The Tea Party Cometh

Conclusion: Signs of the of anti-incumbency theme continue to flash, which should ultimately benefit Republicans in the midterms.  In addition, it should also be a positive for the healthcare sector.

 

With Rand Paul’s victory last night, the Tea Party has in a certain sense become main stream.   We were hashing through the primaries in our morning research meeting, and someone posed the question: What exactly does the Tea Party stand for?

 

Obviously a good question and their website, teapartypatriots.org, is fairly direct in its message.  According to the Tea Party’s mission statement:

 

“The impetus for the Tea Party movement is excessive government spending and taxation. Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values of Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government and Free Markets.”

 

In his victory speech last night, Rand Paul galvanized the mainstream nature of the Tea Party as he referenced them directly in his speech.  He said:

 

“I have a message, a message from the tea party, a message that is loud and clear and does not mince words: We have come to take our government back.”

 

Rand’s victory appears to be a continuation of the Run Against Washington incumbency theme that we have been discussing.  Whether anecdotal or not, it is becoming clear that not being an incumbent has a real advantage in politics these days.  In the past month, this theme has been underscored by the following: 

  • Arlen Specter lost in Pennsylvania even though he was being backed by the sitting President;
  • As mentioned, Rand Paul beat the established Republican candidate for the primary in Kentucky;
  • Senator Bob Bennet lost his party’s nomination earlier in the month in Utah at the State Republican Convention; 
  • Two-term Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas is being forced into a runoff for her party’s nomination; and
  • John McCain, the most recent Republican candidate for President, currently only has 50% of support in his primary battle in Arizona.

Typically one major incumbency challenge is noteworthy, but when every race becomes a challenge against incumbency that is a sign of an emerging sea of change.  As many studies note, incumbents typically win re-election 90% of the time.  These early data points are noteworthy and mark the beginning of perhaps a serious shift by voters away from incumbency.

 

This idea is also supported in recent polls.  Specifically, a recent ABC News-Washington Post poll indicated that nearly six in 10 respondents they’re not likely to vote for their current representatives to Congress.  This poll, and the evidence above, does not bode well for Democrats in the upcoming midterms – particularly as President Obama’s approval rating is mired near the lowest of his Presidency, with a 48.0 approval rating on the Real Clear Political Poll aggregate.

 

As the party in power, the Democrats are in effect the incumbent political party.  And with support for incumbents at generational lows, this could lead to a shift comparable to the one experienced under President Clinton in 1994, the last time incumbency support was this low.

 

In 1994, the Democrats went from a 57 Senators in the majority to the Republicans reclaiming the majority with 52 Senators.  On the same token, the Democrats went from a majority in the house with 258 members to the Republican’s reclaiming a majority with 230 members.

 

As it relates to your portfolios, the sector that will benefit most from Republicans regaining both houses is Health Care (XLV).  As our Healthcare Sector Head Tom Tobin wrote last week:

 

“A Republican return to the majority in the US House of Representatives this fall may be considered a big positive for Healthcare.  But as the Europeans are showing us now, budget cuts are coming to the US.  With Healthcare spending running 22% of Federal spending, it is likely that cuts will be targeted at Healthcare and other entitlement spending.   On the margin, Republicans are likely better for Healthcare private industry, but Deficit Reduction, tinged with a permanent Tea Party taste, could be an equivalent threat as the Democrat/Progressive world view.”

 

A shift is to the right is likely a positive for healthcare investors, but if the Tea Party movement increases then other healthcare risks increase.

 

Daryl G. Jones
Managing Director


Cartoon of the Day: 'Biggest Tax Cut Ever'

President Donald Trump's economic team unveiled what he called last week, "the biggest tax cut we’ve ever had.” Before you get too excited about that hang on a sec. "Trump Tax Reform ain’t gettin’ done anytime soon," Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough wrote in today's Early Look.

read more

Neurofinance: The Psychology Behind When To Sell A Bull Market

"Most momentum investors stay invested too long, under-reacting and holding tight after truly bad news finally arrives to break the trend," writes MarketPsych's Richard Peterson.

read more

Energy Stocks: Time to Buy the Dip? | $XLE

What the heck is happening in the Energy sector (XLE)? Energy stocks have trailed the S&P 500 by a whopping 15% in 2017. Before you buy the dip, here's what you need to know.

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Hard-Headed Bears

How's this for "hard data"? So far, 107 of 497 S&P 500 companies have reported aggregate sales and earnings growth of 4.4% and 13.2% respectively.

read more

Premium insight

McCullough [Uncensored]: When People Say ‘Everyone is Bullish, That’s Bulls@#t’

“You wonder why the performance of the hedge fund indices is so horrendous,” says Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough, “they’re all doing the same thing, after the market moves. You shouldn’t be paid for that.”

read more

SECTOR SPOTLIGHT Replay | Healthcare Analyst Tom Tobin Today at 2:30PM ET

Tune in to this edition of Sector Spotlight with Healthcare analyst Tom Tobin and Healthcare Policy analyst Emily Evans.

read more

Ouchy!! Wall Street Consensus Hit By Epic Short Squeeze

In the latest example of what not to do with your portfolio, we have Wall Street consensus positioning...

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Bulls Leading the People

Investors rejoiced as centrist Emmanuel Macron edged out far-right Marine Le Pen in France's election day voting. European equities were up as much as 4.7% on the news.

read more

McCullough: ‘This Crazy Stat Drives Stock Market Bears Nuts’

If you’re short the stock market today, and your boss asks why is the Nasdaq at an all-time high, here’s the only honest answer: So far, Nasdaq company earnings are up 46% year-over-year.

read more

Who's Right? The Stock Market or the Bond Market?

"As I see it, bonds look like they have further to fall, while stocks look tenuous at these levels," writes Peter Atwater, founder of Financial Insyghts.

read more

Poll of the Day: If You Could Have Lunch with One Fed Chair...

What do you think? Cast your vote. Let us know.

read more

Are Millennials Actually Lazy, Narcissists? An Interview with Neil Howe (Part 2)

An interview with Neil Howe on why Boomers and Xers get it all wrong.

read more