Fact: KATE is consistently one of the most volatile ‘earnings day’ stocks, moving an average of 12.7% (usually down) on the day of the print.
Fact: There is usually a very good reason for the move – either due to poor communication about guidance, or sloppy results as the high-growth model either invests in, or closes non-core divisions.
Fact: KATE’s communication misfires are a thing of the past. The company nailed it this quarter. Even when an analyst asked an inciteful question about participating in the industry’s ‘promotional cadence’ (which could have had a bad outcome), CEO Leavitt proverbially stuffed the question right back at the Analyst, and showed how KATE is on offense as it relates to creating its own destiny as opposed to being hostage to an industry that few on Wall Street really understand.
Fact: This was a great quarter. Sales were up 24%, margins looked healthy across the board (gross margins up 80bps, EBITDA mgns +400bps), and inventories were very much in check (up 12% vs 24% sales growth).
Fact: Comps came in at 9%, and management said that comps should accelerate throughout the year (implying something in the teens). But guidance still calls for high-single digit comps for the year (#conservative – i.e. 9% is already at the highest end of that range).
Fact: We can find absolutely no good reason for the sell-off today. When we saw the print, we checked the box and assumed that the stock would be up modestly. We can usually pin an outsized move on something. But in this rare instance, we don’t get it. That’s probably the only concern that we have about the print – the fact that someone might know something that we don’t (that said, the company does not know it either).
KATE remains one of our top ideas. As outlined below, we think that there’s a roadmap to a $75 stock over 2-years.
Some Details on the Numbers
Comps came in 250bps above the street’s expectations at 9% with Japan down 4% and e-comm in the high teens, low DD. But, due to the 14th week LY, SE Asia JV, and closure of Jack/Saturday sales we’re a little lighter than expected. Year-over-year unit growth slowed from 30% to 7% as the brunt of the store closures fell in this quarter. There are a lot of moving parts on the revenue line now due to the factors mentioned above with the Brazil transition announcement added to the mix.
Despite the noise on the top line, let’s stick to what we know.
1) Sales grew in the quarter on a pro-forma constant currency basis by 28% (24% excluding the currency impact).
2) E-commerce comp in the high-teens, low-20’s assuming a weight of 25% on the low end and 20% on the high end. Even with the pull-back in ‘Flash Sales’ this side of the business continues to outperform.
3) 9% is at the top end of HSD, and comps will accelerate from here. Management again was extremely conservative with its guide but we didn’t hear any reason why we shouldn’t still expect the sequential acceleration management initially guided to…
a) 2Q -- The company moved it’s ‘Friends and Family’ event into 2Q15 this year and will repeat the Semi-Annual sale in 2Q again this year. Also lapping the pull-back in Japanese consumption following the tax hike.
b) 3Q – KATE is lapping the lost Semi-Annual Sale from a year ago, and will be adding back the Juicy re-lo’s which should add a ‘couple hundred bps’ to comps.
c) 4Q – Lastly, the company is lapping the first real pull-back in ‘Flash Sale’ events in the quarter when it took down its events from 3 to 2 in 4Q14.
4) US store productivity flat. The majority of the KATE’s store base (about 60% on our math) is in the 1-3 year old band. Meaning that they should continue to ramp meaningfully on the productivity curve. Our sense is that this helps explain a large part of the stagnant US comp door productivity.
Margins across the board looked really strong. As the company shed the Jack/Saturday anchor. Most of the beat on the gross margin line was attributed to timing and plenty of reasons were given why margins should be flat YY excluding the 4Q14 Jack/Saturday inventory write down. But in 2Q14 Kate Spade Saturday alone accounted for 240bps of the 315bps of dilution on the Gross Margin line (about $6.5mm), and the company will be lapping that when it reports numbers in 3 months.
For the year, the top end of guidance assumes a 15.7% EBITDA margin rate. On par with what the company printed LY when excluding the $29mm in losses from Jack/Saturday in 4Q and the $6.5mm inventory write down charge booked in 2Q14. With Int’l KSNY EBITDA margins guided to HSD from flat last year and Adelington margin neutral there is room to outperform especially if sales come in ahead of guided expectations.
05/05/15 10:29 PM EDT
KATE – We Feel Good About The Print
Takeaway: We think that the long-term call is absolutely on track, and that KATE’s 1Q results should be another milestone on the way to $75
We think that the long-term call is absolutely on track, and that KATE’s 1Q results on Thursday should be another milestone on the way to $75. As the company doubles its sales base over the next three years while taking margins from 11% to 19%, generating $3+ in earnings power. Sales and margins trends look in-tact over the near term as the US e-comm trends looked solid even with the pullback in Flash events. And, margins stand to benefit from the elimination of stand-alone Jack/Saturday stores and the shift of the ‘Friends and Family’ from 1Q14 into 2Q this year.
We’re Above Consensus. We think that management was being overly cautious with its targets for 2015. There are so many levers in this model, and our sense is that the company downplayed them. KATE guided to $185mm-$200mm in EBITDA for the year – assuming the top end of revenue guidance, that’s 15.7%, or about flat on a year/year basis (adjusting for the Jack/Saturday dilution). But we’re modeling $237mm, or about 110bp higher than last year. That’s about 65% EBITDA growth for the year, a number we expect to moderate only slightly to 50% the year after.
Quite frankly, we like the company’s conservatism, as it will keep expectations grounded, and mitigate the likelihood of an earnings day sell-off, which happens too often for KATE to call it a coincidence.
What’s It Worth? So that begs the question as to what we should pay for KATE. By the end of this year, we’ll be eyeing about $345mm in EBITDA and $1.30 in EPS. When looking at the 50% and 100% growth rates in EBITDA and EPS, respectively, we could definitely argue a big multiple. On the flip side, this is a fashion business, and there will almost certainly be a time (like KORS is experiencing now) where it will see multiple compression as it matures. But keep in mind that KORS has a brand footprint of $6.4bn and EBIT margins of 30%. KATE has a $1.4bn footprint (smaller that Tory Burch at $1.9bn) and margins of only 11%. It will be a long time before we have to ask the ‘is it over’ question. Until then, we think the multiple will continue to defy gravity in the eyes of anyone that’s not a growth investor.
For argument’s sake, let’s keep the forward multiples in place that KATE has today – 50x earnings and 19x EBITDA. We think that there’s upside this year as the company beats. But on 2016 numbers we’re looking at 50x $1.32 = $66, or 19x EBITDA in the mid-50s. Roll ‘em to ’17 and you get to over $2+ in earnings power, or around a $75 stock.
1) This is perhaps the most polarizing number we will see during the print on Thursday. While we usually don’t play the near-term comp game, let’s strap the accountability pants on for KATE management. It guided 1Q14 high-teens, 4Q at 8-14% and the full year at 10-13%, and printed 29%, 28% and 24% for each quarter and the year respectively. The company’s initial guidance for the year calls for HSD comps improving sequentially throughout the year. We should see a typical KATE print, sales coming in ahead of expectations followed by a guidance raise.
2) For the quarter we are at a 10% comp, and will be very surprised if we see anything in the single digits. More details on the math behind our assumption and the two controversial areas below…
a) E-Comm – The company continued on its planned pull back on ‘Flash Sales’. Similar to 4Q14, the company hosted 2 ‘Flash Sales’ compared to 3 in the prior year’s quarter. In 4Q14 the company posted dot.com sales growth of ~45%-55% depending on the aggregate weight of the segment. In the quarter, e-comm alone would support 5% comp growth assuming it is a) 25% of the business in 1Q, b) grows at 20%, and c) Brick and Mortar comps are flat. If we ratchet e-comm comps up to 25% holding all other assumptions the same, it would get us to a 6.3% comp for the quarter.
b) Japan – Due to the 37% comp KATE Japan posted in 1Q14 ahead of the country’s consumption tax hike from 5%-8%, management cited this as one of the main reasons for the guided sequential slowdown in comp trends. But given the size of the business (12% - 15% of total revenue) we’re not overly concerned about the potential headwind. Let’s say that comps in quarter are flat, which would imply a 300bps deceleration on the 2yr trend line, and sales growth for the rest of the company was 20%. We are looking at 360bps of headwind to the company average. Or, bear case, Japan is down 10% we are looking at 540bps of dilution. Realistically, let’s assume that the 2-year run rate stays even with 4Q levels – even though it is actually trending higher. A 6% Japan comp would imply a 22% 2-year trend (flat sequentially). That suggests 250bps of sequential headwind on a consolidated basis.
c) Our algorithm consists of a few parts. Organic growth ex. Japan and Jack/Saturday of 13.5%. Japan down 3%. Which gets us to 10% comp growth. That’s broken into e-comm growth of 20% (~25% of the consolidated revenue base) and B&M comps of 6.7% down from the 21% we saw in 4Q14.
1) Gross Margins: The way we see it, the combination of Jack/Saturday caused 130bps of dilution in FY14 from inventory write off charges alone. The company will get all of that back in ’15. With the additional benefit of shedding free standing Jack/Saturday doors which were operating well below the company average.
a) For the quarter, the company is comping against a 150bps decrease in Gross Margin as the company moved its ‘Friends and Family event’ into 1Q14 to pull forward sales lost to a late-April Easter that fell in 2Q14 last year. The company did not repeat the sale in 1Q15 this year. That should more than offset any headwinds from Fx or occupancy related to the newly converted Juicy outlet doors.
2) In total we get to operating margin expansion of just over 300bps, with the majority driven by SG&A leverage with 100bps of Gross Margin expansion. Add on the $12mm in estimated D&A cost gets us to an adjusted EBITDA margin of 11.3%.