The Economic Data calendar for the week of the 15th of October through the 19th is full of critical releases and events. Attached below is a snapshot of some (though far from all) of the headline numbers that we will be focused on.
Takeaway: New data suggests the world economy could potentially experience an outright contraction in real GDP over the intermediate term.
If you look past what many are labeling as a desperate attempt domestically to embellish recent consumer-facing (i.e. voter-facing) economic data ahead of the NOV 6 election (Unemployment Rate; Jobless Claims; UMich Consumer Confidence), one would easily arrive at the conclusion that global growth continues to slow. We’ve been calling for this explicitly since mid-MAR, so this topic is nothing new for clients of our Macro research. What is new, however, are our increasing concerns that the global economic growth slowdown could morph into an outright economic contraction over the intermediate term. As we pointed out in our OCT 1 note titled, “ASIA’S NOT HELPING THE GROWTH BULLS”:
“The list of potential negative TREND-duration economic catalysts is long and their respective probabilities are all rising, not falling. To recap:
We will continue to provide updates on each of those catalysts – specifically whether their respective probabilities are rising or falling – in our written work. For a collection of the recent, relevant notes or to engage in a deeper discussion with our team, feel free to reach out to us anytime.
Jumping ship, we thought we’d flag a few more noteworthy data points that came across our screens this AM during our daily Global Macro grind:
SINGAPORE’S SOUR 3Q12 GDP DATA SUGGESTS CONTINUED WEAKNESS ACROSS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
Overnight we learned that Singapore’s Real GDP growth slowed to +1.3% YoY in 3Q12 from +2.3%; QoQ SAAR: -1.5% vs. +0.2% [revised up from -0.7%]. Excluding 2Q11’s +1.2% YoY pace, this is slowest rate of YoY Real GDP growth in Singapore since 2Q09.
A topic we’re written extensively on in recent years is the relationship between Singaporean economic growth and global economic growth – specifically in that Singapore is one of the better barometers out there (see our latest note: GLOBAL GROWTH UPDATE – WHAT GROWTH?):
Since the turn of the century, Singapore has registered a positive correlation to World Real GDP growth of r² = 0.69. Per this polynomial regression model, Singapore’s incremental growth slowdown implies global growth could come in around +1.4% in 3Q12 on a YoY basis – roughly in line with our +1.3% forecast we initially published in our 3Q12 Macro Themes presentation back on JUL 11th (slide 6):
It’s worth noting that Bloomberg Consensus for 3Q12 World Real GDP was at +2.2% YoY then; it has since come down by -50bps to +1.7% YoY. Chaos theory/embracing uncertainty continues to be the most effective way to stay ahead of the Street on modeling the marginal deltas in GROWTH/INFLATION/POLICY. Our updated world GIP outlook is highlighted in the chart below:
Elsewhere in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore refrained from easing monetary policy today (out of line with our expectations for easing), citing a “build-up of inflationary pressures”. “Core prices will face upward pressure from higher food and services costs, while overall inflation will remain elevated for some time,” officials remarked.
With domestic economic growth slowing to near ~3YR lows and overseas demand for their exports continuing to soften, it’s interesting to see the MAS resist the urge to ease as Singapore continues to import the U.S.’s #1 export in recent years – commodity price inflation. This is 100% in line with what we have been forecasting in recent months – specifically in that the trend in global disinflation has concluded, with inflation poised to accelerate on a reported basis over the intermediate term. For more details on this topic, refer to our SEP 6 note titled: “GLOBAL INFLATION WATCH: ARE BERNANKE AND DRAGHI WEARING THE SAME JERSEY?”.
Perhaps the biggest red flag from Singapore’s latest economic data is that a country home to the world’s #1, #7 and #8 healthiest banks (per a Bloomberg index which takes into consideration comparisons of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and the share of nonperforming assets, among other factors) and which the World Economic Forum rates as the #2 most competitive economy in the world in its 2011-12 Global Competitiveness Index (behind #1 Switzerland and ahead of the U.S. at #5) is only growing at +1.3% YoY on an inflation-adjusted basis. That’s simply not good; nor does it bode well for places like Western Europe and the U.S., where the influence of and reliance upon central planning has accelerated to generational highs in recent months.
IN CHINA, “EXPECTATIONS ARE THE ROOT OF ALL HEARTACHE”
Overnight, China reported its SEP New Loans figure, which slowed to CNY632.2 billion MoM from CNY703.9 billion. On a YTD run-rate basis, new bank loan growth accelerated to +18% YoY from +16.8% in AUG. On an system-wide basis, total domestic financing growth (including bank loans, trust loans, corporate debt/equity issuance, etc.) accelerated to +19.5% YoY in the YTD through SEP from +7.4% YoY in the YTD through AUG.
While those certainly are headed in the right direction, we’d be remiss not to flag official concern over the pace of loan growth in mainland China. While Chinese playmakers haven’t officially announced a 2012 full-year target for lending to our knowledge, it is being floated around the press that they are eyeing a CNY7.5-8 trillion figure. That leaves roughly CNY1.5 trillion through year end (YTD through SEP = CNY6.7 trillion), which suggests the pace of loan growth in China is actually poised to slow in 4Q – a key risk to consensus forecasts that are calling for Chinese economic growth to v-bottom in the third quarter and accelerate well in to 2013.
The following two quotes, sourced directly from the Chinese brass today, draw attention to the systemic risks embedded in the Chinese banking system that we have been flagging in recent months:
For our detailed thoughts on this subject, refer to our latest notes on China:
Taken in conjunction, those two notes should help bring you up to speed with our extensive, long-held expectations for China’s murky long-term TAIL GROWTH, INFLATION and POLICY dynamics – specifically in that investors should not anticipate a meaningful rebound in rates of Chinese economic growth or a substantial fiscal and/or monetary stimulus package amid an oft-dismissed, policy-led drive to rebalance the Chinese economy:
“As of 2010, gross domestic capital formation contributed nearly half of all of China’s economic growth (48.6%) – 1,360bps higher than India, which we’d argue is a comparable country in both size and economic development. Additionally, at nearly half of GDP, modern-day China is more levered to gross domestic capital formation as a means of economic growth more so than Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea, and Hong Kong were in the years leading up to the 1997-98 Asian Financial crisis.
Given the long-term headwinds facing both China’s property market and banking sector (which we have quantified in recent notes; email us for copies), it’s likely that the peak in these ratios is in the rear-view or within reach.
Whether China will be able to gracefully rebalance its economy towards a more consumer-driven growth model in the process – as outlined in the current 5yr plan which calls for only +7% economic growth rates – will go a long way towards determining the slope of global economic growth over the long-term TAIL – particularly given the debt, deleveraging, demographics, property market, and structural unemployment headwinds facing the U.S. and parts of the E.U. Obviously this has major implications for a great [number of] corporations and investor portfolios worldwide.
Indeed, that is a TAIL risk worth pondering for any long-term investor. As the law of large numbers reminds us, as China continues to grow larger (now the world’s second-largest single-nation economy), a structural downshift in rates of Chinese economic growth is not at all out of the band of probable outcomes over the long term.”
–PUTTING CHINA INTO PERSPECTIVE (OCT 18, 2011)
It appears to us that Chinese policymakers are more or less content with the current pace of economic activity. For example, PBOC Board Member Yi Gang recently said full-year growth should come in around +7.8% YoY – equivalent to the 7.8% pace established in 1H12. That means no major reflation is likely to be pursued – in line with Gang’s view that recent “policy fine tuning” measures to support growth with begin to show in 4Q12.
It’s worth noting that only CNY275 billion of the CNY700 billion road and subway construction projects approved by the National Development & Reform Commission in the YTD has been accounted for; the rest needs to come front Chinese banks – institutions who appear hesitant, to say the least (Bloomberg reports they haven’t been taking advantage of the recently-announced 30% discount to official lending rates when extending credit, maintaining the previous up-to-10% discount on new loans underwritten).
In this light, it literally blows our mind that local governments in China have allegedly (according to JPMorgan) announced investment plans totaling CNY19 trillion (~37% of 2012E GDP) from MAY-SEP. If Chinese banks and Chinese banking regulators are officially concerned about the specter of rising NPLs and inflationary pressures emanating from the property market, where do local governments plan on getting the funding from? Local governments in China are only allowed to issue municipal debt on a trial basis in select municipalities and land sales are off -16.2% YoY (a key source of their revenues).
All told, Chinese stimulus talk remains just that – talk. When expectations on the sell-side and at the corporate level worldwide are for Chinese policymakers to act, the lack of meaningful action could be a negative catalyst in and of itself as incremental orders and backlogs start to dry up amid rising inventories for industrial equipment and/or industrial commodities. Some ~400YRS since William Shakespeare’s death, expectations remain the root of all heartache.
HAT ALMOST IN HAND, JAPAN ATTEMPTS TO STAVE OFF RECESSION
A day after Noda publically called for diplomatic talks to assuage Sino-Japanese tensions, Japan and China agreed to talks aimed at reducing tensions a day after Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda warned that the world’s #2 and #3 largest economies would incrementally slow amid rising protectionism. Specifically, Japan's foreign ministry said last night that officials from both countries agreed to hold vice-ministerial level discussions at an unspecified date.
The dispute is playing out exactly as we had anticipated in our SEP 19 note tiled: “ARE CHINA AND JAPAN HEADING FOR WAR?”, specifically in that the clash has caused a severe amount of economic hardship – mostly experienced by Japan, which we outlined as having more to lose on that front. The SEP China sales figures from the large Japanese auto manufacturers were all down YoY in the range of -35% to -45%. Moreover, Japan’s Cabinet Office earlier today downgraded its assessment of the economy for the third-consecutive month – the longest streak since 2009.
SEP Vehicle Sales in China (per StreetAccount):
After seeing the ratty China sales numbers from each of the Japanese auto manufacturers, Noda is likely feeling political pressure to ease up and acquiesce to China’s stern position on the islands. It’s important to note that the automotive industry remains an important part of Japan's economy; data from Research and Markets shows carmakers and automotive suppliers together employ over 5.3 million workers, which is equivalent to 8.5% of the country's total workforce and that the industry generates 10% of the country's tax revenues and makes up 15% of the manufacturing sector, which, in total, generates roughly 20% of Japan's GDP.
That said, however, Noda bowing down to China ahead of a parliamentary election (by AUG ’13) could spell political disaster for the DPJ. Bloomberg data shows Noda’s approval rating was a lowly 34% in a Yomiuri newspaper poll published OCT 3, compared with 65% when he took office 13 months ago. Support for his DPJ was at 18%, while that of the LDP was 28%. Almost 45% had no party preference.
As such, we continue to believe that the uncertainty over the future leadership of both countries (pending Japanese parliamentary elections; Chinese leadership transition) is contributing to what we’d highlight as a delayed response to diplomacy – in spite of the recently agreed-upon talks (i.e. “vice-ministerial discussions at an unspecified date” are probably not going to cut it)! Moreover, we continue to envision accelerating protectionism (either de facto or de jure – same result) and further economic pain as leaders from both nations are in a bind both culturally and politically – at least for now. Weakness likely won’t be tolerated by either populace and, from a behavioral perspective, pride often trumps economic logic in the decision-making process of most men.
To this tune, Japan’s new Economy Minster Seiji Maehara, proclaimed that “Japan has no intention of backing down in a damaging spat with China over the disputed islands regardless of the negative impact it might have on economic ties with its largest trading partner.” The FT article, from which the aforementioned quote was sourced, said Maehara's comments reflect the determination of a handful of hard-line Japanese policymakers to stand firm against pressure from China to acknowledge its claim to the string of islands. Growth Slows as Pride Accelerates?
All told, new data suggests the world economy could potentially experience an outright contraction in real GDP over the intermediate term. As such, we maintain our bearish TREND-duration bias on “risky assets”, broadly speaking. Like he did in mid-to-late 2007, Ben Bernanke has lulled international investors to sleep with his aggressive monetary easing – perpetuating systemic risk for a rude awakening across asset classes if and when the data fails to meet inflated expectations over the intermediate term.
Have a wonderful weekend with your respective families,
Takeaway: No recovery in slot volume in the near-term
Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.
Takeaway: Executive shake-ups at $CAT & Sany not a positive sign. China land sales off ~50% by value. $CAT 2013 sales guidance likely below street.
CAT, Sany and Chinese Land Sales
Jay Van Sciver, CFA
HEDGEYE RISK MANAGEMENT
120 Wooster St.
New York, NY 10012
Takeaway: The IMF and ECB hold hands to manipulate markets; investors must weigh global CB intervention versus challenged fundamentals.
Positions in Europe: Long German Bonds (BUNL)
Asset Class Performance:
The IMF Is All In!
The IMF was heavily in the headlines this week:
While our read through is that Lagarde is further joining hands with global central bankers and is attempting to add confidence to the market alongside Draghi’s “unlimited” put in September, comments late Thursday and early Friday from Germany (namely Chancellor Merkel and her Finance Minister Schaeuble) showed the lack of a united voice across Europe. Schaeuble backlashed at Lagarde’s words saying they are contradictory to her recent statements in which she said that high debt levels threatened economic growth. In short, the fiscally conservative Germans holding the reins in the Eurozone are not comfortable giving peripherals carte blanche on fiscal concessions. Surprised by their response? We’re not.
All in, we think this further demonstrates the lack of a united voice from Eurocrats on the back of a highly compromised framework. Add to that a sterner voice from the UK this week that it wants no part in a Banking Union (overseen by the ECB) and the powder keg of risk across the Eurozone is further revealed – there is surely a long a rough road ahead to crafting a path forward on such issues as bank recapitalizations, a banking union, and a fiscal union.
So all chips in?
We remain of the opinion that while the ECB and Fed are supporting asset prices, we’re not jumping head first into equities in Europe. Our main focus is the numerous tail risks that exist across Europe. Here’s what gives us pause:
This week the S&P downgraded Spain by 2 notches to BBB- (one notch above junk) with a negative outlook (which is now in-line with Moody’s rating). This comes following reporting from the London Times that U.S. hedge funds took down about 25% of the Spanish paper issued in September. Given both announcements we have some unanswered questions:
We don’t have an answer on when Spain will ask for a bailout, but believe it is no longer a question of “if”. Next week on Oct 18-19 EU leaders will join for a summit. We are less than optimistic that leaders will agree on the scope of the ESM (for recapitalization) and sure nothing besides discussion will govern such key topics as a banking and fiscal union.
The European Week Ahead:
Sunday: Oct. UK Oct. Rightmove House Prices
Monday: Aug. Italy General Government Debt
Tuesday: Oct. Eurozone Zew Survey; Sep. Eurozone EU27 New Car Registrations, CPI; Aug. Eurozone Trade Balance; Oct. Germany Zew Survey; Sep. UK PPI Input, PPI Output, CPI, Retail Price Index; Aug. UK ONS House Price; Aug. Bank of Italy Releases, Trade Balance
Wednesday: Aug. Eurozone Construction Output; Germany Government Releases New Macro-Economic Forecasts
Thursday: EU leaders' summit begins (Oct 18-19); Sep. UK Retail Sales; 3Q Spain House Price Index, Trade Balance; Aug. Italy Current Account
Friday: Aug. Eurozone Current Account; Sep. UK Public Finances, Public Sector Net Borrowing; Aug. Italy Industrial Orders, Industrial Sales
Financial transactions tax (FTT) - in a somewhat surprising development, eleven Eurozone countries agreed on Tuesday to push forward with a financial transactions tax (the minimum threshold was nine countries). Spain and Italy decided to support the measure following heavy pressure from Berlin. Austria, Belgium, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain will present a model for how the tax would work by the end of the year, and it’s probably realistic to expect the tax to be implemented by 2014.
Italy - former Prime Minister Berlusconi has begun to signal that he may be ready to scrap his attempt at a political comeback. Berlusconi told the daily Libero that “I want unity of the moderates and I am ready to give up my candidacy, if needed, to achieve a united front." Elections are scheduled for the spring 2013.
Italy - Italian government approved a Stability Law for the 2013-2015 period. It is a package of stimulus measures and spending cuts worth ~€11.6B. The package included an income tax cut of 1% in the two lowest tax brackets that is expected to cost €5B. It also reduced a planned 2% increase in the VAT due to come into effect next June to 1%. Savings from a new financial transactions tax and unspecified fiscal interventions on banks and insurance companies were estimated to eventually amount to €3.5B a year.
ESM Launch – The fund was finally opened on Tuesday and can now lend as much as €200B, while its capacity will increase to €500B over the next 18 months. Until then, ~€192B of leftover EFSF funds will still be available. Recall that the ESM can provide bailout loans to governments, buy bonds in primary and secondary markets and lend money to facilitate bank recapitalizations. However, it cannot directly recapitalize troubled banks until the establishment of a single supervisory mechanism.
Ireland - Irish central bank lowers 2012 growth forecast to +0.5% vs prior forecast +0.7%. And lowered its 2013 forecast for GDP to +1.7% from +1.9%
Eurozone Sentix Investor Confidence -22.2 OCT vs -23.2 SEPT
Eurozone Industrial Production -2.9% AUG Y/Y (exp. -4.1%) vs -2.8% JUL [0.6% AUG M/M (exp. -0.4%) vs 0.6% JUL]
Germany Industrial Production -1.4% AUG Y/Y vs -1.3% JUL [-0.5% AUG M/M (exp. -0.6%) vs 1.2% JUL]
Germany Exports 2.4% AUG M/M (exp. -0.6%) vs 0.4% JUL [rose for a second month]
Germany Imports 0.3% AUG M/M (exp. 0.2%) vs 0.3% JUL
Germany Wholesale Price Index 4.2% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.1% AUG
Germany CPI Final 2.1% SEPT Y/Y [unch]
France CPI 2.2% SEPT Y/Y vs 2.4% AUG
France Industrial Production -0.9% AUG Y/Y vs -2.8% JUL
France Manufacturing Production -0.4% AUG Y/Y vs -2.6% JUL
France Bank of France Business Sentiment 92 SEPT vs 93 AUG
UK Industrial Production -1.2% AUG Y/Y vs -0.8% JUL
UK Manufacturing Production -1.2% AUG Y/Y vs -0.7% JUL
Italy Deficit To GDP (YTD) 5.0% in Q2 vs 7.3% in Q1
Italy CPI 2.9% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.2% AUG
Italy Industrial Production WDA -5.2% AUG Y/Y vs -7.2% JUL
Spain CPI Final 3.5% SEPT Y/Y [unch]
Switzerland Unemployment Rate 2.9% SEPT vs 2.9% AUG
Switzerland CPI -0.3% SEPT Y/Y vs -0.5% AUG
Portugal CPI 2.9% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.2% AUG
Portugal Industrial Sales -1.6% AUG Y/Y vs -4.0% JUL
Ireland Construction PMI 41.9 SEPT vs 40.7AUG
Ireland CPI 2.4% SEPT Y/Y vs 2.6% AUG
Netherland Industrial Production -0.6% AUG Y/Y vs -0.3% JUL
Greece CPI 0.3% SEPT Y/Y vs 1.2% AUG
Greece Unemployment Rate 25.1% JUL vs 24.8% JUN
Greece Industrial Production 2.5% AUG Y/Y vs -5.0% JUL
Sweden Industrial Production 3.2% AUG Y/Y vs -0.9% JUL
Sweden Industrial Orders -6.5% AUG Y/Y vs -5.4% JUL
Sweden CPI 0.4% SEPT Y/Y vs 0.7% AUG
Norway CPI 0.5% SEPT Y/Y vs 0.5% AUG
Norway PPI including Oil Prices 1.4% SEPT Y/Y vs 4.4% AUG
Finland Industrial Production -1.4% AUG Y/Y vs 2% JUL
Denmark CPI 2.5% SEPT Y/Y vs 2.6% AUG
Czech Republic CPI 3.4% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.3% AUG
Czech Republic Unemployment Rate 8.4% SEPT vs 8.3% AUG
Czech Republic Industrial Output -3.1% AUG Y/Y vs 4.2% JUL
Russia Light Vehicle and Car Sales 10% SEPT Y/Y vs 15% AUG
Hungary Industrial Production Final 1.4% AUG Y/Y [unch] vs -2.2% JUL
Hungary CPI 6.6% SEPT Y/Y vs 6.0% AUG
Romania CPI 5.3% SEPT Y/Y vs 3.9% AUG
Turkey Industrial Production -1.5% AUG Y/Y vs 3.3% JUL
Interest Rate Decisions:
(10/9) Serbia Repo Rate HIKED 25bps to 10.75%
Next Monday, October 15th at 1:30pm EST we will be hosting our CRI Black Book Conference Call.
Hedgeye Black Books are deep dive research projects, exposing all details of a company, examining past present and future, they are a tool to be saved. This presentation will discuss how the current macro environment and company specific data points are influencing CRI and the best way to play this stock moving forward.
Topics of discussion will include:
Please dial into the call 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below:
* Call will be answered by a live operator and material will be distributed prior to the call.
This indispensable trading tool is based on a risk management signaling process Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough developed during his years as a hedge fund manager and continues to refine. Nearly every trading day, you’ll receive Keith’s latest signals - buy, sell, short or cover.