China Chart: You Tell Me...

With the Chinese holding the healthiest (most liquid) balance sheet in the world, cutting rates, and cutting domestic taxes, where is the next big move in the chart below?

The Shanghai Composite Index up another +2% last night at 2015. I have a major “Trend” breakout line sitting 13 points away, and my team remains as bullish as they have been on Chinese prospects to re-accelerate growth from the Q4 lows in Q1 of 2009.

We remain long both the FXI and EWH etfs. Buy them on down days.

Trading The New Reality's Gold "Trend"?

As the US$ and VIX are breaking down through critical intermediate term “Trend” support, Gold is breaking out through the same.

For the “Macro Men” on our desk here in the Haven, this makes perfect sense. These macro indicators are all correlated.

Don’t short gold; buy it on down days. Don’t buy it on the 1st down day like today – wait on it; patience has paid in this market and it will pay you here. There is a solid gold support line built up at $801/oz (see chart).

“Re-Flation” cometh. This is The New Reality.

T-Boone Bullish?

We bought Oil today because the math makes sense again - anywhere under $39.15 strikes buy in our models.

Looking at the chart below, I was never quite sure what was in “their” models back in July, but that’s of no concern to anyone anymore. Been there, done that.

As global stock market volatility continues to decline, so will the propensity for investment banks to allocate capital to “prop” traders who want to lever their brains out buying everything “Chindia-Oil.”

Alongside the drop-off of players in the game, enter the hockey players from New haven. With the fundamental backdrop of our “Re-Flation” Investment Theme for early 2009 and a swooning US Dollar, we think we can trade oil very comfortably within a range of $37.11- $51.70.

T-Boone Barber

Early Look

daily macro intelligence

Relied upon by big institutional and individual investors across the world, this granular morning newsletter distills the latest and most vital market developments and insures that you are always in the know.

Tech doesn't have the "Fast Money" that it used to...

Howard Penney and I have been building out our new Sector Strategy product…

If you look at the nine SP500 sector exposure analysis we have recently been running, there are 3 things about Technology that I think are misunderstood:

1. Both the underlying XLK short interest and bottoms up stock short int is amongst the lowest of the 9 sectors
2. Valuation on NTM is the highest at 7.2x EBITDA
3. Sector Beta, for the 1st time in forever is very low in Tech at 0.93

In other words less shorts to squeeze, less incremental value to buy, and less juice on market up days (XLK is #6 out of 9 in terms of beta!... financials, discretionary, materials, and energy is where the traders get most of their rips).

We have recently announced that Rebecca Runkle has joined our team as head of Technology. Most of you will remember Rebecca from her days on the sell side at Morgan Stanley. With McGough, Penney, and Runkle we have taken a nice whack out of what used to make Morgan Stanley great.

RIMM’s 2008 stock price chart is a metaphor for the life of a reactive Wall Street crackberry addict falling out of favor. We’re looking forward to having Runkle’s experienced and patient point of view Captaining our Technology research effort.

They don’t trade Tech like they used to.

Keith R. McCullough
CEO & Chief Investment Officer



Things are bad – everyone knows it. There’s less visibility in the business with closer in bookings and therefore higher need to discount. Fuel is a huge tailwind although FX is a bit of a headwind. At the end of the day, CCL will still do over $2.00 a share and is trading at only 10-12x EPS. The stock is cheap and it should be. It seems like the delta on fuel could be negative. More importantly, supply growth is significant over the next few years. Cost of capital and supply are going up, ROI is coming down, and the credit markets present risk.

Here are our notes from the conference call. Think of it as a transcript with synthesis.


- Fuel and FX act as somewhat of a hedge for each other
- Europe is holding up much better than US, which on the surface is positive because that’s where most of the capacity additions have occurred. However, the delta in Europe could be greater than North America. Research Edge maintains its negative European macro view
- Reduced Local Currency yields to -10% (from -6%) partially due to end of fuel supplement
- Booking patterns are closer in, trade down to value with shorter duration “value” Caribbean trips from exotic and longer ones. Because booking patterns are closer in its also affecting yields.

- Company suspended dividend – saving $1.3BN
- Operating cash flow: $3.3BN
- Committed financing for ship delivery: 800MM
- Capex: $300-400MM
- Debt maturities: $700MM
- Are working new bank financing, have 1.3BN available on their credit line.

2009 booking patterns:

1Q09: Fleetwide capacity up 2.6% (1.9% in NA, 7% in Europe)
- Occupancy and pricing behind next year
- NA brands – 62% capacity in Carib, 12% in Mexico (Pricing slightly ahead and occupancy slightly behind for these two) while longer term and exotic running behind on both
- Europe Brands are running behind in occupancy and pricing, but Costa is running ahead.
- Estimated local currency yields to be 5-10% lower than 1Q08
- Forecasting 20-22 cents per share (vs 30 cents in 08)

- Fleetwide capacity up 4.4%
- Pricing and occupancy running behind
- Think that booking pace will improve in the back half
- Europe brand pricing is a slightly higher with lower occupancies.

- Overall occupancy and pricing significantly behind last year’s levels – evidencing that the US consumer is deferring vacation decisions
- Shaping up to be challenging – but expect the picture to improve given the closer in booking patterns.

Room to cut costs?
- Working to create more synergies and saving throughout the org. Think they can get back to 0% cost metric on a ABDL basis.
- Some improvement in booking post election but on lower yields. People not being able to get credit is affecting their business.

- Post 9/11 there were a bunch of bankruptcies – so that may present an opportunity. Basically put – if CCL is having difficulty getting credit – everyone else is in a much worse position

General Comments:
- Bookings in 4Q08 better than expected – indication more of how conservative they were – not saying that there was any strength
- Volumes in Q109 are strong because the pricing has come in
- Export credits: Basically the government guarantees a piece of the loans
- Have 17 ships on order, have 3 export credits, have commitments for 3 more ships, 2 of the 3 will be signed in the next 2 weeks, last one in 30-60 days. But 5 of the ships are being built in Italy for an Italian flag so they don’t need any credits
- Italy, Germany & France performing the best in Europe, Spain is still a challenge, and UK which is performing worse than continental Europe. US seems to be performing the worse.
- Capacity growth beyond 2012 – (4% already) unlikely to do any more for that year. Still have time to order ships for 2012 if conditions improve.
- They have seen increases in cancellations across all brands. As the booking curve moves they also get less deposits and interest on deposits.

Will they cut costs:
- consolidate their multiple headquarters or cut sales commissions – will absolutely not cut their distribution in tough times… and will not consolidate since they have multiple brands
- They are working more on data center consolidation and sharing sourcing across brands- some of it is baked in and some not, 1% with fuel is 65MM and without 55MM

Can they delay deliveries or asked to?
- No they have not. Can mitigate capacity additions without delivery cancellation by moving inventory and selling older ships. Would rather take an old ship out of service than cancel a new ship

Obamerica: Schapiro to head the SEC

President Elect Obama selected Mary Schapiro as his choice to run the Securities and Exchange Commission. We view this choice positively because she is experienced, she will likely have bipartisan support, and she has been a pro business reformer in prior regulatory roles.

Internally, we’ve been debating whether he should have selected a more activist type personality, as FDR did with his selection of Joe Kennedy in 1935 or as President Bush did with Bill Donaldson (a former Yale Hockey Player) in 2003, but on the margin she is certainly an improvement over the SEC’s current leadership.

Schapiro is currently the CEO of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which is the largest non-governmental regulator for all securities firms doing business with the U.S. public. In conjunction with this role, she is also the Chairman of the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, the largest foundation in the U.S. dedicated to investor education. FINRA is an amalgamation of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), which Schapiro ran as Chairman starting in 2006, and the NYSE’s regulatory body. Schapiro was a driving force between this amalgamation and subsequent simplification of these two regulatory bodies.

Schapiro has previously been appointed to government posts by two Republican Presidents and one Democratic President. Two decades ago, President Ronald Reagan named Shapiro a commissioner of the SEC. She was reappointed by President George H.W. Bush and then named acting Chair by President Bill Clinton. Given this background, it is likely she will garner broad bipartisan support.

In 1996, Shapiro became head of the NASD’s regulatory arm and has been widely commended for her role in reforming that part of the NASD. According to John Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University, before her tenure, the NASD’s enforcement arm was “seen as more of a nuisance than a threat – it just bored you to death with a thousand little paper-cuts. It has become much more serious and much tougher in the last 10 years, and she does get credit for a lot of that.”

Her key challenge from the outset will be dealing with the Madoff fraud. There are number of blogs and news sources this morning that are already suggesting she may have connections with the Madoff family. This is based on the fact that Madoff, and members of his family including his sons Andrew and Mark, were active for decades in the NASD, which Shapiro previously led. Bernie Madoff’s niece, Shana Madoff, also served on FINRA’s Compliance Advisory Group.

This Madoff connections seems largely circumstantial and, undoubtedly, the Obama team has fully vetted any association. That said, dealing with the fraud and its after effects in terms of regulation will be Schapiro’s first key leadership test. After years of uninspired leadership at the SEC, we hope that Schapiro steps up big time and her track certainly suggests she is qualified and ready to do just that.

Schapiro’s last public speech was the FINRA Fall Securities Conference and I could have pulled out a number of excerpts, but one in particular that struck me was the following:

“I think we can all agree that both the management of systemic risk and the protection of individual investors are important to the smooth operation of our financial markets. But are they really at odds with another? In my view, they represent two sides of the same coin.”

Her point is prescient in that she seems to get that, while managing risk is critical, so is ensuring that investors have the confidence to allocate risk capital. In light of the Madoff fraud, restoring this investor confidence, through the SEC, will be of utmost importance. If she can accomplish this quickly in a transparent manner, it could be a real positive catalyst for capital markets.

Daryl G. Jones
Managing Director

Keith R. McCullough
CEO & Chief Investment Officer

investing ideas

Risk Managed Long Term Investing for Pros

Hedgeye CEO Keith McCullough handpicks the “best of the best” long and short ideas delivered to him by our team of over 30 research analysts across myriad sectors.