Takeaway: Last week saw an aggressive +$18B net flow to equity, +$19B of which went to passive ETFs as investors opted in favor of less active risk.
Investment Company Institute Mutual Fund Data and ETF Money Flow:
In the five-day period ending September 16th, investors reduced interest rate exposure withdrawing -$2.2 billion from total bond mutual funds and ETFs. Alternatively, the investment community made a aggressive net contribution of +$18.1 billion to total equity products, the largest inflow to the stock asset class so far in the third quarter. Investors however opted for less active risk with +$19.3 billion of the allocation comprised of passive ETF inflows, +$11.2 billion of which went to the broad-market SPY ETF. Net equity mutual fund flows were negative on the week with international equity putting up +$2.0 billion of subscriptions offset by domestic equity funds which lost another -$3.1 billion. The cumulative running loss for domestic stock funds year-to-date is now -$112.3 billion.
We continue to recommend Shorting/Avoiding Janus Capital (JNS) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) on these trends. At Janus, what was once resurgent fund raising with emerging credit and a slight improvement in some of their equity funds has again turned to substantial outflow this summer. In our note, The More Things Change... The More They Stay the Same, we detail the firm's fund flow woes, most recently evident in the -$900 million firm-wide net redemption in August, the worst monthly period in 22 months. Additionally, we emphasize that both JNS and TROW across cycle have been 100% reliant on market returns to grow AUM and earnings. This situation exacerbates if volatility and negative beta returns persists past 3Q/4Q 2015.
In the most recent 5-day period ending September 16th, total equity mutual funds put up net outflows of -$1.1 billion, trailing the year-to-date weekly average outflow of -$299 million and the 2014 average inflow of +$620 million. The outflow was composed of international stock fund contributions of +$2.0 billion and domestic stock fund withdrawals of -$3.1 billion. International equity funds have had positive flows in 46 of the last 52 weeks while domestic equity funds have had only 10 weeks of positive flows over the same time period.
Fixed income mutual funds put up net outflows of -$4.5 billion, trailing the year-to-date weekly average inflow of +$410 million and the 2014 average inflow of +$926 million. The outflow was composed of tax-free or municipal bond funds withdrawals of -$589 million and taxable bond funds withdrawals of -$3.9 billion.
Equity ETFs had net subscriptions of +$19.3 billion, outpacing the year-to-date weekly average inflow of +$2.0 billion and the 2014 average inflow of +$3.2 billion. Fixed income ETFs had net inflows of +$2.3 billion, outpacing the year-to-date weekly average inflow of +$1.1 billion and the 2014 average inflow of +$1.0 billion.
Mutual fund flow data is collected weekly from the Investment Company Institute (ICI) and represents a survey of 95% of the investment management industry's mutual fund assets. Mutual fund data largely reflects the actions of retail investors. Exchange traded fund (ETF) information is extracted from Bloomberg and is matched to the same weekly reporting schedule as the ICI mutual fund data. According to industry leader Blackrock (BLK), U.S. ETF participation is 60% institutional investors and 40% retail investors.
Most Recent 12 Week Flow in Millions by Mutual Fund Product: Chart data is the most recent 12 weeks from the ICI mutual fund survey and includes the weekly average for 2014 and the weekly year-to-date average for 2015:
Cumulative Annual Flow in Millions by Mutual Fund Product: Chart data is the cumulative fund flow from the ICI mutual fund survey for each year starting with 2008.
Most Recent 12 Week Flow within Equity and Fixed Income Exchange Traded Funds: Chart data is the most recent 12 weeks from Bloomberg's ETF database (matched to the Wednesday to Wednesday reporting format of the ICI), the weekly average for 2014, and the weekly year-to-date average for 2015. In the third table are the results of the weekly flows into and out of the major market and sector SPDRs:
Sector and Asset Class Weekly ETF and Year-to-Date Results: In sector SPDR callouts, investors contributed +$11.2 billion or +7% to the SPY last week, favoring broad-market equity exposure over any individual sector.
Cumulative Annual Flow in Millions within Equity and Fixed Income Exchange Traded Funds: Chart data is the cumulative fund flow from Bloomberg's ETF database for each year starting with 2013.
The net of total equity mutual fund and ETF flows against total bond mutual fund and ETF flows totaled a positive +$20.3 billion spread for the week (+$18.1 billion of total equity inflow net of the -$2.2 billion outflow from fixed income; positive numbers imply greater money flow to stocks; negative numbers imply greater money flow to bonds). The 52-week moving average is +$1.7 billion (more positive money flow to equities) with a 52-week high of +$27.9 billion (more positive money flow to equities) and a 52-week low of -$18.8 billion (negative numbers imply more positive money flow to bonds for the week.)
Exposures: The weekly data herein is important for the public asset managers with trends in mutual funds and ETFs impacting the companies with the following estimated revenue impact:
Jonathan Casteleyn, CFA, CMT
Joshua Steiner, CFA
Hedgeye will host a call analyzing the investment prospects in Boyd Gaming (BYD), a regional gaming/hotel operator.
Friday, September 25, 2015 at 11am. Attendance on this call is limited. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org for details.
Points of discussion include:
- Near term catalysts for BYD and regional gaming
- August vs September – a tale of two months
- Q3, Q4, and 2016 earnings outlook
- BYD’s operational performance vs the competition – opportunities for improvement?
- The emergence of 2 surprising growth markets for BYD
real edge in real-time
This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.
Conclusion: To be clear, we think the Chinese are neither incentivized nor inclined to devalue the CNY again – certainly not in the near term. That said, however, we believe another round of euro debasement out of the ECB is likely the next catalyst for investors to begin pricing in this risk – rightly or wrongly.
According to the [unofficial] Caixin-Markit Manufacturing PMI series, Chinese growth slowed to a 78-month low in September, with the Output sub-index dropping to a lowly 45.7 from 46.4 in August. There are two things investors should takeaway from this release:
- Contrary to the opinions of our perceived competitors, global growth continues to slow – even on their preferred metric (i.e. Manufacturing PMIs). For reference, even after its demonstrable slowdown in recent years, China alone still accounts for over a quarter of all global GDP growth.
- The aforementioned figure weighed on mainland and regional equity bourses and prompted speculation of another round of CNY debasement, which we find to be misguided – at least at the current juncture.
Per official rhetoric, the early August devaluation of the CNY wasn’t designed to stimulate exports, but rather to better align the currency with “market forces”. As such, investors should not expect another CNY devaluation to the extent the market rate and reference rate remain in synch, which has been the case since the devaluation.
We can take their word for it given that: A) said devaluation was really small in magnitude; and B) the CNY had hardly moved against the currencies of China’s two largest export markets (USD and HKD). Regarding the latter point, the CNY had actually declined -0.9% YoY vs. the USD and -1% YoY vs. the HKD on the day prior to the devaluation.
Obviously China could stand to benefit from incremental currency debasement given the deflationary pressures emanating across its economy; we discuss these dynamics is great detail on slides 7-13 of our recent presentation on China (CLICK HERE to access).
That said, however, subsequent devaluations may ultimately equate to China shooting itself in the foot, given the current degree of capital outflow pressure evident in both the data and in market prices. It may also serve to derail China’s hopes of achieving reserve currency status at/with the IMF (CLICK HERE for a thorough discussion of those dynamics).
One could make the case that if the devaluation was designed to make China more competitive vs. the Eurozone (China’s third largest single export market at 11.4%), on the margin, then the PBoC has a lot more hay to bale. The CNY is still up +10.2% YoY and +20.1% over the past 18M vs. the EUR as a result of its managed float vs. the USD.
Given that our #EuropeSlowing theme implies that we expect the ECB to officially expand its QE program by year-end, an incremental devaluation of the euro should turn investor attention back to the specter of CNY debasement – rightly or wrongly. For now, we remain in the latter camp (i.e. “wrongly”), but are certainly not of the mind to pooh-pooh the risk of another round of China-induced global financial market volatility.
Email us with any questions, comments or additional concerns.
As far as China is concerned, we have absolutely no idea how anyone can trust their economic numbers.
Making matters worse, even the numbers they are reporting are slowing – PMI 47.0 SEP vs. 47.3 AUG (that’s the lowest level since 2009).
No, not good.
In case you didn’t already know, the Shanghai Composite Casino remains in full-blown crash mode. It was down another -2.2% overnight. That brings its whopping plunge to down -40% since April.
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.