The Economic Data calendar for the week of the 23rd of November through the 27th is full of critical releases and events. Attached below is a snapshot of some (though far from all) of the headline numbers that we will be focused on.
Yesterday, CAKE’s CFO Doug Benn made what I thought were some interesting comments about restaurant acquisitions in response to a question at an investor conference. When reading Mr. Benn’s response below, it is important to remember that he is speaking from experience as he was the CFO of RARE when it was acquired by Darden in October 2007.
Question: Strategically how does the company think about acquisitions going forward, does that become a more important element over the next couple of years or...
Answer: I think capital allocation is the big question for us, I think next year it’s going to be rather easy, we have $125 million with debt, there is a guaranteed result when you pay down your debt, you know exactly what's going to happen, and then after that there is only the limited number of things that you can do. The company is going to generate substantial free cash flow, acquisitions would be something that we would consider, but be very careful about generally in our industry, maybe in a lot of industries, but certainly in the restaurant business, the acquirer is not the one that makes well in this acquisition, so you got to be very careful, you're either buying a company that is in trouble when you have to fix it and you got a good deal on it or you're potentially overpaying for something that's working very well. It's something that we would look at, but not something that's imminent at all.
I understand that this was merely an off-the-cuff remark and I may be reading too deeply into his comments, but I find this response to be somewhat telling of how Mr. Benn feels about RARE’s decision to sell out to Darden and subsequently, how he feels about Darden now. He says that the “acquirer is not the one that makes well,” which in my scenario would be Darden. He does not say it but that might imply that it is the acquired company that makes out well in the deal, which again, in my scenario points to RARE. In selling to Darden, RARE received a premium multiple just as trends at LongHorn were beginning to soften. Trends have obviously deteriorated further since then so what did Darden get out of the deal?
Again, this is just my interpretation of what he was saying! But, I do think Mr. Benn makes a valid point. Restaurant acquisitions/mergers do not typically make a lot of sense because like he said, companies are often forced to overpay for assets or buy underperforming assets that require a lot of money to fix (if they can be fixed at all).
Regarding CAKE, I think Mr. Benn’s less than positive view of restaurant “acquirers” means we don’t have to worry about the company making any acquisitions any time soon. Instead, CAKE’s future earnings growth will come from a return to positive same-store sales growth and new unit growth as he outlined in his presentation yesterday. This growth plan may not bring about immediate results as it relies on increased consumer spending and job growth, but I think an acquisition would only complicate matters both in the near-term and long-term.
No matter where you go, there that stubborn ole inflation data is. ..
‘He Who Sees No Bubbles’ (Bernanke) will continue to have to face both pending inflation data and continued populist pressures to arrest it.
A lot of people are asking me why the US Dollar has strengthened in the last few days. While it has been ignored by Bernanke, that certainly doesn’t mean this continued REFLATION in the CPI data ceases to exist.
In the chart below, Matt Hedrick and I show what we have been calling for – a Reflation Rotation in the reported Consumer Price Inflation data. The green arrow is what sucked Bernanke into this Great Depressionista narrative. The red arrow is how wrong he has been in forecasting The New Reality. Burning the Buck is, in the end, inflationary. Here are the facts:
Notwithstanding that the calculation for America CPI is ridiculous (they have changed it 9x since 1996), if I accept the Federal Government’s word for it, I still see a rotation from deflation to inflation, using their numbers!
On the margin, for those who are not paid to be willfully blind, this chart is hawkish.
On the margin, hawkish inflation data is bullish for the US Dollar as ‘He Who Sees No Bubbles’ claims to be “data dependent.”
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.
It doesn’t take a whole heck of a lot to get REFLATION traders nervous about their positions does it?
If you didn’t know that the inverse correlation between US dollars and mostly everything priced in those dollars is the most relevant barometer for daily risk management right now – well… now you know.
The US Dollar is up for the 3rd day in a row, and the SP500 is down for the 3rd day in a row. So was that the cycle low for the US Dollar? Is the Buck Bombed Out? That’s one of our 3 Macro Themes here at Research Edge for Q4 of 2009. Currently we are not short the USD. Bottoms are processes, not points.
Currently, the US Dollar is trading up +0.52% to $75.68. Ordinarily, this would be just one more of those opportunities to load the long side of the boat with anything priced in bucks – but swimming along what we call The Shark Line, is far from ordinary.
For those of you who recall our Q2 MEGA Squeeze call for the US stock market, you’ll remember our salty water friend, Squeezy The Shark. He’s making a comeback here today. Matt Hedrick is smiling right now.
If the US Dollar Index is able to hold its gains here and close above it’s immediate term TRADE line, the probability for an immediate term short squeeze in the Bombed Out Buck goes up. That TRADE line is outlined in the chart below at $75.58.
Some people say they don’t care about TRADE lines. I say they should. All TRADEs in my macro model have an opportunity to become TRENDs. The intermediate term TREND line for the USD is now $76.98.
I do not think the bearish TREND in the Burning Buck will be violated to the upside, but I do think that an immediate term TRADE squeeze could test that thesis.
From here, that would put an almost +2% up move for the USD in play. The de-leveraging effect of USD up moves can be as high as 4-5:1, so please manage the risk associated with your long exposure accordingly. I moved to a 67% position in Cash in the Asset Allocation model earlier this week. That’s too high, so I want to be buying things on weakness, but I don’t want to be too early.
If the US Dollar fails to hold today’s strength and rolls over again. Squeezy can go back to sleep.
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
As follow up to our overview this morning on FL and the space in aggregate, here are some notables that mgmt threw out on the conf call, fyi… They support the case for this name (and space) turning on the margin into 2010) as the rest of retail rolls.
Balance of commentary out of FL positive - a few notables:
Today we have included three new charts to help manage risk around the S&P 500, USD Index and the VIX.
The S&P 500 declined 0.9% yesterday, with the index seeing its biggest one-day pullbacks since October 30th. The RECOVERY trade faced headwinds from the bounce in the dollar. The Dollar Index rose 0.11% yesterday and is now up two out of the last three days.
On the macro front, the economic calendar offered some support to the market. Initial jobless claims were unchanged at 505,000 in the week-ended November 14th, and the four-week moving average fell to 514,000 from 521,000, the lowest level since last November. In addition, continuing claims fell for a ninth straight week. The Philly Fed Index was another bright spot, rising to a better-than-expected 16.7 in November from 11.5 in October, with new orders increasing to 14.8 from 6.2 and shipments jumping to 15.7 from 3.3. Leading indicators only rose 0.3% in October vs. consensus expectations for a 0.4% gain; the index is still up for a seventh straight month.
Over the past two days the news flow on the consumer related trends continue to show some deterioration from the recent trends. This week mortgage applications declined 2.5% last week to the lowest level in 12 years. It was reported yesterday that mortgage delinquencies rose to a seasonally adjusted rate of 9.6% at the end of the 3Q09.
Yesterday, the VIX rose 4.6%, but has declined 6.6% over the past week.
While every sector declined yesterday, the three best relative performers were Consumer Staples (XLP), Healthcare (XLV) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY). While the XLY was one of the better relative performers, it was a busy day on the earnings calendar with HOTT, DKS, LTD and ROST all reporting in line numbers. Although, all four stocks declined yesterday on guidance that was disappointing!
The worst performing sectors were Energy (XLE), Financials (XLF) and Materials (XLB). With the dollar up it was a tough day for the sectors with leverage to the global RECOVERY theme. Within the XLB, the steel stocks were the notable decliners.
From a risk management standpoint, the ranges for the S&P 500, USD Index and the VIX are seen in the charts below. The range for the S&P 500 is 33 points or 2% upside and 1% downside.
Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.