prev

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK

TODAY’S S&P 500 SET-UP – February 27, 2014


As we look at today's setup for the S&P 500, the range is 27 points or 1.09% downside to 1825 and 0.37% upside to 1852.                           

                                                                                                    

SECTOR PERFORMANCE

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 1

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 2

 

EQUITY SENTIMENT:

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 10                                                                                                                                                                  

 

CREDIT/ECONOMIC MARKET LOOK:

  • YIELD CURVE: 2.33 from 2.34
  • VIX closed at 14.35 1 day percent change of 4.97%

MACRO DATA POINTS (Bloomberg Estimates):

  • 8:30am: Durable Goods, Jan., est -1.6% (pr -4.3%, rev -4.2%)
  • 8:30am: Init Jobless Claims, Feb. 22, est. 335k (prior 336k)
  • 9:45am: Bloomberg Consumer Comfort, Feb. 23 (prior -30.6)
  • 10am: Fed’s Yellen testifies to Senate Banking Committee
  • 10am: Freddie Mac mortgage rates
  • 10:30am: EIA natural-gas storage change
  • 10:30am: Fed’s Fisher speaks in Frankfurt
  • 11am: Kansas City Fed Mfg Activity, Feb., est. 2 (prior 5)
  • 1:30pm: ECB’s Draghi speaks in Frankfurt
  • 3:15pm: Fed’s Lockhart and George speak in Atlanta

GOVERNMENT:

    • 9:30am: House Oversight panel holds hearing on IRS examinations of political speech by tax-exempt groups
    • 10am: Senate Banking Cmte hears from Fed Chair Yellen on semiannual monetary report to Congress
    • 10am: House Transportation and Infrastructure panel meets on “Improving the Nation’s Highway Freight Network”

WHAT TO WATCH:

  • Janet Yellen to testify before Senate Banking Committee
  • Sony job cuts to include a third of electronics unit workers
  • Baidu 1Q revenue forecast tops estimate as 4Q beats
  • Williams Partners to buy Williams Canada assets for $1.2b
  • JPMorgan sees March bid for Global Special Opportunities: WSJ
  • J.C. Penney gains as sales forecast signals turnaround momentum
  • KKR said to seek Abril Educacao deal avoiding $1b buyout
  • Imerys tops Minerals Technologies bid for clay-supplier Amcol
  • Bitcoin Foundation aided New York prosecutor’s Mt. Gox probe
  • U.S. cos. seen making exchange plans to trade Bitcoin: WSJ
  • Google fights e-mail privacy group lawsuit calling it too big
  • Musk’s $5b Tesla gigafactory may unleash incentive fray
  • Gunmen take Ukraine’s Crimea parliament, raise Russian flag
  • German unemployment falls for 3rd month as growth picks up
  • Eurozone Feb. economic confidence rises to 101.2; est. 100.7
  • RBS posts biggest loss since 2008 as McEwan details overhaul
  • WPP falls most in 4 yrs as exchange rates hurt margins
  • Financing for Jos. A. Bank’s Bauer deal delayed by Goldman: WSJ

AM EARNS:

    • American Realty Capital (ARCP) 6am, $0.27
    • Best Buy (BBY) 7am, $1.01 - Preview
    • Chico’s (CHS) 7:15am, $0.16
    • Cobalt International Energy (CIE) 7am, $(0.16)
    • Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 8am, $0.73
    • Fortress Investment Group (FIG) 7am, $0.19
    • GrafTech Intl (GTI) 7:10am, $0.03
    • Hilton (HLT) Bef-Mkt, $0.16
    • Kohl’s (KSS) 7am, $1.54 - Preview
    • Lamar Advertising (LAMR) 6am, $0.16
    • Linn Energy (LINE) 6:50am, $0.26
    • LinnCo (LNCO) 6:50am, $0.50
    • LKQ (LKQ) 7am, $0.28
    • Mylan (MYL) 6:30am, $0.75 - Preview
    • Nationstar Mortgage (NSM) 6am, $(0.19)
    • NorthStar Realty Finance (NRF) 7:30am, $0.29
    • Ocwen Financial (OCN) 7:30am, $1
    • Pall (PLL) 7am, $0.80
    • Rowan Cos (RDC) 8am, $0.41
    • Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) 7am, $(0.70)
    • Sears Holdings (SHLD) 6am, $(1.82)
    • Sempra Energy (SRE) 9am, $0.97
    • Toronto-Dominion (TD CN) 6:30am, C$1.04 - Preview
    • Valeant Pharaceuticals (VRX) 6am, $2.06 - Preview
    • Wendy’s (WEN) 7:30am, $0.10
    • Western Refining (WNR) 6am, $0.56
    • Windstream (WIN) 6:15am, $0.09
    • WPX Energy (WPX) 7am, $(0.35)
    • Zale (ZLC) 7:30am, $1.04

PM EARNS:

    • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals (ACAD) 4:01pm, $(0.13)
    • Arena Pharmaceuticals (ARNA) 4:03pm, $0.15 - Preview
    • Deckers Outdoor (DECK) 4pm, $3.79
    • Gap (GPS) 4pm, $0.65
    • KBR (KBR) 4:08pm, $0.91
    • Kodiak Oil & Gas (KOG) 4:01pm, $0.18
    • Medivation (MDVN) 4:10pm, $(0.09)
    • Mentor Graphics (MENT) 4:05pm, $0.91
    • Monster Beverage (MNST) 4:05pm, $0.46
    • New Gold (NGD CN) 4:04pm, $0.03
    • OmniVision Technologies (OVTI) 4:18pm, $0.35
    • Ross Stores (ROST) 4pm, $1.01 - Preview
    • Salesforce.com (CRM) 4:05pm, $0.06
    • Salix Pharmaceuticals (SLXP) 4:01pm, $0.93
    • SandRidge Energy (SD) 4:05pm, $0.00
    • Sotheby’s (BID) 4pm, $1.41
    • Splunk (SPLK) 4:02pm, $0.05
    • Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM) 4:05pm, $0.06
    • Universal Health Services (UHS) 5:01pm, $1.08
    • Youku Tudou (YOKU) 4:30pm, $0.02

COMMODITY/GROWTH EXPECTATION (HEADLINES FROM BLOOMBERG)

  • Copper Trades Near December Low With Production Set to Expand
  • Japan No Country for Old Farmers as 7-Eleven Takes Up the Plow
  • EU Fines No Bar to Milk Output Gain as Price Surges: Commodities
  • Brent Crude Declines to One-Week Low; Premium to WTI Narrows
  • Gold Rally Restores Luster to ETFs After Slide: Chart of the Day
  • Wheat Extends Loss as Demand Seen Easing Amid Argentina Exports
  • Arabica Coffee Drops Following Surge on Brazil Crop-Forecast Cut
  • China Copper Premium Slumps to Eight-Month Low as Yuan Weakens
  • Palm Oil Climbing for Merchant’s Coleman on Dry Weather Risk
  • Cattle Poised to Extend Rally With Hogs as U.S. Meat Supply Ebbs
  • Oil Giants Sell Pipelines as Shale Strength Drives Deals: Energy
  • Shale Boom Brings Rethinking of U.S. Crude Export Ban: QuickTake
  • Europe Refiner Bull & Bear Pits New Markets vs. Tax: BI Outlook
  • Gold Erases Drop in London, Is Little Changed at $1,332.07/Oz

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 5

 

CURRENCIES

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 6

 

GLOBAL PERFORMANCE

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 3

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 4

 

EUROPEAN MARKETS

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 7

 

ASIAN MARKETS

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 8

 

MIDDLE EAST

 

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - 9

 

 

The Hedgeye Macro Team

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs

Takeaway: Both equity mutual funds and ETFs displayed solid trends in the most recent week with small but improving bond inflow into mutual funds

Investment Company Institute Mutual Fund Data and ETF Money Flow:

 

In the most recent week, both equity vehicles including mutual funds and ETFs had solid inflow trends with small but improving inflows into bond mutual funds as well:

 

Total equity mutual funds produced a strong week of inflow with $5.8 billion of net subscriptions, a slight deceleration from the $7.2 billion inflow the week prior. The $5.8 billion inflow had a domestic bend during the most recent 5 day period, with $4.1 billion flowing into domestic equity funds and $1.7 billion flowing into international stock funds. The 2014 running weekly average inflow for equity mutual funds is now $4.9 billion, an improvement from the $3.0 billion weekly average inflow for 2013. 

 

Fixed income mutual funds also had net inflows during the 5 day period ending February 19th with $2.8 billion flowing into all fixed income funds. The breakout of improving bond inflow amounted to $2.4 billion into taxable products and a $422 million inflow into tax-free or municipal products, the 6th consecutive week of inflow into munis after 33 consecutive weeks of outflow. The 2014 weekly average for fixed income mutual funds now stands at a $523 million weekly inflow, an improvement from 2013's weekly average outflow of $1.5 billion but a far cry from the $5.8 billion weekly average inflow from 2012 (our view of the blow off top in bond fund inflow).

 

ETFs had mixed trends during the week, with a strong week of subscriptions in stock ETFs with $8.9 billion in net inflow with bond ETFs experiencing withdrawals of $625 million. The 2014 weekly averages are now a $3.3 billion weekly outflow for equity ETFs and a $2.3 billion weekly inflow for fixed income ETFs. 

 

The net of total equity mutual fund and ETF trends against total bond mutual fund and ETF flows totaled a positive $12.6 billion spread for the week ($14.8 billion of total equity inflow versus the $2.2 billion inflow within fixed income; positive numbers imply inflows for stocks; negative numbers imply inflows for bonds). The 52 week moving average has been $6.9 billion (positive spread to equities), with a 52 week high of $30.9 billion (positive spread to equities) and a 52 week low of -$36.9 billion (negative numbers imply a net inflow into bonds for the week). 

 

Continued strong equity mutual fund inflow trends currently support our favorite long idea in the sector, T Rowe Price (TROW) which should benefit with a leading retail equity mutual fund franchise. In addition, we recently added Legg Mason (LM) to our Best Ideas list on the long side to capture the emerging trends on the institutional side of the industry which is experiencing inflow into fixed income and outflow in equities (see our Legg report here).

 

Mutual fund flow data is collected weekly from the Investment Company Institute (ICI) and represents a survey of 95% of the investment management industry's mutual fund assets. Mutual fund data largely reflects the actions of retail investors. Exchange traded fund (ETF) information is extracted from Bloomberg and is matched to the same weekly reporting schedule as the ICI mutual fund data. According to industry leader Blackrock (BLK), U.S. ETF participation is 60% institutional investors and 40% retail investors.   

 

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 1

 

 ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 2

 

 

Most Recent 12 Week Flow in Millions by Mutual Fund Product:

 

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 3

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 4

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 5

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 6

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 7

 

 

Most Recent 12 Week Flow Within Equity and Fixed Income Exchange Traded Funds:

  

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 8

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 9

 

 

Net Results:

 

 

The net of total equity mutual fund and ETF trends against total bond mutual fund and ETF flows totaled a positive $12.6 billion spread for the week ($14.8 billion of total equity inflow versus the $2.2 billion inflow within fixed income; positive numbers imply inflows for stocks; negative numbers imply inflows for bonds). The 52 week moving average has been $6.9 billion (positive spread to equities), with a 52 week high of $30.9 billion (positive spread to equities) and a 52 week low of -$36.9 billion (negative numbers imply a net inflow into bonds for the week). 

 

 

ICI Fund Flow Survey - Solid Equity Inflow into Both Mutual Funds and ETFs - ICI chart 10 

 

 

Continued strong equity mutual fund inflow trends currently support our favorite long idea in the sector, T Rowe Price (TROW) which should benefit with a leading retail equity mutual fund franchise. In addition, we recently added Legg Mason (LM) to our Best Ideas list on the long side to capture the emerging trends on the institutional side of the industry which is experiencing inflow into fixed income and outflow in equities (see our Legg report here).

 

 

 

 

Jonathan Casteleyn, CFA, CMT 

 

 

 

Joshua Steiner, CFA

 


Moving People

This note was originally published at 8am on February 13, 2014 for Hedgeye subscribers.

“As teachers, we want to move people.”

-Larry Ferlazzo

 

That’s such a simple but solid leadership thought from Daniel Pink in the latest #behavioral book I’ve cracked open, To Sell Is Human (pg 39). “The capacity to sell isn’t some unnatural adaptation to the merciless world of commerce. It is part of who we are.”

 

Moving People - battletofight

 

Pink goes on to make an astute point about the information laden world in which we now live in, suggesting that the most successful companies are going to be “curators and clarifiers” of everything that’s being tweeted, googled, and facebooked at you “… helping to make sense of the blizzard of facts, data, and options…” (pg 56)

 

While we have plenty of work to do, lots of people to hire, and many improvements to make, that’s pretty much how we see Hedgeye helping you. We aren’t waking up every morning to punch clock. We want to synthesize and analyze every lick of information we can find, and move you to move when consensus won’t.

 

Back to the Global Macro Grind

 

Moving you out of consumer growth stocks and into Commodities, Gold, and Bonds is where we’ve been at now for almost 6 weeks. That didn’t change at yesterday’s low-volume-lower-high for the SP500 either. That’s where we tried to move you more aggressively.

 

Getting people (including ourselves) to move isn’t easy. We get that. We also get that we need to build your trust in our process so that you understand why we are telling you that we think you should move and when.

 

Our communication process continues to evolve, but the best way for us to move you is:

  1. Get up at the top of the risk management morning and write you this strategy note every day
  2. Update you on the top trending Macro Themes that we don’t think are yet consensus
  3. Dynamically update (real-time) both our asset allocation and long/short position shifts

In terms of asset allocation shifts, you see that in the Early Look every day – the big ones in the last 2 months have been:

  1. Raising Commodities from 0% for most of last year to 15% this morning
  2. Raising Fixed Income from 0% for most of last year to 15% this morning
  3. Cutting our US Equity exposure from our top allocation for all of 2013 to 0% this morning

0%?

 

Yep. I’m un-elected too don’t forget. When I want to move you, I can cut to 0% too!

 

And that’s really the point. We get that each and every person reading this note has different risk tolerances and investment durations. But you don’t pay us to boil the ocean on every single thing for every single person. I think we’re more like your Big Macro weather insurance policy. When we want you to get out of something, we mean it.

 

On the long/short signaling shifts, the only way for me to show everyone what I really think and when is via #RealTimeAlerts:

  1. In the last 3-days (on the way up in stocks), I went from 4 LONGS, 6 SHORTS to 4 LONGS, 10 SHORTS
  2. Of the 4 LONGS, I sold equities like WWW and replaced them with bonds (yesterday bought BND)
  3. Of the 10 SHORTS, I re-shorted most of the names we covered when the SP500 was on its YTD lows

As you all know, I don’t always nail it in terms of my net positioning and long/short security selection. But that’s not the point about giving you 100% transparency in terms of what we do and when. The point is to help you A) understand why we are moving and B) hold us accountable to the timing of every move we make.

 

Back to the macro market, the most important things in my notebook this morning are as follows:

  1. US Dollar Index continues to breakdown, testing its YTD lows, confirming its bearish @Hedgeye TREND
  2. US 10yr Treasury Yield of 2.74% failed to overcome @Hedgeye 2.80% TREND resistance
  3. SP500 has immediate-term TRADE downside to 1728
  4. VIX has immediate-term TRADE upside to 20.41
  5. Yen continues to signal a bullish developing TREND vs USD (very bearish for the Nikkei, -10.8% YTD)
  6. CRB Commodities Index outperformed SP500 again yesterday, +0.5% to a fresh YTD high of +4.3%

In other words, if the both the research and risk management signals are:

  1. Bullish on Commodity #InflationAccelerating (our Top Macro Theme for Q114)
  2. Bearish on rate of change in US Consumption Growth
  3. Bearish on US currency and bond yields

Then why wouldn’t I try to keep moving you out of consumer growth equities and into commodities and bonds? Always right? No. Simple and solid. Yes. That’s what the insurance policy on your long-term investments should be.

 

Our immediate-term Macro Risk Ranges are now:

 

UST 10yr Yield 2.59-2.80%

SPX 1728-1836

Nikkei 13861-15029

USD 80.21-80.87

Pound 1.64-1.66

Gold 1266-1298

 

Best of luck out there today,

KM

 

Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer

 

Moving People - Chart of the Day

 

Moving People - Virtual Portfolio


Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

JCP: The Scoreboard Doesn’t Lie

Takeaway: If you focus on the P&L you’ll like 4Q. If you acknowledge this thing called cash flow, you’ll be scared off. Net/net = pos on the margin.

Conclusion: The puts and takes battle each other fiercely this quarter. Good improvement on the margin on the P&L, but cash flow went the other way. Net/net, let's face it...JCP never gets a win. This is as close to a win as its gotten in a while. That said, probably not enough for us to get back on board, as we think that the earnings power is there, but the right management team is not. For now, we're still 'JCP Agnostic'.

 

DETAILS

With the run that JCP had immediately preceding the earnings release, JCP needed to ‘bring it’ with this print. While the numbers on a stand-along basis were atrocious – it’s tough to argue otherwise, our sense is that there will be two camps emerging from this earnings report; 1) one that looks at the income statement, who will be upbeat about the positive changes on the margin (changes on the margin is what matters), and 2) one that is focused on cash flow and the balance sheet, which looked pretty depressing. The peer analysis below speaks volumes. You might argue that the P&L and Cash Flow might wash each other out. But the reality is that we’re talking about JC Penney here. It NEVER wins. The fact that it showed signs of life on the P&L is a positive that can’t be overlooked. As bad as the results were overall, they got better on the margin. That doesn’t happen a whole lot with JCP.

 

JCP: The Scoreboard Doesn’t Lie - dept store table

 

So does this mean that we jump back on board as one of the lone bulls on the name? We thought about it – very briefly. But the answer is no. Every bit of research we’ve done over the past year – including multiple consumer surveys – tells us that there’s $1.50 in earnings power buried away in there. And let’s be clear…we’re not talking about some phantom earnings power that will never be realized. We definitely think that $1.50 is attainable. But we remain hung up on our view that the current management team simply cannot make those numbers a reality. We acknowledge that Ullman can continue to steer the ship for another year, and productivity, earnings, and cash will all likely be in a better place. After all, this quarter alone showed a nice delta on some key line items. Let’s give credit where it’s due. But we don’t think Ullman is the guy to get JCP to a point where it actually makes money, which is pretty critical to us building up to a defendable value for this company.

 

Everyone will agree that this quarter was challenging for everyone. In order to get a complete picture of the financial landscape, let’s compare JCP to the other department stores that have reported numbers…Macy’s, Dillard’s, and Nordstrom. There are some pretty major comparative differences. Such as…

1)    First off, let’s start with the biggest commonality – which is same store sales. Every single one of them comped within 60bp of 2.0%. That’s as tight a grouping as we recall seeing in a long time. Of course, Kohl’s will probably destroy that trend when it reports Thursday.
 

2)    JCP definitely won with Gross Margin improvement of 461 bp, but it’s still sitting at a GM rate of only 28%, which is well below all of its competitors – even a dog like DDS.
 

3)    JCP also wins the comparison on the SG&A line – for two reasons. The first is the 458 bp improvement in the SG&A rate, but the more important one is the fact that it’s SG&A rate is still the highest out of the group by far. We don’t think that means JCP has costs to cut, but simply that it’s productivity can improve and naturally leverage costs.
 

4)    All good things must come to an end. Let’s move over to the cash flow statement. Cash from operations down 41%? Seriously?
 

5)    Free cash flow margins are half that of Macy’s, and with a 271 bp decline vs last year JCP is the only company in the group to post an erosion in free cash margins.
 

6)    Cash conversion cycle is perhaps the scariest due to a 27 day increase in days inventory on hand. You might think that the company made that up in part by extending payables, right? Nope, those eroded as well. All in, we’re talking a 31 day erosion in the cash conversion cycle. Yes, there was noise in the timing of inventory receipts. But cash is cash. Every other retailer improved it vs last year.

 

JCP: The Scoreboard Doesn’t Lie - jcp sigma

 

JCP: The Scoreboard Doesn’t Lie - departmentstore sigma


[video] McCullough: My Latest Meetings with Wall Street's Best Minds


$FB | $19 Billion Question: Does WhatsApp Have Any Value?

Takeaway: The acquisition price for WhatsApp is greater than its app's addressable market (assuming they can ever monetize it).

Editor's note: This research note was originally published by Hedgeye analyst Hesham Shaaban on February 20, 2014 at 15:02 in Internet & Media. For more information on our subscription service click here.

ACQUISITION SUMMARY

  • WhatsApp is a mobile messaging app with ~450M users (~70% are active daily)
  • WhatsApp will continue to operate as an independent & autonomous company
  • Facebook will pay ~$19B for the company ($4B cash/$15B in FB shares)

$FB | $19 Billion Question: Does WhatsApp Have Any Value? - w1 

ACQUISITION TAKEAWAYS

Monetization Strategy = Slippery Slope

WhatsApp CEO Jan Koum suggested that they have a clear monetization strategy in place.  While WhatsApp is essentially free to download, in some instances, the app requests an annual fee of $0.99.  However that isn't largely enforced if the user declines to pay.  Further, the company is not running ads on the app; which means that they're essentially not monetizing the product.  

 

Jan Koum also suggested that monetization is not a priority for the company right now; deferring to 5-10 year window as his focus.  More importantly, the company is not planning to introduce ads to its service; suggesting the only means for monetization will continue to be the user, which is comical since FB doesn't even charge its users. 

 

The assumption that Jan Koum is making is that the WhatsApp user is sticky, and that they would be willing to pay something for a service that has a series of free substitute options.  While the cost is nominal, it would be a deterrent to growing its current user base, if not sustaining it, if the company tried to enforce the annual fee more aggressively.

 

Acquisition Price > Addressable Market 

The street seems to be justifying the $19 billion acquisition price on a cost/user basis; suggesting that FB is getting a good deal since it is paying $42 per user for WhatsApp vs. its own per-user valuation of $140; essentially a 70% discount.  The inherent flaw in this analysis is simple: the FB user is far more valuable than a WhatsApp user because FB can actually monetize its user base; likely by a much higher margin than is implied by the WhatsApp per-user valuation.

 

The more telling factor is that the $19 billion that FB will pay to acquire WhatsApp is actually larger than the total addressable market for the app.  The addressable market is as follows:  

  • Global Paid App Market: ~$20 billion
  • Global Mobile Ad Market: ~$15 billion.

Once again, Jan Koum suggested that he doesn't want to monetize WhatsApp via ads, so the current addressable market is the $20 billion Paid App Market.  In actuality, it's likely much smaller.  We're not sure what percentage paid messenger apps represent of the total, but given that most of these apps are free, we doubt it's a meaningful percentage (if any).  

 

In short, the current addressable market for WhatsApp is a small fraction of what FB is paying for the company.

 

Now the obvious counter is that both these markets are rapidly growing and will continue to do so.  We're not disputing that. But how much share can WhatsApp hope to gain in a market with existing competition that generally doesn't charge the end user for messaging services? We doubt much.

 

 

 

 

Hesham Shaaban, CFA

203-562-6500

@HedgeyeInternet

hshaaban@hedgeye.com 


Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.

next