“I am the literary equivalent of a Big Mac and fries.”
I’m not going to admit this because my brother is a McDonald’s franchisee. I am going to put it out there because this is really the key to what you really need to know this morning – I love the Big Mac!
As are all things here in the Haven, that’s a multi-factor, risk managed, statement. Not only do I eat Big Macs (weekly), but I wear the Big Macro jersey for Hedgeye with pride.
I am right fired up for our Big Macro Quarterly Themes Call this morning. We’ll be hosting it (49 slides in 40 mins) with the customary anonymous client Q&A at 11AM EST.
As a reminder, last quarter my team nailed the #GrowthSlowing and #BernankeBubbles popping (Gold, Oil, etc.) calls. I’d be lying to you if I said we weren’t looking to land a few fat TAIL risked whales this morning too.
Our Top 3 Themes are going to be as follows:
- Growth Slowing’s Slope – what our GDP models see in Q3 for USA, China, and Germany vs consensus.
- The Cliff – as in the 112th Congress kind; will #GrowthSlowing pull forward the Debt Ceiling Debate?
- Obama vs Romney – pickles or no pickles? You do need a risk management plan under either scenario.
Back to the Global Macro Grind…
After 4 consecutive down days (another 33 point draw-down), the SP500 storytellers who have been telling you to buy stocks “because they are cheap” at VIX 15-16 are going to get one of the many opportunities to buy’em cheaper again this week.
Growth Slowing matters. Most people get that by now. But the narrative of #EarningsExpectations becoming a big market liability has finally perforated the almighty media’s top headlines.
We’ve been saying short pro-cyclical Sectors (Industrials, Basic Materials, Energy) since we made our #GrowthSlowing call in March. That’s not a victory lap – that’s just the score. These S&P Sectors are getting pounded on #EarningsExpectations in July.
Only 10 days in, here’s the S&P Sector scoreboard for Q3 to-date:
- Industrials (XLI) = down -2.94%
- Basic Materials (XLB) = down -2.49%
- Energy (XLE) = down -2.12%
But, but, the Dow is “up for the YTD.” So everything is just fine, right?
There’s a reason why Canadian McDonald’s franchisees refuse to launch anything that resembles eating a yellow snow cone too. Whether you think the average human being on this earth is “smart” or not, there are some things people just get.
The world’s economic growth is not fine. Neither is the perma contention of the Q1 bulls that “people are too bearish.” Maybe at 27 VIX in May (when the II Bull/Bear Spread pancaked to flat) consensus was bearish enough. Not here.
If you bought stocks at 1374 SPX and VIX 16 last week, you certainly didn’t get that call from us. Anything in the area code of 14-16 VIX has been the closest sell signal you can find to a layup as there has been in US Equities since 2008.
Back to the II Bull/Bear Survey, check this thing out (reported this morning):
- Bulls rise from 42.5% to 44.7%
- Bears are unchanged at 24.5%
- Bull/Bear Spread = 2020 basis points wide!
Away from what I am watching and eating, that’s the super little secret of my risk management morning. The general population of investors who are telling themselves consensus is Bearish Enough are simply lying to themselves inasmuch as I would be if I told you I don’t also love the Filet O’ Fish.
My immediate-term support and resistance ranges for Gold, Oil (Brent), US Dollar, EUR/USD, German DAX, and the SP500 are now $1, $97.56-103.01, 82.61-83.81, $1.21-1.24, 6, and 1, respectively.
Best of luck out there today,
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Takeaway: Based on our math, the debt ceiling may be technically breached by late November, which may introduce a new and critical factor ahead of the November elections.
In the world of manic markets, the 2011 debt ceiling crisis seems like a lifetime ago. In reality, the deal to extend the debt ceiling in 2011 was reached on August 2nd, just under a year ago. In fact, President Obama signed the Budget Control Act of 2011 into law on August 2nd. This was the date that the Department of Treasury estimated that the borrowing authority of the U.S. federal government would be exhausted.
In true lagging indicator fashion, Standard and Poor’s downgraded the credit rating of the U.S. government a few days later. As outlined in the chart below, the U.S. equity markets, not surprisingly, were very volatile into and out of this. In fact, the volatility was comparable to the 2008 financial crisis with the Dow dropping north of 5.5% on August 5th alone.
Ironically, the debt ceiling had been successfully raised 70+ times from 1960 heading into the summer of 2011. The advent of the Tea Party elevated the debate on federal government debt and spending and turned a routine Congressional legislative activity into a major political football. The Tea Party pushed their Republican colleagues to reject any proposal that did not also incorporate immediate and sizeable spending cuts.
As noted above, the ultimate compromised proposal was the Budget Control Act of 2011 which had the following key provisions:
- Debt was increased by $400 billion immediately;
- The President could request a further increase of $500 billion, which Congress could veto with a 2/3rds majority; and
- The President could request a final request of $1.2 -> $1.5 trillion, subject to the same super majority.
- The bill outlined $917 billion of cuts over 10 years in exchange for the initial increase;
- The bill established the Joint Select Competitive Committee on Deficit Reduction to agree to cut at least an additional 1.5 trillion over the next 10 years; and
- If the Joint Committee did not come to an agreement on a bill of at least $1.3 trillion in cuts, then Congress could grant a $1.2 billion increase in the debt ceiling but this would trigger across the board $1.2 trillion in cuts equally split between security and non-security spending.
The widely discussed “Fiscal Cliff” in 2013 is a function of both a potential roll back of the broad Bush tax cuts and the automatic spending cuts outlined in the provisions of the Budget Control Act. In our Q3 2012 themes call tomorrow, we will go into a discussion of the “Fiscal Cliff”. In addition to this fiscal cliff and potentially even more pressing, is the issue of once again bumping into the debt ceiling.
In the table below, our Healthcare team outlines three different scenarios when the U.S. may hit the debt ceiling. In the analysis, we show an aggressive scenario, base case scenario, and a conservative scenario. In the most aggressive scenario, the debt limit is breached on November 28th, 2012. In the most conservative scenario, the debt limit is breached on January 14th, 2013. In the aggressive scenario, the debt limit becomes a key issue in the 2012 election. On the other hand, if the debt limit is pushed into January, it becomes an issue just as the fiscal cliff becomes reality.
As our Healthcare team emphasized in a recent note, the post election period looks potentially very frightening as both the Fiscal Cliff and Debt Ceiling back up on each other within weeks. The post election period between November 6th, and the deadline for the “Fiscal Cliff” on January 1, 2013 may be more uncertain than last summer when volatility skyrocketed.
The wild card as it relates to some resolution of either the Fiscal Cliff or the Debt Ceiling may well be the increasing likelihood that U.S. Employment and GDP will still be growing at a vulnerable pace. In effect, it seems highly unlikely that a standoff over the Fiscal Cliff or the Debt Ceiling will materialize in the very short term as either or both items will likely induce a recession. That, of course, assumes that our politicians will act rationally, which is of course is not very likely in an election year.
Daryl G. Jones
Director of Research
Here’s the deal: Barclays has a mess on its hands that is not going to go away anytime soon no matter how many executives resign. In fact, the LIE-BOR situation has been exacerbated if anything and has spread to Germany where Deutsche Bank is now under investigation. What’s going on is that regulators and market participants are beginning to take a good hard look at banks and their tangible common equity relative to total assets.
Glass-Steagall is long gone. It shouldn’t have been destroyed in the first place. What is happening is a paradigm shift in which the public will demand that Barclays break up its traditional banking unit from its investment banking unit (Barclays Capital).
This trend will continue all over Europe and eventually, may reach the U.S. But think about this for a minute: Barclays currently has a market capitalization of about $20 billion. It has around $2.1 trillion in gross net exposure to derivatives. In other words, the bank is well undercapitalized. We think that should a spinoff occur, Barclays Capital alone would need $20 billion in addition capital, which will be difficult to raise.
5-10 minutes prior to the 11AM EST start time please dial:
(Toll Free) or (Direct)
Conference Code: 142354#
Materials: * PLEASE NOTE MATERIALS WILL BE SENT OUT TOMORROW MORNING PRIOR TO THE START OF THE CALL.
"Q3 MACRO THEMES AND PRESENTATION"
This Wednesday, July 11th at 11am EST, the Hedgeye Macro Team, led by CEO, Keith McCullough, and DOR, Daryl Jones, will be hosting our 3Q12 Macro Themes Call.
Topics will include:
- Growth Slowing's Slope - Our fundamental view is that growth will come in lower than expectations across a collection of major economies - including the U.S. We refute the notion of the U.S. decoupling and will present the main indicators that signal a higher probability of equities crashing from here.
- The Cliff - We analyze the assumptions embedded in consensus/CBO forecasts regarding the "fiscal cliff" and offer our view on how heightening uncertainty regarding this event should impact global financial markets. Further, we discuss the question: will slower domestic growth pull forward the debt ceiling debate and introduce uncertainty on a fiscal cliff resolution?
- Obama vs Romney - As elections approach we evaluate the policy impact on the broader economy based on the victor. Could the U.S. look more like Europe if Obama wins? And what asset classes stand to outperform based on the next president?
Hedgeye Risk Management is a leading independent provider of real-time investment research. Focused exclusively on generating and delivering actionable investment ideas, the firm combines quantitative, bottom-up and macro analysis with an emphasis on timing. The Hedgeye team features some of the world's most regarded research analysts - united around a vision of independent, uncompromised real-time investment research as a service.
The Hedgeye Sales Team
Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.