In this brief excerpt from The Macro Show today, Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough responds to a subscriber’s question about why he’s still bullish on McDonald’s (MCD), Utilities (XLU), and Long Bonds (TLT) even though they are “getting expensive.”
Takeaway: Last week, a flurry of soft US economic prints stoked fear. Weakening commodities, slowing China and reversing High Yield fanned the flames.
A number of U.S. economic measures raised concern for the market last week; the ISM Manufacturing Index came in lower than expected at 50.8, jobless claims rose by +17k (the largest w/w increase all year), and April jobs growth came in lower than expected at +160k. Beyond this, commodity prices began to roll over, taking high yield prices with and EM sovereign CDS with them. Chinese steel was down for the first time since mid-February, CRB declined, and high yield YTM rose. Beyond this, the median sovereign CDS widened by +3 bps to 100; Italy and Spain caught the brunt of investors' concerns with their respective CDS widening by +9 bps to 127 and by +10 bps to 97.
Our heatmap below is negative on the short term, positive on the intermediate, and mixed on long-term measures.
Financial Risk Monitor Summary
• Short-term(WoW): Negative / 1 of 13 improved / 3 out of 13 worsened / 9 of 13 unchanged
• Intermediate-term(WoW): Positive / 7 of 13 improved / 3 out of 13 worsened / 3 of 13 unchanged
• Long-term(WoW): Negative / 2 of 13 improved / 2 out of 13 worsened / 9 of 13 unchanged
1. U.S. Financial CDS – With weak economic data last week such as a lower than expected ISM Manufacturing Index, rising jobless claims, and slower than expected job growth, swaps widened for 14 out of 16 domestic financial institutions and the median spread widened by 2 bps to 102.
Tightened the most WoW: COF, JPM, PRU
Widened the most WoW: HIG, AIG, LNC
Tightened the most WoW: RDN, BAC, C
Widened the most MoM: HIG, AIG, AXP
2. European Financial CDS – Financial institution swaps mostly widened in Europe last week, led by Portuguese Banco Espirito Santo swaps, which widened by 150 to 1546.
3. Asian Financial CDS – Financials CDS in Asia were mixed last week. 2 of 3 Chinese bank swaps widened, and both Japanese Daiwa and Nomura swaps widened. Meanwhile, all Indian bank swaps tightened.
4. Sovereign CDS – Sovereign Swaps mostly widened over last week. Spanish sovereign swaps widened the most, by 10 bps to 97.
5. Emerging Market Sovereign CDS – Emerging market swaps mostly widened last week, led by Turkish sovereign swaps, which widened by 27 bps to 267. Meanwhile, Indian CDS stood out as the only EM sovereign swap to tighten, by -5 bps to 161.
6. High Yield (YTM) Monitor – High Yield rates rose 7 bps last week, ending the week at 7.46% versus 7.39% the prior week.
7. Leveraged Loan Index Monitor – The Leveraged Loan Index fell 1.0 points last week, ending at 1892.
8. TED Spread Monitor – The TED spread rose 1 basis point last week, ending the week at 43 bps this week versus last week’s print of 43 bps.
9. CRB Commodity Price Index – The CRB index fell -1.4%, ending the week at 180 versus 182 the prior week. As compared with the prior month, commodity prices have increased 5.2%. We generally regard changes in commodity prices on the margin as having meaningful consumption implications.
10. Euribor-OIS Spread – The Euribor-OIS spread (the difference between the euro interbank lending rate and overnight indexed swaps) measures bank counterparty risk in the Eurozone. The OIS is analogous to the effective Fed Funds rate in the United States. Banks lending at the OIS do not swap principal, so counterparty risk in the OIS is minimal. By contrast, the Euribor rate is the rate offered for unsecured interbank lending. Thus, the spread between the two isolates counterparty risk. The Euribor-OIS spread was unchanged at 9 bps.
11. Chinese Interbank Rate (Shifon Index) – The Shifon Index fell 5 basis points last week, ending the week at 2.00% versus last week’s print of 2.05%. The Shifon Index measures banks’ overnight lending rates to one another, a gauge of systemic stress in the Chinese banking system.
12. Chinese Steel – Steel prices in China fell 5.2% last week, or 160 yuan/ton, to 2915 yuan/ton. We use Chinese steel rebar prices to gauge Chinese construction activity and, by extension, the health of the Chinese economy.
13. Chinese Non-Performing Loans – Chinese non-performing loans amount to 1,274 billion Yuan as of Dec 31, 2015, which is up +51.2% year over year. Given the growing focus on China's debt growth and the potential fallout, we've decided to begin tracking loan quality. Note: this data is only updated quarterly.
14. Chinese Credit Outstanding – Chinese credit outstanding amounts to 148 trillion RMB as of March 31, 2016, which is up +12.3% year over year. Note: this data is only updated quarterly.
15. 2-10 Spread – Last week the 2-10 spread tightened to 104 bps, -1 bps tighter than a week ago. We track the 2-10 spread as an indicator of bank margin pressure.
16. CDOR-OIS Spread – The CDOR-OIS spread is the Canadian equivalent of the Euribor-OIS spread. It is the difference between the Canadian interbank lending rate and overnight indexed swaps, and it measures bank counterparty risk in Canada. The CDOR-OIS spread tightened by 1 bps to 43 bps.
Joshua Steiner, CFA
Jonathan Casteleyn, CFA, CMT
the macro show
what smart investors watch to win
Hosted by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough at 9:00am ET, this special online broadcast offers smart investors and traders of all stripes the sharpest insights and clearest market analysis available on Wall Street.
Takeaway: A closer look at global macro market developments.
Editor's Note: Below are complimentary charts highlighting global equity market developments, S&P 500 sector performance, volume on U.S. stock exchanges, and rates and bond spreads. It's on the house. For more information on how Hedgeye can help you better understand the markets and economy (and stay ahead of consensus) check out our array of investing products.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
Takeaway: The curtailing of the Special Enrollment Period is welcome news for insurers like UNH, AET and ATHM but probably not a game changer.
Facing a May 11, deadline when insurers must submit applications to sell insurance products on the Healthcare.gov federal exchange and a whole lot of sword rattling from the insurance industry, CMS opted for appeasement. HHS released what is known as an "Interim Final Rule with Comment" which is a device designed to fast track adoption of a regulatory change. The change will more clearly define the circumstances under which an individual can purchase insurance on the exchanges outside of the open enrollment period in what is called a Special Enrollment Period (SEP) for a "permanent move."
Under current regulations, individuals that make a "a permanent move" are eligible to use a SEP to gain access to coverage. Insurers have raised concerns that this SEP was subject to abuse. In the Interim Final Rule, CMS notes that use or, rather abuse, of the "permanent move" SEP "has the potential to destabilize the health insurance market by creating an opportunity for adverse selection where persons undertake a permanent move solely for the purpose of gaining health coverage, in which they would otherwise not be qualified to enroll."
Speaking of SEPs in general, UNH CEO Stephen Hemsley was more direct. Speaking to investors on the Q3 2015 earnings call, he said, "In our view, in recent weeks, market performance expectations for exchange products have further deteriorated. We have identified higher levels of individuals coming in [via SEP] and out of the exchange system to use medical services, lower expectation for overall future participation, declining performance in and accelerating failures of the sponsored health cooperatives and out own emerging claims experience, which is worsening as the end of the year nears." At a Credit Suisse investors meeting, also in November, Aetna (AET) CFO made similar comments citing the SEP which enabled people to get into the system long enough to get medical services and then drop coverage, according to reports.
To make the point further, the insurance industry commissioned a report from Oliver Wyman. Authors Carlson and Giesa submitted the following findings:
- SEP enrollment represented 17 percent of total exchange enrollment in 2014 and represented almost 25 percent of active enrollees as of December 31, 2014.
- The per member per month claim costs during 2014 for individuals that enrolled in an SEP were 10 percent higher than those enrolled during the Open Enrollment Period (OEP)
- Per Member Per Month (PMPM) claim costs for SEP enrollees during 2014 were 24 percent higher on average during the first three months of enrollment than for OEP enrollees
- In 2015, the difference in PMPM claims cost increased to 41 percent for the first three months of enrollment
- SEP enrollees are more likely, on average, to lapse coverage. Lapse rates were 3.5 percent for OEP enrollees as compared to 5.0 percent per month for SEP enrollees
This report is based on claims data submitted by 13 different health insurance issuers for January 2014 to June 2015 and paid through October 2015. The submitted data represented $27 billion in premiums and $26 billion in allowed claims.
Since CMS is using this Interim Final Rule to address the SEP triggered by a permanent move, we should assume it was this class of SEP causing the biggest headaches for insurers. CMS acknowledges that the regulatory language for the "permanent move" SEP does not align with the intent of the provision. The original idea was that the SEP would be available to someone who moved out of one insurer's service area into another's and therefore lost coverage. However, when the regulations were written, no qualifying language was included. A permanent move could be one across country, across state or across town.
As a result of the vagueness of the regulations (and no doubt some poor oversight), insurers had run smack into an issue that has plagued educators for years - mobility. Low income populations, particularly those under 200 percent of the federal poverty threshold -the cohort that experienced the largest drop in uninsured rates after passage of the ACA - can be highly mobile, especially in urban areas. Because mobility involves moving from one school to another, the Bush-era education law, No Child Left Behind required the collection and reporting of mobility rates. as a way to evaluate academic performance. Bailey Middle School in Nashville, TN with a population that consists of almost 95 percent free and reduced lunch eligible kids (up to 185 percent of the federal poverty threshold) had a mobility rate of 50 percent in the 2013-14 school year, to use just one of thousand examples.
Insurers, especially those with limited exposure to lower income, highly mobile populations, and regulators assumed that an SEP for a permanent move would apply on a limited basis. In fact, what has happened is that low income marketplace eligible enrollees were taking advantage of their mobility to get covered, if only on a short term basis. This behavior has led to a more unstable insurance market on the exchanges characterized by rising premiums and the withdrawal of UNH and others from a number of exchanges. Facing the expiration in 2017 of a number of ACA-mandated mitigation programs like reinsurance and the much maligned risk corridor program, insurer unrest and threats of a death spiral, the Obama Administration had to act.
Under the new rules, CMS will only permit use of the SEP for a permanent move if the enrollee was covered by another ACA-qualified plan for one day or more in the 60 days prior to the permanent move. Excluded from this change are people who are released from incarceration or who have moved back to the United States from a foreign county. Also excused from the new criteria are people who should have been Medicaid eligible but living in non-expansion states and who then move to another state where they are eligible for coverage on the market places.
CMS is also eliminating the requirement that exchanges provide advanced availability of SEPs by January 1, 2017. Advance availability allows an enrollee to complete the necessary paper work before the triggering event such as a move or release from prison. Instead, CMS will leave it up to the individual state exchanges as to whether or not they wish to build out their IT infrastructure to accommodate this feature. In the meantime, CMS is reviewing SEP enrollment data to see what, if any additional changes must be made to regulations to ensure consumers are not inappropriately accessing coverage during SEPs.
The change is a positive for insurers but will it be enough to stem the tide of departures, bad press for the exchanges, and increased premiums?
We tend to think not. It is our opinion that the dissatisfaction with the SEPs and the marketplaces in general expressed by some insurers is a failure of strategy more than a structure, exacerbated by politics.
Policy makers, insurers and the Congressional Budget Office all forecast that the introduction of the health insurance marketplaces would result in people moving from employer based plans to the state or federal exchanges. In March 2015, the CBO had estimated that employer-based coverage would decline by 6 million people in 2016. In one of the great mysteries of the post-ACA era, that did not happen. A recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey shows that 57 percent of employers offering coverage in 2015 up from 55 percent in 2014.
Exacerbating the resistance of employers to dropping their group plans was the Obama Administration's decision, in the face of substantial fallout from people whose health insurance was cancelled, to allow states to waive the requirements of the ACA with respect to benefit design. This decision left those that were satisfied with their insurance - presumably because they were healthy or happy with their pre-ACA coverage - out of the marketplace.
With the currently insured - either through an employer or via a pre-ACA plan - sidelined, the exchanges have been primarily the insurance market for lower income individuals. Post-ACA, the cohort experiencing the biggest drop in uninsured rates has been people with incomes at 100 to 200 percent of the federal poverty threshold or between $24,000 and $47,000 for a family of four, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation report (Some of this growth is, of course, a result of Medicaid expansion).This population is also one that often moves in and out of Medicaid eligibility. In short, UNH, AET others thought the exchanges would be an extension of the relatively healthy and stable populations they were serving though their employer-centered plans. Instead, the exchanges have become an extension of the Medicaid system.
The plan design for a product geared more to a middle class, healthy working individual is different from that designed for an individual who moves between the exchanges and Medicaid coverage. UNH plans, for example, tend to be more expensive but offer more options through wider networks, This typical design makes such plans ripe for abuse by people churning through the system by taking advantage of the "permanent move" SEP to access the richer benefits and broader networks, if even on a short term basis..
Lost in the outcry about the exchanges has been the comments recently of Molina Healthcare's CEO, Joe Molina during the Q12016 earnings call and which are worth quoting extensively here:
Having addressed the cost drivers in the first quarter results, let me now turn to the future. What do all of the headlines about other insurers exiting the marketplace mean to Molina Healthcare? What is our strategy for the marketplace? Our plan is to stay the course. That is because our strategy and our goals for this product are different from those of many other insurers.
Our objective is to provide an accessible extension of our Medicaid product to individuals whose eligibility for Medicaid fluctuates, and we believe that we are successfully doing so. As a reminder, the segment most likely to purchase an exchange project from Molina healthcare are individuals under 250% of the federal poverty level who receive significant government subsidies. Approximately 90% of our marketplace members receive a government subsidy for co-pays and premiums.
We have never expected our marketplace product to perform better than our Medicaid business, nor operate at significantly better margins over the long term.
Molina's extensive experience with Medicaid appears to have paid off for their exchanged-based plans. Centene (CNC) is similarly situated. Of course, these companies are tiny compared to UNH, AET et al. which may just be the point. The exchanges are not and probably won't be much of an opportunity for big insurers. They do, however present a load of possibilities for the smaller, non-traditional insurers like MOH with the experience and data necessary to support service to the low income populations that currently dominate the health insurance exchanges.
Takeaway: Chinese equities descended further into crash mode overnight on unequivocally poor economic data.
A bullish cabal of investors was quick to call a bottom in China's cooling economy. Well, Chinese equity markets are getting hammered this morning on yet more unsavory economic data.
Here's analysis via Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough in a note sent to subscribers this morning:
"China down hard overnight (Shanghai Comp down another -2.8% and -47% from 2015’s high) on terrible export (-1.8% y/y APR vs. +11.5% MAR) and import (-10.9% y/y APR vs. -7.6% MAR) data – we’re not in the everything has “bottomed” camp."
The China knock-on effect reverberated loudly throughout macro markets...
"After getting smoked for a -5.7% loss last week (Dollar Up, Chinese Demand Down), Copper is down another -1.3% this morning to $2.12/lb after failing to make a higher-high than the March “reflation” level of $2.31/lb"
What does it mean?
Despite Wall Street forecasters and Fed bureaucrats proclaiming "all is good" in the global economy, economic reality continues to prove the contrary. We're crystal clear on this...
The outlook for global growth remains decidedly bearish.
Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.