prev

Alcoa (AA): -6.2% Intraday Reversal From Opening Highs, Ouch!

This kind of pin action doesn't make the hearts of the levered long momentum investing community grow fonder - that, I can assure you. Since my "Fading Fast Money" call on May 21, Alcoa has lost 1/3 of its value.

Short interest is only 2% of the float and we have some "concentrated" hedge fund players on the top holders list that are getting pretty good at buying tops. This continues to look like a great cyclical short.

Earnings season has officially begun.
KM

(chart courtesy of stockcharts.com)




Solid Gold: Amidst Today's Carnage, GLD Shines...

If you have a big allocation to anything that closed up on the day today, smile. That's called alpha. Gold continues to act well on days when US equities swoon. The best part about it is that it's no one's liability.

Attached is the chart of GLD. It's up over +7% since the mid May US bear market rally high in US stocks.

*Full Disclosure: I own GLD in my fund.
KM


Hedge Funds Facing The Reality Of Oversupply...

Bloomberg Article today By Katherine Burton and Saijel Kishan - "Hedge Fund Research Inc. show. It's the worst start to a year since the Chicago-based firm began tracking returns in 1990"....
--------
That story is getting a lot of air time today, and it should - 18 year lows are statistically significant. Can you imagine what these numbers would look like if they back tested 25,000 PM's performance across real bear market cycles like that of 1973-75?

The numbers for June's quarter end are rolling in, and the tide is rolling out on the levered long community. To borrow Buffet's analogy, now we can see who was swimming naked, without a risk management process.

I've been making this call since November of 2007 when I left the buy side. So now, at the very least, I do not have to endure the countless "you have an axe to grind" emails I was getting 9, 6, and 3 months ago from strangers. They were levered long, and ultimately proven wrong.

KM

the macro show

what smart investors watch to win

Hosted by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough at 9:00am ET, this special online broadcast offers smart investors and traders of all stripes the sharpest insights and clearest market analysis available on Wall Street.

RRGB - I Have Seen this move before and the ending is ugly

There are currently two major components driving the direction of RRGB's traffic trends: pricing and advertising. As I have said before, specifically as it relates to SONC and CBRL, rising prices often leads to a drop off in traffic. It appears that senior management at RRGB is using price to protect margins, at the expense of traffic trends. Unfortunately, this is a story that has an ugly ending for shareholders.
  • Average check was up 4.3% in 1Q08 (traffic down 0.4%) and RRGB management commented at the Oppenheimer conference today that it implemented its expected late June 2.7% price increase. 3Q08's traffic trends could be hurt significantly by this most recent price increase as the company will be running at about 6% price through mid-August and should average about 4% for the year.
  • RRGB launched its national advertising campaign in April of 2007 and ran advertisements for 11 weeks in FY07. This year the company increased this ad time to 23 weeks and its total spending to $18-$18.5 million from $11.5 million in 2007. RRGB's traffic trends benefited in 2Q07 and 3Q07 from this incremental spending but turned negative in 4Q07 when the ads went off the air. There was some sequential improvement in 1Q08 traffic (still slightly negative) when there were incremental weeks of advertising relative to no advertising in 1Q07. 2Q08 advertising levels, however, will be about even with last year. The chart to the right shows the quarters when there was no advertising, increased advertising weeks versus the prior year (upward arrows) or an even level YOY relative to reported traffic results.
  • RRGB is scheduled to report its 2Q08 results on August 14, but management issued an 8-K today stating that recent sales trends may trend to the low end of the previously guided sales assumption for the full-year 2008. Because the company had just raised its top-line guidance on its 1Q08 conference call in late May to 2.5%-4% same-store sales growth (from 2%-3.5%), $905-$918 million in revenues (from $880-$893 millions), trends must have decelerated during 2Q. Traffic was most likely hurt by both the increased pricing relative to last year (and this is before the most recent increase) combined with the fact that there was no incremental advertising relative to 2Q07.

Uranium: Don't Cry For Me Obama!

Next week will mark the three year anniversary of the meeting between Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Bush that laid the groundwork for a proposed nuclear energy agreement.

Today Communist factions of the ruling Indian coalition abandoned Singh's party to protest the deal, threatening both his administration and joint US/Indian nuclear development.

Despite rabid opposition from his own side of the aisle, Singh has signaled continued commitment to the deal -with rampant inflation driven by higher oil and coal costs his administration is under tremendous pressure to find meaningful energy solutions. It remains to be seen if he can actually get the deal done, a process that will require additional approval from the IAEA, NSG and the US congress.
  • Andrew Barber Director Research Edge, LLC

China Throwing Factories a Bone??

I almost fell out of my chair this morning when I saw a report from the China Securities Journal that the Chinese government may raise tax rebates for apparel exports from 11% to 15%. Definitely a positive gesture, and one I need to consider as it relates to my 'sourcing margin squeeze' thesis. But the bottom line is that this does not come close to moving the needle.

Aside from the narrowing trade gap, the impetus for this move appears to be that Premier Wen Jiabao and his top economic leaders visited major exporting provinces over the weekend, and saw first hand the impact of regional business challenges (quake, floods) as well as rising wage and raw material costs.

Do you think that maybe they should have thought of this before cutting the VAT tax rebate, and then subsequently mandating earlier this year that factories in key regions pay employees back-pay for vacations?

Remember that there were about 4,750 footwear factories in the Guangdong province earlier this year, and that 2,331 of them have closed due to these cost pressures. Perhaps they're showing some regret for the number of factories they put out of business.

Unfortunately, footwear gets no relief here, as these tax rebates in question apply to apparel only.

But even for apparel, we need to do some math. The cash freed up in the supply chain due to these changes equates to about $0.45 on a $100 garment. We need to see 3-4% pricing power to offset cost pressures. Aside from the fact that China accounts for just short of 40% of our apparel imports (vs. 85% for footwear), this is simply not enough to move the needle.

real-time alerts

real edge in real-time

This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.

next