NKE: Too Good


Fact…I was wrong headed into this quarter. My estimate was high by a nickel, as I thought that the company would start to show meaningful SG&A leverage and gross margin improvement (sequentially), which would offset a modest deceleration in top line.

This is one of those very rare instances where I’m cool with being wrong. Why? Both the top line and futures looked fantastic, and inventories improved on the margin. Our long-term TAIL duration call remains unchanged (see below). But as it relates to our TREND and TRADE duration, everything lives in changes on the margin. Those changes were net positive.

It was somewhat surprising that half of the Q&A focused on the company’s Gross Margin. Admittedly, this came in 60bp below guidance, and presumably about 100bp below Nike’s real internal plan. Some of this was FX, some was lingering labor cost pressures, some was clearance-related, but all was easily digestible intellectually. But what was amazing is that no one seemed to care that Nike is one of the very few (i.e. I can count them on one hand) multi-nationals that is actually printing such tremendous top line growth numbers – ie 18% for a $24bn company – in the midst of a global economic
slowdown. This is what happens when a company invests continuously in its business (i.e. over the past 3-years) when everyone else is harvesting and cutting costs.

As a kicker,


a) futures growth of 13% is more heavily weighted towards the back-end of the 5-month window,


b) this only partially reflects pricing increases that are in the midst of going into effect. In other words, futures will accelerate simply bc of pricing in 2H (this is one of the very few times in the better part of 15 years that I can recall the company having the confidence to actually guide futures), and

c) the company is looking at an outstanding event year, with assumption of the NFL license in April, European Football Championship (Euro 2012) , and the Olympics from July 25 to Aug 12.

d) rest assured, as we do, that these events will simply not come and go, leaving Nike with a tough revenue hurdle in 2013. The company will use each of them to build sustainable businesses to take share long after the games are complete. In fact, Charlie Denson noted several times that there are a few ‘surprises’ coming down the pike later this year. This is the same kind of posturing we saw around major launches like Air 180, Free, Lunar and Nike +. Again, these are platforms, not just products.


So, gross margins were definitely weak. But consider the following. Futures look extremely healthy. Futures lead revenue. Inventories improved sequentially. When those things converge, gross margins almost ALWAYS improve. The following two charts spell it out. And that’s not to mention the positive impact pricing is having on the equation, or the fact that we’re about
to anniversary meaningfully higher raw materials and shipping costs last year (labor costs continue to rise).


NKE: Too Good - Fut v Rev


NKE: Too Good - Fut v Inv


So what’s the punchline? Though the company missed our estimate by a nickel, we remain 15-20% above consensus for the next three years.

The biggest risk here is the ‘can things really get any better’ factor. Sales momentum is strong, margins are on the mend, inventory is coming down, the event schedule looks great, capital intensity is moderating, and Nike is showing greater focus in returning capital to shareholders. But the reality is that we don’t have to worry about that for another year – at least.

If the S&P 500 is your benchmark and you have to at least have an opinion on Nike, how can you afford to miss this? A bear case is very difficult to build.


NKE: Too Good - NKE vs. SP500 spread


Again, the crux of our call is that investors are underestimating both the duration and intensity of this growth story. We’re
looking at 3-years of 20% EPS growth after having lived through 3-years of 7.6% avg growth. We had a 3-year setup, now we’re in year 1 of harvesting and taking share. That’s not bad in this market by even the strictest of standards.

A lingering consideration for you…remember 3 quarters ago when Nike scared the Street and numbers came down by 15% across the board? Each quarter since the company has overdelivered, and guess where numbers are today? Yes, they are above where they were before the earnings scare became reality.  Great example as to why you gotta keep the big picture strategy and motivation for compensation (i.e. to crush both competition and expectations simultaneously) front and center for this company.


NKE: Too Good - NKE S


NKE: Too Good - NKE RNOA


Brian McGough

Managing Director



Here are some of our notes from the call:

Footwear performance by category:

  • Basketball up DD in the quarter
    • Lebron 9 combines flywire and high perfused technology
  • Running up DD in the quarter

NA continues to outperform:

  • Growth driven by DD growth in every category except action sports which declined MSD
  • DTC up 17%
    • Store productivity drove 14% comp
    • Online sales +16%
  • Have yet to launch NFL product – April partial launch. Fall full force.
  • Category offense now fully developed
  • NA is most developed retail marketplace with own stores, wholesale partners and online
  • Thanksgiving weekend
    • In-line and factory stores delivered DD comp store gains


  • Growth in part due to changes in shipping timing LY

Western Europe:       

  • Fueled by growth in running, football, women’s training and basketball
  • Partially offset by lower sportswear revenues
  • DD growth in AGS territory (Austria, Germany and Switzerland) partially offset by declines in other territories
  • EBIT margin decline due to unfavorable FX rates and higher product costs which more than offset DTC and higher pricing      
  • Remains a challenging economic environment

Central & Eastern Europe:

  • Growth driven by higher revenues across all categories:
    • DD running, football and men’s/women’s training
    • DD growth in Russia, and turkey more than offset lower revenues in southern and central European markets


  • Apparel +34% due to shift in timing from Q2 to Q3 of last year
  • Apparel would have been up 20% excluding the shift  
  • Gross margins down due to higher costs and increased promotional activity to clear inventories


  • Revs down 7% reflected holiday futures orders taken in immediately following the natural disasters
  • Sales declines in most categories, running up DD

Emerging Markets:

  • Every category and territory posted higher revenues with Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and Korea driving the largest share of the growth.

“Other” business:

  • Revenue declines in 4 of the “other” businesses were offset by 20% growth in Converse

Gross Margins down 260 bps:

  • Took more meaningful price increases in spring and summer
  • Expected discounting to moderate but it did not which NKE expects to continue into 2H12
  • Primarily due to higher products costs, partially offset by growth in DTC, moderate price increase in fall and holiday and benefit from cost reduction strategy


  • Futures increased at a double-digit rate for all categories except sportswear and action sports which grew at a mid-single digit rate.
  • Unit orders increased 7% while ASP added six points of growth (due to price increases that take effect in Spring and Summer 2012)
  • Future order were more back weighted in the window due to price increases- did not see a significant change in unit velocity

Q2 Inventory growth:

  • Nike inc up 35%
  • 39% up on the Nike brand side
    • 20 pts of the growth due to unit increase (vs. 34% increase in Q1)
    • Remaining 19 points due largely to increased cost per unit
      • Don’t expect costs to continue up or expect it to go down
      • Spring 2011 was the peak
      • Won't come down until the tail end of summer 2012
  • “We continue to expect inventory balances to remain stable over the remaining quarters of the fiscal year with the rate of inventory growth declining sequentially and coming more in line with revenue growth by Q4”

T12Mo ROIC: 22.6%, up 1.4 pts YoY-

Free Cash Flow: Generated $360mm of FCF in Q2 and expect levels to normalize as inventory balances stablize



  • Revenues: Mid Teens (due to Q2 results and future order)
    • Q3 and Q4 revenues expected to grow slightly above the reported futures growth in 2Q
  • Gross Margins
    • Down 160 bps for the full year
      • Down 150 bps in Q3
      • Down
        50 bps in Q4
  • Material Costs
    • Holiday 2011 and Spring 2012 seasons will reflect peak material costs seen earlier in CY2011
    • Expect COGS to reflect lower material costs moving into Summer 2012
  • Price increases:
    • Spring and Summer 2012 price increases are more significant than those that have already taken effect
  • SG&A Spend:
    • Expect demand creation investment weighted in Q4 with operating overhead growth in Q3
  • 24.5% tax rate expectation for the full year
    • Q3 tax rate will be slightly higher



GM Guidance:


  • 1 : FX is a big factor
  • 2: in 2Q, expected to see an improvement in discounts which was actually flat and expect trend to
    • Keeping discounting focused by had to move through some excess apparel in China
    • Want to keep inventories clean
  • 3: seeing strength in NA vs. international which has a mix shift to the downside

Converse China license:

  • Positioned very differently than the Nike brand
  • Have seen good steady healthy growth in FW in China
  • Looking to build a good apparel base in China for converse


  • Bullish on China and feel great about the brand
  • Looking to be locally relevant while having the right brand at the right time
  • Looking to get better on the apparel side- great appetite for apparel in the Chinesemarketplace
  • Still more work to be done
  • DC-pleased with overall performance
    • Greenest building in china
    • Have been short term hickups getting it up and raining but provides huge competitive advantages moving forward

Western Europe into 2012

  • Certainly one of the more challenging geographies
  • Keeping a sharp focus on inventories
  • Large part of the impact on GM from FX in the quarter
  • Most pleased with the performance product which is performing well
  • Opportunity to get more market share on the sportswear side in both FW and APP

Direct to consumer:

  • Seeing Stronger growth out of inline stores- both formats up on a comp store bases
  • Strong growth out of digital as well

Western Europe futures:

  • More acceleration in the back half due to events?
  • European championships come at the end of the FY with olympics in FY2013 neither of which is reflected in futures

NFL License:

  • Will see initial products go into market place in April
  • Won’t see material impact until the Fall season

Price increases: Completely reflected in futures order already?

  • Current futures number 7% increase in units, 6% increase value per unit
  • Next futures window will be spring and summer and will reflect full impact from price increases
  • Manage and measure sell through with wholesale partners to monitor reaction to price increases
  • Thinking differently about pricing than in the past by season and expect to see improving gross margins improve in the long term







Comments from CEO Keith McCullough


Another debt laden central plan, another short covering rally – Joy to the Levered World.

  1. CHINA – apparently the Chinese didn’t get the Institutional AM short covering memo (short red; chase green) – China looked more like Oracle’s guidance last night, losing another -1.2%, still in freefall at -22% YTD (Shanghai Comp). Remember, adding more leverage to the system structurally impairs Global Growth.
  2. LTRO – genius. brilliant. Right, right – for another short-term TRADE squeeze but piling another 498B Euros (monster #) in LTRO leverage onto this sick puppy is like lathering up tricky Dick Fuld a month before the blowup. This has both the DAX and CAC getting squeezed right back above TRADE lines of support (5809 and 3062, respectively) and I would not be short European Equities or the Euro here. EUR/USD mini breakout line = 1.31; waiting on 1.33 to re-short.
  3. SENTIMENT – the best thing about not running money is I get much better feedback on how people are really positioned. While its fashionable to say “everyone is bearish”, as of DEC the data no longer supports that qualitative claim (VIX anywhere in the area code of 21-23 is a very complacent signal and the II Bullish/Bearish Survey Spread just popped right back up to a 3mth high (to the Bull side) of +1800bps wide (last registered Dec 7th, before we swooned, again)


I have no European or US Equity Index/Sector shorts. I’ll say that’s plain lucky – because I didn’t see people hoping for this LTRO being the elixir of a levered life. Big risk management range in the SP500 of 1 is now the game that’s in front of us, so play that. Bullish TREND; Bearish TAIL.







THE HBM: MCD, WEN - subsector fbr





MCD: McDonald’s Romania expects sales to top EUR 100 million this year, versus EUR 99 million in 2010.


WEN: Wendy’s is set to overtake Burger King as number two in the domestic QSR sales rankings.  Sales at Wendy’s restaurants in the U.S. are on track, according to the Wall Street Journal, to be $8.42 billion or $53 million higher than Burger King’s this year .



THE HBM: MCD, WEN - stocks


Howard Penney

Managing Director


Rory Green



Attention Students...

Get The Macro Show and the Early Look now for only $29.95/month – a savings of 57% – with the Hedgeye Student Discount! In addition to those daily macro insights, you'll receive exclusive content tailor-made to augment what you learn in the classroom. Must be a current college or university student to qualify.

Tequila Sunrise

"Alcohol is the anesthesia by which we endure the operation of life."

-George Bernard Shaw


Keith is New York today for meetings and to co-host Squawk on the Street at 10am eastern, so I’ve been handed the keyboard on the Early Look.  I actually have the pleasure of writing this missive from my vacation in Mexico (Cancun to be exact), so unlike many of you stock market operators who have had to endure the manic volatility over the last couple of days, I´ve been enjoying the sun, beach, and, dare I say, a few nips of that old magic agave elixir . . . tequila!


To be sure, this has been a year in which the consumption of alcohol has gone up in proximity to many of the world´s financial districts. Although I certainly would not condone overconsumption, to Shaw´s point above, a few drinks does, at times, provide an appropriate release and if there was ever a year in which a suspension of reality was needed, it may be 2011.


Yesterday, the SP500 closed up almost 3% at 1,241.   Interestingly, that is about 5 S&P points below the price at which November closed, 1,246.  So, despite the massive squeeze the SP500 is still down roughly 40 basis points on the month.  So far, at least, Santa Claus has not delivered.


Although the stock market will likely not end the end the year with a meaningful decline, at least not in the U.S., underperformance has been rampant at many mutual funds and hedge funds. To those that have generated positive performance and alpha this year, Hedgeye salutes you as it has not been easy.


Roughly a year ago, Fortune asked us for our perspective on 2011, so I wrote an article on December 31stwhich outlined our key thoughts with the following summary:


“When contemplating the outlook for the upcoming year, the best place to start is consensus expectations. Currently, according to a Bloomberg survey of the strategists from 11 of the largest brokerage firms in the United States, the mean consensus target for the S&P 500 by year end 2011 is roughly 10% above current levels. Further, every single strategist is expecting a positive performance out of the index in 2011.


Suffice it to say, Hedgeye is decidedly non-consensus heading into 2011.


As it stands, we see a trinity of negative fundamental macro clouds on the horizon that have yet to be properly discounted by the market, and which are poised to cast a potentially long shadow over domestic equities heading into next year. The three key risks we see to these lofty consensus expectations heading into 2011 are: global growth slowing, inflation accelerating, and interconnected risk heightening.”


 (The article in its entirety can be found here: )


Interestingly, interconnected risk has become the most noteworthy of the three risks we flagged at the end of last year.  The most relevant evidence of this is probably a recent statistic emphasized by Jim Grant.  According to his analysis, in the entire history of the SP500, going back to 1957, there has never been a day when all 500 stocks rose or fell.  There have, though, been 11 days when over 490 stocks moved in the same direction and 6 of those have occurred since July 2011.  Still think government intervention has no impact on your portfolios?


At times, our outlook for 2011 looked really wrong.  In fact, by April 29th2011 the SP500 was up 8.4% for the year and on track for a 25%+ gain on an annualized basis, which, of course, would have made our outlook not just wrong, but dead wrong.  As for those of you who have followed us closely for the past few years, we are anything if not convicted in our research.  In 2011, it paid to have conviction on that macro process.


Related to the game in front of us, the short term question is what to do with yesterday's massive squeeze.  The key drivers of the squeeze were both a better than expected new housing data point in the U.S. and the newest panacea from Europe (or is it the newest acronym?), the ECB’s LTRO facility.  On the first point, housing starts were up 9.3% sequentially to 685K on an annualized basis, but this was driven by a 25% growth in multifamily starts (single family starts have been flat since the expiration of the second tax credit in April 2010 and remain well off prior cycle peaks of 2.27MM on an annualized basis).  As it relates to Europe, Italian 10-year yields are up at 6.85% this morning, which suggests we may be shortly awaiting the next European panacea to keep the equity rally going.  (Incidentally, Greek 10-year yields are north of 35%.)


Unlike Taiwan equities which posted a 4.56% gain overnight, that market’s biggest gain in 2.5 years, on the back of the government saying it will let its National Stabilization Fund buy equities to support domestic markets, China closed down 1.2% and is now down 22% on the year.  The Chinese, it seems, are less excited by the continued path of structurally impaired growth as insinuated by the 498 billion Euros to be lent from the ECB to the European banking system.


As for our moves yesterday, Keith bought back long term Treasuries (TLT) and shorted oil (BNO) as the SP500 remains Bearish from a TAIL perspective with a range of 1,207 and 1,270.  As for me, I’m headed back to the beach to enjoy a few more margaritas before my vacation ends, but rest assured I will be risk managing my consumption.  For as Seneca once said:


“Drunkness is nothing but voluntary madness.”




Happy holidays to you and your loved ones,


Daryl G. Jones

Director of Research


Tequila Sunrise  - Chart of the Day


Tequila Sunrise  - Virtual Portfolio


TODAY’S S&P 500 SET-UP – December 21, 2011


Another debt laden central plan, another short covering rally – Joy to the Levered World.


As we look at today’s set up for the S&P 500, the range is 24 points or -1.15% downside to 1193 and 0.78% upside to 1251. 




So my TREND line of 1207 support holds and zoom! Everything that was a down December of -3.3% to-date (24hrs ago) is fixed. Just like that – presto.  Perfectly manageable, provided that you can change your entire positioning in 1 hour of trading.  


The new range for the S&P 500 (1 - TAIL) and my call remains that you’ll push the low end of that range on Dollar up moves and the high-end on Dollar down.  With the immediate-term TRADE correlation (inverse) between SP500 and USD = -0.88 and for EuroStoxx vs USD its -0.97.


We are long Consumer Discretionary (XLY) as I think the USD down day today is more of a counter-TREND move than the bigger picture one that continues to develop.  Strong Dollar = Strong Consumption (new YTD highs today in our big cap Consumer favorites – WMT and SBUX), and a much more sustainable economic and risk mgt environment than what you’re attempting to deal with as central planners attempt to “smooth” the price/volatility cycle.




THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - daily sector view


THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - global performance




SENTIMENT – the best thing about not running money is I get much better feedback on how people are really positioned. While its fashionable to say “everyone is bearish”, as of DEC the data no longer supports that qualitative claim (VIX anywhere in the area code of 21-23 is a very complacent signal and the II Bullish/Bearish Survey Spread just popped right back up to a 3mth high (to the Bull side) of +1800bps wide (last registered Dec 7th, before we swooned, again)


  • ADVANCE/DECLINE LINE:  2135 (+4057) 
  • VOLUME: NYSE 947.03 (+22.25%)
  • VIX:  23.22 -6.82% YTD PERFORMANCE: +30.82%
  • SPX PUT/CALL RATIO: 1.25 from 1.60 (-22.10%)



  • TED SPREAD: 57.12
  • 3-MONTH T-BILL YIELD: 0.01%
  • 10-Year: 1.94 from 1.82   
  • YIELD CURVE: 1.68 from 1.58


GLOBAL MACRO DATA POINTS (Bloomberg Estimates):

  • US MBA Mortgage purchase applications index (4.9%) in 16-Dec week; total market index (2.6%) compares to (8.2%) and +4.1%, respectively, in the prior week; refi index (1.6%) vs. +9.3%
  • 10am: Existing home sales, Nov., est. up 2.2% to 5.05m
  • 10:30am: DoE inventories
  • 1pm: U.S. to sell $29b 7-yr notes


  • Bank of America said close to settling a Justice Dept. probe into whether its Countrywide unit violated fair-lending practices
  • Fed’s plan to boost supervision for U.S. banks stopped short of setting minimum liquidity levels, delayed decisions on risk-based capital and leverage until intl. regulators weigh in
  • House, Senate remain deadlocked on extending unemployment benefits
  • Bullish sentiment increases to 48.4% from 45.3% in the latest US Investor's Intelligence poll
  • Sinopec's buying spree has wide-ranging effects - WSJ
  • Switzerland and the United States are " reasonably close" to foster a tax agreement in order to end tax evasion using Swiss accounts – Swissinfo
  • Hackers in China got access to all of US Chamber of Commerce's information – WSJ




  • Nordic Shipping Banks Beat UniCredit Amid Overcapacity: Freight
  • Record Coal Deals Whittle Targets as Prices Climb: Commodities
  • Gold Extends Climb on Global Recovery Speculation, Weaker Dollar
  • Oil Climbs a Third Day on U.S. Economy, Shrinking Crude Supplies
  • Emerging Stocks to Drop on Commodities Risk: Technical Analysis
  • Hedge-Fund Refuge Sought by Traders Amid Bank Cuts: Commodities
  • Copper Climbs on Chinese Pledge to Support Exports, Trade Data
  • Container-Shipping May Rise in 2012 After Alliances, Platou Says
  • Corn, Wheat Decline on Forecast of Rains Easing Stress on Crops
  • Temasek Buys Mosaic Shares to Become Largest Shareholder
  • New Gold May Top 1 Million Ounces in Six Years, Oliphant Says
  • Oil Climbs a Third Day on U.S. Economy, Shrinking Crude Supplies
  • China Refined Copper Imports Rise to 29-Month High on Prices
  • Palm Oil Gains on Concern Supplies May Drop as Production Slows
  • Metal Thieves Thought to Have Taken London Sculpture, FT Says
  • Gold Gains as Euro Advances on IMF Pledge, German Confidence
  • India May Allow More Sugar Exports After Mills Fill Quota

THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - daily commodity view




THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - daily currency view




LTRO – genius. brilliant. Right, right – for another short-term TRADE squeeze but piling another 498B Euros (monster #) in LTRO leverage onto this sick puppy is like lathering up tricky Dick Fuld a month before the blowup. This has both the DAX and CAC getting squeezed right back above TRADE lines of support (5809 and 3062, respectively) and I would not be short European Equities or the Euro here. EUR/USD mini breakout line = 1.31; waiting on 1.33 to re-short.


THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - euro performance




CHINA – apparently the Chinese didn’t get the Institutional AM short covering memo (short red; chase green) – China looked more like Oracle’s guidance last night, losing another -1.2%, still in freefall at -22% YTD (Shanghai Comp). Remember, adding more leverage to the system structurally impairs Global Growth.


THE HEDGEYE DAILY OUTLOOK - asia performance



  • Goldman Sachs Sukuk Row May Dent Industry Lure: Islamic Finance
  • U.S. Joins EU Pressing to Cut Iran Oil Sales Over Nuclear Effort
  • Troops Are Gone but Iraq War Is Not ‘Over’: Meghan L. O’Sullivan
  • Aldar Won’t Delist Shares From Abu Dhabi, Deputy CEO Says
  • Almarai Acquires Argentina’s Fondomonte for $83 Million
  • Aldar of U.A.E. Drops to Record Amid Delisting Bets; Yield Falls
  • US Military 'Ready to Engage in a Conflict With Iran'
  • Lebanon Deposit, Loan Growth Slow on Syria Unrest: Arab Credit
  • BPCL Said to Plan Paying Iran for Crude Via Rivals’ Accounts
  • Qatari Group to Acquire 90% of Dexia BIL in $950 Million Deal
  • Dexia break-up quickens with Qatari deal
  • Oil Climbs Second Day on Gain in Housing Starts, Iran Concern
  • Genel in Talks With Longford Over Iraq Oilfield Stake Purchase
  • Record Oil-to-Natural Gas Ratio Reshapes Chemicals: 2012 Outlook
  • Drydocks World Sees $2.2 Billion Debt Restructuring in March
  • Hayward’s Genel in Talks to Buy Further Stake in Iraq Field: Sky
  • Etihad Signs $1 Billion Technology Deal With Sabre Airline
  • National Marine Dredging to Buy Emarat Europe Fast Building



The Hedgeye Macro Team

Howard Penney

Managing Director

The Degenerative Science

This note was originally published at 8am on December 16, 2011. INVESTOR and RISK MANAGER SUBSCRIBERS have access to the EARLY LOOK (published by 8am every trading day) and PORTFOLIO IDEAS in real-time.

“Economics is too important to leave to the economists.”

 – Steve Keen


I graduated with a degree in Economics from Princeton University; looking back at old textbooks and syllabi, and listening to former professors debate current economic issues, I can’t help but feel like I “dropped a hundred and fifty grand on an education [I] could’ve gotten for a dollar fifty in late charges from the public library,” to quote one of my favorite movies, Good Will Hunting.   [I fully expect an angry call from my parents today.]


But it seems that I’m not alone.  Last month, seventy freshmen at Harvard walked out of Gregory Mankiw’s introductory Economics 10 lecture; they wrote to the well-known economist that his course “espouses a specific – and limited – view of economics that we believe perpetuates problematic and inefficient systems of economic inequality in our society today.”  And that, “As your class does not include primary sources and rarely features articles from academic journals, we have very little access to alternative approaches to economics.”


The quote that prologues this note is from Post-Keynesian economist Steve Keen’s book Debunking Economics.  If you’ve never heard of him it’s because he doesn’t write for the New York Times or dine in Davos, though in 2010 he did win the Revere Award for Economics for being “the economist who first and most cogently warned the world of the coming Global Financial Crisis.” 


He is a harsh critic of mainstream economists; while Keen warned as early as 2001 that “economic theory has been complicit in encouraging America’s investing public to once again delude itself into a crisis,” neoclassicists like Greenspan, Bernanke, and Geithner were our economic leaders that empowered the private sector to lever up to an unsustainable level (private sector debt to GDP of 300%), gave no warning of imminent danger, and today fail to apply appropriate policies to lift us out of the recession because they don’t understand what caused it.


Like those Harvard freshman, Keen isn’t afraid to say that today’s Emperors of Economics aren’t wearing any clothes.  Hedgeye says it every day.


The economists that make the world’s crucial monetary policy decisions are the same economists that I listened to in lecture halls and authored my textbooks.  While superficially appealing, their theories lack empirical evidence, are riddled with internal inconsistencies, and are based upon tenuous assumptions.  Specifically, their models are built on downward sloping demand curves, upward sloping supply curves, perfect competition, rational consumers, benevolent dictators, and general equilibrium; there is no dynamic analysis, no consideration of disequilibrium, and no role of private sector debt.


What real-world, market economy adheres to the principles defined by our leading economists?


There isn’t one.  That’s why Milton Friedman argued that a theory cannot be judged by its assumptions, but only by the accuracy of its predictions.  But that defense doesn’t hold up so well after every neoclassical economist failed to predict the financial crisis and ensuing recession.  In fact, in August 2008, Olivier Blanchard, professor at MIT and now chief economist at the IMF plainly stated that, “The state of macro is good.”  Somehow, even when groupthink’s policy resulted in turmoil the world over, economic leaders failed to judge modes of economic thought by the accuracy of their predictions.  As a result, the same actors – Geithner, Bernanke et al. – remain in systemically-important roles even after being proved wrong pre and post 2008.


As Keen puts it, neoclassical economists are “wedded to the belief that capitalism is inherently stable.  They cannot bring themselves to consider the alternative perspective that capitalism is inherently unstable, and that the financial sector causes its most severe breakdowns.”


Rather than expanding the range of phenomena that economics can explain, the leading edge of neoclassical theory focuses on defending the core beliefs from the attacks of ancillary views.  It is truly a Degenerative Science, if economics can be considered a science at all.   True sciences expand and evolve: genetics, psychology, quantum mechanics, astronomy; economics defends itself – it is an ideology.


On scientific progress, German physicist Max Planck said that, “Science advances one funeral at a time,” and Keen concurs: “You cannot persuade people who believe a mythical vision of reality and their whole lives are dedicated to believing that way.” 


As it pertains to the leadership of our globally-interconnected economy, we’re more optimistic.  The American people’s frustration demands a faster rate of change than “one funeral at a time.”  Whereas academic economists move at a glacial pace (if they are moving at all), the people are unafraid of change – they will fold a losing hand.  Public opinion polls have shown for some time the dissatisfaction of the American people with Bernanke’s performance, for instance.


Americans want to stop playing with perennial losers, while potential winners are left on the bench. 


Including concepts from complexity theory, evolutionary economics, Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics, and other alternative economic schools – all shunned by today’s monetary and fiscal policy leaders – would be a positive change on the margin.  What we need is an economic theory that is more relevant to a modern capitalist economy – one that embraces uncertainty and disequilibrium, is grounded upon realistic assumptions, is judged by the accuracy of its predictions, and where debt and money are implicit, important factors.


Like Wall Street 1.0, Economics 1.0 is broken and has to evolve.  Keen aptly states, “If economics is to become less of a religion and more of a science, then the foundations of economics should be torn down and replaced.”  We are on the way.


Our immediate-term support and resistance ranges for Gold (bought it on 12/14), Brent Oil (Bearish Formation), and the SP500 are now $1568-1596, $103.23-107.91, and 1206-1228, respectively. 


Kevin Kaiser



The Degenerative Science - EL chart KK


The Degenerative Science - vp mh


Enter your email address to receive our newsletter of 5 trending market topics. VIEW SAMPLE

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.