• run with the bulls

    get your first month

    of hedgeye free



TODAY’S S&P 500 SET-UP – September 13, 2013

As we look at today's setup for the S&P 500, the range is 37 points or 1.15% downside to 1664 and 1.04% upside to 1701.                        










  • YIELD CURVE: 2.47 from 2.47
  • VIX  VIX closed at 14.29 1 day percent change of 3.40%

MACRO DATA POINTS (Bloomberg Estimates):

  • 8:30am: PPI M/m, Aug., est. 0.2% (prior 0.0%)
  • 8:30am: PPI Ex Food and Energy M/m, Aug., est. 0.1%
  • 8:30am: Retail Sales Advance M/m, Aug., est. 0.5%
  • 8:30am: Retail Sales Ex Auto and Gas, Aug., est. 0.3%
  • 9:55am: UMich Confidence, Sept. prelim, est. 82 (prior 82.1)
  • 10am: Business Inventories, July, est. 0.2% (prior 0.0%)
  • 11am: Fed to purchase $3b-$4b in 2019-2020 sector
  • 1pm: Baker Hughes rig count


    • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission meets, 9:30am
    • CFTC holds closed meeting on enforcement matters, 10am
    • President Obama holds talks with Emir of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jaber Al Sabah; topics to include defense, energy


  • Twitter files IPO w/ SEC; Goldman said to be lead manager
  • Derivatives would face transition fees under Obama proposal
  • Goldman sees risk of gold below $1,000 as U.S. economy gains
  • Vodafone’s $10.2b Kabel Deutschland bid wins shareholder support
  • U.S. House Republicans lack fiscal plan as Oct. 1 deadline nears
  • Dimon boosted JPMorgan compliance as examiners lost trust: WSJ
  • Japan to consider corporate tax cut in stimulus package
  • Obama to name Summers as next Fed chief, Nikkei says, citing unnamed people
  • Europe’s biggest phone cos. brace for AT&T entry into mkt
  • Hoyer says Obama could strike Syria without Congress vote


    • No S&P 500 cos. expected to report today


  • Goldman Sees Risk of Gold Below $1,000 as U.S. Economy Gains
  • Gold Traders Most Bearish Since June as Syria Eases: Commodities
  • Goldman Lifts Soybean Price Outlook as USDA Downgrades U.S. Crop
  • Soybeans, Corn Steady After USDA Releases U.S. Harvest Outlook
  • Pemex Holds Emergency Response Meeting on Gulf of Mexico Storm
  • Spot Gold Reverses Gain, Slumps to Five-Week Low as Silver Drops
  • Copper Set for Weekly Loss as Investors Prepare for Fed Meeting
  • Indonesia Commodity Exchange Fails to Sell Tin for Second Day
  • Commodity Outlook Is ‘Quite Benign,’ Goldman’s Jeff Currie Says
  • Blythe Masters Shows Resilience as Dimon Lauds ‘Impressive Job’
  • Natural Gas Rises a Second Day on Lower U.S. Stockpile Increase
  • Glencore Agrees to Progress Study of $3 Billion Congo Iron Mine
  • Tropical Depression to Bring ‘Threatening’ Floods to Mexico
  • Record Soybean Crop to Boost India Meal Sales to 6-Year High


























The Hedgeye Macro Team














Takeaway: EM debt and EM FX should continue to broadly decline while EM equity returns should become increasingly bifurcated at the country level.



  1. We remain bearish on emerging market debt (both USD and local currency paper) and emerging market currencies with respect to the intermediate-term TREND and long-term TAIL. Irrespective of idiosyncratic country fundamentals, we think #StrongDollar, #RatesRising and #DebtDeflation will be hard for any emerging market to overcome in this environment. There will, of course, be relative winners and losers, but we think you can continue to extract absolute returns with a passive strategy.
  2. On the LONG side of EM equities from here (TREND and TAIL duration), we like South Korea, Poland, Thailand and Mexico. While absent from our EM Crisis Risk Index due to the lack of cross-country comparable data, Taiwan also looks solid fundamentally (stable currency, great BOP dynamics, mature and liquid financial markets…).
  3. On the SHORT side of EM equities from here (TREND and TAIL duration), we like South Africa, Nigeria and Indonesia. We’re also inclined to loop India and Brazil back into this mix, but they’re so bombed-out on longer-term durations (i.e. 1Y, 18M and 3Y), one has to start to wonder how much more downside is left.


When EM capital and currency markets were appropriately tanking into their late-JUN lows, making money on the short side of the emerging markets space was so easy even a bunch of former football and hockey players could do it. While never in search or need of validation for our research conclusions, we’d be lying if we said it wasn’t gratifying to see world-class investors such as Ray Dailio adopt what is essentially our #EmergingOutflows thesis.


As highlighted by our EM divergence monitor (full methodology below), just about any asset that had been previously perma-bull marketed to investors as an “emerging market” was down double digits on a trailing 1M, 3M and 6M basis at the JUN 24 low in the MSCI Emerging Market Index.


(prices and performance figures as of 6/24)



Flash forward to today, we’re seeing some pretty solid dead-cat bounces uniformly across the EM space on a WoW basis; in fact, the only primary or secondary asset class that isn’t up is Peruvian equities (down -0.1% WoW). Looking to performance across the 1-3 month time frame tells a different tale, however, in that the performance is decidedly less uniform.




In line with this market signal, we think it will become increasingly important for equity investors to become “country-pickers”.


It’s worth stressing that by “country-pickers”, we are not referring to the traditional “ABC country has great demographics and will be XYZ percent of global GDP by 2030” perma-bull marketing that is found in every emerging market fund prospectus on the planet.


Conversely, in a #StrongDollar, #RisingRates environment, we think the direction, supply and cost of global capital flows will increasingly determine the trend rates of growth, inflation, urbanization and reformation across the emerging market space – just as the USD and US interest rates did on the way down.


Specifically, we believe it to be flat-out intellectually dishonest to suggest that a pervasively weak dollar and cheap, excessive global capital haven’t perpetuated a golden era in EM economic and financial market conditions during the most recent EM “boom” cycle as it had done in the two previous cycles (late-70s to the early-80s and late-80s to the mid-90s).


Simply put, the absolute return strategy of gathering assets and aggressively “diversifying” into emerging markets is over and, quite frankly, it’s been over for a while now (FYI, EM equities peaked when the USD bottomed in 2011 – alongside other consensus carry trading strategies such as gold, commodities and EM currencies).






In light of this updated view, we thought it would be helpful to rehash where we think intermediate-to-long-term investors will be most rewarded for investing their hard-earned capital on the long and short side of emerging markets:


  • We remain bearish on emerging market debt (both USD and local currency paper) and emerging market currencies with respect to the intermediate-term TREND and long-term TAIL. Irrespective of idiosyncratic country fundamentals, we think #StrongDollar, #RatesRising and #DebtDeflation will be hard for any emerging market to overcome in this environment. There will, of course, be relative winners and losers, but we think you can continue to extract absolute returns with a passive strategy.
  • On the LONG side of EM equities from here (TREND and TAIL duration), we like South Korea, Poland, Thailand and Mexico. While absent from our EM Crisis Risk Index due to the lack of cross-country comparable data, Taiwan also looks solid fundamentally (stable currency, great BOP dynamics, mature and liquid financial markets…).
  • On the SHORT side of EM equities from here (TREND and TAIL duration), we like South Africa, Nigeria and Indonesia. We’re also inclined to loop India and Brazil back into this mix, but they’re so bombed-out on longer-term durations (i.e. 1Y, 18M and 3Y), one has to start to wonder how much more downside is left.








Below, we present our latest Hedgeye Macro Emerging Market Crisis Risk Index as some support for these selections. You’ll note that we didn’t just pick the absolute best vs. the absolute worst; other factors (such as accessibility and quantitative signals contributed to our thought process):
















Please email us any time you’d like to receive our more nuanced thoughts on a specific country and/or its capital and currency markets. We’ve done all the analytical heavy-lifting and we continue to monitor for critical deltas and inflection points each day so it’s no trouble at all for us to assist you in that regard.


Have a great evening,


Darius Dale

Senior Analyst



To help clients get a better grasp of all the moving parts across EM capital and currency markets, we have created a dashboard to systematically monitor performance divergences with the intent on flagging developing, existing, and dissipating trends in the marketplace. The dashboard is specifically programmed to highlight divergences in EM primary and secondary asset classes that are in excess of [1] standard deviation relative to their respective sample means.


The dashboard is grouped into three distinct buckets (i.e. samples): Asset Classes, Regions and Countries. Realizing that we could and should do better than implementing an all-or-nothing strategy in emerging markets, this multi-tiered setup will allow us to spot the development and dissipation of said trends at the level most appropriate for any given investor.


Lastly, we thought it would be best to use actual ETFs, rather than the benchmark indices themselves to track said divergences because: A) the universe of liquid ETFs most likely accurately reflects the universe of broadly investable emerging market securities and asset classes; B) the ETFs are all both un-hedged and priced in US dollars, which means they automatically adjust for deltas in the currency markets; and C) ETFs have an underlying fund flow element to them that influences price trends – which is precisely what we’re trying to capture with our #EmergingOutflows thesis.


It’s also worth noting that whenever there was a collection of ETFs that represented a particular asset class, region and/or country, we selected the specific ETF in our sample based on a combo score of size (AUM) and liquidity (average daily trading volume).

Summary Notes: Energy Drink Conference Call with Dr. Kennedy

Yesterday we hosted an expert conference call titled "Are Energy Drinks Harmful?" with Dr. Deborah Kennedy, a pediatric nutrition and expert on energy drinks.  The call was very comprehensive and well received by our clients. If you missed the it, here are links to the podcast replay and presentation. We encourage you to take the time (one hour in length including a Q&A session) to listen to the call, and have included a summary of the call below. 


Note: We will be putting out a subsequent post with our outlook on the energy drink space, in particular on Monster (MNST), and giving consideration to key take-aways from Dr. Kennedy’s presentation on the industry. 


-Matt Hedrick




What are Energy Drinks?

  • There is no legal definition, manufacturers came up with term. FDA has not defined parameters of what may be in an energy drink.
  • What can be added?  Depends if labeled as a Beverage or a Supplement.

Summary Notes: Energy Drink Conference Call with Dr. Kennedy - zz. bev chart

  • Under the beverage label (note: all the major energy drink makers are considered a beverage, whereas only energy shots are a supplement) caffeine is considered GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe); and under the supplement label there’s no limits to caffeine content.  Therefore, manufacturers can put as much caffeine in the product as they choose and the onus is on them to determine the product’s safety.
  • For ingredients other than caffeine, if a supplement: onus is on manufacturer to decide. If a beverage, need preapproval of ingredients or need to contain GRAS elements.
  • Under the Food and Drug Cosmetic Act, neither a supplement nor a beverage is legally required to list the caffeine content on its products.
  • When caffeine passed as a GRAS ingredient, there was a recognition of the need to put limits on the caffeine content in drinks, and the FDA decided to limit the amount of caffeine in soda to 71 mg  in a can of soda (12oz.). No limits have since been put on energy drinks.
  • For Beverage, what you put in the product has to be on the ingredient list, but because caffeine is not considered a nutrient by the FDA (it is considered a food and drug), caffeine does not have to be on the nutrient fact panel.
  • If Beverage, can buy with food stamps. If Beverage, do not need to report if anyone dies from consumption of the product, however deaths must be reported if labeled a supplement.
  • Energy drinks have been around since 1901 but only in significant quantities since 2007
  • Red Bull came to the U.S .in 1997 – major forerunner in energy drink industry, then Rockstar (2001), Monster (2002); and 5-Hour Energy Shots (2004).
  • 66% of energy drink consumers are between the age of 13-35 (65% of consumers are male)
  • Sales of energy drinks have surpassed that of fruit and sports in U.S.

About Caffeine?

  • Known to increase heart rate, blood pressure, speech rate, and motor activity
  • Concern for children: unclear what impact caffeine can have on neurological and cardiovascular systems
  • U.S. Avg person gets 250-300mg of caffeine per day. Moderate consumption = 1-2 cups of  coffee a day (approx. 260mg caffeine). Heavy consumption = 5 cups a day (~ 500mg).
  • Teens should limit to under 100mg/day.  < 13 years of age = none to less than 50mg/day.
  • Ability to handle caffeine varies from persons to person, including how liver metabolizes caffeine, and tolerance.  Children and elderly are at greater risk for adverse events, and males are more susceptible than females for adverse events.

How much Caffeine in Energy Drinks?

  • Avg 80mg/8oz., but serving sizes vary and caffeine range is wide across offerings
  • Compared to Coffee?  How much caffeine is in coffee depends on how strong coffee is brewed. Generic Brewed Coffee 95 -200mg per 8oz.  (for reference: 12oz. Coca Cola = 30-35mg)
  • Believes that media has convinced consumers that all they need to pay attention to is the amount of caffeine. (Comparing Starbucks coffee to energy drinks is false advertising. Apples to oranges. In energy drinks you can have other substances besides caffeine, that may not be counted that contribute to the total level of caffeine.

Dangers and What Experts are Saying

  • Retailers are not prohibited legally from selling energy drinks to kids.
  • Case of adverse affects are being reported: With Red Bull, shortness of breath, anxiety, chest pain, heart attack, convulsions, mental impairment. With Monster, 4 heart attacks, 5 deaths, chest pain, tremor, anxiety, psychotic disorder.
  • Dr. Kennedy questions how we can live in a society where such products that cause these adverse affects are not pulled off the shelf. Suggests if this were an OTC drug, with similar results to consumers, that drug would be pulled off the market immediately.
  • Of the 5,448 U.S. caffeine overdoses reported in 2007, 46% occurred in those younger than 19 years.
  • Dr. Kennedy hopes energy drinks are put behind the counter.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics says energy drinks should not be consumed or sold to kids.

Dr. Kennedy Predictions

  • Dr. Kenned believes manufacturers will never give up the teen and tween market, but will give up the market <12.
  • Energy drink makers say they are not marketing to this demographic (kids), but believes the events at which the manufacturers market is tells a completely opposite story.
  • Thinks the FDA will look at the idea of calling caffeine GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) and will provide more regulation in terms of amounts allowed.
  • Thinks like cigarette companies, who got caught marketing to kids, and later confess to it, energy drink manufacturers will run a similar course.

Q&A Highlights

Q) What ingredient recommendations have been made or given to the energy drink makers from doctors and/or the FDA?

A) Nothing yet. A doctor can say whatever he or she wants but the manufacturers are not listening. Now some Senators are involved and they’re asking the energy drink manufacturers to playing nice and stop marketing to kids, but until the FDA comes down on limits to caffeine levels nothing will change.


Q) Do you foresee that the FDA could pass a standard for caffeine in drinks?

A) Yes, although technically it gets complicated because of molecular differences across caffeine types.  So it will take awhile to get to any standard. 


Q) With respect to the cross over between age regulations for energy drinks and coffee, would you promote that a 16 year old walking into a Starbucks can’t order a grande redeye coffee drink, or needs to show identification to purchase it?

A) For a teen there needs to be a warning label on anything over 100mg of caffeine. Similar to calorie counts on food menus, the consumers need to have information so that they can make a reasonable choice. The consumer should know which beverages are over 100mg of caffeine and could potentially cause toxicity. Not looking to card minors, rather given teens the ability to make their own choices.


Q) Would you like to see the energy drink makers come up with one size of energy drink with one level of caffeine?

A) I would like to see what happened to soda. Those companies are set to a certain standard so that you know exactly what you’re buying. So yes, I agree the same should be the standard for energy drinks.   

Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.


Takeaway: In the note below, we debate the merits of the long-term bull case for China. We’re not impressed, but we’re not "not impressed" either.



  1. We continue to think it’s appropriate for investors to stop shorting or selling down their exposure(s) to China.
  2. Moreover, we think China’s long-term economic outlook has indeed improved on the margin (i.e. it has gotten “less bad” recently).
  3. We’re not yet outright bullish on China, however. A trifecta of headwinds may result in negative surprises during the fourth quarter and more clarity is needed on the policy front with respect to the longer-term outlook.



My how fast things change in today’s policy-driven markets. A week ago, we were as bearish as anyone on China’s long-term economic outlook and both our top-down and bottom-up quantitative signals supported that view.


Fast forward one day from then to last Friday’s color on the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (FTZ) and the subsequent closing of the insider-dominated Shanghai Composite Index above its TREND line and, just like that, our choice to get out of the way on the short side is looking like an increasingly appropriate risk-managed decision (the index is up +5.4% WTD vs. a regional median delta of +2.6%).


Not to be all sales-y in a research note, but I personally think one of the main things that differentiates our Global Macro research product from the industry norm is the consistent demonstration of mental flexibility at potential inflection points like this (see: orchestrating a 180-degree turn to being bullish on US equities in DEC ’12 despite having US equity-bearish 4Q12 Macro Themes titled, “#EarningsSlowing and #KeynesianCliff).


Accordingly, Mr. Market doesn’t care that we’ve done months of bottom-up research on the structural headwinds facing China’s financial sector and its fixed assets investment-driven economy (most recently rehashed on slides 8, 62-72 and 77-78 in our AUG 30 EM chartbook). If it’s priced in, it’s priced in.


To that point, we turn to the latest Bloomberg Global Poll data (released today), which is based upon the responses from a random sample of 900 subscribers to the Bloomberg Professional Service (over 300k clients worldwide):


  • Q: Which of the following do you think poses the biggest risk to the world economy in 2013?: Chosen by 32% of respondents, “a slowing Chinese economy” was identified as the #1 risk… this compares to 31% in the previous survey (MAY ’13);
  • Q: What is your view of the economy in China?: 39% of respondents viewed the Chinese economy as “deteriorating” vs. 42% for “stable”, 17% for “improving” and 2% for “have no idea”… this compares to 44%, 45%, 9% and 2%, respectively, in the previous survey;
  • Q: Which market will offer investors the best opportunities over the next year?: 14% of respondents selected China… this compares to 13% in the previous survey; and
  • Q: Which market will offer investors the worst opportunities over the next year?: 23% of respondents selected China vs. 27% in the previous survey.  


On balance, it’s clear the consensus attitude towards the Chinese economy and its financial markets has improved marginally QoQ. While it’s natural to want to be contrarian and fade this delta, we’d argue that after three straight years of slowing economic growth and three straight years of rancid-to-subpar equity market performance (-14.3% in 2010, -21.7% in 2011 and +3.2% in 2012), it’s more appropriate to extrapolate these results as positive on the margin.



Looking at China objectively from here, we have to lend the appropriate amount of credence to Premier Li’s most recent guidance (key highlights from his commentary at the Davos Economic Forum):


  • Li referenced the positive sequential deltas in China’s AUG growth numbers when saying, “China has entered a stage of fast expansion with its commitment to reforms growing stronger.”
  • “Beijing will be encouraging foreign companies to make investments and start businesses in China by creating a more investment-friendly environment, intensifying intellectual property rights protection and providing an environment that encourages fair play.”
  • “Now the new season of the Chinese economic miracle, one with better quality and higher efficiency, is unveiled, and I guarantee you even more exciting stories to come.”


As an aside, it’s good risk management practice to lend credence to anything that comes out of the “horse’s mouth” that is the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC); Chinese officials almost always do what they said they were going to do. From our JUN 26 Early Look titled, “Uncertain China”:


“We’ve become a broken record on this, but it’s critical to remember that China’s present day economic woes are actually a function of very deliberate macroprudential policies. While highly unlikely, at any given time, Chinese officials can reverse course and keep the credit bubble inflating longer than any of us short-sellers can remain solvent.”


We’re not going to make up a bunch of BS reasons why China’s economic reforms are going to specifically boost the Chinese economy; the whole, “reform ABC will contribute XYZ percentage points to GDP growth” is so sell-side/IMF. Rather, we’ll call it like we see it: no one outside of the PSC knows exactly what specific policies China will implement and at what pace.


All we really know at the current juncture is that the market clearly thinks the Shanghai FTZ and it’s “innovative tax policies” (per Premier Li… the latest rumors call for a -1,000bps corporate tax cut to 15%), interest rate and capital account liberalization and pro-foreign business reforms will be enough to help offset the structural liquidity headwinds to Chinese credit growth that are currently being predicated by deteriorating current account dynamics and a likely explosion of nonperforming assets (reported or evergreened) across the banking sector – at the margin at least!


At the end of the day, buying China here is akin to buying a tiny piece of a bombed-out stock in the thralls of its bull-bear debate. If it doesn’t work, you keep it on a tight leash and sell it; if it starts to work, you buy more and update the fundamental story as you go along.



All that being said, however, we are NOT telling you to run out and buy China here. Rather, we’re merely acknowledging the merits of what we view as the most credible intermediate-to-long term bull case (i.e. the rough opposite of our former bearish thesis).


Additionally, we continue to believe that SEP will mark the top in this latest cyclical uptrend in China’s monthly economic growth statistics (CLICK HERE for the analysis supporting this conclusion).


Inclusive of this short-cycle peak in Chinese economic growth, the Chinese economy as a whole looks poised to take a trip to Quad #3 on our GIP model in the fourth quarter amid a likely uptick in inflation after aggressive credit growth in the YTD (Total Social Financing is up +24.4% YoY through AUG).




All things being equal, that would make it difficult for Chinese stocks to perform well through the balance of the next few months – unless, of course, the insiders are looking through a sequential deterioration in corporate operating conditions in the fourth quarter to a long-term economic outlook that appears increasingly “less bad” on the margin.


Looking to the next potentially bearish catalyst, the insiders might eventually join us in looking towards NOV’s Third Plenary Session as a potential catalyst for the PSC to take down the country’s 2014 GDP growth target. As a refresher, the 2013 target is equal to +7.5% with a “floor” of +7%; will the 2014 target be revised lower to +7% with a “floor” of +6.5%?


We would not be surprised if that turned out to be the case; in fact, we expect them to keep walking Chinese growth expectations down the natural stair steps afforded by the law of large numbers – especially given their desire to rebalance the economy towards consumption in lieu of fixed assets investment and the aforementioned debt-induced headwinds to high growth rates from here.


Lastly, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) might blindside investors any month by tightening the screws on the Chinese property market(s) via additional curbs, more aggressive enforcement and/or an outright nationwide [punitive] property tax trial. Most recently, they were beginning to investigate local authorities on their potentially lax implementation of the existing nationwide curbs to housing transitions and mortgage lending.  


DEBATING THE BULL CASE FOR CHINA - China Real Estate Climate Index


One of the things we’ll monitor to determine whether or not it’s an appropriate time to buy or if more confirmation is needed is whether or not the insider-driven Shanghai Composite Index closes above its late-MAY highs; that lower-high came just before the JUN liquidity crunch and subsequent consensus debate about China’s financial sector risks (i.e. the same risks we called out in our Hedgeye Macro Emerging Market Crisis Risk Index back on APR 23).


Specifically, a close above that level would be akin to receiving a second quantitative “thumbs-up” in our playbook (the first being the recent TREND line breakout).




Best of luck out there risk managing the world’s second-largest economy!


Darius Dale

Senior Analyst


As we mentioned earlier this week, MCD is facing a number of issues within their control, including operational complexities, a lack of truly innovative ideas, and an unhappy franchisee base.  Outside of their control, competitors such as SONC are stepping their game up.  SONC along with other regional and super-regional QSR brands are finding innovative ways to not only drive sales now, but to continue to drive them in the future. 


SONC released its initial estimate for system-wide sales in 4Q13 today, reporting +5.9% growth in the quarter.  The company continues emphasize “21st Century Engagement” and it is this mentality that has them well positioned for the future.  Management has integrated the three most important communication platforms (television, social, and mobile) into one network, called Sonic ICE (Sonic Integrated Customer Engagement).  Sonic ICE is an integrated network driven by the data cloud that connects social platforms and communications to the company’s digital POPS (point of personalized service) platform, which is the main platform that drives the consumer experience.


The POPS unit will be installed in SONC’s drive-in stations and communicates with the consumer in three ways:

  1. Suggestive selling
  2. Offering the consumer personalized rewards based on their behavior
  3. Other brand engagement ways and content ways that they can engage the customer

With this system in place, SONC will be able to connect with the user individually, drive consumer demand toward specific items and, ultimately, drive profitability.  This is a system that franchisees are excited about and one that will enhance the customer experience.  The company will also be launching a new mobile platform in October.


WEN's stock up 4.5% today, and 54% over the past three months, is an indication of better times to come.  The bottom line — McDonald's direct competitors are getting stronger and its very apparent that MCD has fallen significantly behind the competition on new product innovation and putting technology in place that can drive incremental traffic. 







Howard Penney

Managing Director


Strong Dollar = Weak Putin

Yes - oil prices like Putin.


Strong Dollar = Weak Putin - poo99


Brent Oil broke its immediate-term momentum line of $115.11 last week. But it held our TREND support line and bounced right where it should have.


Higher oil prices remain the biggest risk to global consumption growth. There’s only one real way for President Obama to fight Vladimir Putin on this – weapons of mass US currency appreciation.


In other words, America needs #StrongDollar.


Strong Dollar = Weak Putin - drake1

(Editor's note: This brief excerpt is from Hedgeye's morning research. For more information about our products please click here.)

the macro show

what smart investors watch to win

Hosted by Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough at 9:00am ET, this special online broadcast offers smart investors and traders of all stripes the sharpest insights and clearest market analysis available on Wall Street.