Takeaway: One thing hidden in these stellar results is the GM upside from e-comm growth (ie not FL). Also, keep an eye on guidance w CFO transition.
If you (like us) were wondering why Nike was so expensive, well now you know. Is this company for real? We expected a big earnings beat, and we got it (GAAP $0.98, $0.92 adj vs our $0.90 and the Street’s $0.83). But by just about any stretch, we should have seen some stress in Nike’s US Futures numbers with this print. No dice. Growth is healthy throughout the portfolio, margins are strong, and guidance is up for the quarter and full year. Revenue was +5%, GP +6%, EBIT +15% and earnings +26%. Not bad. The simple fact that we’re not seeing any holes (when we otherwise should) either a) speaks to the company’s increasing dominance with the consumer globally, b) points to the excess profits Nike is seeing as it’s e-commerce engine kicks into high gear, or c) suggests that CFO Don Blair jettisoned his usual conservatism in issuing guidance as Nike starts its new Fiscal Year (and Blair hands off these expectations for his successor to deliver upon – starting on Aug 1). We think it’s all of the above.
The possibility that the company just set earnings targets that are not a complete slam dunk does not particularly thrill us. Part of what makes Nike work so consistently is how the company’s own internal goal setting inadvertently sandbags the CFO in order to maximize payout for the different business units. We wonder if this might be a year where we don’t quite see the upside we’re accustomed to. We’ll have to see where estimates shake out, but we think that a ‘low double digit’ EPS target for the year is quite safe. In addition, as outlined below, we think it’s only a matter of time before people start asking the question as to whether Nike can print a 50% Gross Margin. We think it could. We’re not sure we want it to, as we want to see reinvestment in the business (which Nike will almost certainly do – especially with a new CFO in place), but if it wanted to, we think it’s in the cards within 2-3 years. So, are we enamored with the stock here? Not really. Not at an all-time high price, multiple, and all time low short interest. But earnings appear safe, if not beatable, in the first quarter of the CFO transition. It’s the quarters after Don leaves the premises in October that concern us a bit more.
Back to the US Futures numbers – they came in at +13%. Let’s put this in perspective. That equates to about $880mm in growth over the next six months. On an annualized basis, we’re looking at growth of $1.6bn in the US alone (assuming Futures growth moderates to 10%). For comparison’s sake, that’s bigger than the footwear business in aggregate for any other brand selling in the US. It’s about as big as either Reebok or Adidas US, and is 57% as large as UnderArmour’s entire $2.8bn.
Gross Margin is THE Key. If there’s one single thing we’d call out here, it’s the Gross Margin. People will rightfully highlight it as a positive, but for the wrong reasons.
Any way we cut it, we should be seeing weakness in Gross Margins if we look at Nike through historical lenses. Consider the following…
- Inventory levels simply do not look good at Nike. It’s positioning on our SIGMA analysis is actually very alarming at face value.
- The spread between Futures growth and the change in Inventory is going the wrong way. This has almost always led to weakness in Gross Margins. Not this time, for some unexplained reason. Despite these factors, the company guided Gross Margins HIGHER for both the quarter and the year, which it rarely does (at least until two quarters ago). Why?
- That brings to the impact of e-commerce, which we think is disproportionately driving both the Gross Margin rate and to a greater extent, Gross Margin dollars. By our estimate, this quarter’s GM% was up by 105bps from e-commerce alone. The company will give you a smaller number, but that’s including retail stores as well. That 105bps is 9% accretive to earnings, which is a lot given that many companies in retail are struggling to grow earnings at all.
- Check out the company’s reported change in Gross Margin vs the real underlying change in margin (which includes the impact of e-commerce).
- The way the math works on gross margin for 4Q we get to a 200bps benefit from ASP, a 150bps headwind from rising input costs, 20bps in total from DTC (inclusive of e-comm more on that below), and -10bps from Fx which turned from a tailwind/neutral input to a headwind in the quarter.
- Over the past 2 years, DTC has accounted for 70bps or 30% of 240bps of gross margin expansion. We expect that to continue to march higher as e-comm continues to ramp from a $1.5bil business into a $5bil business.
- The underlying margin continues to benefit from ASP improvement offset slightly by input costs, but we saw a sequential improvement of 50-60bps in 4Q15 on a 2yr basis.
- Fx turned from a tailwind in 1H to a headwind in 2H and was marginally dilutive in 4Q. We’d expect that to continue through 1H16 as Fx compares get more difficult.
Here are other details from our note on 6/24/15
Conclusion: We remain bullish on Nike over the intermediate and long-term, but let’s be crystal clear, we don’t feel good about Thursday’s print. We actually think that the company will beat EPS estimates by a wide margin – about $0.90 vs the Street at $0.83. Gross Margins are likely to continue to defy gravity, which we think is entirely due to e-commerce. That said, promotional activity and potential ‘channel overfill’ in the mid-tier has us concerned about a reversion to the mean (+HSD) in US Futures. That’s still a respectable level – but a deceleration nonetheless. If that happens, then that’s the headline – not the EPS beat, unfortunately. We’re also concerned on the margin about this being Don Blair’s (CFO) last conference call, as it has implications for guidance. Lastly, keep an eye on increased capital costs coming down the pike as Nike spends to regain its top position in the athlete endorsement world – something it seemingly lost to UnderArmour over the past six months.
Combine all of that with short interest at less than 1% of the float, the stock sitting at an all-time high, as well as the highest multiple in 17-years, and it’s really difficult to be overly bullish on a near-term event. If we see a pull-back on any of the issues we flagged, we’d likely get vocal to buy on weakness. Similarly, if none of these concerns play out, then we’ll be even more impressed and will want to buy it anyway – just not before the event.
Here’s a few key questions/issues we’re considering for Nike into tomorrow’s 4Q print.
1. Quality of the Order Book. For the better part of two years, Nike US wholesale sales have outgrown the reported revenue growth for virtually every athletic specialty retailer. In fact, over the past two quarters alone, Kohl’s sales of Nike product have been up about 22%. Should Nike really be up 22% in a retailer like Kohl’s? Probably not. Then a little over a week ago, we noticed extremely uniform discounting on mid-tier Nike product at Dick’s, Kohl’s, JC Penney, Finish Line, and Macy’s. It was not extremely deep (about 25%), but the breadth of the pricing actions definitely caught our eye – particularly given that they did not occur at this time last year. We want to get some clarity into what price points and channels are really driving Nike’s futures.
2. Inventory Control: Kind of a boring topic – but it’s critical for several reasons. There’s one thing that you can take to the bank, when futures are strengthening, and inventory is declining, it is nearly fool-proof trigger for a significant lift in Gross Margins at Nike. Unfortunately, the opposite holds true as well – weakening futures and higher inventories = weak Gross Margin setup. While we think that e-commerce will be a meaningful boost to gross margins for the quarter, the reality is that if we had to bet on a directional change in futures, it would be on a mean reversion to the high single digit range (C$). At the same time, the chart below shows that the spread between futures and inventory has been unfavorable for the past four quarters running, and gross margins have remained bullet proof. E-commerce is buoying this…but we worry about near-term sustainability of the trend if the futures rate declines without material improvement in inventory.
3. Athletic Endorsements
Just about any way you slice it, UA has stolen the spotlight from Nike on its home turf over the past six months. We think we’re going to see a meaningful tweak in Nike’s endorsement strategy – in other words, spending more money – which will be easier to push through the system with Don Blair out of the picture.
Some will argue that Nike’s new NBA deal will help, but we’d argue that no fewer than seven out of ten people think that Nike already is the league sponsor. They’d be wrong – it’s Adidas. League endorsements largely do not work. Consumers don't care about the logo players are required to put on their shirts. They care about the logo they proudly wear on their feet. That's why Nike walked away from these League deals over a decade ago. Now it’s a good idea again?
Adidas paid $400mm over 11 years. Nike is paying $1bn over 8-years. While this is still less than the $1.1bn/5-yrs that Nike is paying for the NFL, it is a lot of coin to pay for the 5th most watched sport in the US (NFL, MLB, CFB, NASCAR, NBA, NHL) -- yes, NBA is just a notch above hockey.
Here's where Nike can earn its keep. If they somehow figure out how to innovate the uniforms such that players notice a dramatic improvement in their ability to put points on the board and play over an extended period of time, then there's a commercial apparel opportunity for Nike. That's what it did with the NFL. But a football player's uniform weighs about 30lbs, and has not been innovated or streamlined in 30 years. That was a ripe opportunity for Nike. Basketball is a very different story -- shorts, tank top, that's it.
4. E-Commerce. There are some major considerations here.
A. E-commerce was up 42% last quarter, which is a sequential slowdown from 2Q’s 66%. But looked at on a 2-year run rate, underlying growth remains at peak levels. We think that Nike has plans to set new peak levels in FY16. How we’re doing the math, e-commerce represents about 6% of Nike’s sales. That’s about $1.8bn today. We think the company will add between $1bn-$1.2bn in FY16, or 55%-65% growth. Nike will probably tell you that we’re too aggressive. But let’s put the accountability pants on. In Oct 2013, the company said that e-comm would go from $540mm in 2013 to $2bn in FY17. It appears to be hitting that goal 1-2 years ahead of plan. It didn’t purposely sandbag, but rather it’s such a dynamic growth opportunity with more and more growth opportunity by the day.
B. The margin on those sales is a big consideration. How we do the math, e-commerce sales are about 20points margin accretive. That’s outlined in the table below. But more important than the actual gross margin rate is the magnified amount of gross margin dollars as Nike captures a full retail price instead of one with a 50% wholesale discount. A 20%+ margin on a 2x price = nearly 4x the gross margin dollars.
C. Yes there are increased working capital requirements, which Nike will have to manage. There will be a learning curve there. But outright capital spending and incremental SG&A investment on e-commerce is shrinking – for now at least – given what Nike has been investing (much of it quietly) over the past three years.
D. We could actually make the argument that 100% of the e-commerce spend will be incremental – as in, not take away from its wholesale business (FL, FINL, HIBB). Not over the long term, but temporarily. The point is that Nike is going to manage its wholesale model with kid gloves. It will say and do all the right things, as will its partners. But make no mistake, it will aggressively push the envelope with its e-comm model along the way. It will only know it pushed too far when some serious channel stuffing is apparent in the wholesale channel (ie. higher inventories, lower comps at FL, or maybe even 24% growth in a sub-par outlet like KSS in the last qtr). And at that point, the right decision will likely be to still grow e-comm aggressively.
E. In the end, we think that e-commerce growth will account for $750mm-$900mm in incremental gross profit – or about 60% of gross profit growth. That also translates to 5-7% in EPS growth. Back to the comparison to other companies above, we think this largely explains away why Nike is growing earnings 2x the rate of sales while other non-durables brands are flat to down.
5. Guidance -- WWDD
What will Don do? This is Don Blair’s last conference call as CFO. It’s also when Nike will give more definitive guidance about FY16. Does Don set a conservative plan for his successor, Andy Campion, to beat in his first year out of the box? That’s bad near-term, but good for the next few quarters. Or does he set the bar high with a bullish outlook for the year that the team might or might not hit? Keep in mind that when Don Started at the company over 15 years ago, he got a major black eye when he misread the internal budgeting process and lowered street expectations significantly – when in actuality the company ended up having a great year. Maybe Campion needs the same ‘trial by fire’? Our sense is that Campion ran the budgeting process with Don as a chaperone. There may be some noise, but it should appear relatively seamless to most observers. Nonetheless, we'll be watching this one closely.
Takeaway: We are adding Kate Spade (KATE) to Investing Ideas.
Please note that we are adding Kate Spade to Investing Ideas today.
According to Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough:
I've been waiting, very patiently, for a risk management signal to line up with Brian McGough's research view on Kate Spade.
KATE is finally signaling immediate-term TRADE oversold.
Here's Brian's latest research view:
Conclusion. We’re all-in on KATE at current levels. All along, we’ve pointed to a $70-$80 value. The stock is off 26% over the past month, due to sentiment concerns around 'the space' (KORS is off 27%), but our fundamental outlook has not changed one bit. The business remains very strong, we think that comps are accelerating into the double digits in 2Q, and we think that KATE’s margin guidance for this year will prove conservative. Ultimately we think that numbers this year are 15% too low – a delta that widens to 35% next year, and to 50%+ by 2018 when we think KATE has $3.00 in earnings power. Using decelerating multiples as growth accelerates and the P&L matures gets us 55% upside in a year and a 2-3-bagger by 2018. If we see the typical 'peak multiple on peak earnings' that retail knows so well, then a $100+ stock by year 3 is not out of the question.
Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.
In this brief excerpt from today’s edition of The Macro Show, Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough explains how slowing global growth has impacted Industrials and Transports stocks (and not in a good way.)
Don't subscribe yet to The Macro Show? Click here!
The German DAX is broken from a trend perspective; it would have to get back above 11,741 to reverse this. Currently the DAX has immediate downside risk to 10,770.
Whether or not you believe the Greeks are going to get something done, it's important to remember that the entire free world of market participants are long the concept of the next central plan having upside as oppose to downside – but what happens if they don’t get it done?!
From here the asymmetry is to the downside. You can buy Germany, but you don’t have a lot of upside vs. downside.
Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from our morning research. We offer investors multiple high-caliber products. Click here to learn more and subscribe today.
Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros
Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.