coagulate a lot of the thoughts that I have alluded to in my 2008 missives.
I’m an aspiring Yale economist, of sorts – at least that’s what the B.A. on my resume says. Summers is an established Scribe, and the former head of both the US Treasury and Harvard University. If you think I am too negative on the “Trend”, read his take.
Summers correlates today with the central banking credibility issues associated with the 1970’s, but he points consistently to the 1930’s in the US and the 1990’s in Japan. “Just as the bottom was called a number of times in Japan in the early 1990’s and in the US in the early 1930’s, we have seen and no doubt will see moments of sunlight that create hope that the worst is past”, he wrote.
Other quotes by Larry Summer’s that I wanted to highlight:
• “Then there is the problematic situation of the banking system. Where traditional non-mark to market accounting is in use, banks have not yet revised estimates of their capital to reflect likely future losses… they have instead assumed that the market’s valuation of their assets reflects transient liquidity factors rather than underlying problems.”
• “We do not have a framework in place in which authorities can do what is necessary to counter systemic risk”
• “Government involvement in recapitalizing financial institutions is like devaluation: a very unattractive last resort”
Article at (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/794801a8-63e8-11dd-844f-0000779fd18c.html)
If you think the "Tech Bubble" settlements were bad for Wall Street, wait until the lawyers get their nails under this moldy rug.
This is the "R" (Re-Regulation) factor within our RIPTE model. Citigroup (C) has rallied to $20 in recent weeks. On a break down through the $17.79 line, I see $14/share being re-tested. Don't forget what happened to this company in 1991.
The question for the US stock market is where does Johnny Mac go from here?
- McCain's Runnup Signalling A Near Term Top?