• run with the bulls

    get your first month

    of hedgeye free


Cartoon of the Day: Eating Crow

Cartoon of the Day: Eating Crow - Brexit cartoon 01.05.2016


"Oh have the Brexit Bears been wrong," writes Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough. The FTSE hit yet another post-Brexit high today after the U.K.'s Services Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) for December accelerated to 56.2 versus 55.2 in November. We still like the Pound on the long side, especially against the Euro.



Click here to receive our daily cartoon for free.


Why Are Kohl's Shares Down -20% Today? It's On The Road To Extinction

Why Are Kohl's Shares Down -20% Today? It's On The Road To Extinction - kohls image dodo2

What do the Dodo bird and department store Kohl's have in common? One word: Extinction. Hedgeye Retail analyst Brian McGough has been warning that Kohl's is on the "road to extinction" for some time now. Even after the -20% decline, McGough is sticking with his short call.

ICYMI: What to Watch Ahead of Tomorrow’s Jobs Report


If we see a positive Jobs Report tomorrow, we think Gold and the 10-year Treasury get smoked.”

–Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough

Get ready. It’s Jobs Day tomorrow.

And we think most investors are missing a critical opportunity ahead of Friday’s labor market check-up.


The Federal government’s Non-Farm Payroll report, as the jobs report is called, will give us an update on the number of jobs added for the month of December. Since February 2015, the year-over-year growth (or rate of change) in jobs has been slowing, from that peak of 2.58% to the November reading of 1.58% (see the brief video above for more).


It’s one of the few U.S. economic indicators that’s still slowing.


But this could change. Especially as we head deeper into 2017 and jobs growth “compares” get easier. This means last year’s absolute jobs number, over which tomorrow’s December reading will be compared to calculate year-over-year growth, is a lot lower. So, essentially, labor market growth isn’t as hard to come by, particularly heading into the first and second quarter of 2017.


Sell Gold (GLD) and Long-Term Treasury Bonds (TLT) ahead of the report. These are classic slower economic growth macro exposures. In other words, they could get crushed tomorrow if tomorrow’s jobs report is better than expected.

Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble

Takeaway: An easy money Fed encouraged investors to blindly buy stocks. Passive index funds benefited. Active funds lost. That may be changing.

by Mike O'RourkeJonesTrading


Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble - blindfolded man


We started highlighting the trend towards “Blind Buying” back in 2013 and over the course of 2016, the trend reached new heights. In general, we are referencing behavior in which individual stock analysis plays little or no role in the investment process. In short, equities are purchased for exposure to the asset class as opposed to purchasing a company’s shares based upon the individual growth and value prospects of its business.


While the strategies come in many forms – asset allocation, automated, correlation driven, factor driven, social media driven – none has been more influential than the shift away from active investing towards passive investing. That has become one of the key themes of the market over the past year.


Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble - orourke callout 1 5


It was three decades ago when the seminal research by Brinson, Hood and Beebower was published indicating that asset allocation is the overwhelming determinant of returns in comparison to market timing and stock selection. Over the past three decades, this point has been debated countless times. 


Subsequent research has noted that the high correlation reported is the result of “aggregate market movement,” i.e. they are all invested in stocks. This is often referred to as the "rising tide lifts all boats" argument.

The 9-Year Bull Market: Active vs. Passive Funds

Regardless, there are numerous arguments and examples of passive funds outperforming active funds. One can understand how those arguments have reached a fever pitch as we head into the ninth year of a bull market, a bull market that has been fostered by unconventional accommodative policy.


This is a policy that has included 9+ years of one or more major central banks always buying assets and concurrent zero or near zero interest rate policies. In such an environment, it becomes very easy to outsource the decision making and let the market (and the central banks) do all of the work.


It is a one size fits all approach. The leading rationalization behind riding the rising tide has been the fact that equities are “relatively” inexpensive in comparison to Treasuries (which are very expensive), even after the bond market selloff over the past 6 months.


Interestingly, that Fed Model relationship moved dramatically during the Treasury selloff and equities are now the most expensive they have been versus Treasuries since 2010 (chart below), which is the year earnings began to recover.


Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble - fed model


Considering both stocks and bonds are very expensive, comparing them to one another is a dangerous proposition. A more realistic approach is to measure how expensive stocks and bonds are together - relative to history. One can add the S&P 500 earnings yield and the 10 year Treasury yield, essentially inverting the Fed Model.


One can go one step further and multiply the S&P 500 earnings yield by 60% and the Treasury yield by 40% to create the theoretical historic valuation for a 60% equity/40% fixed income portfolio mix (chart below). The readings for both metrics over the past year, especially the past 6 months, rank in the most expensive percentile of readings dating back to 1962.

Why do active managers exist?

They exist so investors can differentiate their returns. In different environments, different stocks, industries, sectors and assets perform better than others. When the two main assets reach their most expensive levels in 56 years, one can understand why investors are not looking to differentiate.


Furthermore, the static monetary policy environment that is almost a decade old has accentuated and elongated this trend. When policy is static, investors don’t need to worry about how policy will influence their holdings and “one size fits all” appears to work.


When monetary and fiscal policy change and the static environment comes to an end, investors will once again need to look to differentiate. Apparently, this is not happening overnight, but as each gradual shift occurs, the gradual pressure will grow into an unsustainable weight.


Since inflation has been rising for over a year and it’s on pace to continue, now is not the time to argue that low inflation justifies a higher multiple. Many will be caught off guard because it has been way too easy to “set it and forget it” in recent years.

Bottom Line

The psychology associated with simply being invested in the “market” has become so pervasive that it is reminiscent of the 2005-2006 housing bubble arguments that “US Home prices have never declined year over year” - until they did. One size fits all makes sure you are wearing something, but it may not be the right thing.


Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble - 60 40 model


Guest Contributor: Current Market Psychology Reminiscent of 2005 Housing Bubble - disclaimer


This is a Hedgeye Guest Contributor research note written by Michael O'Rourke, Chief Market Strategist of JonesTrading, where he advises institutional investors on market developments. He publishes "The Closing Print" on a daily basis in which his primary focus is identifying short term catalysts that drive daily trading activity while addressing how they fit into the “big picture.” This piece does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Hedgeye.

Can Stocks Hit Fresh All-Time Highs? Yup. Volume Is Accelerating

Can Stocks Hit Fresh All-Time Highs? Yup. Volume Is Accelerating - volume accel

The U.S. stock market is within spitting distance of all-time highs


Which begs the question: Can the market go higher? You bet.


As you can see in the Chart of the Day below (from today's Early Look), equity market volume (the number of shares traded on U.S. stock exchanges) yesterday was up +11% versus its 1-month average and up 8% versus the 3-month average. The S&P 500 was up +0.6% yesterday. This follows increasing volume in Tuesday trading as well, when the market was up 0.85%. Here's the volume scorecard on that move higher:


  • Trading volume (1/3) vs. 1-month average: +30%
  • Trading volume (1/3) vs. 3-month average: +26%

What Accelerating Volume Means For Stocks

Think of accelerating volume (on up days) as a vote of confidence that the market can head higher. It's simple. If more investors are buying as the stock market heads higher that's bullish. Conversely, if volume accelerates on down days that means investors are selling in droves. That is very bad and very bearish signal.


Consider what happened during a two particularly trying weeks at the end of October and early November in which stocks fell -3%. Volume was consistently accelerating as investors headed for the door. On November 1st and 2nd, volume was up almost 20% versus the one-month average as stocks dropped -0.6% on both days. 

Bottom Line

We're a far cry from those dismal days today. The U.S. economy is growing, stocks are heading higher and volume is accelerating. All of this bodes well for equities. We don't see an end to the 9-year bull market just yet.


Can Stocks Hit Fresh All-Time Highs? Yup. Volume Is Accelerating - 01.05.17 EL Chart  2

The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation

The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation - food delivery cartoon 01.05.2017


Veteran restaurant industry analyst Howard Penney is calling it "the most disruptive change in the restaurant industry in this generation." He's referring to restaurant DELIVERY and his analyst team is hosting a special call featuring in-depth analysis of this development Thursday at 1pm ET.


Penney will discuss how the consumer's need for convenience is paramount. Access to food is no exception. With the likes of Domino's and other pizza players having had a lock on meal delivery for some time, it is now time for others to join the party.


Here's a brief look at some key discussion points.



The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation - Z POST


There has been a spread of third party delivery services such as DoorDash and Postmates which have received considerable venture funding, and partnered with many independents and large national chains.



The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation - z grub


Historically, GrubHub has merely been an aggregator of orders. But now it has begun to delve into the delivery space. Both organically and through acquisitions.


GRUB's business model is under severe pressure. We see considerable downside to management's lofty top line and margin goals given competitive actions and company initiatives around delivery. The commission model is also going to be under pressure and is unsustainable at the current rates.



The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation - z panera


The chain of bakery-café fast casual restaurants has been investing immense amounts of capital to push out their Panera 2.0 initiative, which is nearly completed in company-owned stores. Panera Bread's next frontier is delivery, which they anticipate will be in 15% of units by the end of 2016, and ramping to 35% - 40% of the system by the end of 2017.


We are looking at 2017 as being another investment year for PNRA and 2018 will be a much cleaner year from a profitability standpoint. We believe PNRA's ownership of delivery will allow them to maximize the profitability while having complete control of the process, yielding top of class results.



The Most Disruptive Change In the Restaurant Industry In This Generation - z dominos


Founded back in 1960, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was President, Domino's Pizza remains the darling of the restaurant industry from a technology and convenience standpoint. It trades at a premium valuation accordingly. We have not talked about DPZ much, but we now believe there is line of sight to their domination in the delivery business ending.




If you are an institutional investor interested in accessing this call email sales@hedgeye.com.

Early Look

daily macro intelligence

Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.