• run with the bulls

    get your first month

    of hedgeye free


The U.S. Industrial Recession Continues

Takeaway: Year-over-year industrial production numbers declined for the 11th straight month.

The U.S. Industrial Recession Continues - industrial production 8 16


Today's year-over-year industrial production number came in at -0.5% marking the 11th consecutive month of contraction. (The vertical red bars in the chart above mark recessions and anything below the red line indicates a contractionary reading.) For context, and a bit worrisome, it's worth noting how long industrial production contractions lasted during the last two economic recessions:


  • Recession, December 2007 - June 2009: Industrial production declined for 12 straight months (y-o-y)
  • Recession, March 2001 - November 2001: Industrial production declined for 16 straight months (y-o-y)

The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July

On Friday, we published a research note titled, “Here Comes the Inflation Boogeyman” in which we thoroughly detailed our hawkish outlook for reported inflation over the next three quarters, as well as the implications therein for both investors and policymakers.


With the advent of today’s soft inflation data for the month of JUL, one could make the case that we’re 0-for-1 in pending 9-month forecast period:


  • Headline CPI decelerated to +0.8% YoY from +1.0% prior, missing Bloomberg consensus expectations of +0.9%;
  • Core CPI nudged down to +2.2% YoY from +2.3%, missing Bloomberg consensus expectations of +2.3%; and
  • Looking to our proprietary “Essentials Basket”, which is comprised of non-discretionary items like food and shelter, the annual inflation rate ticked down -40bps sequentially to +0.6% YoY; this is right in line with the TTM average.


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - CPI


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - CORE CPI


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - CPI ESSENTIALS PLOT


All that being said, however, we’re not in the business of playing pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey for any single economic data release. Our process is specifically designed to forecast inflections or continuations in trending (i.e. multi-quarter) rates of change across growth and inflation, with the express intent of forecasting how policymakers might respond to those deltas. Indeed, understanding the interplay between these three principle components of factor exposure performance has helped us make more than our fair share of lucrative and often contrarian macro calls over the years: http://docs3.hedgeye.com/macroria/An_Introduction_to_the_Hedgeye_Macro_Research_Product.pdf.


Going back to domestic consumer price inflation specifically, we are still anticipating a trending acceleration over the intermediate term. There is, however, one important development that we think is worth calling attention to – i.e. the divergence between commodity price changes and Headline CPI.


As we outlined in Friday’s note, our analysis has shown fluctuations in commodity prices have been the primary driver of the marginal rate of change in reported Headline CPI for nearly a decade now. But with this relationship breaking down, at the margins, throughout 2016, Core Goods CPI and Core Services CPI may be slated to become increasingly important as drivers of trending changes in rates of Headline CPI – something that would certainly imply less upside in our outlook for the latter (particularly as we start lapping trough energy compares in 1Q17).


  • Correlation between the rate of change of our commodity price basket and Headline CPI from JAN ’08 through DEC ’15: +0.78; correlation 2016-to-date: -0.61;
  • Correlation between the rate of change of Brent crude oil and Headline CPI from JAN ’08 through DEC ’15: +0.84; correlation 2016-to-date: -0.49;
  • Correlation between Core Goods CPI and Headline CPI from JAN ’08 through DEC ’15: +0.25; correlation 2016-to-date: +0.43; and
  • Correlation between Core Services CPI and Headline CPI from JAN ’08 through DEC ’15: +0.23; correlation 2016-to-date: -0.54.


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - INFLATION MODEL


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - BRENT CRUDE OIL MODEL


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - Core Services Inflation Less Core Goods Inflation


All told, it’s too early to tell whether or not the aforementioned divergence between commodity price changes and Headline CPI is here to stay, but it bears watching and reacting to to the extent we don't see a meaningful "catch-up" reversal in Headline CPI in the AUG/SEP timeframe. Moreover, the jury’s still out on Core Goods CPI and Core Services CPI taking over as key drivers of inflation from here.


As of now, we don’t either of these observations is sustainable and still anticipate a trending acceleration in Headline CPI – likely alongside wages – over the intermediate term.


The Inflation Boogeyman’s Flight Got Delayed In July - NFP YoY vs. YoY Wage Growth


All the best,




Darius Dale


BOJ Not Buying Stocks = Nikkei Back In Crash Mode

Takeaway: Nikkei back in crash mode as the BOJ didn't buy stocks last night.

Dollar Down, Yen Up …. And the Nikkei smoked right back into crash mode (-1.6% overnight and -21% from the 2015 Global Equity #Bubble peak) as the BOJ did the un-thinkable and didn’t “buy stocks” into the bell… (this should all end well). The JGB 10yr Yield fell 2bps to -0.11%.


Meanwhile, Nikkei Asian Review reports that Japan's stalling growth is adding fuel to the GDP measurement debate between the Bank of Japan and the Cabinet Office. Funny how these debates always heat up when output sucks.



Editor's Note: The snippet above is from a note written by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough and sent to subscribers this morning. Click here to learn more.

Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

TGT | Short The News

Takeaway: Manageable expectations. Deteriorating fundamentals. Competitive pressures intensifying. Short the news.

We're bearish on TGT, and think that the print on Wednesday will support that view. That is we expect softening numbers on the margin in the form of decelerating comps and negative earnings growth. With the key caveat being that expectations headed into the print are more than manageable for the company to manufacture a beat. If for some reason TGT should fail to meet what we see as the most modest/conservative expectations in the space, we’d still short on weakness as we think an earnings miss, however unlikely, is a much greater statement about this company’s competitive position now that Cornell has made the easy fixes (Canada, Rx, headcount) and the state of the US consumer. Assuming things play out the way we think they will, we’d short on strength. Regardless of the outcome tomorrow, short the news.


On the one hand, TGT has recouped all (and then some) of the market cap the company coughed up after the 2Q guide down back in May. And expectations from here are far from easy. With the Street baking in an acceleration in comps on both a sequential basis from 0.2% in 1H to 1.4% in 2H and in the underlying trend (up 30bps in the 2yr run rate). That ultimately flows through to earnings growth rate of 14% in 2H vs. 4% in 1H. If there is any risk to the print, it’s on the full year guidance, as management took a 'wait and see' approach before taking down numbers past 2Q.


But we’ll curb that prior statement by pointing out how low expectations are headed to the print up and down the P&L. Current Consensus expectations assume i) a -0.9% comp, the lowest TGT will have printed (assuming it hits the mid-point of its guide) since it lost 70mm customers’ credit card information, ii) 50bps of margin deleverage, which translates to 100bps+ of deleverage when you factor in the benefit the company is getting from the sale of its Rx business to CVS, and iii) a 7% earnings decline that’s being propped up by a share count 7% lower than it was a year ago.


The point there is that TGT was proactive three months ago when it took down numbers to a level where it could manufacture a beat in 2Q and allow the company to hold FY guidance for now, while it peddles the consumer/weather bottomed in 2Q narrative for another three months until it has to face the music of back-loaded guidance against equally tough comps.


Over the long-term, we’re not buyers of that storytelling, as we think that TGT’s competitive positioning – hello WMT and AMZN – and underinvestment relative to its competition equates to a flattish 4yr earnings CAGR compared to the Street at 11%. As we think flattish margins on a 2.5% top-line is a pipe dream. That gets us to a sub-$5.00 earnings number in 2018 vs. the Street at $6.25.

TGT | Short The News - tgt financials 



Key space considerations headed into the print…


TGT Hated, WMT Loved

We think this chart is particularly interesting given the space we allocate to the relationship between TGT and WMT in the paragraphs below. Essentially, this tells us that sentiment on TGT relative to WMT is at all-time lows. Demonstrated by a trough relative multiple (TGT 14x NTM P/E, WMT 16.8x NTM P/E) and peak short interest. At the same time short-interest ticked up to its highest rate in a half a decade. The irony is that we’d own WMT here over TGT without hesitation. The pessimism around TGT is deserved. Over the long-term, people are bearish – but not bearish enough.

TGT | Short The News - TGT WMT relative PE


Competitive Dynamics Still Evolving

Core to understanding the TGT story here is the company’s competitive placement in US retail. Currently, it’s right smack dab in the middle of very unenviable competitive set that is: WMT, Dollar Stores, Grocers, Department Stores, and AMZN. There are puts and takes on each as it relates to the TGT call, but we think the one worth focusing from a demand perspective is AMZN. And no, it’s not because TGT started stocking Kindle’s on its shelves once again.


The real callout is the overwhelming share of consumers wallets that AMZN has taken over the past 12 months. The numbers look like this…1) per the government, US retail has added an incremental $111bn added over the past 12mnths, 2) AMZN alone has accounted for 26% of the incremental growth, 3) that’s $28bn when you incorporate 3rd party sales, and 4) that’s good for the highest rate we’ve ever seen and a rate 50% higher than the company recognized a year ago.


For a company like TGT that needs perfect conditions to comp in excess of 2% in its core US business, that’s a material change to the competitive landscape.

TGT | Short The News - AMZN usretail 


Where’s The Investment?

Let’s take this step by step...

1) We are seeing considerable market share pressure as AMZN takes a bigger and bigger chunk of the retail pie, that’s up to 26% on TTM basis as of the latest AMZN print.

2) TGT’s biggest brick and mortar competitior, WMT, announced last year that it would open up its usually-tight pockets to invest in employees, e-commerce, stores, vendors, and, to a certain extent, price. At the same time, WMT lowered expectations to a level that meant it wouldn’t hit 2015 earnings levels again until 2019.

3) We’ve seen that play out in pretty dramatic fashion over the past 4 quarters, as WMT put its money where its mouth was in the US with SG&A/Sq.Ft. up 9% in the quarter the company reported 3 months ago. That compares to TGT, who just went negative, opening up the biggest spread in SG&A dollars that we’ve seen between the two companies in at least 3 years.

4) From here, the TGT playbook calls for the company to free up $2bn in cost savings to fund the investments needed to prop up a 3% comp. The key buckets of that investment are as follows: people (they’ve added a lot of new faces in the C-Suite alone), e-commerce, stores, grocery, infrastructure, and of course…buying back stock.   

5) Not only do we think that’s the wrong strategy for a company that must now grow 100% organically, but it’s also not enough to keep pace with a competitive set who are making material and quantifiable investments needed in order to win the traffic/market share battle. The low hanging fruit for Cornell and Co. has already been picked and the easy comps have already been lapped. Ultimately, we think this plays out with TGT being the net market share loser.

TGT | Short The News - TGT WMT spend 


WMT Throwing Down The Gauntlet…Again With Jet.com

While we think the purchase of Jet.com at ~6x sales at the tail-end of an economic cycle is a poor use of shareholder capital for WMT, the company’s newest (and most expensive) acquisition we think signals a few things to the both the market and the rest of retail – the most important being that e-commerce is the single most important growth vehicle going forward. That’s not new news by any means, but when WMT is willing to fork over $3.3bn to supplement the talent/technology in its perennially underperforming channel, it sets the investment hurdle rate that much higher for the rest of its competitive set.


That’s particularly important for a company like TGT, who like WMT, has consistently underperformed in the e-commerce channel. Heck, TGT’s dot.com sales penetration at 3.6% is within spitting distance of WMT, and it’s not like near-term execution or communication of the opportunity in that channel has been well-handled. Back in March, the management team backed off its long-term 40% e-commerce growth CAGR as well as the long-term investment needed in order to get TGT to a competitive level with the most of its competitive set. Between this most recent move by WMT and the relative gap between TGT and the rest of retail, we think that means a much higher investment rate than is currently embedded in street numbers. 

Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday

Takeaway: A closer look at global macro market developments.

Editor's Note: Below are complimentary charts highlighting global equity market developments, S&P 500 sector performance, volume on U.S. stock exchanges, rates and bond spreads, key currency crosses, and commodities. It's on the house. For more information on how Hedgeye can help you better understand the markets and economy (and stay ahead of consensus) check out our array of investing products




Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - equity markets 8 16


Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - sector performance 8 16


Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - volume 8 16


Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - rates and spreads 8 16


Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - currencies 8 16


Daily Market Data Dump: Tuesday - commodities 8 16

August 16, 2016

Want more from Daily Trading Ranges? CLICK HERE to submit up to 4 tickers you'd like to see on the list. 


  • Bullish Trend
  • Bearish Trend
  • Neutral

10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield
1.60 1.47 1.55
S&P 500
2,160 2,195 2,190
Russell 2000
1,207 1,243 1,241
NASDAQ Composite
5,120 5,275 5,262
Nikkei 225 Index
15,990 17,103 16,869
German DAX Composite
10,298 10,948 10,739
Volatility Index
11.01 14.70 11.81
U.S. Dollar Index
94.75 96.51 95.57
1.09 1.13 1.11
Japanese Yen
99.43 102.40 101.24
Light Crude Oil Spot Price
39.67 45.99 45.74
Natural Gas Spot Price
2.45 2.90 2.59
Gold Spot Price
1,330 1,372 1,347
Copper Spot Price
2.13 2.21 2.15
Apple Inc.
103.39 110.37 109.48
Amazon.com Inc.
753 780 768
Netflix Inc.
91.90 97.68 95.31
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
62.82 66.71 65.72
Intel Corp.
34.10 35.98 34.91
Home Depot Inc.
133 139 137
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Explore
33.77 36.91 36.81
1,235 1,265 1,242

Hedgeye's Daily Trading Ranges are twenty immediate-term (TRADE) buy and sell levels, along with our intermediate-term (TREND) view.  Click HERE for a video from Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough on how to use these risk ranges.

Hedgeye Statistics

The total percentage of successful long and short trading signals since the inception of Real-Time Alerts in August of 2008.

  • LONG SIGNALS 80.37%
  • SHORT SIGNALS 78.32%