• It's Here!

    Etf Pro

    Get the big financial market moves right, bullish or bearish with Hedgeye’s ETF Pro.

Once again, the hold impact confuses investors.  Sell side compares apples to oranges.  This was a solid quarter.

Heading into earnings, a lot of analysts raised estimates bringing consensus EBITDA estimate from $178 million just a month ago up to $220 million.  Their reason?  Higher than normal hold percentage.  So MPEL comes in at $240 million - $195 normalized for hold – and some on the Street call it a miss?  Seems disingenuous to us.  High hold was already in their estimates.  It was in ours and they still beat us by $5 million.  If one uses the same VIP hold as last year, EBITDA would’ve still grown 75-80%.  This was a good quarter.

Aside from the hold confusion, there were other factors at play here.  Genting Singapore took a large charge for doubtful receivables and made commentary that they were worried about the credit situation.  MPEL's receivables were also up 14% QoQ, but that was also on higher volumes and a higher percentage of direct play in the quarter.  Property stocks in Hong Kong are also taking a beating.  Mass volume was a little lower than we anticipated but higher hold percentage looks sustainable.  Finally, management didn’t handle the equity question appropriately.  The response to the question should’ve been:  “pigs will fly before we issue equity at these prices.

While November in Macau may be a disappointment relative to October and the expectations of some, continued stability in the market will allow people to conclude that $200 million in EBITDA is a good quarterly run rate which puts MPEL’s valuation at 7x – a ridiculously low valuation for a Macau stock.  Even if VIP were to drop 25% next year (which would mean a 45% sequential drop from current trends), MPEL’s multiple would still only be 9x.  We worry immensely about sentiment and investors expectations for November, but this stock is a value for those that can stomach the volatility.

CoD

CoD’s net revenue came in 1% below our estimate but Adjusted EBITDA was $2MM better due to lower fixed costs at the property and /or a favorable hold mix

  • Gross VIP table win was $1M below our estimate
    • RC volume was $600MM above our estimate due to a higher percentage of direct play- which we estimate was 16% vs. our estimate of 13%- a little surprising with the opening of the Neptune room in July
    • It appears that the rebate rate was 90bps
    • We estimate that the commission rate was 1.33%
    • If hold was 2.85%, we estimate that EBITDA would have been $8MM lower
  • Mass table win was $1MM better than we estimated
    • Mass volume was 9% below our estimate but hold was 2.5% better
    • Mass win of 25.5% was higher than the 6 & 4 quarter trailing average of 22%.  We estimate that the higher than historical mass hold boosted EBITDA by $10MM.
  • Slot win was in-line with our estimate with lower handle offset by a higher win rate
  • Non-gaming revenue, net of promotional allowances, were $4MM lower than we estimated
  • It appears that fixed operating expenses were $66MM - $4MM below our estimate.  Although we suspect that what appears to be lower fixed operating expenses is really just a favorable mix of luck on the RC business

Altira

Altira’s net revenue came in 1% below our estimate but Adjusted EBITDA was $4MM better due to lower fixed costs at the property and /or a favorable hold mix

  • Gross VIP table win was $2MM below our estimate
    • The rebate rate was .955% or .05% higher than we estimated
    • We estimate that the commission rate was 1.3%
    • If hold was 2.85%, we estimate that EBITDA would have been $7MM lower
  • Mass table win was $4MM lower than we estimated
    • Mass win of 15.7% was lower than the 6 quarter trailing average of 17%.  We estimate that the lower mass negatively impacted results by $1MM.
  • Non-gaming revenue, net of promotional allowances, were $2MM higher than we estimated
  • It appears that fixed operating expenses were $24MM - $4MM below our estimate.  Although we suspect that what appears to be lower fixed operating expenses is really just a favorable mix of luck on the RC business.