Why Our Economy Is Still Waiting for the Young to Show Up
Editor's Note: In this complimentary edition of About Everything, Hedgeye Demography Sector Head Neil Howe discusses why the Millennial Generation is coming into adulthood, but delaying traditionally big steps like homeownership and family life. Howe explains why and explores the broader investing implications.
Many forecasters are pegging 2016 as a momentous year for young adults.
The multitudinous 1990 and 1991 birth cohorts (at 4.8 million, the two largest birth years of the Millennial Generation) start turning 26 this year—precisely the age at which young adults have traditionally taken the big steps in homeownership and family life.
But if we are on the brink of Millennials making their move, the numbers aren’t yet showing it.
Despite record-low interest rates and a six-year-old economic recovery, single Millennials are avoiding setting out on their own. Between 2007 and 2014, the share of 25- to 29-year-olds living alone fell slightly, from 11 to 10%—while the share living with family or friends jumped from 39 to 48%, a massive 9 percentage-point surge. The vast majority of this increase came not from more cohabitating couples, but from a surge of singles living either with Mom and Dad or with each other.
Later this year, Census will release 2015 household data, but we doubt the new year will show anything different.
In decades past, analysts have ordinarily assumed that young adults generate all the new households. Well, that’s no longer happening. Researchers are now finding that, despite the massive wave of Millennials moving into adulthood, all age groups under 55 (including young adults) actually generated negative net household formation between 2014 and 2015.
Who is creating all the household growth today? Boomers, another large generation, as their tail end moves past age 55. Boomers can actually afford to “go solo” if they so choose.
OK, so what about starting a family? Well, Millennials aren’t doing that, either. Marriage rates among 20- to- 24-year-olds are only half of what they were in 2001. And this downward trend shows no sign of stopping. Even though the peak 1990 birth cohort reached age 25 last year, total marriages in the 25-to-29 year-old age bracket actually fell from 2014 to 2015.
Census defines a “family” as a married couple living together or as any person, married or not, living with his or her child. In 2014, by this definition, 59% of adults in their late twenties had not yet started their own families. This is surely a first in American history. Until the Great Recession, this figure was never above 50%. (Back in the Silent Generation’s American-High era, it was never above 30%.)
According to the latest CDC data, the mean age of a mother at first birth was 26.3 years old in 2014, with birthrates declining to a record low for women in their early 20s. If it weren’t for a large rise in the rate at which Gen-X moms are giving birth in their late 30s and 40s, the U.S. fertility decline would be catastrophic.
WHY IT’S HAPPENING: DRIVERS
The lingering effects of the Great Recession. Though the economy has improved significantly since 2009, Millennials’ income levels and overall job prospects have continued to disappoint—making it tough, if not impossible, for many of them to truly start their adult lives.
In 2014, the real median income of 15- to 24-year-olds and 25- to 34-year-olds was still 10% and 7% (respectively) below their levels in 2006. In other words, it’s not only Generation Xers who have struggled since the recession.
Yes, the employment/population ratio for young adults has improved since the depths of the Great Recession. But progress has been maddeningly slow. The optimism that many forecasters felt earlier this spring was dashed by the most recent BLS Employment report, which showed that the employment/population ratio for 25- to 34-year-olds dropped from 77.3 to 76.9 last month—back to where it was a year ago. (And 76.9 is only about halfway back from the ratio’s recession nadir of 74.0 and its pre-recession peak of 78.0.)
Even when Millennials do get jobs, they’re often lower quality than the careers that earlier generations of young adults once entered. A rising share of Millennials with college degrees, for example, work in jobs that don’t require a degree. This so-called “underemployment rate” rose to 46% in mid-2014—a level not seen since the early 1990s.
Meanwhile, the share of employed young adults working in well-paid and stable blue-collar trades has continued to fall, while the share working in the service sector still surges. Many of today’s “full-time” Millennial workers are part of the gig economy—including permalancers and Uber drivers who depend on a string of temporary projects to make a living.
Increased educational attainment. Over the last twenty-five years, young Americans have been driving up college enrollment and graduation rates. Paradoxically, this rise has retarded their progress toward adulthood.
Between 1992 and 2001, enrollment in degree-granting institutions increased 15 percent. And from 2002 to 2012, as Millennials became the new college frosh, enrollment accelerated another 24%. In 2015, the share of 25- to 34-year-olds who have completed four or more years of college climbed to an unprecedented 36%.
But as Millennials spend more time in the classroom, they effectively “bid up” the minimum credential they need for a relatively fixed number of desirable careers. Not to mention the mountain of student loan debt that now weighs them down: According to the New York Federal Reserve, the change in real per capita debt for student loans rose by 174% for 30-year-olds from 2003 to 2015.
Shifting generational attitudes. Risk-averse Millennials saw what happened when their parents plunked down big money on homes prior to the downturn. And despite ever-higher tuitions, Millennials still see college as a necessary (though obviously not sufficient) condition for career success.
Result: soaring college debt, but sizable reductions in every other form of debt. For Millennials, college loans are not only crowding out home mortgages—they are crowding out credit card borrowing and car loans as well.
From 2003 to 2015, total debt for post-college young adults (age 23-35) was virtually unchanged, despite the sizeable demographic growth in this age bracket. Compare this to the change in total debt for 60+ Americans: Debt mushroomed by between 65% and 120% for every cohort. The increase was driven both by the growth in Boomer numbers and by growth in Boomer borrowing per capita.
Though most Millennials eventually want to end up married, they’ve come to see marriage more as a capstone than a cornerstone. Millennials want their mortgages and careers in place before they think about walking down the aisle. Some even have their own Boomer parents reminding them that all divorces start with marriage.
As for childrearing, when Millennials do have kids, they’re more open to having them outside of marriage. According to a recent Pew report, Millennials still believe that a two-parent household is the best way to raise a child—whether the parents are married or not.
In fact, Census data show that “shotgun cohabitations” (that is, moving in together after a pregnancy) surpassed “shotgun marriages” for the first time during the last decade. In decades past, it was the father of the bride who was holding the shotgun. Today, it’s social stigma that motivates young fathers who may not want to support their children.
Millennials are unlikely to produce another baby boom—even as the massive 1990 birth cohort reaches the age at which biological fertility peaks and society traditionally expects family formation. When fertility rates fall during a brief and severe shock (like a recession or war), fertility does often play catchup—what demographers call a “tempo” effect. By now, however, too much time has passed and too many new habits have formed to expect a sizable rebound. Demographers have another maxim: Fertility delayed is fertility denied. When young men and young women delay having kids, they often think they will be able to make up lost time later. But life goes on, events change, and the original lifetime fertility goal (which demographers do track in surveys) is forgotten.
Pew Research noted in a study released late last year that the share of young women ages 18 to 34 living with parents reached 36.4% in 2014. That is up from only 20.0 in 1960. It is also the highest share ever recorded going all the way back to 1940 (when it was 36.2%).
In 1940, of course, the Great Depression still lingered. And this brings to mind the cohort of women born in 1910, who came of age at a memorably adverse moment: Imagine reaching age 23 just as unemployment is hitting one-quarter of the labor force and the President is closing down all the banks. This cohort ended up with a very low lifetime fertility rate and one of the highest childless rates (22%) ever recorded, even to this day.
My take? Don’t expect a big fertility rebound to just sneak up on us. It’s not like a dumb coiled spring, waiting for any chance to bounce back. Fertility is smarter than that. It’s looking for a clear change in the direction of the nation, the economy, and the social mood. Over the last century, America has only experienced two large fertility rebounds. One of them (lasting from about 1946 to 1962 and creating most Boomers) was triggered by the end of a total war in which America overhauled its political institutions, conquered half the world, and created a global Pax Americana. The other, more modest rebound (lasting from about 1979 to 1990 and creating first-wave Millennials) was triggered by a moral panic over children. We became, suddenly, are more child-friendly and family-oriented society. Look for something on the same order of these events to trigger the next baby boom.
As they do assume adult roles, don’t expect Millennials to follow the same path as older generations. Buy a home? No thank you, we prefer to rent a home. With real estate prices pushing into the stratosphere in so many desirable urban areas, we will wait until the expected capital gains are likely to be positive. Live alone? Sure, great idea if our goal is to burn money. Instead, we like to live in peer groups (see WeLive)—or, if we must live alone, let it be in a closet or micro-apartment for sleeping only. Live with ‘rents? Why not? We save a bundle and my god their credit rating is so much better than our boyfriend’s (girlfriend’s)!
Millennials won’t be snatching up the McMansions their parents adored. Too remote, too libertarian, too vast. On the other hand, they won’t want to stay in the live-work-play CBDs (central business districts) once they start families, either. Instead, as I’ve said before, Millennials will opt for homes in the inner suburbs that give them more square footage than an urban apartment without losing the distinct flair of city life.
In the coming years, the pressure will be on these suburban areas. With core urban Millennial hotspots like New York City and Silicon Valley running out of space (at least, affordable space), suburbs with plenty of community amenities and reliable transportation to urban areas stand to gain the most.
- Rates of homeownership, marriage, and childbearing have all declined drastically among today’s young adults. Plenty of Millennials are “waiting it out” until their career prospects and balance sheets improve.
- Millennials don’t mind taking a nontraditional road to adulthood. For young Silent and even for some Boomers, it was easy to follow the childhood song “first comes love, then comes marriage, then comes the baby in the baby carriage.” For Millennials, that pathway isn’t necessarily a straight line.