Takeaway: Here we explore a) brand loyalty and b) why people spent less - critical factors we'll be looking at for incremental change on Mon 3/24

Here's the fourth note in a series of five in advance of our LULU Consumer Survey results on Monday March 24th at 11am ET.  When we polled consumers three months ago, we pulled away some clear insights. The concerns largely outweighed the strengths, which foreshadowed the company's results, and ultimately the stock price.


We're re-running our survey to gauge the incremental change over the past quarter, with the goal of seeing whether LULU is making progress (which could get us more constructive on the name) or not.


In preparation for 'Round 2' we want to offer up some of the notable takeaways from our last survey, as they'll be framing the discussion on Monday.




We asked consumers which Yoga brands they are likely to recommend to friends. The highest scores were Sweaty Betty, Prana, Nike, UnderArmour and Idealogy (Macy's). At the other end of the spectrum, unfortunately, was Lululemon, Old Navy, Puma and Roxy.  Definitely a problem for LULU -- one that few people, even the company, are likely to debate.




On the flip side, we asked which brands are highest on the list of brands that you are UNLIKELY to recommend to friends. This is slightly different than the inverse of the first question, as it looks to measure negativity as opposed to lack of positivity.  But the results are the same in that Lululemon scored higher than any other brand on the 'unlikely to recommend' scale. Other notables include Old Navy and VS/Pink.  






Next we asked the people who have never purchased anything at Lululemon why they don't shop there (this was about 30% of our sample). The primary factor is that there are no stores in their area -- which is actually a bullish factor for LULU. That speaks to the square footage growth opportunity for the company.   The next factor -- and only other one that registered at a notable level -- is that prices are too high. We discount this to some degree, as certain people in the sample simply might not be able to afford high end Yoga apparel.






More interesting to us is the rationale people who are purchasing less product than they used to gave as to their altered purchasing habits. This one was interesting.


The top answer -- by a country mile -- is that the prices are too high. In fact 76% of the people in this group said so. Importantly, they are preexisting customers of LULU, so you can't just say that they can't afford it. The reality is that at one point price was not a factor, but three months ago, it was.


#2 answer = Dislike Corporate Management. Seriously, have you ever heard Main Street talk about not liking a corporate management team? Wall Street says it all the time, but for this to be an issue with Main Street it has to be really bad.


#3 answer = Poor Reputation. Again, this is likely a function of LULU's self-inflicted wounds. It had nothing but a stellar reputation 13 months ago.


#4 answer = Poor Quality Products. We're the first to admit that Lululemon's product -- generally speaking -- is outstanding quality. In fact, that may be an issue for them in that a pair of Yoga pants can literally last 5-years (not good for the replacement cycle). But that's not a bad problem to have. In this case, most of us agree that any ding to LULU's reputation on quality is entirely a function of Luon. We'll see with our next survey on Monday if public perception on this issue is getting a bit more forgiving.



6 Charts: The French Election, Nasdaq All-Time Highs & An Earnings Scorecard

We've been telling investors for some time that global growth is picking up, get long stocks.

read more

Another French Revolution?

"Don't be complacent," writes Hedgeye Managing Director Neil Howe. "Tectonic shifts are underway in France. Is there the prospect of the new Sixth Republic? C'est vraiment possible."

read more

Cartoon of the Day: The Trend is Your Friend

"All of the key trending macro data suggests the U.S. economy is accelerating," Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough says.

read more

A Sneak Peek At Hedgeye's 2017 GDP Estimates

Here's an inside look at our GDP estimates versus Wall Street consensus.

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Green Thumb

So far, 64 of 498 companies in the S&P 500 have reported aggregate sales and earnings growth of 6.1% and 16.8% respectively.

read more

Europe's Battles Against Apple, Google, Innovation & Jobs

"“I am very concerned the E.U. maintains a battle against the American giants while doing everything possible to sustain so-called national champions," writes economist Daniel Lacalle. "Attacking innovation doesn’t create jobs.”

read more

An Open Letter to Pandora Management...

"Please stop leaking information to the press," writes Hedgeye Internet & Media analyst Hesham Shaaban. "You are getting in your own way, and blowing up your shareholders in the process."

read more

A 'Toxic Cocktail' Brewing for A Best Idea Short

The first quarter earnings pre-announcement today is not the end of the story for Mednax (MD). Rising labor costs and slowing volume is a toxic cocktail...

read more

Energy Stocks: Time to Buy? Here's What You Need to Know

If you're heavily-invested in Energy stocks it's been a heck of a year. Energy is the worst-performing sector in the S&P 500 year-to-date and value investors are now hunting for bargains in the oil patch. Before you buy, here's what you need to know.

read more

McCullough: ‘My 1-Minute Summary of My Institutional Meetings in NYC Yesterday’

What are even some of the smartest investors in the world missing right now?

read more

Cartoon of the Day: Political Portfolio Positioning

Leave your politics out of your portfolio.

read more

Jim Rickards Answers the Hedgeye 21

Bestselling author Jim Rickards says if he could be any animal he’d be a T-Rex. He also loves bonds and hates equities. Check out all of his answers to the Hedgeye 21.

read more