“Even the locals didn't believe the GDP number, and they're paid to - Shanghai closes -0.14% on the ‘news,’" Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough wrote earlier today.
In case you somehow missed it, China reported year-over-year GDP growth of 6.9%, versus the government’s 7% target. It was the weakest print since the financial crisis. Of course, China’s numbers are more than just a little suspect.
As Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough wrote earlier today:
“Look on the bright side of their storytelling they didn’t stick a 7.0% this time and made-up “6.9%” GDP instead. Lol. Even the locals (who are paid to think a certain way) didn’t buy Chinese stocks on that – Shanghai Comp closes -0.14%.”
A recent Hedgeye headline comes to mind: “The Epic Gong Show That Is China's Shanghai Composite Casino.” For the record, the Shanghai Composite Casino is off nearly 34% since it peaked in June.
Incidentally, one of our latest quarterly macro themes is sagging global growth = #GameOfSlowing, spoofing the popular HBO show Game of Thrones. Our macro team compared China and Emerging markets to the character Eddard Stark who dies early and he does not come back.
More to be revealed...
Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.
It was difficult to think that Spain would make a comeback in 2011 when the Conservative Party (PP) won the elections. The challenges were too large.
The previous administration, PSOE, Socialist, had left a deficit of 9% of GDP after promising a maximum 7%.
When the crisis started, the socialist government consciously decided to substitute the bursting real estate bubble with a massive civil works stimulus. It spent 3.2% of GDP, debt ballooned by 350 billion euro and destroyed more than 3 million jobs. On top of it, in the period from 2007 to 2009 the average annual trade deficit was around 6% of GDP and at one point in 2008 reached 9% of GDP.
Spain was a Keynesian dream becoming a nightmare.
When the socialist government left office, Spain had more than 40 billion euro in unpaid invoices from the public administrations to the private sector, the public savings banks presented a capital requirement of 100 billion euro and the regions and municipalities faced a bailout of 125 billion euro.
It was an unsurmountable situation.
However, after a large austerity plan that was split 50% in tax increases and 50% in spending cuts, and a very substantial set of reforms, including the financial sector, labor market, entrepreneurship programs and early payment schemes, Spain recovered.
Between 2014 and 2015 Spain started to grow well above the EU average. It led job creation in the Eurozone, with more than one million jobs, and brought unemployment rates back to September 2010 levels. It went from a massive trade deficit to a balance by 2015.
In summary, Spain undertook the largest adjustment seen in an OECD economy, 15 points of GDP, and managed to do so growing and creating jobs.
Despite critics´calls of a recovery fuelled by the ECB QE and low oil prices, these claims are easily refuted as Spain is growing more than countries with a similar sensitivity to interest rates and oil prices, like Italy or Portugal, and has recovered with no increase in total (public and private) debt.
However, all was not well and many challenges remain.
- A high unemployment rate, despite the reduction and the evidence that many jobs are hidden in the underground economy and counted as unemployed.
- A large fiscal deficit. Despite the massive adjustment, Spain´s deficit is well above the EU stability pact target.
- External debt remains at 100% of GDP and public debt at 97%.
The austerity plan helped bring Spain out of the living dead, but did not create social stability. Despite the conservatives´efforts to maintain social spending, the population perceived that the cuts were unacceptable. Public debt increased to 97% of GDP partially due to the bailout of the regions and savings banks as well as taking care of unpaid bills, but increasing pensions and keeping unemployment benefits didn´t please the public, as real wages fell. As in Greece, fringe parties started to appear fuelled by “magic solution” promises of default, massive increases in public spend and interventionist “miracles”.
Now Spain faces a historic election process. The Conservatives (PP) face the backlash of unpopular austerity measures and corruption accusations, and might win by a very small majority. The Socialists (PSOE) also faces a major loss of votes due to corruption and the past performance in government. However, the Socialists and the Communist-anti-establishment parties (Podemos, Ahora en Comun) could become part of a coalition for the next government with the promise of stopping the recent reforms, especially the labor market law. The moderate center party, Ciudadanos, which has steadily risen in polls, could be the deciding factor.
In any combination, the new government will not have a strong majority, and most of the likely agreements may only come with parties who promise more spending.
The risk of Spain falling under the QE trap, putting all the bets on the European Central Bank, as it did in 2008, and go back to the same mistakes of deficit spending and public sector white elephants to “boost growth” is not small. Halting reforms and going back to past failed measures will likely give the same results. Less growth, less jobs, more debt.
Spanish political parties tend to mention the Nordic nations and Obama as examples, yet they support the rigidity and intervention of France and Greece, not the economic freedom and flexibility of the leading economies. And when you copy France and Greece you get the growth of France and the unemployment of Greece.
Let us hope the decision on the 20th of December is not to bet on repeating 2008.
---Daniel Lacalle is an economist, CIO of Tressis Gestion and author of Life In The Financial Markets and The Energy World Is Flat (Wiley)
It's been an ugly day for Morgan Stanley shareholders.
Shares have dropped over 5% on news that third quarter trading revenue fell 15% from the same time last year. For the firm’s bond trading business, it was the worst quarter since the financial crisis. It’s just another example — see JPM last week — on why we’re reiterating our call to sell financials. (See Real-Time Alerts)
Morgan Stanley CEO and Chairman James Gorman partially blamed uncertainty about the Federal Reserve’s rate hike for recent volatility. Meanwhile, no help appears to be on the horizon. At least not from New York Federal Reserve Bank President William Dudley.
Earlier today, a small Italian newspaper, CorrieraEconomia, quoted Dudley as saying:
"It's true we thought we could raise interest rates by the end of 2015, but turbulence on financial markets, modest global growth, energy prices and macro-prudential imbalances are slowing this process down."
It is “still too early to think about raising interest rates,” he added.
For the record, #LowerForLonger on rates has long been our macro team’s call for quite some time. Cue more uncertainty…
(Sorry Mr. Gorman.)
Another gripe from the Morgan Stanley CEO was “historic” market moves in China that had made trading difficult.
… Again, no end in sight there for Morgan Stanley.
10/01/15 CAG | IN THE BEGINNING
9/28/15 CAG | GOING LONG
Food and organic stocks that we follow were in-line with the XLP last week. The XLP was up +0.3% last week, the top performers on a relative basis from our list were Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN) and Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) posting increases of +3.9% and +3.7%, respectively. The worst performing company on a relative basis on our list was Lifeway (LWAY), which was down -6.3%.
XLP VERSUS THE MARKET
The XLP has fared better than most other sectors in the YTD time period but struggled last week versus the market. In the last five trading days, while the SPX was up +0.9%, the XLP was up just +0.3%.
From a quantitative perspective, the XLP is BULLISH on a TRADE and TREND duration.
Food and Organic Companies
Keith’s Three Morning Bullets
So far, no good = 58/500 S&P names have reported = Revs -2.7%, EPS -7.9% - bull market, in storytelling (and Long-Term Bonds):
SPX immediate-term risk range = 1; UST 10yr 1.98-2.07%
Please call or e-mail with any questions.
This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.