prev

HYATT 1Q13 CONF CALL NOTES

Confusing and disappointing quarter presents buying opportunity?

 


"Our first quarter of 2013 reflected continued improvement in average daily rates with comparable owned and leased average daily rate increasing 4% excluding the impact of currency. We continued to see strength in transient demand, however group demand declined, in part due to the timing of Easter as compared to the prior year."

 

- Mark S. Hoplamazian, president and chief executive officer of Hyatt Hotels Corporation

 

 

CONF CALL NOTES

  • For US full service hotels, transient was strong and transient revenue represented more than 50% of room revenues in the quarter in the Americas owned/leased portfolio revenues. Transient room revenue increased 8% with half of the increase due to demand and half due to rate.
  • Group segment: represents about 45% of their room revenues of US managed hotels.
    • Decreased 6% - all due to occupancy decreases, rate was up 2%. Flat group revenues in Jan & Feb and a 20% decline in March. 2/3rd of the occupancy decline was due to renovations (San Diego, DC and Dallas) hotels. Other factors contributing to the group level declining included the timing of Easter holiday and some cancelled business in connection in with which we were unable to fill gaps in our patterns.
    • In the quarter for the quarter booking were down 12% and in the quarter for the year bookings were down 8%.

    • Government related group demand was particularly weak - down 50% in the quarter and represented half of the decline for bookings for the year 
  • Had $4MM for termination and contract modification fees in 1Q12 which were non-recurring. Renovations at ASCPAC hotels also impacted results by $2MM
  • Several hotels also left the system which negatively impacted results by $1MM
  • Excluding the F&B impact, margins would have increased 100bps
  • Higher property taxes are an area of pressure as are healthcare costs which are rising above inflation
  • Group revenue production was up over 3%.  Bookings for 2014 and beyond were up 13%. Much of of the weakness on the short end was due largely to government business. Group pace for the final three quarters of 2013 is up in the mid single digit % range as of the end of the first quarter
  • In April, Group business increased 15% as compared to booking made in April 2012 - partly due to Easter timing
  • Booking window is lengthening
  • Expect group business to improve QoQ but still expect transient demand to be the driver for the Q
  • Expect geo-political volatility to continue
  • In China, austerity measures will continue to impact F&B revenues in the short term
  • Expect the impact of issues already mentioned to be at the lower end of the previously mentioned $3-6MM range over the next 2 quarters.  They also expect to begin to realize fee growth this year and they increased their guidance for new hotel openings from 30 to 35.
  • Paid a 10% cap on the Driscoll on TTM  basis
  • Sold 3 limited service hotels at a 7.5% cap rate on TTM NOI
  • The JV hotel that they disposed of in Asia had an imputed multiple of north of 20x
  • Continue to be active in repurchasing their stock - $16MM post Q close was purchased
  • Their obligation to purchase tendered notes is conditional on Hyatt issuing new debt at satisfactory terms

 

Q&A

  • Impact of renovations and Easter on NA RevPAR: 
    • Easter (200bps impact in the Q)
    • Renovations (150bps in the Q)
    • They maintain the hotels in the comp set unless more than 25% of the rooms are out of service
  • Managed hotel renovations
    • NA renovations finish in the 3Q and 4Q
    • Asia renovations continue through 2014
    • Fee distruptions start to subside in 3Q 
  • ASPAC region:
    • if you take out the renovation impact out, the ASPAC RevPAR results would have been up 2%
    • Japan was up in the high single digits
    • HK was weaker - had renovations; same is true for Taipei and Singapore which also had renovations
    • China was down 8%: North China down over 10%, South China only down in the low single digits and East China down in the mid-high single digits
      • Lots of this is due to supply issues and austerity
      • Diplomatic travel and other travel to Beijing decreased in 1Q but that's starting to improve. Significant diplomatic flow of bookings at their hotels is really improving
      • Supply absorptions vary across regions
  • Group business:
    • Group exposure in the US: 45% for full service managed.  Slightly less for owned portfolio.
    • Outlook for 2013 is improving but short-term bookings are concerning.  
    • Group bookings are up mid single digits for the remaining 3 Q's of the year. 
  • Their float has actually expanded over the last 15 months
  • $100-120MM of investments relate to JV projects like Andaz Wailea
  • Incentive fees: 37% of NA hotels are paying incentive fees... 
  • Their M&A focus remains on gateway cities in US and Europe and increasing their resort presence.  Pursuing sale options for 6 full service hotels currently.  Overall they are encouraged by the transaction activity they see in the market.
  • Didn't buy the Driscoll with the goal of owning it forever
  • Affordable Care Act impact on their business: they have already absorbed some of the costs of broader costs. Expect HC costs to continue to exceed the rate of inflation for the next few years. Implementation costs are also evolving now, so a lot of things are still unclear. 
  • Owned portfolio: London had a really tough quarter - was down almost 10% while the US was up 4%. 
  • A couple of the resort markets where they had group weakness - were already in weak markets and then the impact of the group weakness was exacerbated.
  • Modeling disruptions for Asia will continue into next year. They will continue to try to provide visibility on that.
  • In terms of their owned portfolio, they are largely through the large renovations. No plans for big renovations in the foreseeable future.
  • Encouraged by what they are seeing on the group booking side, and the transient bookings are a source of huge support
  • For things that they can predict and have a perspective on, they have started to give more guidance around. Don't want people to be hyper-focused on the quarter but rather focused on the outlook for several years. 
  • The multiple of their business is the lowest amongst all public companies - partly due to their lack of given guidance
  • Plan to give more details about their outlook over the next few years
  • The disruptions they saw in 2011 and 2012 are much greater since they were on their owned portfolio. The renovations now are focused on very large hotels with lots of Group and therefore a lot of F&B business so the impact on mgmt fees is pretty high.
  • Why isn't their owned portfolio benefiting from the renovations they undertook in 2011-2012. They saw a lot of that benefit in 2012. They had about $25MM of disruption in 2011. 
  • EBITDA associated with the 6 hotels they are marketing is about $25MM (in 2012)
  • The net result is to see booking pace up 6% for the year -when you wash out April strength with March weakness from the holiday shift. Total production on group was up 3.4% for the year.
  • In 2012 Government business was about 5% and in 1Q it was 2% (but bear in mind that it was down a lot too). They don't expect further declines off of currently levels.
  • Vast majority of their owned portfolio is in the US. 

 

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE RELEASE

  • "Looking ahead, we continue to focus on improving performance at existing hotels and expanding in new and attractive markets. Owned hotels that have recently undergone renovations are performing well, particularly in New York and San Francisco. As the year progresses, we expect margins to improve as we benefit from increases in average daily rate."
  • Adjusted EBITDA was $131MM and adjusted EPS was $0.09
  • Comparable owned and leased hotel RevPAR increased 4.5% (4.4% excluding the effect of currency)
    • Revenue for comparable owned and leased hotels was negatively impacted by a decline in group room revenue and lower banquet revenue.
  • Owned and leased hotel operating margins increased 20 basis points.... Comparable owned and leased hotel operating margins were flat in 1Q13
    • Excluding expenses related to benefit programs funded through Rabbi Trusts and non-comparable hotel expenses, expenses increased 1.6%
  • Comparable systemwide RevPAR increased 2.4% (3.2% excluding the effect of currency)
    • RevPAR was negatively impacted by renovations at certain managed hotels and the timing of Easter.
  • Comparable U.S. full service hotel RevPAR increased 2.7% in the first quarter of 2013  
  • Eight properties were opened. As of March 31, 2013, the Company's executed contract base consisted of approximately 200 hotels or 45,000 rooms.
  • Hyatt repurchased 664,951 shares of Class A stock at a weighted average price of $41.32/share, for ~ $27MM.
  • On April 30, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $200 million of common stock.
  • "Our global realignment has been completed and we are seeing the benefits of increased adaptability and innovation. We are operating under a structure that is able to be leveraged as we continue to expand. We believe that our current run-rate in SG&A is at a normalized level and we continue to maintain discipline on expense growth."
  • Pro rata share of unconsolidated hospitality ventures Adjusted EBITDA decreased 11.1%... primarily due to asset sales and weaker performance in certain international markets.
  • Americas Mgmt & Franchising Segment:
    • Group rooms revenue at comparable U.S. full service hotels decreased 5.8%.... Group room nights decreased 7.4% and group ADR increased 1.7%
    • Transient rooms revenue at comparable U.S. full service hotels increased 8.0%....  Transient room nights increased 3.7% and transient ADR increased 4.1%
    • Revenue from management and franchise fees was flat.... Fees were negatively impacted by the previously mentioned renovations at certain managed hotels, contract change or termination fees received in the prior period and fewer managed hotels in the first quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.
    • Adjusted EBITDA increased 4% YoY
  • Southeast Asia, China, Australia, South Korea and Japan (ASPAC) Management & Franchising Segment:
    • RevPAR was negatively impacted by renovations at several hotels.
    • Revenue from management and franchise fees decreased 13.6%.... Fees were negatively impacted by a contract termination fee received in the prior period and the previously mentioned renovations.
    • Adjusted EBITDA decreased 18% YoY
  • Europe, Africa, Middle East and Southwest Asia (EAME/SW Asia) Management Segment:
    • Revenue from management and franchise fees was flat in the first quarter of 2013 
    • Adjusted EBITDA increased 33%
  • Capital expenditures: $43 MM (Maintenance: $14MM; Enhancements to existing properties: $20MM; Investment in new properties: $9MM)
  • M&A transactions:
    • Acquired The Driskill in Austin, Texas for approximately $85 million
    • Sold three select service hotels, with an aggregate of 426 rooms, for approximately $36 million.
    • Sold its interest in a joint venture for a nominal amount. The joint venture owned one ASPAC hotel which the Company continues to manage under a long-term agreement. As a result of this sale, the Company's pro rata share of unconsolidated hospitality venture debt was reduced by approximately $23 million.
    • Entered into long-term management agreements for four hotels in France. In conjunction with the agreements, the Company entered into a seven year performance guarantee.
  • Subsequent to the end of the quarter, Hyatt :

    • Announced that it will redeem its outstanding 5.750% Senior Notes due 2015, of which an aggregate principal amount of $250 million is currently outstanding, on May 10, 2013. Redemption price is expected to be approximately $281 million.
    • Commenced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of its $250 million 6.875% Senior Notes due 2019.
  • 1Q13: Debt of $1.2BN; Cash: $330MM and short term investments: $457MM
  • 2013 guidance: 
    • Adj SG&A: $305MM
    • Capex: $275MM
      • Including approximately $100MM for investment in new properties, such as Grand Hyatt Rio de Janeiro, Hyatt Place Omaha and other properties
    • Investment spending: $100-120MM
    • D&A: $340MM
    • Interest expense: $70MM (excluding impact of 2015 and 2019 Note redemptions)
    • Hotel openings: 35

 


Sectors Outperforming The S&P 500

The S&P 500 hit an all-time high yesterday of 1596 and is up +11.7% year-to-date. But several individual sectors that are part of the S&P 500 are killing it with their performance during the same time period. The Top 3 performers are as follows:

 

  1. US Healthcare Stocks (XLV) = +18.68% 
  2. US Consumer Staples Stocks (XLP) = +17.31% 
  3. US Consumer Discretionary Stocks (XLY) = +15.12% 

As consumption continues to grow, Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary stocks stand to benefit the most from a stronger US dollar and weaker commodity prices.

 

Sectors Outperforming The S&P 500 - SPDRsectorperf


BLMN TICKING ALONG

Last night, Bloomin’ Brands reported 1Q13 EPS of $0.50, surpassing consensus of $0.44 on 1.6% blended domestic company comparable restaurant sales growth (negatively impacted by 80bps due to Leap Year).

 

 

Noise in the Quarter

 

The bottom-line beat was driven by a lower tax rate, which added ~$0.03 to EPS. Looking forward, management guided to 2Q13 EPS of $0.21, below the consensus estimate of $0.27.  These discrepancies are largely due to noise on the tax line related non-operating items (deferred tax allowance). For the year, BLMN updated EPS guidance to at least $1.10 (from $1.06 prior) which is below consensus expectations of $1.11. While traffic (adjusted for trading day impact) was +3.2% at Outback, the FY13 guidance raise being smaller than the 1Q beat was a disappointment.

 

The highlight was the impressive same-restaurant sales performance at Outback. 1Q13 comps grew +2.5% versus consensus of 1.1%. In addition, there was one less week of advertising in the quarter. When adjusted for the trading day impact, comps were 3.5% at Outback. This was the 12th consecutive positive comp growth quarter for Outback, supported by continued growth at lunch and new menu initiatives. Fleming’s comps were well above the consensus 2%, and up sequentially, while Bonefish was in line with the Street as it laps very difficult 1H compares. Carrabba's continues to be a laggard.

 

Sales leverage, labor cost savings, and other cost cutting measures could not help mitigate food inflation as restaurant level margins were down 40 basis points.

 

BLMN TICKING ALONG - outback pod1

 

 

Conclusion


We are staying on the sidelines for now as earnings expectations seem to have limited upside.  Management has demonstrated its capability to grow same-restaurant sales but we believe that the stock is fairly valued at these levels.

 

BLMN TICKING ALONG - blmn eeg1

 

 

Howard Penney

Managing Director

 

Rory Green

Senior Analyst

 

 


real-time alerts

real edge in real-time

This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.

CLX - Expensive Stocks that Miss are Supposed to go Down, Right?

CLX reported Q3 ’13 EPS $0.05 below consensus along with “meh” constant currency sales growth of 1.6%.  Despite the miss, the company maintained full-year EPS guidance of $4.25 to $4.30 while shaving 1 pt off its sales growth forecast.  The company also provided an initial look at 2014 – EPS of $4.55 to $4.70 (consensus is already at $4.69, so 7.5% EPS growth at the midpoint of both guidance ranges).



With the stock down just 64 bps on this news, it feels as if we are taking crazy pills.

 

CLX - Expensive Stocks that Miss are Supposed to go Down, Right? - mugatu



We have a 2% top line growth asset that just told investors that it is an 8% EPS grower trading at 18.2x calendar ’14 numbers.  We just don’t get it.  We understand low volatility and the continued yield chase that we are seeing in the market, but CLX is fast becoming Exhibit A in the absurdity of staples valuations.



What we liked:

  • ’13 continues to be a very good year for FCF - $2.66 per year in FCF versus $1.62 per share in the same 9 month period in ‘12
  • Balance sheet remains tight – accounts receivable and inventories +0.9% and 0.0% year over year, respectively
  • Increased advertising as a % of sales 35 bps versus 2012
  • Costs are well controlled – SG&A as a percent of sales declined 119 bps year over year

What we didn’t like:

  • Missed consensus (EPS of $1.00 versus consensus of $1.05)
  • +1.6% constant currency organic sales growth (against admittedly the most difficult comparison of fiscal 2012).  However, the 1.6% print is likely within the company’s long-term sustainable growth profile.
  • EBIT declined in every segment in the quarter
  • Gross margin declined 50 bps
  • Valuation is absurd

Bottom line, god speed to the machines and whomever else thinks it’s worth adding to CLX at these levels – at some point, you are going to need all the luck you can get.

 

Call with questions,

 

Rob


Robert  Campagnino

Managing Director

HEDGEYE RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC

E:

P:


Matt Hedrick

Senior Analyst




Retail Sentiment Outliers

Takeaway: Sentiment outliers: COH, COLM, FINL, FL, FNP, JCP, GES, LULU, M, NKE, PVH, RL, ROST, SKX, WWW. Email us for our book of 100 retailers/brands

We assembled a book of individual Sentiment Monitor charts for each of about 100 retailers and brands. We include some of the more notable outliers below. For the full book, send an email to .

 

As a frame of reference, our sentiment monitor triangulates buy-side (short interest), sell-side (ratings) and insider trading activity. It then assigns a quantitative score for each company – and the incremental changes are tracked over time. There is strong evidence that these quantitative scores serve as a contra indicator for stock performance (i.e. overly bullish sentiment = subsequent negative returns, and vice versa).

 

DETAILS

Here's the aggregated Sentiment Score for the Retail Sector vs the MVR (Retail Stock Index). Sentiment continues to detiorate while prices grind higher. More proof of the most hated rally of this generation. 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s1

 

HERE ARE SOME STOCK-SPECIFIC CALLOUTS

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s2aeo

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s2bby

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - d3coh

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s4colm

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s5deck

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s6dks

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s7finl

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s8fl

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s9ges

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s120jcp

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s11jny

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s13lulu

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s14m

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s15nke

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s16pvh

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s17rl

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s18rost

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s19skx

 

Retail Sentiment Outliers - s21www

 

 

 

 

 


FTSE In Bullish Formation

The FTSE 100 Index, which is essentially London's version of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, is doing quite well for the year-to-date. The index is up +11% compared with the Dow, which is up +12.7% year-to-date. This morning's economic data in the UK was the manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), which came in at 49.8 for April versus 48.3 in March. That positive news has kept the FTSE in bullish formation and we expect the index to rise higher over the next month.

 

FTSE In Bullish Formation - ftse100


investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.

next