The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly



Last night at 11:50pm, CityCenter got its gaming license and opened its doors to the public.  We have mixed opinions on the property as shown below, but the major concern continues to be whether this property has enough of a differentiated appeal to drive visitation beyond the room/casino supply it is adding.  We remain skeptical.



The Good:

  • Different, modern feel for those who, well, like the new and modern feel
  • Lots of exciting new dining options
  • Several new clubs and bars
  • Great artwork and like Wynn/Encore there are lots of nuances to the property that will likely take many stays to discover
  • Central location on the Strip


The Bad:

  • The modern feel may not appeal to many gamblers 
  • Despite the “natural light”, on overcast days or in the mornings, the casino feels very dark with its “earthy” colors
  • There are already lots of overpriced dining options in Vegas, many of which are now offering discounted pre-fix that the budget-strapped consumer or the “trade-up” customer can afford
  • While the central location is nice, you still have to walk several blocks off Las Vegas Boulevard to get to Aria. So it may not get the same foot traffic as many center-strip properties get with easier egress


The Ugly

  • The rooms are very small... or as one person euphemistically put it “urban chic”.  Unfortunately, this isn’t New York and the finicky Vegas “higher end” guest that typically stays at Wynn/Encore, Venetian/Palazzo, or Bellagio is used to more space.  The tower suite was, at most, 300 square feet.  There’s only one chair next to the bed and, directly beside that, a desk with a flat screen mounted over it.  I think that this property will have a real challenge charging rates at a premium to Wynn and some of the other premium properties.
  • The Elvis show was a total flop.  Hopefully they can improve it over time, The experience felt like attending a bad Elvis musical.  Many people we spoke to felt the same.







The 480k print this morning marks a small step back from the 457k and 462k levels two and three weeks ago, respectively, but the volatility of weekly initial claims numbers makes it necessary to focus on rolling claims. We use a four week rolling average to smooth out that volatility.


The rolling average claims improved further this week to 468k from 473k last week - an improvement of 5.2k, and in-line with the slope of 5.3k/week since March (8.3 months of data). We are keeping a close eye on this metric as rolling claims are the leading indicator for ongoing recovery in the economy and, by extension, the loan books for consumer lenders.




For those wondering how to interpret a possible inflection in rolling claims in coming weeks, should there be one, we would suggest using a positive slope of 7.2k/week as an outer risk band. This is the fastest weekly rate at which rolling claims increased over a two week period since the trend of improvement began in March. Alternatively, in the absolute, one can use 490-495k as a rolling upper limit based on the downward channel that's been in place since March.


Ok, so Vietnam is not on your list of countries that you watch on a daily basis – we do.  The big news today is not the Citi (C) debacle but what is happening in Asia—there were big breakdowns in the TRADE lines in the equity markets of Vietnam, China and Hong Kong.


Last night Vietnam was down 1.6% and is now down 30.5% over the past month.  That is a stock market CRASH!  Also last night, Hong Kong broke its TREND line of 21,557, declining 1.2%. The next question is, why?   We see the reason being China. Not only did the Shanghai A-Shares get smoked last night trading down 2.3%, but also broke its TRADE line, an important momentum line that has not been violated in quite some time. 


We continue to make the call that China is going to slow down from an economic data point perspective in 1Q10.  It should also be on your radar screen that we’ve seen a big divergence in the property stocks in China, which have underperformed the local index by nearly 1000 bps.  Our take-away from this is that the property bubble appears to be popping in China, just like the financial “bubble” is popping here in the US.  The XLF has underperformed the S&P 500 by 990 bps over the past three months.


We continue to harp on the fact that China is going to restrict loan growth in the property sector because of “bubble” fears. 


With the Japanese market declining for the past three months, there is not much in Asia that looks positive right now.   



Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer




get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

HOUSING – A Bottoming Process

It was recently reported that November housing starts rose month-to-month by 8.9%.  October’s starts were revised so as to show a 10.1% decline, after initially having been reported down by 10.6%. The year-to-year change was down by 12.4% in November, following a revised annual contraction of 30.9% in October.   


As seen in the chart below, since December 2008, housing starts have been bouncing along the bottom at historically low levels.  In November housing starts were reported at 574,000 versus the 3-month moving average of 564,000.  Over the past 6 months housing starts have averaged 576,000.  Since June 2009, all monthly readings have been within the normal range of monthly volatility around the 6 month average. 


To describe the housing market in a "recovery" phase based on housing starts is a slight over statement.  No matter how you look at it, housing starts remain well below any levels seen since the end of World War II.


Howard Penney

Managing Director


HOUSING – A Bottoming Process - starts1


HOUSING – A Bottoming Process - starts2

Mind the Covert Deal Activity

Overnight, there have been a number of statements (and speculation) about a number of deals in retail and consumer. Most are small and seemingly inconsequential. But looked at in aggregate, it supports our view that M&A activity in retail will pick up meaningfully in 2010.


  1. Delta Apparel buying Art Gun Technologies, a maker of technology needed to customize patterns and colors on garments.
  2. A SPAC is stepping up to buy Fashion Box, the owner of “Replay”, “We Are Replay” and “Replay & Sons” (no kidding) denim brands.
  3. Emerisque – who recently bought Hartmarx, said in a public statement that it is stepping up its acquisition efforts meaningfully – but apparently is subscribing to the Ackman-esque model (remember when he justified losing money on Target by saying that he uses a 50-year model?) and distancing itself from financial buyers that are now pained with the task of unloading similar deals that were done 3-4 years ago at peak margins and valuations.
  4. Also some non-retail deals worth noting

       a) Apollo buying Cedar Fair for $700mm.

       b) Boyd/Station
       c) Jarden broadens its portfolio of eclectic assets with the acquisition of Mapa Spontex.
       d) Sally Beauty Supplies buys Sinelco – a beauty supply distributor in Europe.


A notable trend is that since the Dollar General and Rue 21 deals, the IPO part of our ‘Banker Bonanza’ call has dried up. But the M&A portion appears to be picking up steam. The evolution into 2010 should be when both are humming simultaneously.


I was not a big believer that restaurant stocks would post strong performance in 4Q09 when comparisons “were easy” – demand is just not there.  While many analysts have suggested that the decline in capacity was a net positive for the industry, the decline in visits has been enough to offset it (and then some) so there is really no net improvement in trends for the industry. 


In 2008, the restaurant industry faced both declining demand and historically high input costs (the double-edged sword).  The big story in 2009 has been that margins have benefitted from dramatically lower food costs and a rationalization of individual business models, despite no recovery in top-line trends.  In 2010, I am not yet a believer of the demand-recovery story and the cost cutting story will be in the rear view mirror, as will the lower food cost story.  In that respect, the underlying themes in 2010 may not be too different from 2008; though the magnitude of commodity inflation may not be as great and the decline in demand not as surprising.


Demand Trends

I see no real shift in 2010 in the consumption-led recession that the restaurant industry faces.  Employment issues, access to credit and increased savings (or debt reduction efforts by consumers) will continue to put incremental pressure on traffic trends and average check. 


According to NPD's CREST data, traffic declined across all restaurant segments for the quarter ending September 2009. Total industry traffic declined 4% YOY in 3Q09.  By segment, visits to QSR declined 4% and Casual Dining visits were down 5%.


Casual dining same-store sales growth, as measured by Malcolm Knapp, continues to get worse on a 2-year average basis as we move through 2009 (outside of July, when operators, on average, posted their biggest declines year-to-date).  QSR demand trends have fallen off more significantly in recent months, leading JACK management to say in a presentation last week that it now appears that consumers are trading out of the restaurant segment rather than trading down to QSR.


Margin Trends

I have been saying for some time now that the trajectory of margins in 2009 is not sustainable without a pick-up in top-line trends.  As you can see in the charts below, both QSR and casual dining margins have moved higher in 2009 after declining for most of 2008 for QSR and for a much longer period of time for casual dining.  Specifically, 1Q09 marked the first time the casual dining operators on average grew margins since 3Q04.  The two food cost charts below also show that both the QSR and casual dining sectors have benefitted tremendously from favorable YOY commodity costs in 2009 as food costs combined with labor costs account for about 60% of restaurant companies’ operating expenses. 


Although food costs as a percentage of sales have continued to move lower on a YOY basis, the trend for food costs is already moving higher as evidenced by the CRB Food Stuff Index (also shown below), which bottomed in 2Q09.  For the casual dining names on average, the change in food costs as a percentage of sales on a 2-year average basis appears to have already bottomed in 2Q09; though costs are still coming down YOY. 


The decline in absolute commodity costs, however, is not the only factor to consider when looking at food costs as a percentage of sales.  Also impacting these numbers is the prevalence of industry discounting.  Without such discounting, these food costs as a percentage of sales would likely be lower.  I would argue that lower food costs in 2009 have afforded restaurant companies the opportunity to take promotional activity to a new level in a desperate move to stave off traffic losses.  The real question in 2010 is what the impact on margins will be if this discounting continues when food costs move higher.  And, if rising costs force companies to rethink their discounting tactics, what will happen to demand?


I maintain that margins will again be the big story in 2010; though I do not expect them to move in the same direction as 2009.  Demand will remain soft and food costs are likely to move higher.  And, the commodity headwind in 2010 will only complicate the fact that most companies will be lapping the bulk of cost saving initiatives they took in late 2008/early 2009.










Food Costs Trends

When it comes down to understanding the dirty details on food costs, the timing is slightly different for each individual company due to long-term contracts.  Regardless of the timing and length of contracts by company, it does not change the fact that we will be hearing about higher food costs in 1Q10. 


Beginning in 2010, the dagger in the back of the restaurant industry could result from declining food production and a more rational food processing industry.  In November, global food costs jumped 7%; the most since February 2008.  So far in 2009, farm price inflation has lagged behind prices for copper, gold and oil.  The big MACRO question is will the global economic recovery, especially in emerging markets, spur an increase in demand for food and thus, drive commodity prices higher?


In an inflationary environment, the agricultural commodities and related stocks will be the biggest beneficiaries.  On the margin, restaurant companies will be the biggest losers; the marginal restaurant concepts will be hit the hardest.  I’m thinking about smaller companies in the very crowded Bar and Grill segment, like RT and CHUX, who do not have the same level of purchasing power as that of their larger competitors.   


As a result of the combined impact of lower herd sizes and low inventories in a number of grains markets, the prospect of food inflation in 2010 cannot be ruled out. 


Pork and Poultry processors are reducing herd size

After two-years of losing money, pork farmers have cut the herd size to the smallest level since the USDA started collecting data in 1964.  As a result, wholesale-pork prices are up 27% this year.  While this may already seem dramatic, the CEO of Smithfield Foods believes that “further liquidation is needed." 2010 projections include another 4% cut to herd size.  As an aside, I’m not naive to the fact that Smithfield Foods has a big economic incentive to convince competitors to reduce production.


The same holds true for the poultry industry.  In 2009, broiler production decreased for the first time since 1975; the USDA is estimating a 3% decline in 2009.  Currently, the USDA is forecasting a 1% production increase in 2010.  However, there is a chance that production could decline again in 2010 for the following reasons:  (1) the continuation of volatility in feed costs, (2) uncertainty of maintaining exports to the two largest markets - China and Russia, (3) a sluggish economic recovery in the United States and globally, and (4) continued reluctance on the part of banks to lend money.


The key segment to watch in 2010 is wholesale chicken wing prices.   Currently, wing prices surpass boneless/skinless breast meat prices.  The ever-growing consumer demand for buffalo-style wings is putting increased pressure on a relatively fixed supply of wings.  As the boneless wings trend continues, it will help ease the price pressure on bone-in wings while adding marginally to the demand for breast meat.  I continue to be very cautious on BWLD going into 2010.


Milk Supplies are tight

In 2010, higher milk and cheese prices are almost a given.  In 2009, dairy farmers have been reducing their herd size, too.  Currently, domestic dairy production is down 8.2% in 2009.  According to the USDA, the price of nonfat dry milk, used in baking products and baby formula, will rise to an average of $1.275 a pound next year from 92 cents, and cheese will increase 28%.  Also, the USDA thinks processed and fluid milk will jump 31% to $16.75 per 100 pound.    


Corn prices and Federal mandates

Corn prices began to decline in 2008 when it became apparent that flooding in the Midwest had not devastated the corn crop and that farmers would harvest another large crop in 2009.  Fast forward to today and the USDA is projecting that the US will need more corn in the coming months than will be harvested; the implications are that we are beginning to draw down on reserve stocks.  The likelihood that we could face a repeat of 2008 increases as the federal mandate for corn-based ethanol keeps increasing. 




RESTAURANTS 2010 – REMEMBER THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD - Wheat current vs forecast

Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.