Takeaway: The stock is fully valued.

DRI – MOVING PIECES - Chart 1 replace v2


As expected DRI put up a very strong quarter, management noting cost cutting, less discounting and an extra week as leading causes.  That being said, management is doing a great job getting the cost structure of the company and the margins to return to normalized levels.  At this point the stock currently reflects all the good news and is 10% above our sum-of-the-parts analysis.


The key points coming out of the earnings release are:

  1. Consolidated margins are benefiting from a slight sales tailwind from lower gas prices
  2. Olive Garden margins are benefiting from less discounting
  3. Cost cutting is a priority
  4. The margin structure of the company will change significantly from the REIT transaction



One of Starboard Values top priority’s when getting control of Darden was “substantially improving the value proposition and experience at Olive Garden to increase guest counts.”  Part of Olive Garden’s operational improvement plan was to return the concept to its Italian roots, enhance the guest experience all while reducing costs.  On this earnings call management provided little evidence that they were focused on returning the concept to its Italian roots.  The focus on to-go sales is not a long –term solution.  The Olive Garden team has been working on more contemporary concepts, designed to appeal to today’s consumer. And although these concepts may be resulting in improved sales, they are being implemented in a small number of stores and expanding slowly. The speed and breadth of these changes are ultimately not going to be enough to improve their very tired asset base!  


While Olive Garden had a better year in 2015 there remains few signs of life that the concept is back on track.  As we have said before, the improved profitability at the concept is due to industry tailwinds and less discounting.  Management has now set expectations that traffic will be positive in FY2H16, providing little evidence to support that claim.  As seen in the chart below traffic trends at the concept remain elusive.  The improvements in 2015 same-store sales have been driven by price and mix as traffic remains slightly below industry trends.






  • Adjusted EPS $3.05-3.20 vs FactSet $2.88 (before adjusting for the REIT transaction)
  • Same-restaurant sales growth (52-week basis) of 2.0% to 2.5%
  • Total capital spending of $230 to $255M (very little in this for remodels)
  • New unit openings of 18 to 22 restaurants
  • Does not include the impact of any fiscal 2016 real estate transactions and related cash and capital structure activities



Today, Darden announced that its Board approved a strategic real estate plan to pursue a separation of a portion of the company's real estate assets.   The separation would be achieved through a combination of selected sale leaseback transactions and the transfer of a portion of its remaining real estate assets to a new REIT that will be separated by a spin-off resulting in the REIT becoming an independent, publicly-traded company.


According to the company there is “a significant amount of work remains and there can be no assurance the company will be able to successfully complete the transaction and establish a REIT.” 


If the current plan is consummated, Darden will transfer approximately 430 of its owned restaurant properties to the REIT, with substantially all of the REIT's initial assets being leased back to Darden.  The leases are expected to have attractive rent coverage ratios, fixed rent escalations and multiple renewal options at Darden's discretion. The proposed REIT would be well positioned to grow through real estate acquisitions of other assets. 


In addition, Darden has been marketing selected properties for individual sale leasebacks.  To date, the company has listed 75 properties, and over 30 of these properties have been sold or are under contract.  The company expects an average cash capitalization rate of approximately 5.5% for all 75 properties, and expects to close most of these transactions by the end of August.  In addition, the company is seeking to sell and lease back its Orlando Restaurant Support Center property and buildings under a long-term contract with multiple renewal options at the company's discretion.


After receiving proceeds from the completion of the strategic real estate plan, the company expects to retire approximately $1B of its debt over time and maintain its investment grade credit profile.



It is clear that the new Board has DRI headed in the right direction.  With the financial engineering aspects of the turnaround nearly complete, the hard part begins, fixing Olive Garden!



DRI – MOVING PIECES - Chart 4 v3



NKE - Key Issues Into The Print

Takeaway: We usually feel great into a NKE print. But not this one. Too much has to go right. We're buyers on weakness, or after the event.

Conclusion: We remain bullish on Nike over the intermediate and long-term, but let’s be crystal clear, we don’t feel good about Thursday’s print. We actually think that the company will beat EPS estimates by a wide margin – about $0.90 vs the Street at $0.83. Gross Margins are likely to continue to defy gravity, which we think is entirely due to e-commerce. That said, promotional activity and potential ‘channel overfill’ in the mid-tier has us concerned about a reversion to the mean (+HSD) in US Futures. That’s still a respectable level – but a deceleration nonetheless. If that happens, then that’s the headline – not the EPS beat, unfortunately. We’re also concerned on the margin about this being Don Blair’s (CFO) last conference call, as it has implications for guidance. Lastly, keep an eye on increased capital costs coming down the pike as Nike spends to regain its top position in the athlete endorsement world – something it seemingly lost to UnderArmour over the past six months. 


Combine all of that with short interest at less than 1% of the float, the stock sitting at an all-time high, as well as the highest multiple in 17-years, and it’s really difficult to be overly bullish on a near-term event. If we see a pull-back on any of the issues we flagged, we’d likely get vocal to buy on weakness. Similarly, if none of these concerns play out, then we’ll be even more impressed and will want to buy it anyway – just not before the event.


Here’s a few key questions/issues we’re considering for Nike into tomorrow’s 4Q print.


1. Quality of the Order Book. For the better part of two years, Nike US wholesale sales have outgrown the reported revenue growth for virtually every athletic specialty retailer. In fact, over the past two quarters alone, Kohl’s sales of Nike product have been up about 22%. Should Nike really be up 22% in a retailer like Kohl’s? Probably not. Then a little over a week ago, we noticed extremely uniform discounting on mid-tier Nike product at Dick’s, Kohl’s, JC Penney, Finish Line, and Macy’s. It was not extremely deep (about 25%), but the breadth of the pricing actions definitely caught our eye – particularly given that they did not occur at this time last year. We want to get some clarity into what price points and channels are really driving Nike’s futures.  

NKE - Key Issues Into The Print - Nike NA vs B M Growth


NKE - Key Issues Into The Print - Nike discounts


2. Inventory Control: Kind of a boring topic – but it’s critical for several reasons. There’s one thing that you can take to the bank, when futures are strengthening, and inventory is declining, it is nearly fool-proof trigger for a significant lift in Gross Margins at Nike. Unfortunately, the opposite holds true as well – weakening futures and higher inventories = weak Gross Margin setup. While we think that e-commerce will be a meaningful boost to gross margins for the quarter, the reality is that if we had to bet on a directional change in futures, it would be on a mean reversion to the high single digit range (C$). At the same time, the chart below shows that the spread between futures and inventory has been unfavorable for the past four quarters running, and gross margins have remained bullet proof. E-commerce is buoying this…but we worry about near-term sustainability of the trend if the futures rate declines without material improvement in inventory.
NKE - Key Issues Into The Print - NKE futures GM


3. Athletic Endorsements

Just about any way you slice it, UA has stolen the spotlight from Nike on its home turf over the past six months. We think we’re going to see a meaningful tweak in Nike’s endorsement strategy – in other words, spending more money – which will be easier to push through the system with Don Blair out of the picture. 


Some will argue that Nike’s new NBA deal will help, but we’d argue that no fewer than seven out of ten people think that Nike already is the league sponsor. They’d be wrong – it’s Adidas.  League endorsements largely do not work. Consumers don't care about the logo players are required to put on their shirts. They care about the logo they proudly wear on their feet. That's why Nike walked away from these League deals over a decade ago. Now it’s a good idea again?


Adidas paid $400mm over 11 years. Nike is paying $1bn over 8-years. While this is still less than the $1.1bn/5-yrs that Nike is paying for the NFL, it is a lot of coin to pay for the 5th most watched sport in the US (NFL, MLB, CFB, NASCAR, NBA, NHL) -- yes, NBA is just a notch above hockey.


Here's where Nike can earn its keep. If they somehow figure out how to innovate the uniforms such that players notice a dramatic improvement in their ability to put points on the board and play over an extended period of time, then there's a commercial apparel opportunity for Nike. That's what it did with the NFL. But a football player's uniform weighs about 30lbs, and has not been innovated or streamlined in 30 years. That was a ripe opportunity for Nike.  Basketball is a very different story -- shorts, tank top, that's it.


NKE - Key Issues Into The Print - endorsement weight


4. E-Commerce. There are some major considerations here.

A. E-commerce was up 42% last quarter, which is a sequential slowdown from 2Q’s 66%. But looked at on a 2-year run rate, underlying growth remains at peak levels. We think that Nike has plans to set new peak levels in FY16. How we’re doing the math, e-commerce represents about 6% of Nike’s sales. That’s about $1.8bn today. We think the company will add between $1bn-$1.2bn in FY16, or 55%-65% growth. Nike will probably tell you that we’re too aggressive. But let’s put the accountability pants on. In Oct 2013, the company said that e-comm would go from $540mm in 2013 to $2bn in FY17. It appears to be hitting that goal 1-2 years ahead of plan. It didn’t purposely sandbag, but rather it’s such a dynamic growth opportunity with more and more growth opportunity by the day.

B. The margin on those sales is a big consideration. How we do the math, e-commerce sales are about 20points margin accretive. That’s outlined in the table below. But more important than the actual gross margin rate is the magnified amount of gross margin dollars as Nike captures a full retail price instead of one with a 50% wholesale discount. A 20%+ margin on a 2x price = nearly 4x the gross margin dollars.

C. Yes there are increased working capital requirements, which Nike will have to manage. There will be a learning curve there. But outright capital spending and incremental SG&A investment on e-commerce is shrinking – for now at least – given what Nike has been investing (much of it quietly) over the past three years.

D. We could actually make the argument that 100% of the e-commerce spend will be incremental – as in, not take away from its wholesale business (FL, FINL, HIBB). Not over the long term, but temporarily. The point is that Nike is going to manage its wholesale model with kid gloves. It will say and do all the right things, as will its partners. But make no mistake, it will aggressively push the envelope with its e-comm model along the way. It will only know it pushed too far when some serious channel stuffing is apparent in the wholesale channel (ie. higher inventories, lower comps at FL, or maybe even 24% growth in a sub-par outlet like KSS in the last qtr).  And at that point, the right decision will likely be to still grow e-comm aggressively.

E. In the end, we think that e-commerce growth will account for $750mm-$900mm in incremental gross profit – or about 60% of gross profit growth.  That also translates to 5-7% in EPS growth. Back to the comparison to other companies above, we think this largely explains away why Nike is growing earnings 2x the rate of sales while other non-durables brands are flat to down. 

NKE - Key Issues Into The Print - Nike ecom vs whole


5. Guidance -- WWDD

What will Don do? This is Don Blair’s last conference call as CFO. It’s also when Nike will give more definitive guidance about FY16. Does Don set a conservative plan for his successor, Andy Campion, to beat in his first year out of the box? That’s bad near-term, but good for the next few quarters. Or does he set the bar high with a bullish outlook for the year that the team might or might not hit? Keep in mind that when Don Started at the company over 15 years ago, he got a major black eye when he misread the internal budgeting process and lowered street expectations significantly – when in actuality the company ended up having a great year. Maybe Campion needs the same ‘trial by fire’? Our sense is that Campion ran the budgeting process with Don as a chaperone. There may be some noise, but it should appear relatively seamless to most observers. Nonetheless, we'll be watching this one closely.

real-time alerts

real edge in real-time

This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.

OC: Removing Owens Corning from Investing Ideas

Takeaway: We are removing Owens Corning from Investing Ideas.

Please be advised that we are removing Owens Corning (OC) from Investing Ideas today.


*  *  *  *  *  *  *


"The reason being is that our #HousingAccelerating call is starting to get priced into expectations," according to Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough. "Owens Corning has had another nice move off its lows and we’d rather add it back to Investing Ideas on the next pullback."

From Bear to Bull: Why McDonald's Is Going North of $100 (And Won't Look Back) | $MCD


In this brief excerpt from The Macro Show this morning, Hedgeye Restaurants Sector Head Howard Penney explains why he's gone from bearish to bullish on McDonald’s (MCD) and why shares have meaningful upside and limited downside from here.


Subscribe to The Macro Show today for access to this and all other episodes. 


Subscribe to Hedgeye on YouTube for all of our free video content.




CCL’s earnings release and conference call went as planned.  A big Q2 beat but little change to 2015 yield or EPS guidance.  With the stock up today, it appears that investors view the guidance as conservative, once again.


We’ll take the other side to this – guidance looks reasonable to us, given the company’s struggles in Europe.  CCL, along with RCL, tends to trade on the assumption that Street estimates are too low.  If we’re right, in-line performance won’t be good enough and stock upside in both names should be limited.


Please see our detailed note:

investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.