This note was originally published at 8am on January 28, 2013 for Hedgeye subscribers.
“To see, and to show, is the mission now undertaken.”
Born in China to missionary parents, Henry Luce went on to graduate from Yale in 1920 and become one of the most influential multi-media content generators in world history.
In June of 1944 in Life magazine, Luce declared the following about America: “With the establishment of a firm lodgment on the continent, we are now the most powerful nation on earth.” (The Last Lion, page 847)
That’s one way to get Americans to like you. Another is calling it like it is. Now that central planners of the world have saved us from themselves (again), I wonder how Luce would characterize the new world order today.
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
If there was another Luce born in China in the 21st century, she probably wouldn’t be able to publish what she really thinks about China’s role as a burgeoning super-power anyway. Power and influence have some ugly disclosures.
This morning China’s power-center is ticked-off (expressing it in their state controlled media) because the Japanese are adding 287 people to their military. That’s not a typo, 287. Since Japan’s armed forces number north of 225,000, what’s the point?
The point is that we are in a Currency War, and the Japanese continue to tick just about everyone from South Korea to China off. This isn’t going to end any time soon. Neither will the longstanding cultural differences between Japan and China. If we are right on how it ends for the currency debaucherers in Japan, the Chinese won’t be there to bail them out like they did Europe.
Last week, in what was nothing short of another fantastic one for US Equities (SP500 and Russell2000 up another +1.1% and +1.5% to fresh YTD highs, respectively), there were 3 major divergences in Global Equities:
Now, when a market price snaps TRADE and TREND support in our model, we don’t buy-the-the-damn-dip. We wait and watch. When a market price holds TRADE/TREND support, we like buying those instead.
If you bought China on Friday (we’re long Taiwan via EWT), nice job. This morning, Chinese stocks ripped a fresh new YTD high, closing up another +2.4% at 2364 in Shanghai. That’s what bull markets do – they correct and climb.
South Korea’s stock market didn’t do that however. The KOSPI saw follow through selling overnight, down another -0.36% to immediate-term TRADE oversold within its freshly established bearish intermediate-term TREND (1961 = resistance).
Since the KOSPI is an important leading indicator in our multi-factor Global Macro model, what is this signal telling us?
In any risk management model with Chaos Theory at its core, the 1st answer to an early signal is ‘I don’t know.’ That might not sound as smart as someone who allegedly knows something about everything, but over the years the limits of my thick hockey skull remain readily apparent – so I’ll stick with Embracing Uncertainty.
The other big question you should be asking yourself is could we see a 6% handle on the US unemployment rate in 2013?
Remember, expectations of the Fed getting out of the way matter more than them actually doing so. Looking at this week’s Macro Catalyst Calendar, there will be plenty of data to consider on that front:
And, as usual, the market has already front-run some of these considerations via its own expectations:
Now I know some people are calling for both epic levels of inflation and the end of the world – but the good news is that we have neither of those two things, yet. Nor do we expect them before you have to report results to your investors at month-end.
What we have so far (and for the last 2 months really) is a Growth Scare, and it’s to the upside. How else can you explain another all-time high in the Russell2000 of 905 (all-time is a long time) and confirmed 5-yr lows in US Equity Volatility (VIX)?
To see and show our Top 3 Global Macro Themes (#GrowthStabilizing, #HousingsHammer, and #QuadrillYen) as they are happening helps illustrate that Global Macro A) works both ways and B) is interconnected. This is our mission, undertaken.
Our immediate-term Risk Ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), US Dollar, EUR/USD, USD/YEN, UST 10yr Yield, and the SP500 are now $1654-1678, $111.75-114.28, $79.62-80.14, $1.32-1.34, 89.55-91.11, 1.88-1.98%, and 1485-1508, respectively.
Best of luck out there this week,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.
“For a theory is a very dangerous thing to have.”
I just got back from an island in the Bahamas and I’m flying to London this morning. As a result, February will be a very productive month of reading. I just finished grinding though both The Last Lion and Antifragility. I’m digging into Ike’s Bluff next.
The problem with self-education is that the more you read, the less you know. This helps contextualize how clueless the people who are trying to centrally plan your life actually are. Particularly when it comes to economic policies, I agree with Taleb that their “theories are superfragile.”
He also goes on (and on and on) to differentiate between social and hard sciences: “Physics is privileged; it is the exception, which makes its imitation by other disciplines similar to attempts to make a whale fly like an eagle.” (Antifragility, pg 116)
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
After closing up for the 6th consecutive week, the US stock market is flying like something – and it’s not the London Whale. On almost no volume on Friday (down -21% from my YTD average for market up days), the Russell2000 made yet another all-time high.
As we like to say at Hedgeye, all-time is a long time… but now we’ve been writing about all-time for a pretty long time too. For perma-bears, this has to be leaving a mark. Last week’s II Bull/Bear Sentiment Survey saw Bears capitulate to a fresh new YTD low of 21.1%.
Other than playing with my kids in the Bahamian sun, what did I like about last week?
I know some of our competitors keep talking about the risk of raging inflation – but that’s a Dangerous Theory to have if the US Dollar continues to make a series of long-term (40 year) higher-lows.
We’re not theorizing that Bernanke’s Bubbles (Commodities) will continue to pop from their all-time highs (2008-2012). They are already popping. Oil topped in 2008; Gold and the CRB Index stopped going up in 2011; and Food Prices put in their all-time highs in 2012.
If your theory was that the Fed would print to infinity and beyond and you bought Gold, Silver, etc. on that in 2008-2009, great call. But what happens to your theory if employment and housing #GrowthStabilizes in 2012-2013 and the Fed gets out of the way?
What didn’t I like about last week?
Since everything that matters in our macro model happens on the margin, what we call negative divergences (they do bad things when the US stock market headlines are doing good things) really matter.
Some clean-cut negative divergences vs the SP500 closing at its YTD high (1517) were as follows:
Then, in terms of positive divergences (US Equities), some of the Bullish Style Factors we have been bulled up about got as extended as they have been versus the SP500’s +6.4% YTD return:
Since A) I have extension (immediate-term TRADE overbought) in our most bullish factors and B) I’ve finally been issued some fairly broad based negative divergences across asset classes, my decision late last week was to take down Global Equity exposure and raise Cash.
That’s not theorizing. That’s doing it in real-time and holding ourselves accountable to explaining the decisions we make. I guess that probably makes us dangerous too. But that’s just a theory.
Our immediate-term Risk Ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), CRB Index, US Dollar, USD/YEN, UST 10yr Yield, and the SP500 are now $1, $116.38-118.83, 299-303, $79.79-80.39, 92.67-94.41, 1.93-2.01%, and 1, respectively.
Best of luck out there this week,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Yesterday afternoon, the government of Venezuela announced that the fixed exchange rate would change from 4.30 bolivars to the dollar to 6.30. The move was widely expected, even if the magnitude of the devaluation was unknown.
A number of companies across consumer staples have exposure to this event, and we attempt to provide investors some perspective based upon the prior 2010 devaluation (100% devaluation vs. nearly 50% yesterday). The exposure is two-fold – the one-time revaluation of monetary assets in the country will result in a charge, and then an ongoing flow through the income statement where any income earned in Venezuela is translated back into fewer dollars.
A look back at 2010
Back in January of 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its decision to devalue its currency and the official exchange rate went from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential goods and to 4.30 for non-essential goods – the lower rate was abolished in December that same year.
What happened and to whom?
CL - took a significant charge ($271 million, or $0.53 per share) as a hyperinflationary transition charge in 2010, as well as the impact of bolivars translating back into fewer dollars flowing through the income statement. The company also has a significant local currency asset position ($200 million as of end of year 2010).
ENR - took a $0.20 per share charge ($0.03 in ’11) for the devaluation, on an earnings base of $5.60. The combination of the devaluation and economic conditions in Venezuela resulted in a $23.3 million reduction in net sales in ’11, on a base of approximately $4.25 billion.
AVP - took a $81.0 million charge to EBIT in ’10 (on a base of $705.5 million) as well as a $46.1 million charge in “Other expense, net”. Venezuela represents approximately 5% of AVP’s revenue and 8% of operating profit (first nine months of ’12). Further, AVP had $223 million in cash balances denominated in bolivars (total cash on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2012 was $1,095.5 million).
KMB - took a $96 million charge in Q1 2010, net investment (as of year-end 2010) was $175 million. Venezuela represented 1% of net revenues and 1% of EBIT.
GIS – (from 2010 10K) - “During fiscal 2010, Venezuela became a highly inflationary economy, which did not have a material impact on our results in fiscal 2011 or 2010.
K – (from 2010 10K) – “Venezuela represents only 1-2% of our business; therefore, any ongoing impact is expected to be immaterial.”
HNZ – (from 2010 10K) – net asset position of $81 million (subsequent to the 2010 devaluation) –“While our future operating results in Venezuela will be negatively impacted by the currency devaluation, we plan to take actions to help mitigate these efforts. Accordingly, we do not expect the devaluation to have a material impact on our operating results going forward.”
KO – (from 2010 10K) – “During the first quarter of 2010 we recorded a loss of $103 million related to the remeasurement of our Venezuelan subsidiary’s net assets.” As of December 31, 2011, the company’s Venezuelan subsidiary held monetary assets of $300 million.
PEP – (from 2010 10K) - “In 2010, our operations in Venezuela comprised 4% of our cash and cash equivalents balance and generated less than 1% of our net revenue”.
MJN – very small business there resulted in an $8.5 million loss over the initial balance sheet remeasurement.
In order to assess how the stocks might trade, we took a look at the absolute and relative performance of the names mentioned above versus the S&P 500 and the XLP Consumer Staples Index for the month before the devaluation (December 2009), the week before (devaluation occurred on January 8, 2010), the three weeks following (until February 1, 2010) and then the next month (from February 1 to March 1). Both the prior month and week before saw meaningful underperformance versus the S&P, that was substantially made up (on average) in the three weeks following.
It appears to us that the setup is a little different coming into this event, as the names mentioned above outperformed the S&P 500 by an average of 2.0% over the last month. Also recognize that the magnitude of the devaluation is substantially less than 2010.
Bottom line for us is that the companies with significant exposure (AVP, CL, PEP, and KO) may see some very, very modest EPS weakness and almost certainly more significant one-time charges as a result of this event.
For those folks in the Northeast - happy and safe shoveling!
HEDGEYE RISK MANAGEMENT, LLC
Enter your email address to receive our newsletter of 5 trending market topics. VIEW SAMPLE
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.