Increasing Odds of Preemptive Strike Against North Korea

Takeaway: North Korea's nuclear test makes the commander-in-chief question in the campaign real.

Editor's Note: The note below was written by Hedgeye Potomac Research Senior Defense Policy Advisor LtGen Emerson "Emo" Gardner USMC Ret. For more info on our institutional research email sales@hedgeye.com.

 

Increasing Odds of Preemptive Strike Against North Korea - z kim

 

If it had been an earthquake that measured 5.3 on the Richter scale

 

...North Korea's fifth nuclear test would be considered "moderate", one of over a thousand such occurrences that happen each year.  The impact will be far greater than "moderate" on the campaign and on US defense policy and activity over the coming months.  

 

This was the most powerful North Korean test yet, estimated to be between 10 and 20 kilotons, approximately the size of the Hiroshima bomb, "Little Boy".  North Korea's second test this year comes just 16 days after North Korea's better than expected test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) that went over 300 miles before landing inside Japan's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).  North Korea has claimed that its nuclear test was of a missile-sized payload.

 

While we do not believe that North Korea has the capability to put the two capabilities together yet, it will - and well within the first term of the next President.   Pacific commanders have become increasingly concerned about the rate of North Korean progress.  Although the test was not unanticipated and fits into the well-known North Korean pattern of seeking concessions through aggressive behavior,  the actual event shows the apparent ineffectiveness of sanctions.  Those sanctions had just been increased to the "toughest yet" in March and President Obama has been in Asia for the last week calling for more.   

 

One of the two Presidential candidates who talked about everything but what is really important about being the next commander-in-chief during Matt Lauer's pathetic job interviews on Wednesday night will have to decide how the US is going to stop Kim Jong Un from getting these tools.  

 

A preemptive strike against North Korean capabilities has always been on the US menu of options.  While an effective strike against North Korean nuclear or missile launch facilities can be done, the concept is no slam dunk.  North Korea has been preparing to be attacked for decades. The 10 million people of Seoul are extremely vulnerable to well-concealed North Korean artillery and no amount of preemptive strikes will be totally effective against their use.  

 

Nevertheless, the probability of a US preemptive strike happening over the next twelve months has increased.

 

Two reasons:

 

  1. The North Koreans will do something provocative again soon.  President Obama is certain to tighten the screws further on North Korea and may even get Chinese support. North Korea almost always reacts to such pressure by ratcheting up the tension or doing something provocative.  
  2. Both candidates will try to out tough-talk each other on this issue as it moves to the top of the pile of steaming campaign fodder and one of them is going to be elected.

*  *  *

Email sales@hedgeye.com for more info on our institutional research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


SECTOR SPOTLIGHT | Live Q&A with Healthcare Analyst Tom Tobin Today at 2:30PM ET

Join us for this edition of Sector Spotlight with Healthcare analyst Tom Tobin and Healthcare Policy analyst Emily Evans.

read more

Ouchy!! Wall Street Consensus Hit By Epic Short Squeeze

In the latest example of what not to do with your portfolio, we have Wall Street consensus positioning...

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Bulls Leading the People

Investors rejoiced as centrist Emmanuel Macron edged out far-right Marine Le Pen in France's election day voting. European equities were up as much as 4.7% on the news.

read more

McCullough: ‘This Crazy Stat Drives Stock Market Bears Nuts’

If you’re short the stock market today, and your boss asks why is the Nasdaq at an all-time high, here’s the only honest answer: So far, Nasdaq company earnings are up 46% year-over-year.

read more

Who's Right? The Stock Market or the Bond Market?

"As I see it, bonds look like they have further to fall, while stocks look tenuous at these levels," writes Peter Atwater, founder of Financial Insyghts.

read more

Poll of the Day: If You Could Have Lunch with One Fed Chair...

What do you think? Cast your vote. Let us know.

read more

Are Millennials Actually Lazy, Narcissists? An Interview with Neil Howe (Part 2)

An interview with Neil Howe on why Boomers and Xers get it all wrong.

read more

6 Charts: The French Election, Nasdaq All-Time Highs & An Earnings Scorecard

We've been telling investors for some time that global growth is picking up, get long stocks.

read more

Another French Revolution?

"Don't be complacent," writes Hedgeye Managing Director Neil Howe. "Tectonic shifts are underway in France. Is there the prospect of the new Sixth Republic? C'est vraiment possible."

read more

Cartoon of the Day: The Trend is Your Friend

"All of the key trending macro data suggests the U.S. economy is accelerating," Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough says.

read more

A Sneak Peek At Hedgeye's 2017 GDP Estimates

Here's an inside look at our GDP estimates versus Wall Street consensus.

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Green Thumb

So far, 64 of 498 companies in the S&P 500 have reported aggregate sales and earnings growth of 6.1% and 16.8% respectively.

read more