“The way I feel about music is that there is no right and wrong. Only true and false.”
I was dead wrong on the no-taper call yesterday, and (after covering my US Dollar short position within minutes of the decision) was somehow positioned right (8 LONGS, 0 SHORTS). Where I was brought up, being right for the wrong reasons is called luck.
True or False: Ben Bernanke did the right thing in tapering yesterday? True. Whether or not his obeying the US 2013 #GrowthAccelerating data on a lag (he’s 3 months late in making a decision he should have made in September) proves to be right is up to history.
I think that if most people were intellectually honest about it, they wouldn’t have told you that A) Bernanke was going to taper yesterday AND B) US stocks would rip to all-time highs on that. But they did. That is the only truth that matters this morning.
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
So what do we do now? Sticking with the process, that’s actually the easiest call to make. We simply go right back to where we were positioned from December 2012-September 2013:
- Long Growth (Equities)
- Short Gold, Bonds (and Equities that look like Bonds, like MLPs)
- #RatesRising + a USD that isn’t going down in a ball of flames = bad for Gold Bond positions
- #Flows (out of Gold Bonds into US Growth Stocks) should dominate well into the new year
That’s why my 1st three moves in #RealTimeAlerts after the taper decision yesterday were:
- COVER US Dollar Short
- SHORT Pimco’s Total Return Fund (BOND)
- SHORT Kinder Morgan (KMI)
It’s one thing to make mistakes in this game. It’s entirely another to make mistake-upon-mistake after making that first mistake. In hockey terms, give away the puck once – feel shame. Give it away again – feel sitting on cold Canadian bench for rest of game.
I could have easily given away the puck post taper yesterday buying something like Gold because it was down. It’s down a lot more this morning (Silver -3.9%, Gold -1.1%) and testing its June 27th YTD closing low of $1200/oz.
True or false: Gold hates #RatesRising?
- US Treasury 10yr Yield 2.88% = +17 bps month-over-month and +112 bps YTD
- Gold (started the yr at $1675) = still crashing, -28.3% YTD
Another puck I could have given away would have been trying the long Yen “because everyone is short the Yen.”
True or false: Nikkei loves Burning Yen?
- Japanese Yen (vs USD) = crashing, -17% YTD
- Nikkei = +1.7% overnight to +54.97% YTD
In other words, as soon as you saw the word “taper” yesterday, you got the Dollar right (up) and that helped you get a lot of other things Global Macro right.
True or false: Dollar Up = Emerging Markets Down?
- US Dollar (despite being UP now for 1st wk in 6) = +1.1% YTD
- MSCI Emerging Markets Index = down -5.9% YTD
Oh, and despite the epic US Equity market rip to all-time highs (SP = +26.9% YTD), Emerging Equity markets in Asia were down overnight (India -0.72%, Philippines -0.64%). Turkeys’ stock market is -0.7% this morning too.
On the taper news yesterday, Argentina, Chile, and Peru all saw their stock markets close down on the day. “Emerging” commodity countries = #EmergingOutflows.
So is it the marketing messages of asset management firms that are perma long Gold, Bonds, and Emerging Markets that are right or wrong in a Dollar Up + #RatesRising environment? Or are the perceptions of their investors simply false?
The truth is always in the balance of your account. It’s there, each and every market day, whether you played lucky or not.
Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges are now:
Best of luck out there today,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
We added Panera to the Best Ideas list as a short on 4/5/13 and continue to believe it is positioned as one of the best shorts in the QSR space heading into 2014. Until the street realizes the near-term severity of the situation, we will maintain our bearish bias.
The current EPS estimate for 4Q13 is $1.94, well above the $1.86 we are modeling. We expect to see sales deleverage in the quarter and believe general & administrative costs and occupancy costs will come in higher than the street anticipates. The street is looking for $666 million in sales in 4Q13. Considering PNRA’s current operational and secular issues, we expect sales to come in closer to $655 million. Looking out to 1H14, EPS estimates appear overly aggressive and will likely be revised down in the coming months.
In the 3Q13 earnings call, management acknowledged the bevy of operational issues that the company faces today. These are largely self-inflicted and range from a lack of kitchen equipment to a lack of seating space in their cafes. According to CEO Ron Shaich during the 3Q13 earnings call:
“We analyzed every café to assess its physical capacity levels. What we found is that approximately 10% of our cafes are capacity constrained and approximately a third of our cafes would be constrained should we have a meaningful lift in transactions.”
These capacity constraints, coupled with a lack of adequate labor, have stymied PNRA’s same-store sales growth in recent quarters. Slower speed of service and throughput issues, particularly during peak hours, have led to a less favorable customer experience and, subsequently, declining traffic. The two charts below illustrate why PNRA is having these issues today.
In an effort to improve throughput, capacity, and service, PNRA is now allocating additional capital to labor and equipment. We expect these increases on the labor and G&A lines will squeeze margins more than the street is anticipating in the coming quarters, particularly given the company’s soft sales trends. The fact of the matter is, these are not issues that will be solved in one quarter. It is a process that will take time.
There are several secular forces working against Panera that didn’t exist a couple of years ago. Perhaps the most notable is increased competition. For one, there are now more fast casual options available than ever before. But it doesn’t end there. Panera is also seeing increased competition from QSR chains that have been upgrading there menus to include healthier items. These QSR chains heavily market their products and offer them at a cheaper price point than Panera’s core offerings, making them attractive to consumers.
All told, Panera’s value equation is out of sync. With cheaper prices offered at quick-service restaurants and aggressive discounting at casual dining chains, PNRA has no pricing power. With an average check in the $9 to $10 range, PNRA has created a pricing umbrella for non-traditional competitors to take advantage of. We have seen this play out over the course of the year, as many casual dining restaurants are currently offering meals in the $6-$7 range. Management is aware of this value issue and is working to fix it, but, once again, this will take time.
These operational and secular issues have manifested in the form of declining comparable sales and traffic trends. This is always bad, but particularly bad when coupled with an increase in spending. Margins will inevitably contract and earnings growth will decelerate. Considering the street’s aggressive expectations, we believe PNRA is well positioned to post a couple of subpar quarters.
What we like most about Panera’s current situation is that management is aware of the company’s issues and is working to fix them. Chairman and CEO Ron Shaich is a great leader that we believe will eventually be able to get the company on the right track again. That being said, the team has several initiatives planned for 2014 to right the ship.
These include investing to improve its café operating experience, reconfiguring product lines, adding labor to cafes, improving speed of service and the customer experience, streamlining its menu offerings, testing lower priced items to improve its value perception, improving product consistency, and ramping up advertising spend to drive incremental traffic.
To be fair, the vast majority of PNRA’s initiatives address our concerns. But, to believe the effect of these will be immediate is, in our view, misguided. We can’t help but wonder if the system can handle all of these changes at once.
We understand the bull case. Panera is a beloved company, management is promptly addressing the issues, and trends will begin to accelerate. In fact, we don’t completely disagree with this view in the long-term. However, the bulls are underestimating the length of this turnaround, or regrouping, process. Increasing expenses, which they must do, while traffic is declining and the secular backdrop is discouraging will undoubtedly negatively affect margins. We just happen to think it will negatively affect margins more and for a longer time than the street currently expects.
PNRA is a good company that has many factors currently working against it in 4Q13 and through 1H14. That being said, if management is able to quickly address operational issues and successfully implement the planned demand drivers, we believe trends will accelerate through 2H14 and into 2015. As it stands, Panera is well positioned for the back half of 2014 – but there will be some near term pain.
10/23/13 – PNRA: The Pace of Change?
10/21/13 – PNRA: Stage 1 Denial
9/26/13 – PNRA: No Quick-Fix Recipe
4/05/13 – PNRA Hype Makes It Shortable
2/15/13 – PNRA Mix Tapped Out?
1/30/13 – PNRA Bread Not Quite Baked
Let us know if you have any questions or would like to discuss any of our current ideas in more detail.
The total percentage of successful long and short trading signals since the inception of Real-Time Alerts in August of 2008.
LONG SIGNALS 80.45%
SHORT SIGNALS 78.37%
THE MACAU METRO MONITOR, DECEMBER 19, 2013
MGM CHINA BOSS CALLS FOR BALANCE ON SMOKING ISSUE Macau Business
MGM China CEO Grant Bowie has called for a balanced agreement on smoking in casinos. “Clearly a number of our customers want to smoke. I think the education of the smokers and the ability for the smokers to be part of the solution is important.” The six casino operators have petitioned the government to scrap casino smoking zones and replace them with smoking rooms without slot machines or gaming tables. Bowie added that MGM China was considering investment opportunities on Hengqin Island, but had yet to decide whether to take any.
MACAU CPI DSEC
Consumer Price Index for November 2013 increased 5.78% YoY and 0.52% MoM.
This note was originally published at 8am on December 05, 2013 for Hedgeye subscribers.
“There is no one left, none but all of us.”
So I was in my homeland (Canada) yesterday meeting with some free-market capitalists and couldn’t help but think of what it felt like when I came to this country in the early 1990s - liberating.
Other than the Chris Farley looking mayor dude who did crack, Toronto, Ontario seemed void of what dominates our market lives in today’s USA. There’s no “taper-talk.” There are no professional politicians and TV pundits gorging on the uninformed.
As I boarded the plane back to beautiful Newark, New Jersey, I sighed. Then I cracked open a new book, and felt better again. In the preface to Doris Kearns Goodwin’s The Bully Pulpit –Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and The Golden Age of Journalism, she reminds us of what objective research and reporting used to be. I smiled again. This is our opportunity.
Back to the Global Macro Grind …
“As S.S. McClure well understood, the vitality of democracy depends on popular knowledge of complex questions” (The Bully Pulpit, pg XIV); not using complexity, policy, and demagoguery, as a political Trojan horse to obfuscate the truth.
Albeit I’m just a man with my team in a room, that’s my solemn commitment to you – providing you an objective research view of the truth. To be clear, this is not a position in life I always longed for – it’s simply the position I find myself in.
Even though he went to Harvard, for a long-time I’ve respected Teddy Roosevelt via a paper one of my freshman guidance counselors (who I was older than at the time!) put on my desk when I first got to Yale – The Strenuous Life. If you ever feel like you’ve lost your moral compass, re-read that – and read it again. It does the soul good.
Buying-the-damn-bubble #BTDB may not be chicken soup for your soul, but it has certainly paid the bills in 2013. From a behavioral market practitioner’s perspective, I have developed an affinity for doing precisely the opposite of how I think this ultimately ends. Weird, but it works.
To review, the multi-disciplinary triad of our Global Macro Research Process, there are 3 big parts:
- Behavioral Psych
History provides us context (economic/market patterns, mean reversion risk, etc.); math (fractal dimensions and risk ranges) signals timing; and behavioral, well, that’s a learning process.
How else would you define what it is that you do? Other than Embracing Uncertainty and constantly re-evaluating your position relative to the information surprise (price, volume, volatility) of the day, is there an alternative to mental flexibility? There isn’t for me. I’m not smarter than the market. And it took me a good long while to accept that.
In terms of our current strategy, quite simply put in our Q413 Macro Theme of #GetActive, it’s to do just that. Unaccountable and un-elected @FederalReserve policy making means we need to engage in unconventional market strategies.
In practice, in our Hedgeye Asset Allocation Model, what does that mean?
- At the US stock market highs we moved to 58% Cash (last Friday)
- After a 4-day US stock market correction we moved back to 42% Cash
Don’t lose the message of mental flexibility in the absolute numbers. If you want to be in 90% cash or 10% cash makes no difference to the point I am trying to make. It’s how you move on the margin that counts. I call it Fading Beta.
Looking at it from a different perspective (different Hedgeye product - #RealTimeAlerts):
- Last Friday (on green) we moved to 5 LONGS, 5 SHORTS
- Into yesterday’s close (on red) we moved to 11 LONGS, and 3 SHORTS
Again, the point here is about the process. My process is far from perfect. But at least I can explain, evaluate, and evolve it. Doing that in an open network of client feedback has made me a more responsible and accountable investor.
So why can’t we do that running America? Wasn’t the whole marketing pitch “Yes We Can”? Or, somewhere along the way towards truth, did we put political reputations and excuse making ahead of your country’s learning process?
How do you ever learn if you’re constantly on a quest to prove that you’re never wrong? If there’s one question I’d ask one of the most conflicted and compromised outcrops of Big US Government Intervention (the power of the Fed), that would be it.
And that’s all I have to say about that. It’s time to grind and get on with my day. It’s time for you to get on with yours. Thanks again for taking the time to read what I have to say. Teddy wrote it much more eloquently, but you’ll get the point:
“… our country calls not for the life of ease but for the life of strenuous endeavor. The twentieth century looms before us big with the fate of many nations. If we stand idly by, if we seek merely swollen, slothful ease and ignoble peace, if we shrink from the hard contests where men must win at hazard of their lives and at the risk of all they hold dear, then the bolder and stronger peoples will pass us by, and will win for themselves the domination of the world. Let us therefore boldly face the life of strife, resolute to do our duty well and manfully; resolute to uphold righteousness by deed and by word; resolute to be both honest and brave, to serve high ideals, yet to use practical methods. Above all, let us shrink from no strife, moral or physical, within or without the nation, provided we are certain that the strife is justified, for it is only through strife, through hard and dangerous endeavor, that we shall ultimately win the goal of true national greatness.”
Our immediate-term Global Macro Risk Ranges (see our Daily Trading Range product for all 12):
UST 10yr Yield 2.76-2.85%
Best of luck out there today,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Takeaway: We were wrong in calling for investors to tactically take profits Abenomics Trade on 11/27. Carry [trade] on…
On NOV 27, we published a note titled, “THREE COMPELLING REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD TAKE PROFITS IN THE ABENOMICS TRADE NOW” in which we called for a 3-6M correction in the Abenomics Trade (i.e. short JPY/long Japanese equities); while we don’t want to get caught up in overreacting to today’s FOMC decision to commence tapering, that is no longer a view we have any conviction in.
In the note specifically, we analyzed three catalysts in support of that now defunct thesis:
- The Fed will likely dominate headlines with surprising levels of dovish monetary policy amid a 3-6M monetary and fiscal policy vacuum in Japan.
- Sentiment towards Japanese equities amongst foreign speculators has reached euphoric levels.
- Speculators have recently adopted an overwhelmingly bearish position on the yen. Historically, the USD/JPY cross has faded hard from such aggressive swings in the net length of the futures and options market. Moreover, what’s bullish for the yen has been almost perfectly bearish for Japanese stocks.
Clearly, catalyst #1 – which was easily the most important of the three – has now been voided. As such, we are no longer as concerned as we were about the lopsided nature of consensus positioning – which has actually gotten worse (i.e. even more net short) since that note was published.
In the spirit of keeping score (timing is the most important factor in any investment thesis we present to subscribers), the USD/JPY cross has appreciated a solid +2.1% since then, while the Nikkei 225 Index has appreciated +0.9% since then (not inclusive of what is likely to be a huge melt-up overnight).
Thankfully we weren’t brash enough ignore the existing quantitative signals by making a call to buy the yen or short the Nikkei. Wrong is wrong, however. Now it’s time to move on and trade the market that we’re being presented with today.
As such, while you’re likely to see a near-term correction in the USD/JPY cross as event-driven funds take profits, we now expect what we’ve been expecting since early in the fourth quarter of 2012: the USD/JPY cross is on its way to 125 (and counting) over the intermediate-to-long term.
Giddy-up – Kuroda’s just getting started (in recent statements, he’s actually been setting the table to incrementally ease monetary policy by mid-Spring of 2014). Meanwhile, it appears (for now at least) that the central planning law firm of Bernanke, Yellen, Dudley and Bullard LLP is running out of gas. That’s very bearish for the JPY in the context of the intermediate-to-longer-term monetary policy outlook in Japan.
Enjoy the rest of your evenings,
Associate: Macro Team
daily macro intelligence
Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.