prev

THE WEEK AHEAD

The Economic Data calendar for the week of the 19th of November through the 23rd is full of critical releases and events. Attached below is a snapshot of some (though far from all) of the headline numbers that we will be focused on.

 

THE WEEK AHEAD - week

 


Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession

Takeaway: No great compromise or roadmap in Euro-land ahead.

-- For specific questions on anything Europe, please contact me at to set up a call.

 

Positions in Europe: Short EUR/USD (FXE)

 

Asset Class Performance:

  • Equities:  The STOXX Europe 600 closed down -2.7% week-over-week vs -1.7% last week. Bottom performers: Cyprus -9.2%; Netherlands -3.6%; Ireland -3.5%; Hungary -3.3%; Portugal -3.2%; Switzerland -3.1%; Germany -3.0%; Denmark -2.9%; UK -2.8%.  Top performers: Latvia +1.4%; Poland +1.3%; Estonia +0.2%. [Other: France -2.4%; Greece -1.4%].
  • FX:  The EUR/USD is up +0.17% week-over-week.  W/W Divergences:  CHF/EUR +0.15%; PLN/EUR +0.05%; DKK/EUR 0.00%; GBP/EUR -0.19%; RUB/EUR -0.69%; SEK/EUR -0.88%; NOK/EUR -0.91%.
  • Fixed Income:  The 10YR yield for sovereigns were mostly down week-on-week. Greece declined the most at -49bps to 17.38%, followed by Italy -12bps to 4.88%, Portugal -8bps to 8.78%, and France -6bps to 2.07%. Spain saw the largest gain at +6bps to 5.89% and Germany gained +2bps to 1.35%. 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 22. yields

 

EUR/USD: Keith added FXE to our Real-Time Positions at $127.06. Our EUR/USD TRADE range is $1.26 – 1.28 with a TREND resistance of $1.31.

 

  • Our call - the EUR/USD will trade within our quantitative levels and reflect much of the daily headline risk (from Spain, Greece, and Italy in particular), however ECB President Mario Draghi’s September announcement that “the ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro” and the resolve of Eurocrats to maintain the Union will prevent levels falling anywhere near parity.
  • We believe there is a high likelihood that no significant policy action comes in the remaining weeks of 2012, which could support the band the cross has been trading in over the last weeks.

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 22. eur usd

 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 22. cftc

 

 

R is for Recession:

 

It came as little surprise this week but the Eurozone officially moved into recession with preliminary Q3 GDP showing a -0.1% contraction quarter-over-quarter following a -0.2% contraction in Q2.

Now the task is sorting through the timing of an eventual recovery, which we think could have a long runway.

 

Where We Are At?


Eurozone Finance Ministers agreed to allow Greece to implement its austerity program over 4 years instead of 2 years this week but postponed a decision on the next tranche of Greek aid (€31.5B) until either next Monday’s Eurozone Finance Ministers Meeting or Thursday’s EU Summit. A big point of contention is the rift between the IMF and Eurogroup over Greece’s debt reduction schedule. The IMF wants Greece’s debt to fall to 120% of GDP by 2020 while the Eurogroup says by 2022. While cohesion is needed, what’s more disturbing is both parties will set a target that they both know Greece has no chance of attaining. 

 

Further, the IMF continues to push for an official debt restructuring, while the Eurogroup has rejected the haircut option. It appears the path of least resistance might be improving financing rates and lengthening the maturity of the loans.

 

Longer-term we believe there is a high likelihood that no significant policy action comes in the remaining weeks of 2012.  As a reminder, some of the main topics that Eurocrats are wrestling with are:

  • Setting up a Banking Union (with Pan-European Deposit Insurance)
  • Setting up a Fiscal Union
  • If and when Spain will request another bailout (and will it come from the IMF or ESM, or both?)

In terms of setting up a Banking Union and Fiscal Union, we believe the two are dependent on each other.  While more attention has been given to a Banking Union recently, we believe Eurocrats reaching an agreement on a Fiscal Union over the near term is incredibly unlikely as countries are unwilling to part with their fiscal sovereignty. This could be one factor to put downside pressure in the cross.

 

On Spain, we think the sovereign asking for a bailout is a question of when and not if. The recent rumor that Spain may look to the IMF for a loan would reflect the likelihood of more favorable terms versus the European Commission and ECB’s ‘conditionality’ for aid via the ESM or OMT.

 

 

Beyond the headline news, and broader negative data out this week (see below in the section “Data Dump”), there were a couple of charts that caught our attention this week:

  • Europe27 New Car Registration -4.8% OCT Y/Y vs -10.8% – down meaningfully but showing slight improvement?

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 2. cars

 

  • EU External Trade Balances – only part of the story, but a positive trend move.

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 22. trade balance

 

 

The European Week Ahead:


Sunday: Nov. UK releases Rightmove House Prices

 

Monday: Eurozone Finance Ministers Meeting; Sep. Eurozone Construction Output; Sep. Italy Industrial Orders and Sales; Sep. Greece Current Account

 

Tuesday: Oct. Germany Producer Prices

 

Wednesday: BoE Minutes; Oct. UK Public Finances, Public Sector Net Borrowing; Sep. Spain Trade Balance

 

Thursday:  EU Summit and ECB Governing Council Meeting; Nov. Eurozone PMI Composite, Manufacturing and Services – Advance, Consumer Confidence – Advance; Nov. Germany PMI Manufacturing and Services – Advance; Nov. UK CBI Trends Total Orders and Selling Prices; Nov. France PMI Manufacturing and Services - Preliminary  

 

Friday: Nov. Germany IFO Business Climate, Current Assessment and Expectations; 3Q Germany GDP – Final, Domestic Demand, Exports, Capital Investment, Government Spending, Construction Investment, Imports, Private Consumption; Oct. UK BBA Loans for House Purchase; Nov. France Production Outlook Indicator, Business Confidence Indicator; Oct. Spain Producer Prices; Sep. Italy Retail Sales

 

 

Extended Calendar:


NOV 26  –             Finance Ministers may sign off on Greece’s next bailout tranche, 31.5B EUR

NOV 27 –              AFME 4th Annual Spanish Funding Conference in Madrid

DEC 1 –                 Beginning of the Russian Presidency of G20

DEC 3 –                 Eurogroup Meeting in Brussels

DEC 6 –                 ECB Governing Council Meeting

DEC 12-13 –           First public consultation between the Russian government, B20 Coalition and international civil society representatives on G20 agenda for 2013 (in Moscow)

DEC 20 –               ECB Governing and General Council Meeting

APR 2013 –            Parliamentary elections in Italy

MAY 2013 –            Presidential elections in Italy

 

 

Call Outs:

 

 

European Day of Action and Solidarity – unprecedented and coordinated cross-border protests against austerity measures on Wednesday with 40 unions participating across 23 countries (strikes mainly in Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal). 

 

Spain - El Confidencial, without citing sources, reported that Spain is considering requesting a credit line from the IMF as an alternative to a European bailout. The paper highlighted the support for Spain recently expressed by both President Obama and IMF leaders, along with concerns about Germany's resistance to additional funding for Spain and its continued insistence on austerity prescriptions.

 

Spain - the government passed a decree to prevent low-income families being evicted for defaulting on their mortgages, and plans to create a stock of homes that can be rented out cheaply.

 

Banking Union - some hawkish comments on the proposed banking union from ECB governing council member (and Bundesbank President) Jens Weidmann in a guest column in the German financial daily Handelsblatt. He said that establishing the ECB as the single supervisory mechanism risks compromising the central bank's primary goal of price stability. He also noted that a banking union should not be rushed, while adding that it would need a resolution mechanism that should be funded by the banks themselves, and not by European taxpayers. In addition, he argued that legacy risks should be the responsibility of respective member states.

 


Data Dump:

 

Preliminary Q3 GDP:


Eurozone -0.6% Y/Y (inline) vs -0.4% in Q2    [-0.1% Q/Q (inline) vs -0.2% in Q2]

Germany 0.9% Y/Y (exp. 0.8%) vs 1.0% in Q2   [0.2% Q/Q (exp. 0.1%) vs 0.3% in Q2]

France 0.2% Y/Y (exp. 0.0%) vs 0.1% in Q2   [0.2% Q/Q (exp. 0.0%) vs -0.1% in Q2]

Italy -2.4% Y/Y (exp. -2.9%) vs -2.4% in Q2   [-0.2% Q/Q (exp. -0.5%) vs -0.7% in Q2]

Netherlands -1.6% Y/Y (exp. -0.5%) vs -0.4% in Q2   [-1.1% Q/Q (exp. -0.2%) vs 0.1% in Q2]

Czech Republic -1.5% Y/Y (exp. -1.2%) vs -1.0% in Q2   [-0.3% Q/Q (exp. -0.2%) vs -0.2% in Q2]

Hungary -1.5% Y/Y (exp. -1.3%) vs -1.5% in Q2   [-0.2% Q/Q (exp. -0.1%) vs -0.4% in Q2]

Romania -0.6% Y/Y (exp. 0.0%) vs 1.1% in Q2   [-0.5% Q/Q (exp. -0.4%) vs 0.5% in Q2]

 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 11. eurozone gdp

 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 22. cpi

 

Eurozone ZEW Economic Sentiment -2.6 NOV vs -1.4 OCT

Europe27 New Car Registration -4.8% OCT Y/Y vs -10.8%

Eurozone Industrial Production -2.3% SEPT Y/Y (exp. -2.2%) vs -1.3% AUG   [-2.5% M/M vs 0.9% AUG]

 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 11. industrial prod and retail

 

Germany Wholesale Price Index 4.6% OCT Y/Y vs 4.2% SEPT

Germany ZEW Current Situation 5.4 NOV (exp. 8) vs 10 OCT

Germany ZEW Economic Sentiment -15.7 NOV (exp. -10) vs -11.5 OCT

 

Weekly European Monitor: R is for Recession - 11. zew germany

 

UK PPI Input 0.1% OCT Y/Y (exp. -0.5%) vs -1% SEPT

UK PPI Output 2.5% OCT Y/Y (exp. 2.5%) vs 2.5% September

UK Retail Price Index 3.2% OCT Y/Y vs 2.6% September

 

UK ILO Unemployment Rate 7.8% SEPT vs 7.9% AUG

UK Jobless Claims Change 10.1K OCT vs 0.8K September

UK Retail Sales w/ Auto Fuel 0.6% OCT Y/Y (exp. 1.6%) vs 2.4% SEPT

 

France Prelim. Q3 Wages 0.4% Q/Q vs 0.5% in Q2

 

Spain Q3 GDP Final -1.6% Y/Y (inline)

Spain House Transactions 0.9% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.0% AUG

 

Portugal Prelim Q3 GDP -0.8% Q/Q (exp. -0.6%) vs -1.1% in Q2   [-3.4% Y/Y (exp. -3.2) vs -3.2% in Q2]

Portugal Unemployment Rate 15.8% in Q3 vs 15.0% in Q2

 

Switzerland Producer and Import Prices 0.4% OCT Y/Y vs 0.3% September

Switzerland Credit Suisse ZEW Survey Expectations -27.9 NOV vs -28.9 OCT

Ireland PPI 2.9% OCT Y/Y vs 2.2% SEPT

 

Greece Prelim Q3 GDP -7.2% Y/Y vs -6.3% in Q2

 

Sweden Unemployment Rate 7.1% OCT vs 7.4% SEPT

Netherlands Retail Sales -0.1% SEPT Y/Y vs 0.9% AUG

Iceland Unemployment Rate 5.2% OCT vs 4.9% SEPT

 

Russia Producer Prices 8.8% OCT Y/Y vs 11.6% SEPT

Russia Industrial Production 1.8% OCT Y/Y vs 2.0% September

Russia Preliminary Q3 GDP 2.9% Y/Y vs 4.0% in Q2

 

Estonia Preliminary Q3 GDP 1.7% Q/Q vs 0.5% in Q2   [3.4% Y/Y vs 2.2% in Q2]

Estonia Unemployment Rate 5.8% OCT vs 5.7% SEPT

Estonia Unemployment Rate 9.7% in Q3 vs 10.2% in Q2

Latvia Unemployment Rate 13.5% in Q3 vs 16.1% in Q2

 

Hungary Industrial Production 0.6% SEPT Y/Y vs 1.8% AUG

Slovenia Unemployment Rate 11.5% SEPT vs 11.6% AUG

 

Turkey Consumer Confidence 85.7 OCT vs 88.8 September

Turkey Unemployment Rate 8.8% AUG vs 8.4% JUL

 

 

Interest Rate Decisions:

 

(11/14) Iceland Sedlabanki Interest Rate HIKED 25bps to 6.00%

 

 

Matthew Hedrick

Senior Analyst


DEBT CEILING UPDATE: WILL SANTA’S SACK BE FILLED WITH COAL?

Takeaway: We are likely to hit the Debt ceiling right around Christmas day; that may be used politically to hamper or delay Fiscal Cliff negations.

SUMMARY BULLETS:

 

  • Our analysis suggests we are likely to hit the Debt ceiling right around Christmas day. More specifically, the US Treasury is on pace to breach the Debt Ceiling on 12/24 in Scenario A (the average pace of daily net debt issuance for business days during FY13) and on 12/26 in Scenario B (the average pace of daily net debt issuance for business days during FY11-FY13).
  • It may be that the Treasury dramatically slows or stops issuing new debt altogether around Christmas time, but the point remains: the US government is likely to breach its Congressionally-imposed $16.394 TRILLION Debt Ceiling right around then. Notably, this late-DEC estimate is a bit shy of our previous projection of JAN ’13.
  • The paramount implication of a late-DEC Debt Ceiling breach is that it would likely give the GOP – particularly House Republicans – bargaining leverage in any fiscal cliff negotiations. To some extent, one could’ve argued that the public handed the leadership conch to the Democrats based on the recent election results, but a renewed Debt Ceiling impasse could actually strengthen the Party’s resolve in any Fiscal Cliff negotiations.
  • On the margin, that would be negative for US GROWTH over the intermediate term to the extent any cliff resolution is delayed and/or thwarted outright.

 

While much Manic Media attention has been given to Fiscal Cliff negotiations in recent weeks (and rightfully so), we on the Hedgeye Macro Team continue to warn clients that the timing of the Debt Ceiling breach dramatically lowers the probability of a “grand compromise” that we think the throng of investors that remain bullish on the equity market is likely hoping for.

 

As an aside, per the latest BofA/ML fund manager survey, hedge fund net exposure to equities at 40% is the highest since JUN ’07 – coincidentally right around the last time we saw the corporate earnings cycle roll over like we are seeing today (refer to our Q4 Macro Theme of #EarningsSlowing for more details).

 

Per everyone’s favorite Treasury Secretary Tim “The ‘Tools’ Man” Geithner, “the government could bump into its borrowing limit before the end of the year”, though he was quick to remind the audience that “the Treasury has enough tools to keep the government afloat into early 2013”.

 

We’ll take his word on the latter part of his statement, as we learned from MAY 16, 2011 to AUG 2, 2011 (~2.5 months) that the Treasury Secretary does indeed have a robust bag of tricks to help the government stave off a technical default. As a reminder, those tools include (but are not limited to):

 

  • Declaring a “debt issuance suspension period”;
  • Suspending (until further notice) the issuance of State and Local Government Securities;
  • Prematurely redeeming existing Treasury securities held by the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund;
  • Suspending new issuance of Treasury securities to that fund as investments;
  • Suspending the daily reinvestment of Treasury securities held by the Government Securities Investment Fund of the Federal Employees Retirement System Thrift Savings Plan; and
  • Suspending the daily reinvestment of Treasury securities held as investments by the Exchange Stabilization Fund.

 

It’s worth noting that each of these steps is overwhelmingly benign as it relates to any implications for the economy and/or financial markets. To the extent you’re interested, however, or would like to brush up on historical Debt Ceiling impasses for any clues as to how this one may play out (1985, 1995-96, and 2002-03), please review our MAY 11, 2011 note titled: “FEAR MONGERING MEETS BRINKSMANSHIP: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO NAVIGATING THE DEBT CEILING DEBATE”. The conclusion of that note was as follows:

 

“We expect the current debt ceiling debate to heat up substantially in the coming weeks, resulting in a measured pickup in volatility across global financial markets, primarily as a result of increased  volatility in the US Dollar being driven by the whims of D.C. politicking. Further, we expect the debt limit to be increased prior to any sort of default on any of the federal government’s obligations. And within that legislation, we would expect to see the groundwork laid for potentially meaningful fiscal reform ahead of the FY12 budget debate – an event that is likely to prove dollar bullish when it’s all said and done.”

 

With the looming Fiscal Cliff (inked back in late JUL ’11; ~$8 TRILLION in tax hikes and spending cuts over the long term) posing as “the groundwork laid for potentially meaningful fiscal reform” and the US Dollar Index up about +8% since publication (in spite of now-perpetual QE and Bernanke perpetually kicking the can down the road on interest rate hikes), that call has proved to be rather prescient.

 

Jumping ahead to the current Debt Ceiling showdown, we do not take Geithner’s words on the timing of the upcoming breach at face value. Rather, we conducted our own analysis that suggests we are likely to hit the Debt ceiling right around Christmas day. More specifically, the US Treasury is on pace to breach the Debt Ceiling on 12/24 in Scenario A (the average pace of daily net debt issuance for business days during FY13) and on 12/26 in Scenario B (the average pace of daily net debt issuance for business days during FY11-FY13).

 

DEBT CEILING UPDATE: WILL SANTA’S SACK BE FILLED WITH COAL? - 1

 

DEBT CEILING UPDATE: WILL SANTA’S SACK BE FILLED WITH COAL? - 3

 

It may be that the Treasury dramatically slows or stops issuing new debt altogether around Christmas time, but the point remains: the US government is likely to breach its Congressionally-imposed $16.394 TRILLION Debt Ceiling right around then. Notably, this late-DEC estimate is a bit shy of our previous projection of JAN ’13.

 

The paramount implication of a late-DEC Debt Ceiling breach is that it would likely give the GOP – particularly House Republicans – bargaining leverage in any fiscal cliff negotiations. To some extent, one could’ve argued that the public handed the leadership conch to the Democrats based on the recent election results, but a renewed Debt Ceiling impasse could actually strengthen the Party’s resolve in any Fiscal Cliff negotiations. On the margin, that would be negative for US GROWTH over the intermediate term to the extent any cliff resolution is delayed and/or thwarted outright.

 

Per House Minority Leader Eric Cantor this week:

 

“Resolving the issues surrounding the fiscal cliff, especially the replacement of the sequester, and the next debt limit increase will require that the president get serious about real entitlement reform.”

 

Moreover, House Speaker John Boehner was out earlier in the week saying he would not allow Congress to duck tough decisions with another round of short-term measures. To the extent he holds the GOP true to his words, we could be looking at one messy political showdown in the coming weeks – especially if the Republican Party continues balk at any revenue increases outside of “dynamic scoring” (i.e. closing loopholes and reducing deductions).   

 

As if Washington D.C. wasn’t messy enough…

 

Darius Dale

Senior Analyst


GET THE HEDGEYE MARKET BRIEF FREE

Enter your email address to receive our newsletter of 5 trending market topics. VIEW SAMPLE

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

RE-VALUING ASCA

PENN’s transaction has implications for most gamers – all positive – but none potentially more significant than for ASCA.

 

 

Obviously from our comments today, we think ASCA is the most likely pursuer of PENN’s real estate strategy.  In fact, we think it is actually likely – only the timing is uncertain.  Even if it’s not for two years – following the opening of Mojito Point in Lake Charles – the market is right for ascribing value now.  While the stock is already up 16% today, we don’t think the market has gone far enough today.  We project total company value at $49 to $70 with a $59 midpoint in two years.  Discounted, the midpoint value is still $47.  And that’s with EBITDA/EPS projections below Street consensus.

 

Why does it make sense for ASCA?  While leverage is not necessarily low, ASCA generates a huge amount of free cash flow.  The balance sheet is in good shape.  ASCA owns a lot of real estate.  The only development is Mojito Point in Lake Charles which will open in 2014.  That is probably the only real hold up and the reason why we are projecting a 2 year timeline of consummation.  ASCA’s management team is up there with PENN as the two most focused on creating shareholder value and they are great operators.  Leverage, while somewhat high at 5.5x will drop considerably following the opening of Mojito Point.

 

Even if ASCA decides against this strategy, investors should and will likely focus on free cash flow rather than EV/EBITDA following the PENN announcement.  This bodes well for ASCA’s valuation.  Even after the big move today, the FCF yield for 2013 is still 18%.  The stock could support a yield that is half that in our opinion.  So without a transaction (and our $47 valuation), ASCA could still be worth $35-40 with the re-value.  We're not ready to go quite that high but the theoretical case can be made.  Stay tuned.

 

 

RE-VALUATION DETAILS

 

Assuming a structure similar to PENN’s OPCO/PROPCO design, we came up with a value of $49-70/share off of our 2015 projections.

  • Big picture assumptions
    • ASCA has assets that will meet REIT requirements for a tax-free spin
    • Ability to obtain an IRS ruling and get approval from all the jurisdictions in which they operate in
  • ASCA 2015 forecast
    • $1.5BN of net revenue
    • $504MM of property-level EBITDA
    • $446MM of Adjusted property-level EBITDA
    • Net debt of $1.9BN
    • 34MM shares outstanding
  • ASCA PROPCO REIT
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $225MM
    • 5.5x leverage or total debt of $1.24BN at a cost of 6.5%
    • $15MM of overhead and other expenses
    • AFFO:  $130MM
    • 90% payout ratio gets you a dividend of $3.46
    • Similar to PENN, we think ASCA should be valued at a 7-9% yield or a 12x implied 2015 EV/EBITDA multiple ($38-$49/share). 
  • ASCA OPCO
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $221MM
    • Remaining debt at OPCO of $760MM or 3.4x leverage at a cost of 6.5%
    • Maintenance of $77MM or 5% of net revenue
    • Based on today’s $19 share price, ASCA trades at roughly 7x 2013E EBITDA
    • We believe that ASCA OPCO should trade at a material discount of 5.0-6.5x ($10-$20/share).
      • A $10-$20 valuation would represent a 20-10% FCF yield 

FL: Footwear Sales Growth

With Foot Locker (FL) putting up a solid quarter this week, Wall Street's concerns over slowing sales have been put to rest. Hurricane Sandy has affected inventories as well as future comp prospects, but we think Foot Locker still has potential for further upside in performance through year-end. We’re targeting $3 earnings per share for next year and think it’s entirely possible for Foot Locker to do that while still growing margins. We remain bullish on FL.

 

FL: Footwear Sales Growth - FL FW sales chart

 


PENN OPCO-PROPCO CALL

Takeaway: ASCA, PNK, and BYD are the only other candidates in our universe. unlikely for MGM, CZR, LVS, and WYNN

$53 per share is the midpoint of our value range

 

 

CONF CALL NOTES

  • This transaction has been in the works for 18 months and will unlock the value of their real estate. It will allow them to enter markets that they can't currently participate in
  • In order to finalize this deal:
    • They need to get approval from all the states where they do business
    • They need to reach an agreement with Fortress to convert their preferred shares
    • Carlino family needs to come to an agreement on selling down their ownership of PNG
  • There will be no dividend in 2013 since the transaction will not be affected in time, but they wanted to give people an idea of what the REIT would pay based on 2013 projections
  • Following the exchange, Fortess can either sell (up to the time of the spin) or hold onto it. As soon as Fortress sells their non-voting stock, it becomes voting.  The company has agreed to repurchase those shares at $67/share. If Fortress sells the shares in the open market (not to PENN), then the company will have more cash and that could mean a larger distribution.
  • Spinoff of Propco shares is expected to occur sometime in 2H13 and they expect to elect REIT status as of January 2014
  • Hope to break ground on the Ohio VLTs in early 2013. They are relocating their licenses. Expected to open in 1H2014.
  • They do expect to refinance all of their debt securities, including tendering for the bonds
  • This transaction gives them a huge first mover advantage.  Individuals at the REIT will be licensed. Expect that their gaming regulators will be ok with this structure.
  • It is not their intent to pursue non-gaming assets, but they do have that option
  • This also solves some of the gaming regulatory ownership issues
  • Lowers their cost of capital
  • Spread between the multiples triple net lease REITS is usually between 13-14x vs. the 7-8x range that regionals trade at
  • Want to make sure that OPCO has no issues paying rent and remains healthy. Underlying health of the OPCO impacts valuation of the PROPCO cash stream.
  • REIT will share in OPCO growth opportunities.  There can also be downward adjustments in the lease payments to the PROPCO under certain scenarios.
  • Employees will get the same treatment as shareholders in regards to the spin-off
  • REIT will be able to become a source of financing for the gaming industry and can enter into sale-leaseback arrangements with PROPCO
  • Because they would bring down the market cap of the OPCO, it would make it more interesting to acquire smaller casinos and enter into management agreements with tribes.
  • REIT will have a lower cost of capital and cost of debt than OPCO
  • There are a number of jurisdictions where PENN faces the limitation of just being able to own one property
  • There are no adjustments regarding individual properties in the Master Lease 
  • Ohio Casinos pay 20% of monthly net revenues
  • Fixed rent component gets reset every 5 years equal to 4% of the excess (if any) of the average net revenue for such facilities for the trailing 5 years over a baseline
  • REIT will not be able to finance any other building/ greenfield projects that would compete with OPCO
  • Based on their stress tests, under their worst case scenario (lowest historical EBITDA), OPCO still remains viable and able to make rent payments

 

Q&A

  • They are done with the IRS. They do not need to go back for any more approvals from the IRS
  • Suppose TX comes along, it may be the case that PROPCO is the best source of financing but it's unclear now
  • Growth prospects for OPCO given the new competition - especially when and if National Harbor comes online. They have incorporated that into their expectations though when structuring the lease payments. There are also opportunities in MA and PA for OPCO. International opportunities are open to OPCO. They will also have the 2 Ohio tracks coming online in 2014.
  • Bill Clifford will definitely spearhead the financing for both companies but will not be CFO of both companies
  • Total debt range: $3.75-4.25BN. The higher end number anticipates buying the shares from Fortress ($417.5MM)
  • Additional overhead between both entities? Yes - since there will be 2 separate management teams and support staff. There are also some landlease deals on existing properties where they do not own 100% of the land.  They don't expect corporate overhead to be anywhere near $25MM.
  • Financing of greenfield projects like MA?
    • REITS typically keep their debt fairly stable and then issue more equity for acquisition needs
    • OPCO will pursue financing starting around 3x or more if they have an existing asset to leverage. OPCO generally wants to stay under 5.0x
    • If the MA opportunity gets financed outside of PROPCO, and it may since there are JV properties, they wouldn't take leverage over 5x
  • Triple net structure?
    • 80% is a traditional payout ratio
    • Why NNN structure? Wanted to make sure that OPCO had control of its own destiny to run the assets the right way and from a PROPCO structure, a non-NNN structure requires a lot more overhead.
  • Expected lower cost of capital on the new debt but don't want to disclose
  • Two assets in the taxable REIT subsidiary? Why? 
    • In order to qualify for a tax free spin and these two fit the bill
    • For example, the assets in the TRS can't own a hotel
  • What other opportunities can they pursue now that they can't currently pursue?
    • Non-gaming deals - although those are low on the todem pole now
    • They just announced the PA opportunity
    • They also see themselves as a source of capital for others.  You can bet if TX happens that they will talk to PNG and their partners and other companies.
  • Why is Net revenue for PROPCO higher than rent? Because it reflects Perryville and Baton Rouge revenues
  • Non-Columbus/Toledo assets-rent will be fixed for 5 years, so any upside goes to OPCO.  After 5 years then there is a reset. The tracks at Ohio will also be subject to that calculation after 5 years. For Columbus and Toledo it;s an 20/80 split.
  • Dividend for them will grow faster than at most lodging companies.  2014 REIT dividend will go up a lot. 
  • Regulatory approval process is a highly information intensive review. 
  • The germination of the idea to do this spin began 18 months ago
  • It's also a lot easier to grow a $430MM EBITDA company than a $900MM company
  • It would be a big challenge for them to acquire entire gaming company and split it into a REIT and OPCO
  • PENN has no NOLs 
  • Think that they will close the transaction in 4Q next year. There is a provision in the bonds that allows them to tender at T+50.
  • They are giving Fortress the ability to sell their shares in the open market at $67 or sell back to PENN.  It's really a function of where the stock is.
  • There will be two overlapping Directors but the Boards will be independent. 
  • They apply a simple multiple on the rent stream to come up with a 5.5x adjusted leverage ratio
  • The REIT can technically own international assets but the rules may not be favorable. Depends on the situation.
  • Have some assets in mind that they think can be liberated
  • The two Ohio casinos are also under a triple net lease structure, just at a much higher rate. Let PROPCO participate in the upside going forward. The $450MM of rent does include the two Ohio Casinos.
  • In 2014, when the 2 Ohio tracks come online, there will be an adjustment to the rent calculation at 4% of net revenues for those 2 tracks. 
  • The different between the $450MM of rental payments from OPCO and the $459MM projection is that the PROPCO projection includes EBITDA from Perryville and Baton Rouge, less overhead and land lease payments.

get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

next