Conclusion: All joking aside, while the CBO shows a narrowing of the U.S. budget deficit over the coming years, its projections are predicated on a highly optimistic growth scenario.
The Congressional Budget Office came out with their revised economic and deficit projections this morning and they were interesting to say the least. Perhaps the most noteworthy components, or potentially least reliable, were the economic assumptions in the CBO’s projections. Our Healthcare Team did an excellent point grinding through the release in real time this morning. As noted, the key red flag from the CBO’s numbers are the economic projections, specifically GDP growth.
The CBO’s GDP growth estimate for 2011 remains at 2.3%, which is going to be well off the mark, and then accelerates to 2.7% GDP growth in 2012. Interestingly, the CBO’s growth forecast then hockey sticks to 3.6% from 2013 to 2016. Based on the most recent data we’ve analyzed, these projections are highly optimistic to say the least, given the structural constraints facing the U.S. economy.
For comparative purposes, over the last ten years, starting with the most recent quarter, the U.S. economy has grown at an average real GDP growth rate of 1.6%. If we extend back twenty years, the United States has grown on average at 2.6%. So, while it is possible that the next five or so years will see an acceleration, it is somewhat unrealistic given the many headwinds still facing the economy.
The primary issue with being substantially off on GDP growth assumptions is that it really informs the remainders of the projections, namely long term debts and deficits. The CBO, after also incorporating assumptions from the recent debt deal, now projects U.S. deficits to narrow over the coming years from an estimated -$1.3 trillion in 2011, to -$973 billion in 2012, to -$623 billion in 2013, and to -$380 billion in 2014. That’s actually a decent narrowing of the deficit, but, of course, it assumes the optimistic growth assumptions above.
The key impact high GDP growth has on the federal government budget is on government revenue growth (more commonly known as tax revenue). In the CBO’s estimates out today, government revenue grows at 8% per year over the next decade. While part of this growth is driven by an expiration of the Bush Tax cuts at the end of 2012 (although that is questionable in the scenario that Obama loses), much of it is supported by economic growth and employing reverting to historical averages.
The CBO actually provides a perspective of the deficit outlook in a slower growth scenario. According to their models, if real GDP growth was 0.1% lower per year, then the cumulative deficit through 2021 would be roughly $310 billion larger. In the realistic scenario in which GDP growth is a full percent lower than the CBO predicts over the next ten years, that is a $3.1 trillion addition to the cumulative budget.
Historically, the CBO has been very inaccurate in projecting the deficit beyond the very short term. In August 2009, which was exactly two years ago, the CBO was projecting a deficit for 2011 of $921BN. The actual deficit for 2011 will be ~$1.3 trillion, or more than 40% higher than they projected just two years ago. In addition, the projected deficit for 2012 back in August 2009 was -$590 billion. The CBO is now projecting a deficit of -$973 billion for 2012, which is 56% more than their estimates from just two years ago.
We would strongly urge caution in reading too much into the projections of the CBO. Historically, they have proven to be way off the mark and continue to incorporate economic projections that do not reflect reality. The greater concern is that Congress takes the CBO’s projections seriously and underestimates the magnitude of debt and deficits challenges facing the Federal Government. If we’ve learned anything from Europe YTD, it’s that there’s an eventual end to the road on which the proverbial “can” is kicked.
Daryl G. Jones
Director of Research
get free cartoon of the day!
Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox
By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.
This is going to be a messy quarter for PSS, which reports after the close today, but the reality is that numbers may or may not matter. It’s the company’s first since the departure of CEO Matt Rubel and you can bet that it will be sweeping everything it can under the rug this quarter. All in, we’re at ($0.03) vs the Street at $0.12.
The fundamental call is still that this is a company with two divisions with the PLG group alone worth where the stock is currently trading. That’s unlikely to change with the print. But we can’t debate the fact that this synthetic value is more elusive than ever without a real CEO. Given our below-consensus estimates, we wouldn’t buy into the print, but if it trades off meaningfully around any bloodshed, we’d definitely look to get more constructive.
The ‘dark horse’ move here for PSS (i.e. the move that the 25%+ of the float that is short does not want to see) would be to clear its balance sheet in a meaningful way – especially given that Inventories have been growing disproportionately to sales over the last four quarters. This would tag EPS this quarter, but would be a positive margin event for 2H12.
Here are our assumptions for the quarter:
- We expect sales up +2.7% driven by PLG and continued international expansion.
- In looking at NPD POS footwear data, we can get a sense of what brands are doing from a directional standpoint. While in no way does the data capture all U.S sales of the Performance Lifestyle Group’s big brands, it has still proven to track closely with reported trends. Since Q1, three of PLG group’s four brands have accelerated sequentially or remained flat. In addition, with Q3 backlog up +39% compared to +49% in Q1, we expect revs up +20% on the heels of +22.5% growth last quarter.
- In the domestic business, sales in the family footwear channel have improved sequentially coming in at -1.3% for the quarter up from -2.4% in Q1. In light of a particularly abysmal Q1 and a significantly more favorable compare relative to peers, we expect a stronger sequential pickup with domestic comps still performing below the industry at -4.5% up from -8.3% last quarter.
- On the international front where the company has been performing significantly better, we expect comps up +5% reflecting a modest sequential deceleration on a 2-year basis.
- In aggregate, we expect the Payless comps to come in down -2% driven by an improvement in traffic from last quarter as well as mix (more toning and boots), which is likely to keep ticket up LSD.
- We are modeling a 250bps decline in Q2.
- Similar to Q1, higher product costs and channel mix will pressure margins in Q2. However, with product costs expected to be up LDD from +6% last quarter, we expect this headwind alone to impact margins by -250bps. Mix will likely account for another -40-50bps headwind assuming $35mm of incremental PLG sales at sub 30% margins.
- Offsetting these headwinds to some degree will be modest tailwinds from rent/occupancy equating to +20bps and product mix with greater volume from toning and boots.
- We are modeling SG&A growth of 5.5%, however this may vary considerably as the company could opt to sweep all sorts of costs under the carpet this quarter.
- With a $10mm severance-related charge expected in the quarter (=~$0.10 in EPS) along with costs associated with building out the international business offset in part by increase PLG growth spending last year ($5mm+), we expect SG&A to be up +5.5% in the quarter.
POSITION: Short Financials (XLF)
When the market’s rally is being led by Bank of America (BAC) and the Financials (XLF), that’s not a good thing. Or at least it hasn’t been since the Financials put in their Fed cycle-high in February of 2011.
Across all 3 of our core risk management durations (TRADE, TREND, and TAIL), the SP500 remains bearish/broken:
- TAIL resistance = 1256
- TRADE resistance = 1165-1191 (using a range instead of a price point to capture wicked volatility studies)
- TRADE support = 1108
Critically, nothing has changed in the last 2 days and now I am signaling a lower-low of immediate-term TRADE support (below the prior YTD closing low of 1119). If Bernanke doesn’t deliver whatever it is people are begging for on Friday, this could get very ugly, very quickly.
Bear markets bounce.
Keith R. McCullough
Chief Executive Officer
Athletic apparel sales decelerated last week following stronger sales volume in the first two weeks of August driven in part by tax holiday driven BTS spending. That said, sales up HSD are back in-line with recent trends. Importantly, ASPs remain reasonably strong in the specialty athletic despite softness in other channels.
Daily Trading Ranges
20 Proprietary Risk Ranges
Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.