Cliggott: Here's the $64,000 Question Right Now

03/21/17 01:00PM EDT

Editor's Note: Below is a Guest Contributor note written by our friend Doug Cliggott. Cliggott is a former U.S. equity strategist at Credit Suisse and chief investment strategist at J.P. Morgan. He is currently a lecturer in the Economics Department at UMass Amherst. 

Cliggott: Here's the $64,000 Question Right Now - Bull and bear extra cartoon

On markets...

My views on bonds haven't changed a whole lot from six months ago. But I was wrong on 2017 earnings ... I thought they would be down quite a bit this year, but it does not look that way now.  Profit growth has turned positive. 

1) I think the 10-year yield is heading higher.

Why? Faster inflation caused by rising unit labor costs.  

Non-farm productivity growth remains dismal:  0.2% in 2016, following 0.9% in 2015 and 0.8% in 2014.  With hourly compensation growing at 2.9%, BLS reports unit labor costs rose 2.6% in 2016, up from 2.0% in 2015.  A  2.5% 10-year yield seems unsustainable when unit labor costs are rising at 2.6%. 

Non-residential fixed investment remained stagnant in 2016, even as after-tax cash flow edged up, so it is hard to see what will push productivity growth higher in the near-term.  The focus of corporate America remains returning cash to shareholders rather than investing in the future.  

Share buybacks and dividend payments equaled 53% of cash flow in the non-financial corporate sector in 2016 -- that compares with a 35-year average of 34%. {This is based on Fed data, Cliggott calculation from Table F.103 in the Z1 release - new Fed website looks pretty cool, btw}

Meanwhile, cap ex by non-financial corporations equaled 73% of cash flow in 2016 -- that compares with a 35-year average of 84%.  The two numbers combined {shareholder payments of 53% + cap ex of 73%} still looks high relative to the long-term average combined total of the two -- 34% +53% = 117%.

So if US corporates slow their borrowing for some reason {higher rates?}, my guess is cutting cap ex will come before cutting payments to shareholders.

2) Most LEI's around the world bottomed last summer - including the U.S. 

That was a big surprise to me. This data tends to fit well with the U.S. corporate profit cycle.  Hence my change in view on 2107 profit growth.

I guess now the $64,000 question is -- Is this the beginning of a new cycle or "noise" on the way down?  I honestly don't know ... but given leverage levels and interest rate trends I am VERY SKEPTICAL that this is the beginning of a new credit / profit cycle. 

So my guess is renting {with a short-term lease} rather than owning US equities makes the most sense at this stage. I would note that the IWM hasn't made any net progress in three months ... and the next OECD LEI data release is April 10th!

© 2024 Hedgeye Risk Management, LLC. The information contained herein is the property of Hedgeye, which reserves all rights thereto. Redistribution of any part of this information is prohibited without the express written consent of Hedgeye. Hedgeye is not responsible for any errors in or omissions to this information, or for any consequences that may result from the use of this information.